Hi Rick,
Yes, see the index element:
If you search the code base for 'unique="true"' you should find some
examples.
Regards
Scott
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 17:23, Richard Fleming wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is there a way to define a database unique constraint when def
the array
(i.e. your empty hidden inputs).
See the servlet spec for more info, section 3.1:
https://javaee.github.io/servlet-spec/downloads/servlet-4.0/servlet-4_0_FINAL.pdf
Regards
Scott
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 at 04:49, Avijit Bose wrote:
> My code is as follows:
>
> “final
ur in some
situations (usually if shutting down the instance while the job is being
queued, due to incorrect transaction management).
Regards
Scott
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 at 21:33, Michael Brohl
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible that your job run time is longer than the 5 minutes
> scheduling
x27;t taken steps to lock down this
endpoint then you should do so ASAP. Please also share this warning with
anyone you know who might be affected but perhaps don't keep an eye on this
list.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11716
Regards
Scott
can add your average cost modifier.
Regards
Scott
On 17 April 2018 at 03:03, wrote:
> I am sure there has to be a way to genrerate a price rule without always
> adding and subtracting to or from List Price.
>
> What if I wanted to at cost plus? Or wholesale minus? Or a discount
&
seems buggy to me
based on this report.
Regards
Scott
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018, 02:31 Schumann Ye, wrote:
> Dear Deepak and Paul,
>
> Sorry that I was totally tied up with some management issues in the past
> days and was late to reply to you.
> @Deepak, as tested, the issue could
Chances are the field type was left for backwards compatibility. I'm ok
with it being removed though.
Regards
Scott
On 4 May 2017 at 15:32, Taher Alkhateeb wrote:
> Hmmm I was actually rethinking about this, and this reminds me somewhat of
> the "Bounded context" c
Took a while to dig it out but here it is:
http://ofbiz.markmail.org/thread/c6ee3ewyo6jpik7k
It's not as in-depth as I'd hoped, but it was purposefully removed all the
same.
Regards
Scott
On 3 May 2017 at 17:42, Aditya Sharma
wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> As there is very less in
It was removed purposefully and there was a discussion about it. I'd
suggest we all need to go back and look at that discussion before deciding
how to proceed.
Regards
Scott
On 1/05/2017 19:03, "Taher Alkhateeb" wrote:
> I don't have the historical context, so please ex
I get those notifications from the user list maybe once a month on my
personal gmail, not sure of the cause.
Regards
Scott
On 12/04/2017 02:44, wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think I receive messages from the list, but sometimes I get a copy of
> what I'm forwarding below...my ema
ot "absurd".
Like any other code base in the world, OFBiz contains opinionated design.
Everyone is free to discuss those opinions ad nauseam, but using strong
language such as "absurd" because you have a different opinion is
unnecessary and not constructive to the conversation.
Re
Is there any indication it consumes anything other than some small amount
of RAM after startup?
Regards
Scott
On 19 March 2017 at 22:23, Pierre Smits wrote:
> With respect to gradle that is not entirely true. As you use it to run
> OFBiz it will continue to consume hardware resources.
&g
ecific XML serialized document in return (intended for
communication between OFBiz instances I believe)
- SOAP
- XML-RPC
- JMS
But you're still going to have to do the work of wiring up the notifying
service(s) to the underlying event in the system, there's no tool that
avoids that task.
I don't know, I'm inclined to think these lists do a better job of sharing
information in a searchable manner than Jira does.
Regards
Scott
On 19/02/2017 00:36, "Jacques Le Roux" wrote:
Thanks Scott,
As I referred to the thread it could help people to fix related issues
st the account every time an
auth/transaction is recorded.
Things like that which are more problematic for general use cases than the
potential for deadlocks.
Regards
Scott
On 18 February 2017 at 23:08, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> I was referring to the bug which was in
Which bug are you referring to Jacques? FinAccount services certainly need
to be refactored but the use case that I mentioned was unusual so it
probably isn't worth fixing unless a more common scenario comes along. It
just happened to be a simple example I had on hand.
Regards
Scott
On
nAccountId",
finAccountId));
Assuming all code paths relating to modifying FinAccount data are following
this strategy then each transaction will have to queue on this update
statement until their turn comes up. Voila, deadlocks are gone.
