Is there any chance that Heizer/Royalsoft (or anyone else for that matter) will
make a script compiler for revolution like compileIt?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_
I think perhaps you haven't yet understood Revolution very well.
That's cool; it takes a while.
With Rev, we don't need CompileIt! because Rev produces stand-alone,
compiled applications for multiple platforms as part of its way of
doing business.
On Jun 21, 2005, at 6:48 PM, Eric Engle
y much so i would say - we
all have these uses for it where Rev just doesn't can't
perform fast enough.
cheers
Xavier
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Dan Shafer
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 06:10
&
Do you have Revolution Dreamcard?
You need Revolution Studio, or better, and you can then make a standalone
compiled app.
Pat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Engle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 11:48 AM
Subjec
it where Rev just doesn't can't
perform fast enough.
cheers
Xavier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dan Shafer
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 06:10
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: compileIt for revolution?
I think perhaps
---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dan Shafer
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 06:10
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: compileIt for revolution?
I think perhaps you haven't yet understood Revolution very well.
That's cool; it takes a while.
With Rev,
MisterX wrote:
[ about the need for more speed for some things ]
Example: The HotKeyN2O stack stores all properties of all
controls in a card when the user opens the card. The props
are all in array form which cannot be stored into another
array (time based array of object changes). So for e
Dan,
I also would like to speed up array processing. It kills me that my
friend won't move from VB to Rev because when I write the same array
processing problem that he uses, VB runs 10+ times faster than Rev.
I also have had to jump through hoops trying to figure out ways to
make my ar
I would absolutely echo what Dennis has just said. I
was initially really impressed with rev and I should
say I still am in certain respects - comfort and ease
of use, the elegant and intuitive language and
stack/card paradigm etc. etc.
But I have been unable to get rev to do what I want it
to do
I have spoke with a few individuals in regards to creating a utility for
Revolution that would convert Transcript to C. Unfortunately, I know
little of C and the individuals I talked with were not ready to start a
project such as what you want.
But...it is possible.
If one who knows C and co
005 12:21
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; How to use Revolution
> Subject: Re: compileIt for revolution?
>
> MisterX wrote:
>
> >[ about the need for more speed for some things ]
> >Example: The HotKeyN2O stack stores all properties of all
> controls in a
> >card wh
;
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 11:48 AM
Subject: compileIt for revolution?
Is there any chance that Heizer/Royalsoft (or anyone else for that
matter) will
make a script compiler for revolution like compileIt?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Y
in an image).
Jon
Pat Trendler wrote:
Do you have Revolution Dreamcard?
You need Revolution Studio, or better, and you can then make a standalone
compiled app.
Pat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: "Eric Engle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wedne
nal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Dennis Brown
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 15:40
> To: How to use Revolution
> Subject: Re: compileIt for revolution?
>
> Dan,
>
> I also would like to speed up array processi
Dan Shafer wrote:
How in the world would you expect a compiled script or handler -- if
such a thing were possible -- to then be smoothly integrated into a
stand-alone app?
Seems trivial to me: that's what traditional object code libraries and
DLLs are for.
As for performance, tuning f
f
> Derek Bump
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 16:19
> To: How to use Revolution
> Subject: Re: compileIt for revolution?
>
> I have spoke with a few individuals in regards to creating a
> utility for Revolution that would convert Transcript to C.
> Unfortunately, I k
Total agreement...
Gordon Webster wrote:
I would absolutely echo what Dennis has just said. I
was initially really impressed with rev and I should
say I still am in certain respects - comfort and ease
of use, the elegant and intuitive language and
stack/card paradigm etc. etc.
But I have been
ed to #include
> axtalk.c library in your code. But this is still "vapor" as i hate the c
> debugging.
>
> cheers
> Xavier
>
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > Derek Bump
&g
Mr. X, et al:
The whole compileIT is not required but an internal module to create
ultra-fast native code would be great. Now that would be a programmer's tool
worth any eye candy in RunRev.
Add access to system calls, and you have my support.
