Simon Laws wrote:
I got the code done last week but I'm only just now finishing up the
build.xml file. So, as promised, here's what I did (a bit of a long post but
I think I got it all)
Firstly to get more familiar with the workspace I followed Sebastien's
instructions from the Domain/Contributi
I got the code done last week but I'm only just now finishing up the
build.xml file. So, as promised, here's what I did (a bit of a long post but
I think I got it all)
Firstly to get more familiar with the workspace I followed Sebastien's
instructions from the Domain/Contribution repository thread
bution packaging
schemes: was: SCA runtimes
I like the look of the workspace code Sebastien has been writing and I
propose to try it out on samples/calculator-distributed.
In particular I'd like to help Felix who is hitting the common filesystem
restriction of the current domain implementat
I like the look of the workspace code Sebastien has been writing and I
propose to try it out on samples/calculator-distributed.
In particular I'd like to help Felix who is hitting the common filesystem
restriction of the current domain implementation .
Let me know if anyone has any concerns.
I'l
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I've been running the workspace code to
Simon Laws wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I've been running the workspace code today with a view to integrating
Simon Laws wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I've been running the workspace code today with a view to integrating
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > > Simon Laws wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I've been running the workspace code today with a view to inte
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> >>
> >> I've been running the workspace code today with a view to integrating
> the
> >> new code in assembly which calculates service endpoints i.e. point4
>
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
I've been running the workspace code today with a view to integrating the
new code in assembly which calculates service endpoints i.e. point4
above.
I think we need to amend point 4 to make this work properly..
4. Point my Web browser to the v
Simon Laws wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line...
Simon
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57
Simon Laws wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line...
Simon
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I apologize in
Simon Laws wrote:
I've been running the workspace code today with a view to integrating the
new code in assembly which calculates service endpoints i.e. point4 above.
I think we need to amend point 4 to make this work properly..
4. Point my Web browser to the various ATOM collections to get:
-
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line...
> > >
> > > Simon
> > >
> > > On Mon, Ma
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comments inline.
>
> > A) Contribution workspace (containing installed contributions):
> > - Contribution model representing a contribution
> > - Reader for the contribution model
> > - Workspace
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line...
> >
> > Simon
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I apol
Simon Laws wrote:
Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line...
Simon
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I apologize in advance for the inline comment puzzle, but you had
started with a long email in the first place :)
no p
Thanks Sebastien, Hopefully some insight on the puzzle in line...
Simon
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I apologize in advance for the inline comment puzzle, but you had
> started with a long email in the first place :)
no problem at all. Tha
I apologize in advance for the inline comment puzzle, but you had
started with a long email in the first place :)
Simon Laws wrote:
And here's the separate thread following on from [1]... I'm looking at
what we can do with any endpoint information we have prior to the point at
which a composit
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> > > > It wo
Comments inline.
A) Contribution workspace (containing installed contributions):
- Contribution model representing a contribution
- Reader for the contribution model
- Workspace model representing a collection of contributions
- Reader/writer for the workspace model
- HTTP based service for acce
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > >> Looks good to me, building on your initial list I added a few more
> > items
> > >> and
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> > > It would also be good to have some sort of 'ping' function that could
> > be
> > > used to check if
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >> Looks good to me, building on your initial list I added a few more
> items
> >> and tried to organize them in three categories:
> >>
> >> A) Contribution workspace (containi
On Tue, Feb 5, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> > It would also be good to have some sort of 'ping' function that could be
> > used to check if a service is receptive to requests. Infact I wonder if
> the
> > Workspace Admin should als
>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Looks good to me, building on your initial list I added a few more items
and tried to organize them in three categories:
A) Contribution workspace (containing installed contributions):
- Contribution model representing a contribution
- Reader for the contribution
On Sun, Feb 3, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote:
> [snip]
> > From what you are saying a short term shopping list of functions seems
> to be
> > emerging.
> >
> > Contribution uploader/manager(via browser)
> > Contribution addition/management fr
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
It would also be good to have some sort of 'ping' function that could be
used to check if a service is receptive to requests. Infact I wonder if the
Workspace Admin should also be able to test this sort of a ping per
binding. Is this something that can go into the sectio
It would also be good to have some sort of 'ping' function that could be
used to check if a service is receptive to requests. Infact I wonder if the
Workspace Admin should also be able to test this sort of a ping per
binding. Is this something that can go into the section (B) .. or is this
out of
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
From what you are saying a short term shopping list of functions seems to be
emerging.
Contribution uploader/manager(via browser)
Contribution addition/management from command line (adding as Luciano has
started this and useful for testing)
Workspace to register added co
On Jan 30, 2008 12:24 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote:
> [snip]
> > The model in my sandbox [2], which is very simlar to the XML that the
> > current contribution repository uses, now holds node and contribution
> name
> > information [3]. These could be tw
On Jan 29, 2008 4:22 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Comments inline. Note that I have also some prototype of a install
> program in my sandbox.
>
> On Jan 29, 2008 7:14 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 28, 2008 5:38 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
The model in my sandbox [2], which is very simlar to the XML that the
current contribution repository uses, now holds node and contribution name
information [3]. These could be two separate models to decouple the
management of contributions from the process of associating
Comments inline. Note that I have also some prototype of a install
program in my sandbox.