Regards
Scott
On 16 February 2017 at 09:29, Robb Wagoner w
Hi Robb,
I've encountered similar deadlocks in the past and have simply issued an
update statement on the main row before attempting to work with any child
rows. That has the same effect as the FOR UPDATE statement but without
needing to enhance the framework.
Regards
Scott
On 16/02/2017
as a base platform
for companies needing to build something quite specific where existing out
of the box solutions no longer meet their needs. A few examples I've been
involved in:
- Employee rewards/recognition as a service
- Large scale event management (e.g. trade shows)
- Gift card buy/se
Hi Craig,
Based on the output, you probably don't want to be including the .jar
suffix, looks like gradle adds that itself.
Regards
Scott
On 13 January 2017 at 14:51, Craig Parker wrote:
> I added this:
>
> runtime 'mysql:mysql-connector-java-5.1.40-bin.jar'
>
>
nd
instead take the message in and accept what are actually perfectly fair
guidelines and carry on with our day.
Regards
Scott
On 20/12/2016 06:38, "Mike" wrote:
> As a user, I appreciate information or even marketing emails related to
> ofbiz. If not here, then where?
>
&g
qwkn
Not to mention he's starting going further and including the private list
in his communications which isn't remotely appropriate and serves zero
purpose other than to defy etiquette. If you think there is some other
interpretation available, please feel free to share it.
Regards
Scot
the feeling he sees it as some form of civil
disobedience, chances are that getting 5 complaints about it was quite
satisfying for him.
Regards
Scott
On 30/11/2016 11:25 PM, "Paul Piper" wrote:
> @Pierre: I appreciate the effort. Thanks
>
> @all: Out of 5 replies so far, there i
tte.
Many thanks
Scott
On 30 November 2016 at 21:32, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It pleases me to be abel to announce the availability of following plugin
> components on GITHUB.
> These plugins components are disentangled from the OFBiz trunk repository
> and can b
It was an unreasonable proposition and I think you know that.
I've never looked at the tarpit code to be honest, it was just the first
example of an old contribution from you that came to mind.
Regards
Scott
On 12/10/2016 19:13, "Jacques Le Roux" wrote:
> Le 11/10/2016 à 2
bug in your tarpit/ProtectedView code I wouldn't suddenly expect
you to fix it nor would I threaten to remove it.
Regards
Scott
On 7 October 2016 at 08:07, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Good, then I have no ideas and you should create a Jira and attach your
> stack trace
>
> If you don
Another possible option (which I've never tried), is to use the multi
tenancy functionality to allow two different sets of data without needing
to restart OFBiz or run multiple instances.
Regards
Scott
On 12 October 2016 at 07:40, Craig Parker wrote:
> I was initially thinking of ha
?
Regards
Scott
On 31 August 2016 at 21:16, Vogelsme wrote:
> Hey!
> I was just trying to run a persistent async service with a given requester
> and noticed that the requester itself is completely being ignored.
> I cross-checked trunk and 13/07 for that issue and both handle asyn
I'm certainly no fan of minilang. I prefer something I can step through
with a debugger.
Regards
Scott
On 9/08/2016 20:55, "Paul Piper" wrote:
> Skip,
>
> I fear that you may be right with regards to minilang and the community,
> though luckily with your own pr
o progress.
Regards
Scott
On 26 July 2016 at 19:02, 叶双明 wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> After update ofbiz to 13.07.03, our system was Unstable. At last, I found
> the cause was The transaction created in Event, introduced in revision
> 1,740,632.
> And found https://issues.apache.org
other database servers.
On 9 March 2016 at 03:35, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> I think it's a good question from Vyom. Is that only specific to MySQL? A
> specific MySQL version?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
>
> Le 29/02/2016 13:31, Vyom
();
pooledObject.getObject().setCacheState(false);
return pooledObject;
}
public DBCPPoolableManagedConnectionFactory(XAConnectionFactory
connFactory, ObjectName dataSourceJmxName) {
super(connFactory, dataSourceJmxName);
}
}
Regards
Scott
On 26 February 2016 at 19:48, Vyom Jain
It's most likely a race condition in the UtilCache getOrCreate method (the
exact name escapes me without looking). Does it a actually cause any issues
or is it just strange?