Rob Cozens
Wisdom entereth not into a malicious
into a real-compiled external.
So CompileIt is needed - and very much so i would say - we
all have these uses for it where Rev just doesn't can't
perform fast enough.
cheers
Xavier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dan Shafer
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Gordon Webster
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 16:14
> To: How to use Revolution
> Subject: Re: compileIt for revolution?
>
> I would absolutely echo what Dennis has just said.
always another way to
> do it!
>
> cheers
> Xav
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of
> > Gordon Webster
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 16:14
> > To: How to use Revolu
I think the issue here is an elegant and efficient way to interface
with externals. If we had this, it would solve both problems. When
I say efficient, I don't mean pass a 100MB array as a text string to
an external that converts it to numbers than does some processing and
converts back t
> Transcript/Rev aren't a general-purpose environment. There's
> a whole class of apps for which they are ideally suited.
> There are also many for which it's not the right tool. I'm in
> favor of continuing to make it do what it does do better and better.
>
> I suspect you are, too, so I'm no
The simplest possibility for the external route would be to be able to
pass (and use) to and from the external, handles to large RAM-based
sets of floating-point numbers; that was the solution I used in
Hypercard back when the Earth was still cooling, and it worked very
well.
On 22-Jun-05, at
John,
I actually had a complete matrix algebra package as an external for
Hypercard. I know how to use it, because I cut my teeth on APL. I
implemented my complex algorithms and state machines in it. The
coding was cumbersome, and it was difficult to debug and handle edge
conditions, s
If you are mostly writing for yourself, you can, of course, use RR to
produce a nice GUI, but pass all the time critical computations to, say
Matlab (or Octave, Matlab's GNU equivalent) using the shell commands.
But then, if that were the case, why not just use Matlab (or Octave)
directly? Inc
On Jun 22, 2005, at 1:45 PM, Dr.John R.Vokey wrote:
The simplest possibility for the external route would be to be able to
pass (and use) to and from the external, handles to large RAM-based
sets of floating-point numbers; that was the solution I used in
Hypercard back when the Earth was stil
Not forgetting, Brian, just discounting. :-D
Fair enough. For me, that was the only reason to use CompileIt. Speed
of ordinary scripts felt like something I wanted to deal with
algorithmically rather than by compiling. After all, compiling the same
algorithm was probably going to have less im
Dennis.
You may well be right. But the definition of "this Achilles heel"
varies all over the map. Revolution is not the best programming
language for all classes of problem. Those who choose not to see it
as a "real" programming language because of one perceived lack will
often just
John,
I am not writing just for myself, I use a Mac and my friend uses a PC
and he also has to be able to run my stuff. I do not have the budget
for Matlab, etc., etc. I buy everything out of my own pocket. I am
constrained to exactly what is good about Rev.
Dennis
On Jun 22, 2005, at
Precisely my earlier point.
Rev is not for everything.
If you have an app that needs to engage in this kind of esoteric
processing, then you probably need to pick a different tool either
for the entire app or to create a whiz-bang external that does this
kind of processing fast enough for
I support the notion of making integration of non-platform-specific
externals easier.
But Rev's biggest win for me other than high-performance coding is
cross-platform compatibility and I'm opposed to platform-specific
extensions that either break or cause me to write painful conditional
This whole discussion has been revealing and intriguing to me.
My favorite programming language is Smalltalk. But before it was
possible to create UIs for Smalltalk without writing code, I found it
cumbersome. When a product called WindowBuilder came along, I felt
like we'd achieved the ult
Yes, as long as the constant conversion isn't required; I used handles
both within Hypercard and in the XTHNGs, along with two conversion
routines (compile hc variables into a floating-point array, and convert
a floating-point array into a hc variable); the conversion routines
were used sparing
Dan-
Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 3:11:38 PM, you wrote:
DS> Two aphorisms came to mind as I read this entire thread again today.
DS> One is, "No good programmer uses only one tool for everything."
DS> The other is, "It's a poor workman who blames his tools."
