I surrender! Thank you very much!
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
On 5/2/06, Kyle W. Cartmell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Within my web application (using the Struts action framework) when
validation of an ActionForm fails and control is returned to the JSP
indicated by struts-config.xml, any request a
On 5/2/06, Kyle W. Cartmell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Within my web application (using the Struts action framework) when
validation of an ActionForm fails and control is returned to the JSP
indicated by struts-config.xml, any request attributes that were passed
to that JSP originally are lost be
The fact that you are getting 2 messages makes sense as you are running
validation against both the fields. It does not matter if the arg key is
the same. That would just pick the same message from your properties
file twice.
You could try using the validWhen validator and accociating that
validat
Use Validate method instead Validator framework
On 4/24/06, Dinesh Mehra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using struts 1.1
>
> I have two textboxes (username, password).
> My requirements is
> - I need to display a standard error message when both the fields are
> empty
> or when eith
gokul balasubramanian wrote:
Guys,
I am yet to find a solution for this problem. I validate a form and if validation returned errors, which it does in this case y is the action still being called? even worse the errors are displayed on the action page than on the input page. baffles me. how d
Gokul,
Why don't you just pull the source code and debug it. If you had done
that, by now you would have found a solution to your problem.
Thanks,
Vijay Venkataraman
gokul balasubramanian wrote:
Guys,
I am yet to find a solution for this problem. I validate a form and if validation return
Hi
i found the solution i was looking for :
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsDeprecatedActionErrors
Thank you for those who tried to help me.
Thibaut Lassalle
Thibaut a écrit :
Hi
I have all the time the same problem and there is a week i try to
solve it. It should be trivial but i can
Dave Newton a écrit :
Thibaut wrote:
In the WEB-INF/user/struts-config.xml
type="com.cvdunet.controller.action.UpdateResponsesForRequestAction"
input="essai.html"
Your input page is an HTML file?
Yes it's just to test my "return mapping.getInputForw
Thibaut wrote:
> In the WEB-INF/user/struts-config.xml
>
>
> type="com.cvdunet.controller.action.UpdateResponsesForRequestAction"
> input="essai.html"
Your input page is an HTML file?
Dave
-
To
Hi
I did what you tell me to do. Here is the simpliest thing that does'nt
work :
In the WEB-INF/user/struts-config.xml
type="com.cvdunet.controller.action.UpdateResponsesForRequestAction"
input="essai.html"
name="candidateForm"
scope
There are several things you can do to test. Your blank page has me
wondering if you are really even getting to where you 'think' you are.
The first thing you need to figure out is if what you think is happening
is really happening. Debugging Struts stuff can be a pain I know:)
I haven't seen
I use the libraries i found in the struts-mailreader app in the struts
1.2.8 zip file.
But i still have commons-digester.jar 1.5 because my app use rss object ...
Can it be the problem ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
Rick Reumann a écrit :
Thibaut wrote the following on 3/22/2006 10:18 AM:
I did but it still doesn't work ... still have the blank page instead.
What do the error logs say?
In my /usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/logs/localhost_log.2006-03-22.txt
there are just informations but no error ...
Thibaut wrote the following on 3/22/2006 10:18 AM:
I did but it still doesn't work ... still have the blank page instead.
What do the error logs say?
--
Rick
http://www.learntechnology.net
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
On 3/22/06, Thibaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did but it still doesn't work ... still have the blank page instead.
>
> Did i do something wrong with actionMessages and actionErrors ?
> Is it "" ?
> Is it "errors.add(ActionMessages.GLOBAL_MESSAGE, error);" ?
ActionErrors.GLOBAL_MESSAGE is inhe
I did but it still doesn't work ... still have the blank page instead.
Did i do something wrong with actionMessages and actionErrors ?
Is it "" ?
Is it "errors.add(ActionMessages.GLOBAL_MESSAGE, error);" ?
Vinit Sharma a écrit :
If it is returning to a blank page then looks like your input is
If it is returning to a blank page then looks like your input is wrong.