On 20 Jan 2016 11:41, "Len Shein" wrote:
> All,
>
> There have been instances where one or more of the entitycache store ge
et you one step further along.
Regards
Scott
On 3 January 2016 at 06:15, Tiwonge Kawonga
wrote:
> Here is part of log print out that may help you to help me.
> |E| Error rendering screen
> [component://order/widget/ordermgr/OrderPrintScreens.xml#CompanyLogo]:
> java.lang.IllegalArgum
That's incorrect, there is no foreign-key dependency between
SecurityGroupPermission and SecurityPermission and this is done on purpose.
Here's an old discussion on the topic:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/security-permission-td154203.html#a154208
Regards
Scott
On 29 December 201
er than caching the dom. It's a pain to change because the cached dom
is referenced all over. I believe Adrian converted it to POJOs in one of
the later versions, you could always try backporting that to your version.
Regards
Scott
On 6 Dec 2015 12:51, "Len Shein" wrote:
&
far behind then you have issues if the code
depends on the data being up to date
Regards
Scott
On 7 May 2015 08:01, "Nicolas Malin" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For a customer site I deployed an OFBiz instance connected with a readonly
> postgres database (replicated slave).
http://markmail.org/message/mzbu3i336uu6csps
As always, there's plenty of previous discussion if you search for purchase
order tax on ofbiz.markmail.org
Regards
Scott
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Christian Carlow <
christian.car...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If Accounting-&g
I'm sorry Eric I haven't ever tried it. The link I offered was mostly just
to show that it is possible and contains some clues about how it can be
done.
Regards
Scott
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Heidi Dehaes wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Can it be easily integrated with Ofb
You'd probably need to consider looking into browser extension.
VendHQ is a web-based POS SaaS and their solution to this problem is
documented here:
http://support.vendhq.com/hc/en-us/articles/201378390-Enable-kiosk-silent-printing-for-Google-Chrome-on-Windows-Video-
Regards
Scott
On Sat,
years makes it to become both committer and
> PMC member within the last 3 months of those 6 years..
You've obviously spent some time doing some serious counting there. To what
end? Do you have some issue with the outcome of those votes? Keep in mind
however that a few numbers don
questioned. This potentially decreases the quality of the code base and
results in a less maintainable and usable project. The problem is only
exacerbated if we have lots of committers who aren't willing to discuss their
work with an open mind.
Regards
Scott
On 22/10/2014, at 1:21 am, Pierre
7;s rare for things to go that far. If committers are unwilling
to approach a disagreement with an open mind then it makes life difficult for
everyone.
Regards
Scott
On 18/10/2014, at 1:04 am, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Scott,
>
> Am I correct in understanding that any contributor wi
would simply be that the potential committer
is willing to follow advice and work well with others. Neither of these things
are so strange that they'd need to be further documented IMO.
I can't speak for Jacopo or anyone else, that's just my interpretation.
Regards
Scott
On 17
sagree I'm happy to discuss it.
Regards
Scott
On 17/10/2014, at 11:19 pm, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Scott,
>
> You are correct. Yet, you forgot to mention that Jacopo used 'we' in direct
> relation to the words attitude and trust. So, he is not talking about just
> h
but they would still just be personal opinions.
Regards
Scott
On 17/10/2014, at 10:55 pm, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Jacopo,
>
> I your posting regarding the vote to keep the PROJECTMGR in releases (see
> here: http://ofbiz.markmail.org/message/maha6pwlatlxbb64 ) you addressed
> a
Tom,
You should check with your provider/gateway on what solutions they have for
recurring billing. If you store credit card data in your DB you're going to
have to go through a much higher level of PCI compliance. AFAIK, this
includes annual on site audits, etc. regardless of volume.
Many provid
ne by anyone in the community who cares enough to do
it. Not every problem can be laid solely at the feet of the PMC (IMO very few
actually can, but we obviously disagree on that).
Regards
Scott
On 3/10/2014, at 9:45 pm, Pierre Smits wrote:
> That does work for other top level projects u
munity we should all feel free to lead
the charge in any changes we'd like to see. It also important in an open
source community where all time is donated that we don't try and unnecessarily
burden others with requests that we could easily perform ourselves.
