Any valid command can be executed as a stored procedure via SQLExecDirect
(eg., CALL LIST.READU - you need the CALL to specify a store procedure
call). Just don't call anything requiring terminal keyboard input.. including
anything that pages the output (eg. 'press any key to continue') - other
Unfortunately, this is a 'feature' of UV/SQL Triggers. You will have to disable
the trigger first, if you wish to use RAID. There aren't any means to avoid
this.
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org]
If you don't have a connection pooling license on your UV server, turn it off
in U2 WSDT. See page 113 in the webservices.pdf.
Regards
David
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jason Lin
Sent:
Firstly, given that InterCall is a C-API I am puzzled what you are doing and
exactly why you need to use it? As a C client application, you could only
invoke it from UV via UV shell or via GCI call. Which are you doing?
Secondly, UniRPC and it predecessor - UVRPCD has virtually always required
Oh UV and UD on the same server?
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of David Wolverton
Sent: Friday, 8 January 2010 10:11 AM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] UniRPC returning 39125
And that was the
First, check if your 'Caps Lock' key is broken. :)
Next, check your SSH2 and SSH1 settings are the same on your AIX server.
Finally what version of SSH server are you using? SSH Tectia or OpenSSH server?
I've read about bugs in SSH2 and seen poor SSH2 implementations on terminal
emulators
:02 PM, Hona, David david.h...@cba.com.au wrote:
First, check if your 'Caps Lock' key is broken. :)
Next, check your SSH2 and SSH1 settings are the same on your AIX server.
Finally what version of SSH server are you using? SSH Tectia or OpenSSH
server? I've read about bugs in SSH2 and seen
BTW: The messages numbers are all in SYS.MESSAGE file.
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of andy baum
Sent: Monday, 30 November 2009 11:15 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] errlog question
Doug,
If you create a COMO file (if using UV, you can do this using the DIVERT.OUT or
COMO commands or the !COMO subroutine) it will capture the output in that file
on your host systems in the local account/directory you're current in.
Just a hint, if you have multiple connections (due connection
Bob,
This is kind of a FAQ and you'll find a few responses in the archives for the
U2 Users groups (via Google search) in Mail Archive and similar archiving
services...
Here's one response from Martin Phillips (UV specific, but I think you get the
idea) ... maybe an overkill for you?:
Yeah Martin, that is strange - especially how they can check in the UV PE
edition to make sure you don't exceed the maximum file size allowed. Albeit,
that's probably check the maximum number of groups... ! :)
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
Did you do a sanity check (on your system/UV setup - not you:))- being a
Windows platform check- no real-time anti-virus scanner is in operation on
every file modification and that the UV config is NOT using the defaults
(perhaps you should be setting it to the something similar to your AIX UV
Jayendra,
Trying a google.com query with those keywords. You may be surprised to find
that answer(s) you seek.
It is always useful to do some quick checks of the archives of this email
list - Google being the quickest way to do this.
Good luck!
David
-Original Message-
From:
This usually indicates that your EXECUTE is executing at a different execution
layer. Prime INFORMATION did this by default and had to use PERFORM to use the
same runtime execution layer or overide with a $option statement.
From:
Hi Adrian
I've never seen this particular issue before. What release of UniVerse or
UniData is this (likewise the clients too)? What OS/platform is your U2
installation on?
I would suggest some of the following to assist you in drill down the root
cause:
a) Execute a DIVERT.OUT or COMO ON
It's interesting to see IBM's claims about they didn't buy U2 specifically
(which we know they purchased Informix DB technology and U2 was a bonus) and
it doesn't fit into their future goals. I find that amusing when they continue
to sell databases like IMS and Informix C-ISAM (etc) and the
What's in a name? BTW: I never liked Ardent Software...thank goodness that
name hasn't been brought back... yet! :)
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Henry Unger
Sent: Thursday, 8 October 2009 7:26
: Tuesday, 18 August 2009 10:45 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Connecting to a Universe Database
David,
Do you have examples for the use of UV/BASIC subroutines invoked as stored
procedures from SQL Server/
Thanks,
John
From: Hona, David david.h
It is highly recommended that you upgrade your version of UniVerse before you
consider what interface to use.
An ODBC interface is mostly the easiest to implemented, but the slowest and
hardest to debug. Especially on such an old version of UniVerse.
Further, unless you're UV data is in a
Harold,
You can define the global (or default) value for AUTOLOGOUT by creating a
UV.LOGIN paragraph in the VOC file in the UV account. The UV.LOGIN paragraph
gets executed before the LOGIN paragraph.