Change input to:
input="/missions_copyMailToBasket.jsp"
I believe this page is in the same dir as of close.jsp and mycv.jsp
Thanks,
On 3/22/06, Thibaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The problem is that if the validate(mapp
The problem is that if the validate(mapping,req) method return a not
null errors object it goes on a blank page.
None of the validations that work with Struts1.0 work with Struts1.2.8 ...
I prefere to validate my form by putting the validate="true" in the
struts-config.xml
Thank you for your h
validate="true" just means that the validate(mapping,req) method will
be called and forwarded back to the inputForward before you get to the
action. But as you call it in the action this shouldn't matter..
Are things going wrong in the validate method (i.e. does errors.size()
return zero even when
Thank you for your quick reply !
I really don't know what is the difference between what i do and the
"struts-mailreader" exemple
I already did what you write here. In fact it was the first think i did.
I have this problem for *all my actions* in my app.
So the code is :
Hi
Howecome you have validate="false"? If you want validation, then set it to true
Hermod
-Original Message-
From: Thibaut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 11:41 AM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: Validation Problem
Hi
I have all the time the same problem
Thx I forgot to add the line : key="${var:minlength}" resource="false" position="1"/> to my
configuration file.
But I have allways the javascript warning under firefox 1.5 (I am using
Struts 1.3) :
*Avertissement : reference to undefined property this[varName]
*
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I don'
I don't see any warnings when I try out the struts-examples webapp (latest
1.2.x version) with Firefox 1.5 - in the validator examples the "Javascript
Registration Form" uses minlength on the name fields and it worked with no
problem.
The problem with your error message is that you're not specifyi
No, no database access in the action form - yech, bleh, ptui! :-)
General principle: Form > Action > Business Layer > DAO > Database.
Errors and messages from the lower layers can be handled via the
Action.saveMessages() method, then exploited via the
structures in the .jsp.
hth,
On 2/23/06, S
Action has some convenience methods for saving errors - you can do something
like the following in your Action's execute method:
if () {
ActionMessages errors = new ActionMessages();
errors.add("myProperty",
new ActionMessage("myProperty.error"));
sav
I used the latest version of validator jar (commons-validator-1.2.0.jar). I
had to update struts.jar also and the TLDs from an earlier version to the
latest version for validator to work fine. Now I am getting the following
exception.
[1/30/06 16:51:29:689 EST] 759dc768 InsertTag E
org.apache.st
Mention the JSP as value to your input attribute.
-
Bring words and photos together (easily) with
PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.
This is what's happening:
1) User submit form with invalid data to /Control.do
2) Struts finds action mapping for /Control.do and sees validate="true"
3) Struts call's the form's validate()
4) validate returns false
5) Since validation fails, Struts forwards to the "input" url
6) Go to step 2
The
problem with Validator. Hope it works
for you too.
From: Karthik Manimaran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Validation Issue
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:42:11 -0500
Hi,
I tried this. Using debug info I can see t
Make your input="something.jsp"
-
What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos
Yes. Tried the same and it works now.
I got a different problem now though.
The following action results in validation being called recursively
resulting in server crash.
If I remove the input attribute a server exception is thrown. How can I make
a page submit to itself on validat
I am not saying this is your problem, but I've had times where jar files get
seemingly corrupted for no reason. I haven't figured out why but at least
twice a year a JAR file just dies on me. Try reinstalling Struts and copy the
default validation files out and start from there.
Paul
I get the following error:
[1/29/06 17:35:13:701 EST] 4e5645a ValidatorPlug I
org.apache.struts.validator.ValidatorPlugIn Loading validation rules file
from '/WEB-INF/validator-rules.xml'
[1/29/06 17:35:13:721 EST] 4e5645a ServletInstan E SRVE0100E: Did not
realize init() exception thrown by serv
The validation can silently fail if it is not configured correctly. Make sure
you have the plug-in correctly configured with the 2 validation files -- one
for the validators and the other your validation forms.
Also if you upgraded to a new version of Validator your validator
configurati
Hi,
I tried this. Using debug info I can see that the validate method is being
called. But no errors are being returned.
Thanks and regards,
Karthik.