Or, possibly more apropos,
"No good
Dan-
Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 3:05:06 PM, you wrote:
DS> The way rev implements the OS X-specific stuff is right. On Windows,
DS> it is just ignored. It doesn't break and the app still runs.
Here's where I think you're off base on this, Dan.
I'd like to see runrev spend their time fixing bugs
Dennis-
Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 1:47:25 PM, you wrote:
DB> John,
DB> I actually had a complete matrix algebra package as an external for
DB> Hypercard. I know how to use it, because I cut my teeth on APL. I
DB> implemented my complex algorithms and state machines in it. The
DB> coding was
Derek Bump wrote:
If one who knows C and could figure out some sort of Transcript
wrapper, then it would be possible. There are many freeware and
public domain compilers out there, but finding one that successfully
compiles DLLs for Revolution is seemingly difficult. I've been trying
for a
MisterX wrote:
Gordon,
Beware that even i surprise myself with newby tricks.
I just posted a "slow" fractal moire maker. It creates beautiful patterns
and the detail is amazing but it does so creating some 4 graphics in a
card. For the truely beautiful patterns, it took 30 graphics! Th
Recently, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>> i have the patience to create these graphics and see them rendered. But when
>> it comes to getting rid of them, no way! And the clearGraphics routine took
>> foreever! 200 graphics per second... You do the math - many minutes wasted
>> waiting to create a bette
Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, Richard Gaskin wrote:
i have the patience to create these graphics and see them rendered. But when
it comes to getting rid of them, no way! And the clearGraphics routine took
foreever! 200 graphics per second... You do the math - many minutes wasted
waiting to cre
On Jun 22, 2005, at 4:15 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
What I now do (having got it wrong often enough, including right
now when I was writing down the step-by-step) is to start the stack
up, set the externals, save it, quit Rev. Restart Rev, open the
stack, run the script that sets externals agai
Dennis Brown wrote:
I don't think compiling scripts is the answer.
It wasn't with CompileIt! either. ;)
Yes, it was *possible* to compile straight HyperTalk, but that rarely
ran significantly faster than it did in HC's own interpreter, mostly due
to the need for callbacks to the engine.
So
Derek Bump wrote:
If one who knows C and could figure out some sort of Transcript wrapper,
then it would be possible. There are many freeware and public domain
compilers out there, but finding one that successfully compiles DLLs for
Revolution is seemingly difficult. I've been trying for a fe
Richard Gaskin wrote:
What aspects have you found confusing?
Well, for me it's confusing due to how I've learned every language in
the past. I learned HyperTalk, Transcript, Perl, PHP and ASP by simply
looking at examples and then trying to make them work. Then slowly I
would add in other
Dan,
I used to believe that too, Then I decided to spend twice a much on a
table saw as I ever had before. The quality of my work doubled. The
saw was heavy and stable, the blade did not wobble, and the fence was
solid. My cuts were fast and accurate. Then I decided to buy the
higher
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Derek Bump wrote:
If one who knows C and could figure out some sort of Transcript
wrapper, then it would be possible. There are many freeware and
public domain compilers out there, but finding one that successfully
compiles DLLs for Revolution is seemingly difficult.
Mark,
I did not write the external, I just bought it and used it.
Dennis
On Jun 22, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Dennis-
Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 1:47:25 PM, you wrote:
DB> John,
DB> I actually had a complete matrix algebra package as an external
for
DB> Hypercard. I know how t
From: Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: compileIt for revolution?
This is not to suggest that I believe all Rev fans should learn C, so
let me please dispel that hyperbole before it arises. All I'm
suggesting is that CompileIt! was no panacea, and the effort of usin
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:24:18 -0400
> From: Mikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: the := operator (affectation)
> To: How to use Revolution
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> How is this even a continuing topic of discussion?
On Jun 22, 2005, at 8:46 PM, Eric Engle wrote:
So why use := ? Some people prefer pre-fixing affectation, and as I
said, it is
supported in lingo which is also a pascal derived language. In fact, I
know of
no other language that post-fixes affectation (put value into variable
as
opposed to af
Mark
I have a hard time seeing where you and I disagree here. I think
we're saying the same thing differently.