This merely enforces a default autologout value, for all UV sessions
system-wide. It isn't
Harold,
Is there any reason you don't use the UV command AUTOLOGOUT to time out idle
sessions?
It does what you want already from within UV already (and can be setup
individually or globally for all UV sessions) and doesn't have the problem of
just looking at terminal keyboard input idle
In addition to what Laure mentions - using dynamic arrays to store lots of data
can result in Available memory exceeded errors (resulting in UniVerse
abnormally terminating). Just like if you're using READ/READU to read in large
text/sequential files.
-Original Message-
From:
I useful thing I have found for any connectivity made via U2 APIs (be it UOJ,
UCI, etc) is to get your subroutine to establish a COMO/DIVERT.OUT to log
errors that made not get logged anywhere but output to 'standard output'.
It's surprising the number of errors you get before your main UV
Scott,
The AS/400 DB probably has the same ODBC issues as UV regarding mapping of
non-relational/non-table data. Hence, I've found the use of stored procedures
can be a useful bridge for such issues which UV is the target to be updated.
I don't know if AS/400 supports such a thing as call
I prefer and use lower case statements/functions/labels, etc and variables in
uppercase. Purely to be consistent, all existing code is coded in the style -
layout, format, case of the original. Nothing worse than seeing different
standards in the one program. ;)
It makes good sense for
The BASIC Developer Toolkit represents a significant step in the right
direction which will set the standard for U2 toolsets.
There will also be third-party tools that may have better features or potential
work better. But none that will have the integration and back-up of IBM's U2
team.
As
Hi Craig
No, I was more talking at the TCP/IP socket level. We use this method
extensively due to internal and external firewalls - filtering source and
destination IP, inspecting packet type - sometimes using security tokens as
well authenticating the Active Directory logons.
Of course these
In general, you want web services to stick to what they do best and handle
custom/specific security requirement/issues outside of them. Such an approach
could including installing a proxy server or firewall (hardware or software)
between the web service server and the web services consumers.
Hi David
This probably goes back to the limitations of the original port of UNIX that
had the directory name limited and the maximum number of characters in a
pathname.
It's unfortunate that IBM hasn't address this - but it has been around for a
long, long time. But, I guess there has been
type should be transparent to any application.
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:owner-u2-
us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Hona, David
Sent: Wednesday, 27 May 2009 6:30 p.m.
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] RE: Truncated catdir
It's a feature! For old legacy apps that use the marker (and other
control/non-printable) characters as part of the key and are too hard to change.
UV lets you turn that feature off, maybe UD does too now.
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
The interesting question is why use MQ to communicate between Oracle and
Universe - when you could use UCI? Or do you mean you have two
applications using these respective databases that will communicate??
Failing new bugs/features in MQv7, there should not be any significantly
differences
Further clarification of the requirements would be useful. When and how
often do you want to do this? Do you want to use an API or using the
'shell' okay? Is it to be used on Windows UNIX servers? Does need to
work on UD UV? Do you want to 'spend' any money to get the 'perfect'
or quick 'n'
There was a discussion way back in 2004 about this. Keith Johnston wrote
and published his UV/BASIC solution on PickWiki...
http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?InputWait
Posting/Thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org/msg00891.html
Regards,
David
-Original
I believe the answer is no, you can't speak between UniVerse RPC
daemon versions, as the protocol is version specific. If I recall
correctly, I even UV-Net on 9.5.x and 9.4.x may not work
David
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
In UniVerse, @ABORT.CODE is set to signify the reason code. I can't
recall value set for AUTOLOGOUT though and I can't check right now.
Regards
David
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Mike Roosa
Sent:
Hi Stuart
No doubt, this is a feature (of some description)...
Are these associated multivalues?
Maybe use the UPDATE.RECORD verb - I realise you want to use the SQL
UPDATE though! :)
But sometimes, it is to painful for simple stuff, like what you're
trying to do!
Regards
David
-Original
Do you mean an existing WSDL file, that you have previously
defined/created using U2WSD, but you're moving from a different PC?
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of
iggch...@comcast.net
Sent: Friday, 12
Note that the SYSTEM(9001) function call returns the runtime stack.
I use a generic logging subroutine that writes to a sequential file any
information I want to log:
call @debuglogger(Starting phase 1)
In debuglogger, it writes out timedate stamp, PID, @USERNO, @WHO, @PATH,
etc., etc. along
Great feedback Susan.
Perhaps you should make some suggests to IBM U2 team for a few tweaks
to UV triggers?
I guess this highlights too different schools of thought. The quick and
dirty world of PICK/U2 and the by-the-book of relational databases.