Many thanks
Scott
On 3/10/2
;t work that way for sub-projects either. A community must exist around a
given component before it can have any hope of standing on its own.
Regards
Scott
On 3/10/2014, at 7:50 pm, Ron Wheeler wrote:
> Are there a lot of outstanding JIRA issues that users want fixed?
> It is not inconce
specializing in solid
contributions to further enhance it. "Build it and they will come" is not a
valid approach to sub-project creation.
If this component is so important to some of you, why are you not contributing
to its enhancement?
Regards
Scott
On 3/10/2014, at 2:56 am, Ron Whee
Quite a novel you've written there Piere. There's so many things I'd like to
clarify in your rant but you're so far detached from the reality of how this
community works that it's gotten to the point of being pointless.
Regards
Scott
On 19 September 2014 20:59:4
eted your email in a negative light. Meritocracy can work against you
at times when community members perceive your past actions in a negative way.
Regards
Scott
On 19/09/2014, at 2:07 am, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Jacopo,
>
> This is the first (and presumably the best) place to ask t
Hello All,
We have a need for a refer a friend feature that will generate a unique code
for X% off their purchase which would automatically expire after a set
number of days. We would also like to keep track of which customer referred
who and even extend it to a point by awarding X number of loyal
transaction that executes
after the main one has committed successfully.
Regards
Scott
On 17/05/2014, at 3:46 pm, Adrian Crum
wrote:
> Deadlock issues are hard to reproduce because they are usually timing
> dependent. If your issue is easily reproducible, then most likely it is
> caused by
Thanks guys. Much appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Shopping-Cart-session-tp4650376p4650456.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi All,
On most retail ecommerce sites you can place something in your shopping
cart, close your browser, open new and return to the site only to see the
item still in your cart. The same is true for wish list. AFAIK, Ofbiz uses a
session to keep track of the cart and if you close a browser and re
No I would say it's a perfectly appropriate venue given the context of the
discussion.
Regards
Scott
On 14/03/2014, at 3:35 AM, Mike wrote:
>> I believe he is a destructive force in the community
>
> This is an inappropriate venue for personal attacks.
>
>
> On Wed
re not doing. Just to be clear,
contributing to general discussions isn't much of a contribution, it's
extremely rare that they result in anything positive actually happening.
Regards
Scott
On 7/03/2014, at 9:00 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I invite you t
Check that resource URLs aren't html encoded, some browsers fail to send cookie
information in that situation which causes a new session to be created.
Scott
On 2/01/2014, at 12:16 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> 1)
> In the backend, when having logged in a tenant, we experience that wh
Check first that the "days" variable is actually a number in the freemarker
context. It could be that the formatting is happening earlier which would
explain why your efforts to change the formatting aren't working (because the
value may already be a string).
Regards
Scott
On
tress this enough, do it now.
Regards
Scott
On 21/07/2013, at 4:03 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> CVE-2013-2250 - Apache OFBiz Nested expression evaluation allows remote users
> to execute arbitrary UEL functions in OFBiz
>
> Vendor:
> The Apache Software Foundation
>
> V
Their purpose generally depends on the association type being used. I think in
category members it is for quick add (vague memory, I haven't looked in a
while) and in product associations there are a variety of uses including
marketing packages.
Regards
Scott
On 20/06/2013, at 4:23 PM,
product C (Product D)
Because you're buying Product B and combining it into a single double pack
product it makes sense to have the single and double as separate products I
think, one for purchasing and the other for selling.
Regards
Scott
On 19/06/2013, at 9:46 AM, Robert G. wrote:
> I thou
committers. I don't know how best to
deal with the it but I do think PMC members initiating in such discussions
should consider whether they have the best interests of the project at heart
and act accordingly.
Regards
Scott
On 1/06/2013, at 12:57 PM, David E. Jones wrote:
>
> I supp
Thanks Al. More than anything we need PMC members who are helping the project
rather than hurting it.
Regards
Scott
On 31/05/2013, at 10:13 PM, Al Byers wrote:
> Valid point, Scott. I have offered to resign years ago as I am not active,
> but no one took me up on it. Sounds like yo
t management we need.