Dan
On Jun 22, 2005, at 3:52 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Dan-
Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 3:05:06 PM, you wrote:
DS> The way rev implements the OS X-specific stuff is right. On
W
o know!
cheers
Xavier
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Richard Gaskin
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 01:53
> To: How to use Revolution
> Subject: Re: compileIt for revolution?
>
> MisterX wrote:
> > G
n Behalf Of
> Alex Tweedly
> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 03:23
> To: How to use Revolution
> Subject: Re: compileIt for revolution?
>
> Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
> > Derek Bump wrote:
> >
> >> If one who knows C and could figure out some sort of Transcr
Dan-
Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 8:38:36 PM, you wrote:
DS> I have a hard time seeing where you and I disagree here. I think
DS> we're saying the same thing differently.
Ah... that may be. But I'm pushing *for* a generic external interface,
and you're arguing against it.
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL
Dan, et al,
programming language that is everything to everyone is nothing to
anyone.
Not if it does the job. (You'd really like to switch between different
programming environments to create bits and pieces of an
application?) Isn't C a programming language that is everything to
everyon
Richard, et al:
So instead CompileIt! had its own unique syntax and hundreds of symbols
one could use to implement things that were algorithmically very much like
one would do in Pascal or C. Of course this required a whole other level
of knowledge, and for those symbols related to the Mac Too
> Try not to get your knickers in a twist. In case you haven't noticed,
> hypertalk/transcript is clearly a Pascal derived language, they just got rid
> of
> begin/end, loosely typed it, and made the operator of affectation verbose.
OMG that's funny. Don't forget scoping, and the overarching
pa
tion? 3. Now write your code. If you find yourself writing
spaghetti code, STOP, go back to step 1.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Shafer
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 12:12 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: compileIt for revoluti
Mikey wrote:
Try not to get your knickers in a twist. In case you haven't noticed,
hypertalk/transcript is clearly a Pascal derived language, they just got rid of
begin/end, loosely typed it, and made the operator of affectation verbose.
OMG that's funny.
FWIW, I've read that description al
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:15:28 -0400
> From: Mikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: compileIt for Revolution?
> To: How to use Revolution
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> > Try not to
CompileIt! lovers and haters...
YESTERDAY
I would have to agree with Rob, here. I used CompileIt! to the point
where I made a small C app that RAN externals only and I would get
CompileIt! to compile into that app (called HyperApp). I then wrote a
front end (in CompileIt!) to write and manage
Eric-
Thursday, June 23, 2005, 11:20:16 AM, you wrote:
EE> There's even an entire article on macTech "Comparing HyperTalk to Pascal"
which
EE> says,
EE> "Both Pascal and HyperTalk provide powerful if-then-else control structures
EE> with very similar syntax."
EE> "The specification and calling
Jerry,
Assuming there is sufficient interest what is the first step, and what
would THAT cost?
I'm thinking that the initial ScriptCompiler (or some better name) would just
turn Transcript into machine code. This would be of interest to me (hopefully
others) who want to put guarded code in
Maybe that's what I ended up doing but it was accidental!
Maybe I fell asleep at some point.
My argument is NOT against the ability to build externals to do
whatever one wishes to do, including platform-specific things if you
want to make your life more complicated and miserable or if you on
If you can write externals in Transcript syntax and NOT over-extend
the language to accommodate this demand, I don't have an issue. But
that is not generally the case. When people talk about writing
externals they generally (in my experience at least) mean they want
to make the tool do some
Dan,
Rev is chock full of stuff that I will never use. Perhaps half or
more of the commands are irrelevant to my needs. However, I see on
this list folks that love those irrelevant things in their
applications. You have your ideas about the kind of applications you
want to use Rev for.
Dan,
That's what I got from the first post, exactly. I tend to agree with
your statement and your logic is sound. (not that you need me to say
so)
I just wanted to agree to this and don't want to see Rev changed in
another direction.