Each has pros and cons. Where the two meet, we
What UV account flavour?
What does SR.EXECUTESQL do exactly: EXECUTE or BCI SQLExecute ?
Why don't you clearselect 0, if you're not going to process the result
select list? Like READNEXT DEPENDANT.ID THEN CLEARSELECT 0 ELSE..it
seems pointless ? Or are am I missing something?
-Original
Hi Marcos,
Did you successfully re-link UV?
If so, why don't you try the CONNECT command to connect to your data
source.
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcos Fogaca
Sent: Tuesday, 11 November 2008 12:09 AM
To:
)
for more information.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Hona, David S
Sent: Thu 11/6/2008 7:53 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Need help with GCI system
Isn't your module called magci and not test? As your error indicates
it's looking
Gary, it might help if you send your details to the email address listed
in the posting, not to the entire U2 Users group email list. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GARY TEN HOVEN
Sent: Tuesday, 4 November 2008 3:46 PM
To:
There is no such command in UV, as you stated. Please be more specific
what you're trying to do and why... Perhaps you are referring are to the
BASIC Call Interface (BCI), a ODBC Call-level API for UV/BASIC?
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Check out the UV SQL Reference Guide for NEXT AVAILABLE.
Regards
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Rogen
Sent: Monday, 27 October 2008 2:47 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [u2] UVsql
Good day all,
There is a series articles written by IBM U2 Engineers in the IBM U2
DeveloperWorks website on that topic.
Google it or find it via the mainpage:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/db2/products/u2/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
What are the file stats for this UV file? Just curious.
I guess of you want a high-end SSD then you need to look at a device
supported on AIX and you probably fibre-channel I/O too. Check out this
webpage: http://www.storagesearch.com/ssd-fc.html
Note the comments made on this page:
quote
Maximum number of fields per record = 366
Groups 25% 50% 75%100%125%150%175%200%
full
951617445258613406 861 145 16
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Hona, David S [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What are the file stats
Ray, let's not talk about huge and (formerly) little known security
flaws in UV now... :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Wurlod
Sent: Tuesday, 21 October 2008 12:44 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe
There is extensive documentation in the UniVerse Admin guide - should
you wish to change the UV unirpcd TCP port.
But I am guess you want to change the DataStage daemon, so refer to the
it's installation and configuration/admin guide.
Regards
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
You can by-pass them if you can update the VOC.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Susan Joslyn
Sent: Tuesday, 14 October 2008 10:12 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Universe Triggers
Both Universe and Unidata have
I think the purpose of the trigger is to capture all non-application
changes.
You can't by-pass the trigger easily, unless of course you disable it
entirely.
It has the advantage of being largely transparent (if written correctly,
of course)...regards of where the file is accessed from. It has
Poorly written, implemented, designed and tested triggers - will have a
high impact on your UV system.
Hopefully, you have down a full-scale (real world-like) production-like
test in your UAT environment prior to implementing them. If you have
done this and tested real world scenarios like file,
It's poorly documented (likely many other things!), but use the
following syntax:
EQU MX LIT 'ABCD': @AM: 'EFGH'
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Perry Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, 7 October 2008 7:06 AM
To: U2-Users List
Oops, sorry Charles - I miss read your query... here's app.config from
an IBM supplied Connection Pooling code. It seems to work fine for me.
--- Set pooling programmatically (VB.NET):
[snip]
Private m_IsPooling As Boolean = False
[snip]
UniObjects.UOPooling = m_IsPooling
[snip]
--- set pooling
From TCL, type CONFIG.
If it is licensed then you will have a entry for -CONNPL displayed
somewhere in the output.
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of charles
ferguson
Sent: Thursday, 18 September 2008 1:08 PM
To:
The UV COPY verb is intended for copying records from hashed files.
However the UV COPY verb was originally a UNIX executable (pre UV v7,
I think). Hence, it didn't have the memory limitations of the existing
UV/BASIC application (COPY.B).
I understand that it would required significant
What version of UniObjects are you using for .NET versus the VB6 client?
There is should only be one version and one instance of UniRPCD on the
server. IN theory you could have multiple versions - but that would be a
really *bad* idea.
You also have to be using the correct client for that
Doug
Sounds like your need to plan your next approach need to take a slight
different tack. Perhaps with a effort to help isolate the UniObjects
issue you have identified. As so far you've no luck with the various
approaches you're spent many hours devoted to this tricky issue.
With issues like
I'd have to agree, it is great for a free tool.
The lack of native support for SSH in UniDebugger (and Dynamic Connect)
use to be an issue for anyone who has a site that no longer allows
telnet.
