On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 2:35 AM, William_J_G Overington via Unicode <
unicode@unicode.org> wrote:
>
> I decided that trying to design emoji for 'I' and for 'You' seemed
> interesting so I decided to have a go at designing some.
>
Why don't we just encode Blissymbolics, where pronouns are already
ly also be
> represented as the sequence <0058, 20D2>, just to represent the data.
>
> --Ken
>
> On 9/25/2017 11:34 PM, Leo Broukhis wrote:
>
> If it was implemented as an overprint, either )^H|^H( or \^H|^H/ and was
> intended to signify an invalid character
> (for ex
ot;Also an early
IBM invalid character symbol".
> - Karl
>
> --
> Am Dienstag, 26. September 2017 um 06:48 schrieb Leo Broukhis via Unicode:
>
> >> Wikipedia
> >> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_1620#Invalid_character)
> >> describes the &qu
racter set. But to verify exactly what was going on,
> somebody would presumably have to examine the physical keys of a 1620
> console typewriter to see what they could generate on paper.
>
> I'm guessing the Computer History Museum ( http://www.computerhistory.org/
> ) would have
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Magnus Bodin ☀ wrote:
> It's like if IBM invented the tofu of some sort.
>
Right. The question is, can it be considered a glyph variation of U+?
On a tangent: graphically, the closest glyph which is not a letter appears
to be
U+1F74F
Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_1620#Invalid_character)
describes the "invalid character" symbol (see attachment) as a Cyrillic Ж
which it obviously is not.
But what is it? Does it deserve encoding, or is it a glyph variation of an
existing codepoint?
The question is somewhat
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 6:09 AM, Asmus Freytag wrote:
> On 3/28/2017 4:00 AM, Ian Clifton wrote:
>
> I’ve used ⏨ a couple of times, without explanation, in my own
> emails—without, as far as I’m aware, causing any misunderstanding.
>
> Works especially well, whenever it
You may want to consider U+2370 APL FUNCTIONAL SYMBOL QUAD QUESTION.
Leo
On Dec 22, 2016 15:35, "Martin Mueller"
wrote:
These are very handsome and interesting. But for the purposes of my
project, which involves folks here, there, and everywhere working on
It's new. Let's not tell Randall about the "completing the set" argument.
Leo
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Karl Williamson
wrote:
> "I'm excited about the proposal to add a brontosaurus emoji codepoint
> because it has the potential to bring together a half-dozen
Hi Kim,
While it can be argued that the "NON-DESTRUCTIVE BACKSPACE" capability of a
typewriter, allowing arbitrary overstruck characters, belongs to plain
text, it is more akin to creating subscripts and superscripts by rotating
the platen knob up or down by half-interval, which Unicode considers
For a previous discussion on the topic, please see
the thread "Missing geometric shapes" around 11/12/12
Leo
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Ken Shirriff
wrote:
> Half-stars are used all over the place for reviews and many people have
> expressed interest in a Unicode
Also, or rather foremost, to U+2766 ❦ FLORAL HEART
❦ - what does the (almost) connecting vine remind me of? Hmmm...
Leo
2016-05-06 21:54 GMT-07:00 António Martins-Tuválkin :
> On 2016.05.04 07:54, Julian Bradfield wrote:
>
> See http://xkcd.com/1676/
>> (making sure to
uous.
Leo
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Doug Ewell <d...@ewellic.org> wrote:
> On February 8, Leo Broukhis wrote:
>
> > This is clearly an incomplete set. It makes sense to have a generic
> > "enclosing banknote" emoji character which, when combined with a
> &
be <$> + U+FE0F VS16
>
> Chris
>
>
> Leo Broukhis schreef op 2016-03-01 19:10:
>
> I have a less disruptive proposal than to encode an unprecedented
> combining emoji.
> How about adding variation sequences + U+FE0F VS16 to
> signify BANKNOTE with ?
>
>
w in ~90M Egyptians.