On 1/29/06, Angelo zerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Name of form into validation.xml is the path of your Action
> and not the name of yo
Karthik,
I don't think you will be able to access your query parameter when you
post your form. Your action attribute in your html:form tag should just
be /Control
Have you looked at the struts-example application?
-Richard
Karthik Manimaran wrote:
Hi,
I am using the validator framework f
Hi,
Name of form into validation.xml is the path of your Action
and not the name of your Action :
Declare in your AplicationResources
(see example into validator-rules.xml)
errors.required={0} is required.
privacyPrefForm.strFirstName=First name
Regards
Angelo
2006/1/29, Karthik
This is the form definition
The JSP file is as follows:
<%@ page language="java" %>
<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-html.tld" prefix="html" %>
<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-bean.tld" prefix="bean" %>
<%@ taglib uri="/WEB-INF/struts-logic.tld" prefix="logic" %>
Errors Not Present
What is the form definition for privacyPrefForm? Where is the tag for
your strFirstName field in your form?
Are you using a debugger at all?
-Richard
Karthik Manimaran wrote:
Hi,
I am using the validator framework for form validation. Validation doesnt
seem to happen and no error messages a
I tried subclassing both ValidatorForm and ValidatorActionForm and it still
doesnt work. Checked the properties too. I even tried using a custom error
message using resource="false"
This is always evaluating to true even if I submit the form with errors.
Errors Not Present
On 1/29/06, Paul Ben
Make sure you're using the right validator class. The ValidatorForm keys off
the formname,
ValidatorActionForm keys off the action name. This has happened to me before.
Also make sure your
properties are named the same.
Paul
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tir
Hello,
I don't know what exactly you are doing, whre you are calling the validation
condition.
But still i have a copule of alternative for you, just try. Hope your
problem will be solved. Because i had same problem and i solved that by
applying this teh.
Solution:
Step1. Your actio
Niall:
I took your recommendation and removed the action chaning from my struts
config. I am still not seeing any error text. Here is my new action
mapping:
On 1/27/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On 1/26/06, Daniel Kies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello. I am trying to do some standard validations, but I am failing. Any
> ideas why? I know the errors are getting raised as the request is
> forwarding back to the initial page making the request, but the error
> messages are not showing on
Either one would work, to be consistent with other struts tags I am using,
html:text is probably better. This doesn't affect the validation issue.
On 1/26/06, Thomas Garben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dan,
>
> Should you be using"
> instead of:
>
>
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
>
> Daniel Kies <[EMAIL PR
Dan,
Should you be using"
Tom
Daniel Kies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/26/2006 04:07 PM
Please respond to
"Struts Users Mailing List"
To
Struts Users Mailing List
cc
Subject
Validation problems
Hello. I am trying to do some standard validations, but I am failing. Any
ideas why? I k
Oops, noted...
Paul Benedict wrote:
Laurie, one thing to correct:
Issue: addition of a 'org.apache.struts.action.CANCEL' parameter to any request
will cause
validation to be skipped, but the rest of the request processing / action
invocation cycle to
proceed normally
Should read:
Issue: add
This discussion has moved to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Please
join in there rather than causing the discussion to maintain two
parallel branches.
If you aren't yet subscribed to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, there are
several forum-like options:
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread
But what do you guys mean by lookin for a canceled method in the Action.
I think that the best would be to implement a Cancelable interface if your
Action is cancelable.
You would have to do this in all kind of Actions (DispatchAction too) by the
way.
Or is having interfaces very unstrutsish?
Tam
On Mon, January 23, 2006 9:54 am, Rick Reumann said:
> The solution I would like to see is if the canceled param is passed to
> the Action, it tries to look for a "canceled" method in the Action. I
> know this makes the Action like a DispatchAction but in this regard I
> don't think the non-Dispatc
On 1/23/06, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I supposed I should reply to this on the dev list but since this
> thread is so long now I figured I'd add a bit more on the topic here.
> I see Paul/Frank what the concern is, but I think the 'problem' needs
> to be clarified a bit more. The
I supposed I should reply to this on the dev list but since this
thread is so long now I figured I'd add a bit more on the topic here.
