[unicode] Re: Benefits of Unicode

2001-03-21 Thread Otto Stolz
Am 2001-02-24 um 08:00 hat Tex Texin geschrieben: I have put the page up at: http://i18n.homepage.com/UnicodeBenefits.html I'll put further updates there as well. This page has been moved to: http://www.geocities.com/i18nguy/UnicodeBenefits.html. Best wishes, Otto Stolz

[unicode] Re: Unicode editing

2001-03-21 Thread Edward Cherlin
At 9:30 AM -0800 3/17/01, Marco Cimarosti wrote: [snip] But, although I mentioned rich text, what I really had in mind was plain text. Maybe in a rich text environment, where it is normal to get a run of text it and tag it with some property (e.g. underlined, bold, etc.), it would also be

[unicode] Re: Unicode editing (RE: Unicode complaints)

2001-03-21 Thread Marco Cimarosti
Roozbeh Pournander wrote: If you open a file that contains two adjacent runs at the same level, will you make them one run when you write the file? That was the idea. But only in the case when it is *really* an embedding having the same directionality as the text where it is inserted. Like

[unicode] Re: Moving mail lists

2001-03-21 Thread Marco Cimarosti
Personally, I don't like very much the new policy of adding the label "[unicode]" in front of message subjects, for two reasons: 1) It is the same prefix used by the list [EMAIL PROTECTED], to which I subscribed for receiving daily digests of the Unicode List's message. What I do is to

[unicode] Re: Unicode editing

2001-03-21 Thread J M Sykes
"The trouble with people is not that they don't know but that they know so much that ain't so." Josh Billings' Encyclopedia of Wit and Wisdom (Henry Wheeler Shaw, 1874) And it's so true! Mike. (N.B. I make no claim that the above is a more accurate quote; my source is the Oxford Dictionary

[unicode] Re: Moving mail lists

2001-03-21 Thread Gaute B Strokkenes
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Unicode subscribers: This week Parvati and I will be moving the Unicode mail list to a new server with new mail software. I hope the move goes smoothly, but as you know the best laid plans of mice and machines cough and sputter in the

[unicode] Re: Unicode editing

2001-03-21 Thread Marco Cimarosti
Edward Cherlin wrote: But, in this case, each *single* character in the block must be independently flagged with the property, so that it retains it also if it is copiedpasted somewhere else: the actual start and end codes will only be generated when rebuilding the Unicode string at the

[unicode] x-bar character

2001-03-21 Thread Eric Hausen
Can anyone tell me the character code for the x-bar symbol (mathematical mean). I've looked all over the web, and Unicode's code charts aren't coming up. Thanks Eric

[unicode] Re: Moving mail lists

2001-03-21 Thread Mike Lischke
Hello Florian, Yahoo Groups has ads by default (unless you pay a monthly fee for list hosting), and some people do not trust the privacy policy of such organizations. Yes, I know. I'm subscribed to 9 YG mailing lists and manage another 4 on my own. It is a piece of cake and there is a

[unicode] Re: Benefits of Unicode

2001-03-21 Thread Mike Lischke
Otto, This page has been moved to: http://www.geocities.com/i18nguy/UnicodeBenefits.html. There is a small mistake in the table. Microsoft is mentioned twice in the "Widespread industry support..." row. Ciao, Mike

[unicode] Re: Moving mail lists

2001-03-21 Thread Mike Lischke
I see that the list software now appends [unicode] to all subject lines. This is very annoying, and not very useful, since those who wish to filter their mail and put posts from this list in a folder of its own etc. etc. can now do so by using other headers, such as "X-list: unicode" .

[unicode] Re: Moving mail lists

2001-03-21 Thread Mike Lischke
Hi Christopher, To my mind the Unicode web ftp servers mean that a separate file area just for this mailing list would be pretty well redundant - and I suspect most people subscribed to this list have much better things to do than to participate in chat rooms and polls (and I can't see

[unicode] Re: Benefits of Unicode

2001-03-21 Thread Tex Texin
Yes and no. It is mentioned once for operating system and once for database. tex Mike Lischke wrote: Otto, This page has been moved to: http://www.geocities.com/i18nguy/UnicodeBenefits.html. There is a small mistake in the table. Microsoft is mentioned twice in the "Widespread

[unicode] Re: removing compromises from unicode (WCode)

2001-03-21 Thread Markus Scherer
John Cowan wrote: The result is a back-to-the-principles "WCode", nicely streamlined: - no compatibility or precomposed characters But less compact. Without precomposed characters, the overhead of conversion from old character sets grows considerably. True. Compactness was not a goal

[unicode] Re: Moving mail lists

2001-03-21 Thread Gaute B Strokkenes
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 05:53 PM 3/21/01 +0100, you wrote: I see that the list software now appends [unicode] to all subject lines. This is very annoying, and not very useful, since those who wish to filter their mail and put posts from this list in a folder of its

[unicode] Re: Moving mail lists

2001-03-21 Thread Christopher John Fynn
Asmus Freytag wrote: At 05:53 PM 3/21/01 +0100, you wrote: I see that the list software now appends [unicode] to all subject lines. This is very annoying, and not very useful, since those who wish to filter their mail and put posts from this list in a folder of its own etc. etc. can now