>
> --Jörg Knappen
>
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 09. Februar 2016 um 23:46 Uhr
> *Von:* "Leo Broukhis" <l...@mailcom.com>
> *An:* "Mark Davis ☕️" <m...@macchiato.com>
> *Cc:* "unicode Unicode Discussion" <unicode@unicode.
Not that I need it a lot, but I'm curious if an emoji for
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ILY_sign has ever been requested.
Leo
/emojitracker.com/
>
> Mark
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Leo Broukhis <l...@mailcom.com> wrote:
>
>> There are
>>
>> U+01F4B4 Banknote With Yen Sign
>> U+01F4B5 Banknote With Dollar Sign
>> U+01F4B6 Banknote With Euro Sign
>>
A caveat about using emojitracker.com : it doesn't count newer emoji yet
(e.g. U+1F37E bottle with popping cork is absent), thus, when they are
added, their counts will be skewed.
Leo
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Leo Broukhis <l...@mailcom.com> wrote:
> Thank you for the lin
be the eyes-rolling
> face).
>
> Mark
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Leo Broukhis <l...@mailcom.com> wrote:
>
>> A caveat about using emojitracker.com : it doesn't count newer emoji yet
>> (e.g. U+1F37E bottle with popping cork is absent), thus, when they ar
There are
U+01F4B4 Banknote With Yen Sign
U+01F4B5 Banknote With Dollar Sign
U+01F4B6 Banknote With Euro Sign
U+01F4B7 Banknote With Pound Sign
This is clearly an incomplete set. It makes sense to have a generic
"enclosing banknote" emoji character which, when combined with a
currency
E WITH RIAL SIGN in a much more positive
> light than one for a COMBINING BANKNOTE.
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Leo Broukhis <l...@mailcom.com> wrote:
>
>> There are
>>
>> U+01F4B4 Banknote With Yen Sign
>> U+01F4B5 Banknote With Dollar Sign
As far as I'm concerned, the pop-up contents should end with the link
"Read more about codepoint adoption." In your brief description, you
might want to add a proviso about the temporary nature of character
adoption.
Submitting forms to a 3rd party site is a bad idea.
Leo
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015
By "should end with the link" I implied "should not contain anything
that followed it at the time of my comment, including the form and
the - thus obviated - disclaimer. :)
If submitting a form to a 3rd party site results in an error for any
reason, the error will be displayed by the target
This prompts a question: for case conversion bijectivity in fr_FR
locale, should there be "invisible accents"? E.g.
déjà -> DE(combining invisible acute accent)JA(combining invisible
grave accent) -> déjà
whereas in fr_CA locale, it is simply
déjà -> DÉJÀ -> déjà
Leo
On Wed, Dec 9,
29, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Marcel Schneider <charupd...@orange.fr> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:25:52 +0100, Philippe Verdy" <verd...@wanadoo.fr>
> wrote:
>
>> 2015-10-29 9:29 GMT+01:00 Marcel Schneider <charupd...@orange.fr>:
>>
>>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015
Along the same lines, should I be able to change my last name
officially to Ƃpyxᴎc? (NB all letters are codepoints with names
starting with "LATIN").
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Marcel Schneider wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:04:20 +, Denis Jacquerye
http://www.acronymfinder.com/Information-Technology/PUA.html
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 3:18 PM, alexwei...@alexweiner.com wrote:
PUA?
Original Message
Subject: RE: APL Under-bar Characters
From: Erkki I Kolehmainen e...@iki.fi
Date: Aug 18, 2015 6:55 AM
To: 'Marcel
The discussion widens:
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/15/08/02/2248257/unicode-consortium-looks-at-symbols-for-allergies
Fonts vary and can be copyrighted, no doubt, but Unicode is not about fonts.