Thanks
Tom
On Jun 23, 2005, at 8:20 PM, Dan Shafer wr
Rob Cozens wrote:
I'm really sorry your experience with CompileIt! was such that you
didn't get it.
I believe got it: I wrote a few dozen externals with it, bundled 'em up
into a commercial product, and they paid my rent for a year.
While I enjoyed it (or more specifically, Mark Hanrek's so
Dennis.
You make some excellent points. I don't think that *my* programming
needs should drive the direction of the language or the tool. And I'm
certainly not opposed even to *major* extensions and enhancements of
the language. My only real sticking point is that if and when new
thin
Dan-
No argument from me on that. Maybe I was the one who fell asleep, but
I didn't think anyone was arguing for features that would break the
cross-platform functionality in that way. If so, that's one of those
threads I'm not even going to bother getting involved in.
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PR
How about this:
on eq @x,y -- note x is by reference
put y into x
end eq
You can use that in the order you asked for like this:
on mouseUp
put 0 into b
eq b,7
put b -- puts 7
eq b,b+3
put b -- puts 10
end mouseUp
___
use-revolution mailin
On Jun 22, 2005, at 4:52 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
And as Geoff Canyon discovered, you can go one step further by
drawing all polygons as a single object, but just including a blank
line in the points property wherever you want a discontiguous object.
Actually, I think Tuviah told me that
Geoff Canyon wrote:
On Jun 22, 2005, at 4:52 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
And as Geoff Canyon discovered, you can go one step further by
drawing all polygons as a single object, but just including a blank
line in the points property wherever you want a discontiguous object.
Actually, I thin
Hello,
Slow code can be written in any language. Transcript makes it very
easy to write code, but also very easy to write slow code.
Could you, please, give us (newbies/intermediate scriptesr) some
examples of fast/slow script code ?
Thanks,
Christian L.
Le 24 juin 05 à 09:27, Geoff
How about this:
on eq @x,y -- note x is by reference
put y into x
end eq
You can use that in the order you asked for like this:
on mouseUp
put 0 into b
eq b,7
put b -- puts 7
eq b,b+3
put b -- puts 10
end mouseUp
Does Transcript allow pointers?!?
If so, big news to me (new in
tion? 3. Now write your code. If you find yourself writing
spaghetti code, STOP, go back to step 1.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Shafer
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 12:12 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: compileIt for revo
that some people who write books are clueless.
Jon, in hyper-curmudgeon mode
Eric Engle wrote:
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:15:28 -0400
From: Mikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: compileIt for Revolution?
To: How to use Revolution
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content
Le 23 juin 05 à 20:20, Eric Engle a écrit :
xTalk is a scripting language which is clearly derived from Pascal.
I never think of that...
Is it a real scoop I missed since 20 years, only bad news or a weird
analysis from some keyhole journalism?
:-)
Best regards from Paris,
Eric Chatonet.
Geoff:
If anyone wants to try to help me speed optimize my image processing
loops, download the obvious program from my user space. Load an image
of your choice (but hopefully larger than your screen, to be realistic),
then select Brightness, then Linear.
Let the optimization wars begin!
:
our data, whether your language is
in pcode or machine compiled, results in only milliseconds of difference.
Believe me, over 25 years of programming experience bears this out.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 1:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROT
On Jun 24, 2005, at 2:19 AM, Eric Engle wrote:
on eq @x,y -- note x is by reference
put y into x
end eq
You can use that in the order you asked for like this:
on mouseUp
put 0 into b
eq b,7
put b -- puts 7
eq b,b+3
put b -- puts 10
end mouseUp
Does Transcript allow pointers?
Dan,
Perhaps we are in perfect agreement, just expressing it differently...
I could not argue with the way you have expressed it here.
Dennis
On Jun 24, 2005, at 1:09 AM, Dan Shafer wrote:
Dennis.
You make some excellent points. I don't think that *my* programming
needs should drive th
Paul,
My thoughts pretty much mirror your own, Paul.
First step is environment independent code for parsing, arrays,
calculations.