I see Paul/Frank what the concern is, but I think the 'problem' needs
to be clarified a bit more. The problem, in my opinion, really only
occurs when someone is try
Rick Reumann wrote:
The approach isn't invalid as far as basic validation, but for security
I'd say it was not the best way to handle it. Let me ask you and Paul
this... how many times do you see Struts application's built where if
you are "Role A" you see X Y Z links but if you are "Role B" yo
Rick,
It's a security risk because you're allowing in non-validated data. You could
pass in good data,
bad data, malicious data, etc. You could pass in a string that's a million
characters to your
database, perhaps characters that will appear in SQL, wrong ranges of numbers,
constantly causing
Paul Benedict wrote:
I don't do any business validation with the Validator; I just make sure I get
proper data formats
so that everything is in proper format when going into the service layers. I
want XYZ to be
integers and ABC to be strings.
Then where is the big 'security' risk? Worst case
Rick,
I don't do any business validation with the Validator; I just make sure I get
proper data formats
so that everything is in proper format when going into the service layers. I
want XYZ to be
integers and ABC to be strings.
Paul
__
Do You Yah
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
You may be 100% right, but it's not especially relevant to this... I'm
sure you wouldn't say the solution is for everyone who is using
automatic validation now to rewrite their apps, are you? :)
No you are right there. I know people like the automatic validation
stu
Laurie, one thing to correct:
Issue: addition of a 'org.apache.struts.action.CANCEL' parameter to any request
will cause
validation to be skipped, but the rest of the request processing / action
invocation cycle to
proceed normally
Should read:
Issue: addition of a 'org.apache.struts.taglib.ht
>>(Some of?) the DispactAction variants dispatch to a special method and aren't
>> subject to the
consequences listed above, but most action implementations don't.
Rick, let me correct something here:
The DispatchAction variants are also subject to the problem with
validate="true" WHEN there is
Rick Reumann wrote:
2) Use a DispatchAction. I really don't get why some of you are against
them:) Do you make separate "DaoForCreate" and "DaoForUpdate" objects?
My guess is you have one Dao that handles CRUD for a particular type of
concern. To me it's just annoying having separate actions f
OK, transplanted to dev then :)
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Excellent summary Laurie, thanks! I think you captured all the
pertinent information clearly and concisely. I just suggested to Paul
to open a ticket for this as well, that should probably be mentioned
(with a ticket # if available whe
Not going to rehash the issues including the issues in the new thread
started by Michael and the summary brought up by Laurie in that thread
(and yes Franks this thread is nested, somehow michael's message started
with a new messageId which breaks into a new top level thread for those
clients t
Excellent summary Laurie, thanks! I think you captured all the
pertinent information clearly and concisely. I just suggested to Paul
to open a ticket for this as well, that should probably be mentioned
(with a ticket # if available when you post). Two minor comments below...
Frank
Laurie H
[Moved to a top-level thread, as this doesn't have anything to do with
(either of) the thread(s) it was nested in! :-)]
I think this thread deserves discussion on the dev list, but before I
move it over I thought I'd post a summary to make sure I've captured all
the arguments. I've also added
P.S., Paul, I'd suggest going ahead and opening a ticket for this and
reference this thread... say that a couple of different solutions were
suggested and patches can be easily created once a consensus on the
right answer is reached (I know you said you'd create a patch, and I
would too if nece
Paul Benedict wrote:
Cancelable Actions (independently on the Action type: normal Actions,
DispatchActions) could
even implement a Cancelable interface with a cancel method.
Tamas, good one. I thought of this too but never mentioned it because
implementing interfaces
doesn't seem too cool/acc
On 1/21/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try it yourself!! Just add "?org.apache.struts.taglib.html.CANCEL=true" to
> any GET URL and your
> execute() method will magically be called as if you didn't have any
> validation added to your code.
Calling ActionForm.validate() explicitly
>> Cancelable Actions (independently on the Action type: normal Actions,
>> DispatchActions) could
even implement a Cancelable interface with a cancel method.