Leo
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Doug Ewell d...@ewellic.org wrote:
Garth Wallace gwalla at gmail dot com wrote:
I read this proposal [L2/15-196R] and was a little confused. Why
aren't they proposing the actual
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Doug Ewell d...@ewellic.org wrote:
Leo Broukhis leob at mailcom dot com wrote:
Most platforms display unknown printable characters as white
rectangles with hex digits in them.
In Doug's message, I saw a rectangle with 01F in the upper row, and
3F3 in the lower
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Doug Ewell d...@ewellic.org wrote:
Leo Broukhis leob at mailcom dot com wrote:
What I don't like about PRI #399 is its proposing to use default-
ignorable characters. On a non-vexillology-aware platform, I'd like
to see something informative, albeit
without squinting.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Ken Whistler kenwhist...@att.net wrote:
On 7/3/2015 9:14 PM, Leo Broukhis wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Doug Ewell d...@ewellic.org wrote:
Leo Broukhis leob at mailcom dot com wrote:
What I don't like about PRI #399 is its
vacation spot, Florida, and the friend sees a flag for New
Jersey.
Mark
— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com wrote:
Why not add another 26 A-Z characters, call them regional
supplementary symbols, and let carriers decide what
...@ewellic.org wrote:
Leo Broukhis leob at mailcom dot com wrote:
With extensible self-delimited regional indicator sequences the
carriers will be able to come to an agreement and to petition Unicode
to register them as named character sequences symbolizing flags not
encoded by an ISO entity, like various
.
Leo
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Ken Whistler kenwhist...@att.net wrote:
On 7/2/2015 12:33 PM, Leo Broukhis wrote:
If REGIONAL INDICATOR DASH and REGIONAL INDICATOR digits are added,
along with regional supplementary symbols, then sequences
RISRISRIDRSS*RIS can be parsed unambiguously
Ukrainian is in Estonia, Estonian is in the Baltic sea.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Eric Muller eric.mul...@efele.net wrote:
I am pleased to announce that the UDHR in Unicode project
(http://unicode.org/udhr) has reached a notable milestone: we now have 400
translations of the Universal
word boundary. There is only one hyphen because no language
(AFAIK) claims it as part of its alphabet.
Leo
On 7:01pm, Thu, Jun 4, 2015 Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com wrote:
Along the same lines, we might need a MODIFIER LETTER HYPHEN, because,
for example, the work ack-ack isn't decomposable
, however, existence of the MODIFIER LETTER [same glyph as
used for English contractions] in Unicode is a coincidence which
should not have an effect on usage of apostrophes in English.
Leo
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:58 PM, David Starner prosfil...@gmail.com wrote:
On June 4, 2015, at 11:01 PM, Leo
Along the same lines, we might need a MODIFIER LETTER HYPHEN, because, for
example, the work ack-ack isn't decomposable into words, or even morphemes,
ack and ack.
Leo
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:31 PM, David Starner prosfil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:38 PM Markus Scherer
The format that I am suggesting would allow the image for a non-standard
emoji character to be included in a text message, with the image located at
the correct place in the text.
A more common occurrence is the need to include a non-standard
character in a text message, be it a ski piste
Being used in maps and map legends is not a sufficient condition for
encoding a symbol. If it were, all symbols used in physical maps would
have been encoded, including each and every mineral and rare metal.
Leo
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Shervin Afshar shervinafs...@gmail.com wrote:
plans for that?