No timeline or cost on this yet. Still seeing who's interested.
-JD
On Jun 23, 2005, at 5:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerry,
Assuming there is suffic
Dan,
I thought Tom Pittman did a very good job of maintaining the purity of
HyperTalk when he did CompileIt! Any future efforts could stand on his
shoulders in that regard.
-JD
On Jun 23, 2005, at 7:26 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
If you can write externals in Transcript syntax and NOT over-extend
Jerry Daniels wrote:
I thought Tom Pittman did a very good job of maintaining the purity of
HyperTalk when he did CompileIt! Any future efforts could stand on his
shoulders in that regard.
Just get an interface more like Mark Hanrek's please. :)
So much faster, so much simpler
--
Richar
From: Dan Shafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
Then my second favorite language was Python. The GUI-building tools
for Python are pathetic to non-existent. But the language is powerful
and elegant and extends naturally. If the PythonCard project I was
engaged in before I discovered Revolution had been
On Jun 23, 2005, at 10:09 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
Verbosity is a virtue in my mind. Not only does it make code more
readable and therefore maintainable, but I can't tell you how many
times I've just sort of guessed at what command or property change
might have some desired effect only to hav
On Jun 24, 2005, at 4:26 AM, Jon wrote:
With all due respect, Jim, if you are trying to do even simple math
on a large array of numbers (like computing a histogram of image
data), Rev is simply too slow to use. It has nothing to do with
data structures: it has to do with slow pCode trying
I already posted the code and announced it on this list: look for my
image processor in my user space, open a large image (at least
1000x1000), select Bright, and then Linear.
I look forward to seeing what you optimists ... er ... optimizers come
up with!
:)
Jon
Geoff Canyon wrote:
On
I sent this message Saturday, and it just came back to me as bounced
(because the list-server was off-line).
So here it is again - with an addendum ...
Geoff Canyon wrote:
On Jun 24, 2005, at 4:26 AM, Jon wrote:
With all due respect, Jim, if you are trying to do even simple math
on
Jon wrote:
I already posted the code and announced it on this list: look for my
image processor in my user space, open a large image (at least
1000x1000), select Bright, and then Linear.
Jon - I got an error trying to download your stack from RevOnline.
Did you try to upload it (or change i
Maybe there was one better than Mark's!
On Jun 24, 2005, at 2:30 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Jerry Daniels wrote:
I thought Tom Pittman did a very good job of maintaining the purity
of HyperTalk when he did CompileIt! Any future efforts could stand on
his shoulders in that regard.
Just get
The file doesn't appear to be accessible within RevOnline. I get an
error message file-not-found when I try it. If the code in question
is of a manageable size and format (no really long lines) then
posting it here is likely the best option. Otherwise (and in any
case), can you re-upload th
Geoff:
I already posted a message saying that you can find the stack at
www.jonbondy.com/jlbimage.rev. Another poster noted that the code has
"errors" in it, and wondered if the code was current. I pointed out
that I gave up on Rev for this particular application when it proved to
be too sl
Geoff Canyon wrote:
The file doesn't appear to be accessible within RevOnline. I get an
error message file-not-found when I try it. If the code in question
is of a manageable size and format (no really long lines) then
posting it here is likely the best option. Otherwise (and in any
case)
Alex Tweedly wrote:
There's a problem with RevOnline. Here's the central part of Jon's code
Right now I'm working on converting Jon's code to C to include within an
external. But if anyone happens to know of an easier way, or of an
External that already does this...and cares to share...then
Derek:
First off, thanks for your help.
Secondly, why convert it to C? I have already written it in
Delphi/Pascal. The whole point was to make something that was
cross-platform. If you create an external on your platform (Window?
Mac), would it automatically work on the other platforms?
Jon wrote:
First off, thanks for your help.
Not a problem.
Secondly, why convert it to C? I have already written it in
Delphi/Pascal. The whole point was to make something that was
cross-platform. If you create an external on your platform (Window?
Mac), would it automatically work on t
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