I haven't tried it lately, though - not sure if it has been updated or
if IBM still gives it away
Why re-invent the wheel when there are plenty of commerical SSL/TLS
packages out there already?
Such as SecureBlackBox suite (there are plenty more out there)...they
have downloadable trialware code examples, etc.
http://www.eldos.com/sbb/net-ssl.php
Regards
David
-Original Message-
Without actually knowing what you're really trying to achieve (as the
two queries are markedly different in what would be produced)... It
seems the second query should be an INNER JOIN - perhaps?
Seeing the EXPLAIN output of your original queries and the second one
with a INNER JOIN could be
Try:
uvSession.EncryptionEnabled = 1
True evaluates to -1 in VB usually.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Lin
Sent: Saturday, 19 July 2008 9:51 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Question about Uniobject and session
Have you tried PCL 3 PCL 4 drivers to create your PRN file?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don P. Nagai
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 12:12 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Extra Form Feed from .prn File Followed by Text
Same as U2 BASIC via sequential read/write. Check out the UniObjects for
.NET documentation for the UniSequentialFile Class.
If it is a large complex .RTF then, you may be far better processing it
server-side - if feasible.
As the round robin impact of sending the data to the client and back to
Is it the same query for both files/tables (that share the same
dictionary)?
Do both your queries work from a different client PC? If so, is there
different client software versions or ODBC clients?
Regards,
david
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Oh, delete the line with 'ListBox1.DataSource = DS' in it, I forgot to!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hona, David S
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 2:32 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET: populating
uvbackup is the official database backup/restore utility. Hardly anybody
uses it though, it's too slow and not very flexible for some. It has the
advantage of performing internal data (structure) file integrity
checking, as part of the backup and internally tagging the files as
backed-up.
You can
Clif,
Try something like this...
Cmd = uvSession.CreateUniXML
Cmd.GenerateXML(SORT CUSTOMER COMPANY ID.SUP)
DS = Cmd.GetDataSet
ListBox1.DataSource = DS
With ListBox1
.DataSource = DS.Tables(0)
.DisplayMember =
: .GenerateXML method fails
Thanks, David. I'll check those references and post a summary findings
back to the list.
I really appreciate the help!
Regards,
Clif
On May 6, 2008, at 8:31 PM, Hona, David S wrote:
Clif,
I vaguely recall that the UniXML functionality isn't officially
supported
You probably just need to use SET.INDEX to change the pathname to where
the index file is now located. It's been discussed lots of times in
this forum is the most common problem with indexes in UV. It's a
feature!! :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If not an identical pathname now, it would simply mean you had an old
index at the same pathname previously. Now it appears you don't. Index
broken - 'cause index is not there. Very common problem in UV.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I don't know about asp.net, but in my vb.net app.config that is using
uo.net, I have (no doubt actually cloned from another app, probably IBM
supplied sample!):
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8 ?
configuration
!--
UO.NET
General
add
Baker,
This can be fixed by changing the initialisation string in your UV
terminfo database for your terminal type you're using (copy
source/original, re-compile uv terminfo, etc). By default it changes the
numeric keypad to Application mode fot DEC VT-series emulations. Or
change your emulator
UniVerse 10.x has COMMAND.EDITOR, ported from PI/open but it is not
officially supported nor documented by IBM. It has most, but not all the
functionality of the PI/open version.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Miller
Sent:
Depdends on your UVCONFIG parameters...what are your values for...
GSEMMUM
RLTABSZ
If I recall correctly...
GSEMMUM * RLTABSZ = maximum number of READU/READL locks
Regards
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Ferries
Sent:
It may be easier to use a UNIX utility like lsof, if you have it on
your system already. Just a warning that it will produce details of the
UNIX level files (all of them). You need to use the -p PID or -u
unix-user-id (latter is not good if you're logged in multiple times
though) to limit the
As pointed out by George Land and Brian, they're effectively the same
except for some very specific features that the average developer or
end-user would've generally utilise...so to a great extent it doesn't
make a lot of difference to most.
To add what already has been said...
UniVerse also
It's a problem with other applications too. We had the exact same
problem with another third-party packaged application. The problem is
Windows allows you to define David and david to mean the same thing.
But to application software, these are two different users - unless the
third-party
In the UniVerse Administration guide (admin.pdf). Did you have a look or
you can't find them? The documentation isn't the best!!
These errors are best reported to IBM U2 Support. Especially, if you can
reproduce the problem.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
It is documented in UniVerse BASIC Command Reference Guide
(BasicRef.pdf), even prior to 10.2. See ENCODE function page 232 in
the manual Version 10.1 September, 2005 (not sure in the 10.2 version
what page).