Thanks,
Leo
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com wrote:
In light of http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr51/#Faces_Hands_Zodiac
mentioning, among other things,
ZIPPER-MOUTH FACE
MONEY-MOUTH FACE
FACE WITH THERMOMETER
NERD FACE
THINKING FACE
FACE
In light of http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr51/#Faces_Hands_Zodiac
mentioning, among other things,
ZIPPER-MOUTH FACE
MONEY-MOUTH FACE
FACE WITH THERMOMETER
NERD FACE
THINKING FACE
FACE WITH ROLLING EYES
UPSIDE-DOWN FACE
FACE WITH HEAD-BANDAGE
ROBOT FACE
HUGGING FACE
(some, like UPSIDE-DOWN FACE
Exact semantics of formatting characters aside, it is best to define plain
text as a stateless stream. The characters you're proposing require a
decoder to keep state, therefore they won't do. TICAt most you may ask for
*U+E1001 COMBINING ITALICIZER
*U+E1003 COMBINING BOLDIFIER
after all, we
Ken,
zgrep U011D /usr/share/i18n/charmaps/*
ANSI_X3.110-1983.gz:U011D /xc3/x67 LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH
CIRCUMFLEX
EUC-JISX0213.gz:U011D /xaa/xe0 LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH
CIRCUMFLEX
EUC-JP.gz:U011D /x8f/xab/xba LATIN SMALL LETTER G WITH CIRCUMFLEX
EUC-JP-MS.gz:U011D
in 1986. That date, by the way, is earlier than
anything I have firsthand records for.
--Ken
On 3/23/2015 10:10 AM, Leo Broukhis wrote:
How come this character is in ISO-8859-3? IBM905?
Leo
___
Unicode mailing list
Unicode@unicode.org
http
Here
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a4/Contrastive_use_of_kratka_and_breve.JPG
is an example of й and и + U+0306 COMBINING BREVE used contrastively (/j/
vs short /i/) thanks to a difference in typographic style of Cyrillic breve
(kratka) and regular breve.
For me in Win7 using и
the canonically equivalent composition which could occur in many
places.
2014-07-02 18:11 GMT+02:00 Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com:
Here
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a4/Contrastive_use_of_kratka_and_breve.JPG
is an example of й and и + U+0306 COMBINING BREVE used contrastively
(/j
K
Den 2014-07-02 20:48, skrev Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com:
Jukka,
If the font happens to have lunar breve at U+0306, whereas the letter й
has the rounded bowl breve, using CGJ should guarantee to achieve
distinctive rendering, because и, CGJ, U+0306 is not canonically
equivalent to и
http://www.omniglot.com/writing/nenets.htm
shows two letters (’ and ”) in both versions of the Cyrillic Nenets
alphabet (voiced taser” and unvoiced taser”) that don't seem to be
encoded as letters. Should they be encoded, or 2019 and 201D are good
enough?
Leo
Thank you, but how convenient!
Calling a letter a modifier allows to avoid re-encoding the same shape in
various alphabets.
Leo
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Jean-François Colson j...@colson.eu wrote:
Le 02/07/14 22:33, Leo Broukhis a écrit :
http://www.omniglot.com/writing/nenets.htm
for
that distinction.
Leo
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Richard Wordingham
richard.wording...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 13:08:42 -0700
Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com wrote:
The difference is real and intentional, but isn't it akin to the
difference between (IIRC a discussion several
would have been much lighter.
2014/1/23 Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com
I find http://unicode-table.com/ of which I cannot find a previous
mention on the list, quite convenient (keep scrolling). Not all of Unicode
6.0 and 6.1 is there yet, though, as it is a hobby project of a
multi-national
I find http://unicode-table.com/ of which I cannot find a previous mention
on the list, quite convenient (keep scrolling). Not all of Unicode 6.0 and
6.1 is there yet, though, as it is a hobby project of a multi-national
team.
Interface languages include English, German, Russian, Ukrainian,
Hasn't http://www.unicode.org/standard/where/#Variant_Shapes explained it
once and for all?
Leo
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 4:42 AM, d...@bisharat.net wrote:
FWIW, a blog post prompted by discussions in the wake of a DejaVu font use
of N-form over n-form capital ŋ (eng or engma):
The 'eng'
wish they never do.
Leo
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Michael Everson ever...@evertype.comwrote:
On 12 Dec 2013, at 15:29, Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com wrote:
Hasn't http://www.unicode.org/standard/where/#Variant_Shapes explained
it once and for all?