Regards
Scott
On 22/05/2013, at 10:26 PM, Al Byers wrote:
> I feel like I owe another apology to the OFBiz developers. Though my
> initial remarks were accidental (and embarrassing), I was wrong not to
> acknowledge that OFBiz has a wealth of functionality that Moqu
Oh hi Pierre, how did things go at ApacheCon Europe?
Regards
Scott
On 21/03/2013, at 6:01 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In a screen.xml I can have a pop-up window with following
> code:
>
> "ajax-window" width="1000" height="400" style=
Doubles have no place in financial transactions, the correct fix is to set a
scale on the divide operation.
Regards
Scott
On 11/01/2013, at 11:30 PM, Deepak Agarwal wrote:
> InvoiceServices.java :
>
> billingAmount =
> billingAmount.subtract(amountAlreadyIncluded.divide(bil
That is not a valid example, you should never modify the JobSandbox directly.
Use dispatcher.schedule(...)
Regards
Scott
On 9/01/2013, at 6:21 AM, mohd Viqar wrote:
> Here is an example
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Keep in mind that if your machine IP address ever changes then any jobs queued
or running at shutdown won't get picked up on restarting.
Regards
Scott
On 6/08/2012, at 3:06 PM, Sam Hamilton wrote:
> Many thanks Jacques - off to do some testing!
>
> Cheers
> Sam
>
>
h the data.
Regards
Scott
On 24/06/2012, at 2:10 PM, Brett Palmer wrote:
> The only place I have found this to be a problem is in the server hit
> entity. The server hit functionality is configurable. We disable that
> functionality. We write custom applications using the ofbiz framewo
Hi Carsten,
That kek stuff is a very new addition done by Adam, I'm not sure how closely he
follows the user list so you may want to raise this up on the dev list or in
jira. My understanding though was that kek was an optional feature so this
most likely is a bug of some sort.
Regards
Hi Indela,
You need to set a Facility on your Product Store.
Data: ProductStore.facilityId
Screen: Catalog -> Stores
Regards
Scott
On 9/05/2012, at 12:17 AM, indela wrote:
> hi all,
> i added catalog, categories and product. but when i was browse products
> throw exception is lik
s, I understand that you think your
messages are very important but I can assure you they are no more important
that anyone else's and we all seem to get by just fine by choosing one list to
post our messages to. It's just basic netiquette.
Regards
Scott
On 8/05/2012, at 8:46 AM, Pie
Please stop posting to both lists.
Thanks
Scott
On 8/05/2012, at 1:54 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Did you know that OFBiz contains a solution delivering a help to each
> screen accessed? And do you use it?
>
> Currently for following applications/components
Exactly, you need to perform (or have on performed on your behalf) analysis of
the site. There are plenty of OFBiz sites out there that perform just fine
with nothing much more than correctly configured cache settings.
Regards
Scott
On 3/05/2012, at 1:06 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> This thr
In regards to one part of that post, I wouldn't recommend disabling Visit
tracking for ecommerce unless you have some other type of analytics in place.
It can be an invaluable resource for tracking down slow pages and also aid in
locating requests are causing errors in the logs.
Regards
I don't think "evolving" is the right word to use. How about "stable" :-)
Regards
Scott
On 27/04/2012, at 9:35 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Yes, it's maybe not that clear. It's in opposite to frozen branch. We decided
> to no longer backport bug fixe
What exactly does "evolving branch" mean?
Regards
Scott
On 27/04/2012, at 7:27 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems, though he did not annouce it (yet?), Christian finished the demos
> rotation. So now we have:
>
> demo-trunk.ofbiz.apa
Hey All,
I know it's trivial but the "OFBiz home is here" link on nabble at the
following page http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/ points to www.ofbiz.org
which is dead. I guess it should be pointing to ofbiz.apache.org?
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/OFBiz-H
o check for regardless if anything was to move into OFBiz proper.
Thanks
Scott
On 10/04/2012, at 2:07 PM, Nick Rosser wrote:
> Scott,
>
> Np. We'll update this all tomorrow. Not sure what you mean by 're-used'.
> Anyway, I don't believe there is anything that is not
l to us if you could call that out in the license
notice as well.
Thanks!