LOTS of commands don't exist in the online help. IBM recently advised a
new online help
Oh yeah, got to love that. It didn't even make into the index, let alone
the table of contents (of the PDF). How did they manage that?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HENDERSON MIKE,
MR
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 9:20 AM
To:
Hi Craig
UniSOAPServer is built on top of Jetty (it is embedded). So, it won't
work under Tomcat, unless it has some kind of servlet mode hidden
under the covers.
Turn on UniSOAPServer debugging and check out the log file, you can see
all the glory details. ;-)
Regards,
David
2008 Mar 28
Of course, the best confirmation needs to come from IBM. Drop their
support team a request and get them to verify. It would help if there
was deployment documentation, then we wouldn't need to go digging around
and guess what the heck is going on(!).
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
Hi Craig,
You're actually executing an application server of sorts, in reality, as
UniSOAP server is actually an implementation of Jetty (or vice-versa,
depending on your viewpoint).
There is a debate of the merits of Tomcat versus Jetty. Adding another
layer/interface has its pros and cons. But
I'd have to agree. If it's important, you should not be using unreliable
means to input data.
There are so many points of failure, worse than losing data it could be
corrupting data.
I wouldn't want to be the one to explain that to external auditors or
angry workers whose payroll got glitched
If you have never used MQSeries before, it is a steep learning curve.
Even if you have, as Craig pointed out...the AMI libraries used by IBM
to interface UV to MQ only seem to add to the learning curve and
frustration at times (if you're learning and developing at the same
time).
Once you get it
Easiest and official means of doing this is:
COMMAND.EDITOR ON MYPROMPT ;* Set
COMMAND.EDITOR ON ;* Reset
Syntax is:
COMMAND.EDITOR [ON|OFF] [ALL|VERBS] [INSERT|OVERLAY] [Optional TCL
Prompt String]
However, COMMAND.EDITOR is not officially supported and was developed by
a third-party and
Ah, that's a good idea...but I guess by-passing this restriction (which
must be in place for a good reason), should not be taken lightly
(especially in an mission critical environment).
I guess you could also write some UV BASIC code based on RFC4122 if you
want to be fully compliant. See the C
Hmmm, a miracle tool for little or no money too? ;-) I do not know, if
this meets your specific requirements, but...
Have you looked at DOWNLOAD from
http://www.cedarville.edu/departments/compserv/ftp.htm ?
It's been around for a long, long time...no need to roll your own, when
it's been done
UniVerse has a little used function for inline field-level editing and
keyboard function trapping, provided by !EDIT.INPUT (and !PACK.FNKEYS)
which can do what you want.
Probably 'cause it's poorly documented and a little hard to use, which
is why it's little known or used (also 'cause it is
Sara
IBM does not supply a U2 specific SOAP server for deployment in any
environment. You need to deploy it yourself... Unfortunately, they make
the assumption that you know how to do this yourself.
It's been covered in a previous topic (which you started :)), I posted
some clues on how to
If business data integrity is a major concern, then you also need to
ensure you business processing is complete and (ideally) - shutdown the
UniVerse environment prior to any manipulation of UV database files
using third-party/OS tools (rm, cp, rcp, scp, mv, tar, etc, etc).
For high-availability
Louie
It depends what you mean by work with and how you have your cluster
configured.
Are you using IBM's HACMP clustering software? If so, how is it
configured now for your non-UV apps?
What benefits are you expecting from clustering?
Do you have UV Transaction Logging or Replication in use
Oops sorry, I didn't read your issue properly!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boydell, Stuart
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 7:00 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] Selection help
Thanks but it didn't work.
Oh yes, I forgot to add that, I was answering in a hurry doing something
else...didn't read the requirement again...LOL.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Leach
Sent: Wednesday, 23 January 2008 8:38 PM
To:
Corrupt file? Is the file over 4 GB?
What platform/OS version and UV version?
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oaks, Harold
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 10:39 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2]
Try
SELECT LOOKUP.TABLE XYZ SAVING UNIQUE EVAL RAISE(CODE)
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boydell, Stuart
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 5:57 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] [UV] Selection help
I
Bill,
Haven't you already asked this question before?? ;-)
http://www.nabble.com/UD-IP-Address-tc10993435.html
Although, seems your issue wasn't fully responded to...
My best guess...you've got U2 device licensing and your local IP address
is being returned to the UD server by your device
101 - 200 of 282 matches
Mail list logo