On Jan 29, 2008 7:14 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008 5:38 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > snip...
> >
> > > I'm not too keen on scanning a disk directory as it does
On Jan 28, 2008 5:38 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> snip...
>
> > I'm not too keen on scanning a disk directory as it doesn't apply to a
> > distributed environment, I'd prefer to:
> > - define a model representing a contribution repository
> > - persist it in some XML form
> >
>
>
>
On Jan 28, 2008 5:34 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I don't think that a Webapp is the right architecture but I may be wrong
> or missing something, so you should probably just try and see for
> yourself if this is what you want to do.
>
Can you explain more about why wha
SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes
ant elder wrote:
On Jan 24, 2008 7:47 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
ant elder wrote:
[snip]
The (F), (G) and (H) would use the packaging in your (B). For your (B)
how/where were you expecting those sca contribution
snip...
> I'm not too keen on scanning a disk directory as it doesn't apply to a
> distributed environment, I'd prefer to:
> - define a model representing a contribution repository
> - persist it in some XML form
>
I've started on some model code in my sandbox [1]. Feel free to use and
abuse.
R
>
>
> Add the
> > code that loads all contributions that are available from the file
> system.
> > Ant already has this code in various forms
>
> We can do simpler than load "all contributions that are available from
> the file system" as the list of contributions to be loaded in a node is
> determ
Simon Laws wrote:
[snip]
How about the following as some first steps.
1. Disengage the Node from the domain in the way that it is connected at the
moment leaving the Node able to load Contributions and start composites as
it does currently in stand alone mode. Doing this we remove the sca
appl
ant elder wrote:
On Jan 24, 2008 7:47 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
ant elder wrote:
[snip]
The (F), (G) and (H) would use the packaging in your (B). For your (B)
how/where were you expecting those sca contribution jars to get used?
Ah I'm happy to see that there are n
On Jan 25, 2008 1:16 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sebastien/Ant
>
> >
> > > Here's a longer scenario, showing how I want to use contributions and
> > > composites in a domain for the store tutorial I've been working on.
> >
> A real eye opener. Thank you for this.
>
> snip...
>
> >
Sebastien/Ant
>
> > Here's a longer scenario, showing how I want to use contributions and
> > composites in a domain for the store tutorial I've been working on.
>
A real eye opener. Thank you for this.
snip...
>
> getting this to work on a single node first without the gui and individual
>
> d
On Jan 24, 2008 7:47 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > The (F), (G) and (H) would use the packaging in your (B). For your (B)
> > how/where were you expecting those sca contribution jars to get used?
>
> Ah I'm happy to see that there are not
More comments inline :)
Raymond Feng wrote:
I'm a bit confused by that your statement in :
6. Mark http://store#store as deployed. Store has a reference to a
CurrencyConverter service (from composite http://cloud#cloud which is
not in my domain yet) so it shows a red-x and appears disabled.
In
Comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes
Some more input on steps 7 and 9.
I agree
Some more input on steps 7 and 9.
I agree with your other comments (snipped out to keep this short).
Raymond Feng wrote:
[snip]
7. Upload cloud.jar, find deployable composite http://cloud#cloud in
it, mark it deployed. The red-x on deployed composite
http://store#store is now gone.
We should
nt: Thursday, January 24, 2008 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes
ant elder wrote:
[snip]
The (F), (G) and (H) would use the packaging in your (B). For your (B)
how/where were you expecting those sca contribution jars to get used?
Ah I'm happy to
ant elder wrote:
[snip]
The (F), (G) and (H) would use the packaging in your (B). For your (B)
how/where were you expecting those sca contribution jars to get used?
Ah I'm happy to see that there are not so many packaging schemes after
all :)
We've already started to discuss contribution us
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes
ant elder wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008 9:31 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAI
On Jan 23, 2008 6:24 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
> > On Jan 21, 2008 9:31 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Simon Nash wrote:
> >> >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> - Under which circumstances does the app package
mond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes
Raymond Feng wrote:
A & B seem to be the two primary schemes. A variation of o
ant elder wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008 9:31 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
- Under which circumstances does the app packager want to package the
Tuscany and dependency JARs with the application artifacts.
[snip]
With a big
Raymond Feng wrote:
A & B seem to be the two primary schemes. A variation of option A is
that we package all the jars (as utility jars) into an EAR so that JEE
applications can use Tuscany/SCA.
Can you help me understand what you meant by: "so that JEE applications
can use Tuscany/SCA"?
A
On Jan 21, 2008 9:31 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Simon Nash wrote:
> >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >> - Under which circumstances does the app packager want to package the
> >> Tuscany and dependency JARs with the application artifacts.
> [snip]
> > With a big top
;
To:
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 1:31 PM
Subject: SCA contribution packaging schemes: was: SCA runtimes
Simon Nash wrote:
>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
- Under which circumstances does the app packager want to package the
Tuscany and dependency JARs with the application artifacts.
Simon Nash wrote:
>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
- Under which circumstances does the app packager want to package the
Tuscany and dependency JARs with the application artifacts.
[snip]
With a big topic like this, dividing it into separate threads makes it
easier for people to follow and part
57 matches
Mail list logo