No, because users of N-shaped
, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Asmus Freytag asm...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On 12/12/2013 2:25 PM, Leo Broukhis wrote:
Hmmm... As a person with Russian as the first language I can assure you
that from any literate Russian-speaking person's perspective italic ū is an
unacceptable and *WRONG* representation
the preference at hand?
Leo
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Michael Everson ever...@evertype.comwrote:
On 12 Dec 2013, at 22:25, Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com wrote:
Hmmm... As a person with Russian as the first language I can assure you
that from any literate Russian-speaking person's
The board of directors of the Central Bank of Russia has [finally] approved
the de facto standard ruble sign.
http://lenta.ru/news/2013/12/11/symbol/
Leo
Thank you!
Leo
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Michael Everson ever...@evertype.comwrote:
I’m already on it.
On 11 Dec 2013, at 23:51, Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com wrote:
The board of directors of the Central Bank of Russia has [finally]
approved the de facto standard ruble sign
Wow! ROFF-family languages are still being used?
But again, IMO, this is beyond markup. In TeX \s{} and in groff .zs are
subroutines.
Leo
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Steffen Daode sdao...@gmail.com wrote:
Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
|Using TeX:
|
| \def\s{${}^{\rm
, 2013 at 05:51:09PM -0700, Leo Broukhis wrote:
Hi All,
Attached is a part of page 36 of Henry Alford's *The Queen's English: a
manual of idiom and usage (1888)* [
http://archive.org/details/queensenglishman00alfo]
Is the way to indicate alternative s/z spellings used there plain text
To: Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com
Cc: unicode Unicode Discussion unicode@unicode.org
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:09:31 +0200
Subject: Re: COMBINING OVER MARK?
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:51:09PM -0700, Leo Broukhis wrote:
Hi All,
Attached is a part of page 36 of Henry Alford's *The Queen's English
:
Le 01/10/2013 12:20, Frédéric Grosshans a écrit :
Le 01/10/2013 02:51, Leo Broukhis a écrit :
Hi All,
Attached is a part of page 36 of Henry Alford's */The Queen's English: a
manual of idiom and usage/ (1888)* [http://archive.org/details/**
queensenglishman00alfohttp://archive.org/details
and script size) pretty much makes it formated
text to me.
Regards,
Khaled
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:19:24AM -0700, Leo Broukhis wrote:
Khaled,
On a typewriter, the same effect can be achieved as
anathematihalf-interval upsBS1 interval downzhalf-interval upe
Where would the line
khaledho...@eglug.org
To: Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com
Cc: unicode Unicode Discussion unicode@unicode.org
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 11:09:31 +0200
Subject: Re: COMBINING OVER MARK?
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:51:09PM -0700, Leo Broukhis wrote:
Hi All,
Attached is a part of page 36 of Henry
mathvariant=romanz/mi/**math| (drop
that in an HTML document and take a look).
This doesn't look like plain text to me. I don't think it argues in favor
of any sort of combining Z or general combinator mark. This is just what
markup is for.
~mark
On 10/01/2013 08:05 PM, Leo Broukhis wrote
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Stephan Stiller
stephan.stil...@gmail.comwrote:
Anecdotally people in Germany always tell me of a mythical
parenthesis-bracket-brace hierarchy { [ ( ) ] }, which I've never actually
encountered, and btw even the hierarchy [ ( ) ] isn't used by everyone.
I
In light of recent news about New York adopting a redesigned handicapped
symbol
http://www.disabilityscoop.com/2013/05/28/handicapped-symbol-facelift/18034/
http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity/2013/05/revamped-handicapped-icons-coming-to-new-york-city.html
and the new signs starting to appear
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Asmus Freytag asm...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
For symbols, once you leave the canonical shape behind, there's always the
argument that what you have is in fact a new symbol.