Scott
On 7/04/2012, at 11:42 PM, Nick Rosser wrote:
> Yes
>
> Nick
> C: 516.901.1720
> nros...@salmonllc.com
>
> On Apr 6, 2012, at 1:29 AM, Jacopo Cappellato
> wrote:
>
>> Do you mea
The main issue regardless of the URL being hit is that JSON responses return
the entire request attribute map. It is IMO a problem that we've always used
the request attributes directly to pass data from events to views.
Regards
Scott
On 6/04/2012, at 10:09 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Nick,
Any progress on the licensing situation for the project? As an OFBiz committer
I can't really look at your code without fear of tainting my open source work
until I know what the license is.
Regards
Scott
On 30/03/2012, at 4:19 AM, Nick Rosser wrote:
> OFBiz users,
>
Hi Boris,
You could consider implementing a custom preprocessor event that does its own
auth check and redirects as appropriate.
Regards
Scott
On 4/04/2012, at 6:45 AM, Boris Hamanov wrote:
> Hi guys and gals,
>
> My case is that I need to make the default ecommerce app to be acc
We update from the trunk every other month or so, merge our code and then
test and eventually go live. Seems to work out pretty well too.
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/SEO-friendly-URL-tp4472158p4475075.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at N
I'll see how that method works. Thanks.
Scott Spillmann
Software Engineer
Factor500, Inc.
sco...@factor500.com
(919) 354 - 1366
On 02/16/2012 06:36 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I meant to look beyond the data model and view OFBiz as a platform for
business solutions. If the platform accommo
h
because this is a conversion from MS Access. So, the first thing to do
is understand how our old data fits the new model. I know it fits, just
not sure how.
Scott Spillmann
Software Engineer
Factor500, Inc.
sco...@factor500.com
(919) 354 - 1366
On 02/16/2012 06:14 PM, Adrian Crum
7;ll be writing custom screens for this.
Can this model be done with Products and variants, or do I need to do
some extending of base entities?
Thanks
--
Scott Spillmann
Software Engineer
Factor500, Inc.
e a better choice IMO.
Regards
Scott
On 28/01/2012, at 8:49 AM, Info Olagos wrote:
> Jacopo,
>
> So what is then the most intelligent to upgrade from version 09.04 ?
>
> To release 10.04 or to the trunk?
>
> Heidi
>
> 2012/1/27 Jacopo Cappellato :
>> Jus
h a paper statement
close period
create reports
-Scott
st consider the main service to be
set as run-on-error="false" permanently.
Aside from this there is the whole issue of transactions to consider, if a
service error results in a transaction rollback then that will effect all other
service calls executed within the same transaction.
R
t eca with ignore-error="false" that
when executed it returns an error, and you then you have an "invoke" event eca
with run-on-error="false" then this eca will not be executed because an error
condition exists.
Regards
Scott
On 6/09/2011, at 11:56 AM, Anne wrote:
If this and the rental item topic are things that you plan on committing then
the discussion really belongs in the dev list.
Regards
Scott
On 30/08/2011, at 4:30 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
> this is the service to a product the customer delivers adhoc, not the
> products owned by the compa
"context" in groovy typically refers to a screen context (that's where the bulk
of the groovy scripts in OFBiz are run from). There is no context for request
events so you need to put your data in the request attributes, anything placed
in there will end up in the screen context.
${StringUtil.wrapString(custRequestItem.story)}
Regards
Scott
On 3/08/2011, at 3:43 AM, Gavin Mabie wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> I have added a visual-editor-enable="true" element to the story field in the
> EditCustRequestItem form. The HTML markup is now saved in the
If you're trying to do this from within the screen widget then it is too late
at that point because the response has moved past that point. You'll need to
do it from a request event.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 27/07/2011, at 7:53 PM, Ajay Lashkari wr
> First, you start out with the latest and greatest, even if there may
> be a couple of non-blocking issues.
This sentence is so completely biased it's ridiculous. I've said my piece and
have nothing further to add.
Regards
Scott
On 26/07/2011, at 4:52 PM, Mike wrote:
>
time to
create and maintain and a relatively small amount of OFBiz is covered by them.
Using a released version requires much less work and virtually no risk of
regression between minor releases.
Regards
Scott
On 26/07/2011, at 2:57 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
> If errors come back, why not ad
1 - 100 of 1318 matches
Mail list logo