Tamas, good one. I thought of this too but never mentioned it because
implementing interfaces
doesn't seem too cool/accepted in the Strut
>> If everyone used dispatch-type Actions, I would disagree because then it
>> would just be a matter
of providing a cancel() method and making sure that got called.
There's actually a funny bug here. cancel() method ALWAYS gets called in a
dispatch action BUT
it's default behavior is to retur
>
> Interestingly, the doc for the cancel tag *does* say that validate()
> won't be called and that the Action will be called normally. I never
> noticed this before. So, at least no one can claim this behavior isn't
> documented :)
Yes, but if you don't want to use the cancel tag you probably
If everyone used dispatch-type Actions, I would disagree because then it
would just be a matter of providing a cancel() method and making sure
that got called. But, since not everyone does (including me whenever I
can avoid it), that's not the end of the story.
Interestingly, the doc for the
I'm not sure this solves the problem Rick... partially it does...
As Paul pointed out, the cancel function itself is a legitimate case.
In that situation, you wouldn't want the form to be populated (you
wouldn't care if it was or wasn't I suppose, but ideally why bother
doing the extra work?)
All of this just adds *ONE MORE REASON* to my list of *NEVER EVER* use
validate="true". I always call validation manually from my Action class
and the sooner people get into a habit of this the way better off they
will be. If you validate or call the form's validate method manually
from your Ac
Tamas Szabo on 22/01/06 07:30, wrote:
There is a legitimate case: when an form can be cancelled, you do
want to skip client-side and server-side validation. That's just
fine because in these case you do want to call the cancelled()
method from DispatchAction, dump out any state you collected, an
Hi!
Very interesting problem!
In my oppinion is clearly a bug!
On 1/22/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> >>I can't think of a good reason it wouldn't call validate() too, like any
> other request, just
> because the action was canceled. Like I said, maybe someone can come up
> wi
>>I can't think of a good reason it wouldn't call validate() too, like any
>>other request, just
because the action was canceled. Like I said, maybe someone can come up with a
reasonable
explanation for that behavior, but I can't see it :)
There is a legitimate case: when an form can be cancell
That is of course the other angle on this... maybe you can argue that
this is only a substantial security problem in certain contrived
situations... ok, fine :) ... but, as Paul points out, it makes it
exceedingly easy to break an application. That's a Denial Of Service
risk, so it still falls
Rick Reumann wrote:
Maybe I'm missing how the above would happen. How would passing in the
canceled parameter end up getting them access to a table? Oh wait, maybe
this is with regular Actions with just an execute? It's been so long
since I used a non Dispatch Action I'm not aware of the behavi
Rick you said:
>> I must still be missing something.. what is the big deal here? If you don't
>> code to handle the
cancel nothing serious can happen, and if you do code for a cancel, what's the
worst case
scenario?
Yes, you are missing something :) If you don't code the cancel, then your
act
Rick,
I think my concern is valid. I am sorry you don't find this a "big deal" but I
wonder how many
sites actually use validation to make sure they defend against bad input, only
to find out I can
pass in a request paramter to simply skip their checking. I mean, that's a
pretty big deal in my
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
Now, imagine a hacker wants to get to a completely different table in
the database (I suppose reading from a selected table would be a better
example, but I digress). To do so, they can pass in the canceled
parameter and whatever table name they want, assuming they c
Rick Reumann wrote:
Paul Benedict wrote:
The problem isn't that Struts allows the user to cancel an action, but
that EVERY action can be
cancelled.
I must still be missing something.. what is the big deal here? If you
don't code to handle the cancel nothing serious can happen, and if you
d
Paul Benedict wrote:
The problem isn't that Struts allows the user to cancel an action, but that
EVERY action can be
cancelled.
I must still be missing something.. what is the big deal here? If you
don't code to handle the cancel nothing serious can happen, and if you
do code for a cancel,
>> Arguably, by default you would want to say that all Actions are either
>> cancelable or not,
rather than having to set something on all mappings. Just my superficial
thinking about it though
:)
Agreed. That's why I recommend a property default with overrides
at the
level.
Better solution
Frank,
I am getting your emails delivered twice to the list today. Are you click happy
today? :) haha
Maybe mine are getting delivered twice; please tell me if so.
As for the bug/issue, I mainly use MappingDispatchAction and so there's no
reason to specifically
code for isCancelled() BUT I
Paul Benedict wrote:
Hmm, maybe I don't understand the problem... as I understand it, cancel
essentially has no
effect on anything in Struts unless you manually check for it and act
accordingly, correct? Or
are you saying that everything happens *except* validation?
Correct. Cancel has no ef
> Hmm, maybe I don't understand the problem... as I understand it, cancel
> essentially has no
effect on anything in Struts unless you manually check for it and act
accordingly, correct? Or
are you saying that everything happens *except* validation?
Correct. Cancel has no effect unless you reli
Paul Benedict wrote:
The problem isn't that Struts allows the user to cancel an action, but that
EVERY action can be
cancelled.
Understood...
This problem is heavily felt by GET requests because URLs are easy to mangle...
and parameters can
be added ad-hoc. I can take any action I use for
Frank,
Good response. Let me add some to it:
The problem isn't that Struts allows the user to cancel an action, but that
EVERY action can be
cancelled.
This problem is heavily felt by GET requests because URLs are easy to mangle...
and parameters can
be added ad-hoc. I can take any action I u
Hmm... is it truly a security hole? That's an interesting question...
I'm not so sure I would consider it one because in general you can play
a lot of games with a Struts-based app (and really just about any
webapp, although JSF is nice in this regard in that, AFAIK, everything
is POST-based)
I want to correct a statement here. What can be passed in is
"org.apache.struts.taglib.html.CANCEL" or
"org.apache.struts.taglib.html.CANCEL.X" which will set
the cancelled flag.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam prote
http://struts.apache.org/struts-taglib/tlddoc/html/messages.html
L.
Thomas Garben wrote:
Niall,
Thanks for the hint.
Did you mean "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
01/20/2006 10:58 AM
Please respond to
"Struts Users Mailing List"
To
"Struts User
Niall,
Thanks for the hint.
Did you mean
01/20/2006 10:58 AM
Please respond to
"Struts Users Mailing List"
To
"Struts Users Mailing List"
cc
Subject
Re: Validation Asterisk
*
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Garben" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
*
Niall
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Garben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 2:41 PM
Subject: Validation Asterisk
> Hello
> Does anyone know how to easily get an Asterisk next to a field that fails
> Struts validation?
> I know of the LabelTag by E. Hatche
Rick Reumann wrote:
Sony Thomas wrote the following on 1/13/2006 8:34 AM:
1. You can set the validate attribute to false in struts-config and
then in the action you can call the validate method.
inside the action
This is the approach I like to use:
http://www.learntechnology.net/validate-m
I was able to solve the problem. The problem was I was
calling the URL for the form directly from the
browser. Fixed the problem..
Thanks
Maha
--- Mahadevan Venkataraman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Here is the stack trace that I got from the
> catalina.log
>
> Maha
>
>
>
> Jan 11, 20
Sony Thomas wrote the following on 1/13/2006 8:34 AM:
1. You can set the validate attribute to false in struts-config and then
in the action you can call the validate method.
inside the action
This is the approach I like to use:
http://www.learntechnology.net/validate-manually.do (bottom of
Hi,
you can solve this problem two three ways.
1. You can set the validate attribute to false in struts-config and then
in the action you can call the validate method.
inside the action
either by : form.validate(request,mapping)
or by : suppose it is UserForm
UserForm userForm = (UserF
can u send ur struts_config.xml file with validator plugin and mentioning
message_resource class in that file.
also pls send ur jsp in which u want to print error messages.
regards
vasu
Quoting Mahadevan Venkataraman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> Here is more info on the
Here is the stack trace that I got from the
catalina.log
Maha
Jan 11, 2006 3:05:52 PM
org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorForm validate
SEVERE:
org.apache.struts.validator.FieldChecks.validateRequired(java.lang.Object,
org.apache.commons.validator.ValidatorAction,
org.apache.commons.vali
501 - 600 of 948 matches
Mail list logo