There are some exceptions to this, where notational aspect of symbol use
is so strong
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Andreas Stötzner a...@signographie.dewrote:
Am 29.05.2013 um 17:39 schrieb Leo Broukhis:
In light of recent news about New York adopting a redesigned handicapped
symbol
…
I'd like to ask: what is supposed to be the trigger condition for the UTC
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Andries Brouwer a...@win.tue.nl wrote:
I wondered how to code an s-j overstrike combination in Unicode.
I'd write s ZWJ j and use a font that has the appropriate ligature.
Leo
Everything dialectology-related is a fancy presentation of the
phoneme attribute markup.
Leo
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Asmus Freytag asm...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On 2/13/2013 2:56 PM, Leo Broukhis wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Andries Brouwer a...@win.tue.nl wrote:
I
Andrés,
For me, ␃ U+2403 SYMBOL FOR END OF TEXT
has various glyphs depending on the font. I see either an 8-pointed
star with ETX inside, or a lower right corner.
This seems to fit your request well.
From what I've seen in various publications, commonly ∎ U+220E END OF
PROOF or a similar
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Whistler, Ken ken.whist...@sap.com wrote:
Leo asked:
My question was narrower: assuming that the strings being compared are
words, could it be supported without any markup?
... where it refers to conditional weighting based on the (identified) word
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Whistler, Ken ken.whist...@sap.com wrote:
Leo Broukhis said:
Granted, not yet, but by itself the argument is invalid. Unicode
collation rules are descriptive;
I'm not sure what you mean by that. UTS #10 is a *specification* of an
algorithm, with various
In Russian, the difference between Е and Ё is primary at the beginning
of a word as they are considered distinct letters of the alphabet, yet
secondary in the middle of a word, as the dieresis over Ё is not
mandatory. As an example, ель ёлка, but тёлка тель, see
[Philippe tells me that his message that I'm quoting could have been
rejected by the mailing list as spam; my answer is below.]
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
This is an interesting case. A solution would be to be able define a
distinct collation
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Leif Halvard Silli
xn--mlform-...@xn--mlform-iua.no wrote:
You say that the difference is primary in the beginning of a word but
elsewhere secondary. And yes, that orthographic dictionary that you
link to above, looks as you describe.
However, in reality, the
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote:
2012-12-21 21:05, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
My Moscow Russian-Norwegian from 1987 and my Pocket Oxford Russian
Dictionary from 2003 agree that both list words on Ё and Е under the
same category – namely, under the
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Leif Halvard Silli
xn--mlform-...@xn--mlform-iua.no wrote:
In «Tolkovïj slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo jazïka» from 2005
(«Dictionary over contempary Russian language»), has located words on Ё
in its a separate category, consisting of exactly one word: Ёмкость.
Telling font designers how to do their job (even if it's within
Unicode's purview which I doubt) by adding new codepoints is a novel
idea to say the least.
Leo
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 3:32 AM, QSJN 4 UKR qsjn4...@gmail.com wrote:
Old Cyrillic letter YEST (Є) has two variants: broad (also called
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Julian Bradfield
jcb+unic...@inf.ed.ac.uk wrote:
On 2012-09-04, Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com wrote:
My question is about the symbol before the name Уот. Has anyone seen
it before? Is it a NE arrow in a square or a spade? What does it mean?
Might it simply
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Asmus Freytag asm...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On 9/7/2012 8:12 AM, Leo Broukhis wrote:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Julian Bradfield
jcb+unic...@inf.ed.ac.uk wrote:
On 2012-09-04, Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com wrote:
My question is about the symbol before
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Philippe Verdy verd...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
In my opinon the shape visible inside a a side effect of the paper
texture, with inking defects the same size as those visible on the
surrounding letters.
My opinion is that the symbol inside the large square is a
The magnification of the attached fragment is about 2x compared to
what it was on the calendar page if viewed on a 100 dpi display.
There are only two pages surviving, and the second one doesn't have that symbol.
Ctrl-+ while viewing the attached image should help.
