RE: [U2] Access to IBM knowledgebase for in-house developers

You are being paranoid ;-) They want to be able to connect your license with the account. This way you can also access support calls etc... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eppel,Gary Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:04 PM To: u2-users@li

RE: [U2] [UV] Strange characters in XML output

Have you tried using XMLMAPPING? Thanks, Nick Cipollina -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Lin Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 11:08 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] Strange characters in XML output [EMAIL

RE: [U2] RE: Unidata v6 into SQL 2005

Thanks to Angelo and Adrian for replies, probably going to use mv.net (core objects) with a Unidata trigger. Regards Graham -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Merrall Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 8:12 PM To: u2-users@listserver.

[U2] Personal Edition - RPC Error

How do I get resolve this UniAdmin error on XP-Pro? RPC Connection Error 1 No RPC Connection active Suggestions would be appreciated. --Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] Personal Edition - RPC Error

Sounds like the UniRPC Service is not started. Use UniVerse Control and verify the services are started. If not, manually start using Windows Services, rt. click My Computer\Manage then Services and Applications. Under Services check UniRPC Service for troubles. If it will not start, make sure all

Re: [U2] Personal Edition - RPC Error

I'd start by checking start>settings>control panel>administrative tools>services to see if the UniRPC service is running. From there, check your firewall on the machine and be sure the UniRPC port (31438 if I remember correctly) is open Brutzman, Bill wrote: How do I get resolve this UniAdmin

RE: [U2] Personal Edition - RPC Error

Thanks to Paul and Jeff. It is the PC at home so I will try these suggestions later today. --Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul Hamrick Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 12:45 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Person

[U2] [UV] OpenXMLData error

Hi guys. I am doing some testing of receiving XML data into Universe database and I and kind of stuck with the OpenXMLData function which keeps returning a INVALID.XML.HANDEL error. Here is what I attempted to do in a BASIC program mostly by following the examples in BASIC Extension documentation

[U2] [UV] Question about EQU

I inherited some code and I noticed that the programmer consistently placed his equates outside of the program flow, in other words, the equates would never be executed. Nevertheless, the DO get evaluated. For example: LABEL1: FOR I = 1 TO 10 PRINT 'HELLO WORLD' NEXT RETURN EQU THIS T

RE: [U2] [UV] Question about EQU

>See how the EQU would never be "executed"? >Since it works, I assume the tokenizer reads >the whole program and picks up the equates, >but what I want to know is, is there some >reason for doing it this way, perhaps better >performance or less memory used? I would guess there is neither a pe

Re: [U2] [UV] Question about EQU

About 20 years ago I saw a programmer use a similar method. Like your observation, it seemed to work as they were Equated variables and not available in the debugger. This programmer also felt that the program would compile faster by having all of the comment lines after the last logical END. Some

Re: [U2] [UV] Question about EQU

Let's not have a contest on bad programming techniques or we'll be here all year. Thanks. - Original Message - From: "Kevin King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 8:45 PM Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Question about EQU > >See how the EQU would never be "executed"? > >Sin

Re: [U2][UV] System() Trace equivalent

Something like this has been posted - check the archives. From memory it's up around SYSTEM(9001). --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Re: [U2] [UV] Question about EQU

Mark Johnson wrote: About 20 years ago I saw a programmer use a similar method. Like your observation, it seemed to work as they were Equated variables and not available in the debugger. This programmer also felt that the program would compile faster by having all of the comment lines after the

RE: [U2] [UV] Question about EQU

Thanks, everyone. Now that I know there is no apparent reason for it, I'm going to do what *I* think is the sensible thing . Barry Brevik --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] Question about EQU

Barry, EQUATES happen at compile time not run time and MUST proceed their use. Many programmers will put them inside a never used IF statement like: IF 0 THEN EQU ... EQU ... EQU ... ... END This does help while debugging and stepping through a program and might even be faster to exe

RE: [U2] [UV] Question about EQU

David, I am interested in your opinions as to why, given that equates are compile time constructs, would have any impact at all on execution speed. Understand, I am not contesting your premise, but rather would simply like more explanation to understand your perspective. -Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]