I can see quite clearly that
The LOZENGE is also found in GOST 10859; my guess that it was there
not to represent sown fields or female fertility
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lozenge#Symbolism) but rather for its
usage in modal logic to express the possibility of the following
expression
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Kent Karlsson kent.karlsso...@telia.com wrote:
UAX 44 has:
Characters with a soft dot, like i or j. An accent placed on these
characters causes the dot to disappear. That is sort of correct, but
apparently open to misinterpretation. This goes for all cc 230
Kent,
No, 20D7 is not a Diacritic, it is Other_Math, therefore the dot should remain.
In general, mathematical combining characters are not diacritics.
Renderers that treat combining as a synonym for diacritic and
remove the dot are in error.
UAX 44 says, Characters that linguistically modify
Ↄ⃝ may be a better approximation.
Leo
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Jean-François Colson j...@colson.eu wrote:
Recently, the Canadian symbols (marque de commerce) and (marque
déposée) have been added to Unicode at U+1F16A and U+1F16B.
Would it be possible to add the copyleft symbol
,
Brennan Smith
On Jul 2, 2012, at 10:45 PM, Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com wrote:
Brennan,
I can only suggest http://shapecatcher.com/ - there you can draw an
outline of your icon and pick an existing character that resembles it
the most.
Leo
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Brennan
Hello Brendan,
Do you happen to have any sculptures you need to convert to guitar riffs?
Leo
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Brennan Smith brennansmit...@me.com wrote:
Hello,
My name is Brennan Smith and I am wondering how I can transfer my images or
PNG icons to unicode?
Any info will
Speaking of U+17D2 KHMER SIGN COENG, what is a conforming renderer to
do if someone writes A ្B ? (U+0041 U+17D2 U+0042)
Leo
On 3/6/12, Richard Wordingham richard.wording...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:26:43 -0600 (CST)
Benjamin M Scarborough benjamin.scarboro...@utdallas.edu
On 3/6/12, Doug Ewell d...@ewellic.org wrote:
Speaking of U+17D2 KHMER SIGN COENG, what is a conforming renderer to
do if someone writes A្B ? (U+0041 U+17D2 U+0042)
Roll its eyes?
I guess :), but how should it look on the screen?
Leo
On 3/6/12, Ken Whistler k...@sybase.com wrote:
On 3/6/2012 2:34 PM, Leo Broukhis wrote:
On 3/6/12, Doug Ewelld...@ewellic.org wrote:
Speaking of U+17D2 KHMER SIGN COENG, what is a conforming renderer to
do if someone writes A្B ? (U+0041 U+17D2 U+0042)
Roll its eyes?
I guess :), but how
Thank you, Ken!
What about Grapheme_Extend class characters placed out of context? It
would be nice to see a dotted box in cases like AׁB
(U+0041 U+05C1 HEBREW POINT SHIN DOT U+0042)
Leo
On 3/6/12, Ken Whistler k...@sybase.com wrote:
I see. I was under an impression that the renderer must
Hi Andre,
Does the upside down character ever appear in plain printed text
(newspapers, books, fortune cookies), or only in drawings?
Leo
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 7:34 AM, Andre Schappo a.scha...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
The character 福 means
happiness
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Richard Wordingham
richard.wording...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Expanding on Mark's answer, the basic difference is whether a character
of Bidi class ET (percentage-type and currency symbols) when stored
before or after European or Persian etc. digits goes to their
In light of W*dings fonts being reviewed as a source of addenda to
Unicode and the reasons for disunification mentioned in N4115, I'd
like to ask if there is anything in the Symbol font that is not yet
adequately represented by encoded characters (to wit:
http://www.numericana.com/about.htm) and
Namely, there are two characters that could be considered candidates:
no-vinculum radical symbol and radical extension.
Leo
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Leo Broukhis l...@mailcom.com wrote:
In light of W*dings fonts being reviewed as a source of addenda to
Unicode and the reasons
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo