ith Routed mode you'll have
full control of the public IPs assigned.
There will be a session by Wei Zhoue showcasing this new mode in the next CCC
on Friday 22nd of November at 11:30am (CEST): https://www.cloudstackcollab.org/
Cheers,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Bi
s not used nearly as often as the rest.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Tiang
Sent: 01 September 2024 21:48
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Port Forwarding in Network
Hey Alex
Noted on this, will lo
Hi Bryan,
Indeed, your use case is extreme, I'd highly recommend using more networks with
less autoscale groups.
On making the VRs redundant, that will take even more resources than standalone
routers and won't really give you much extra uptime.
Regards,
Alex
-Origin
al VM.
In this initial implementation there's no load balancer in ROUTED mode, so no
Autoscale groups. But it is definitely a possible improvement for future
versions.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Tiang
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2024 11:11 AM
To: users@cloudsta
Hi Cristian,
What's the use case there?
Also, which type of network are you using?
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: cristian.c@istream.today
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2024 7:24 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Update CIDR - Isolated network - ACS 4.18.3
.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=315492858
Cheers,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Marty Godsey
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 11:07 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Port Forwarding in Network
Thank you, Alex. I am excited about that addition.
Definitely, also with pure routing the VR can handle at least double the
bandwidth.
-Original Message-
From: Marty Godsey
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 11:07 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Port Forwarding in Network
Thank you, Alex. I am excited about that
to use
Shared Networks, but then end users can't deploy the networks themselves
without operator intervention.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Jayanth Babu A
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2024 10:27 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Port Forwarding in Networ
In the past I've just run MacOS on top of ESX, it should run fine on KVM as
well.
If you want to ensure you don't break Apple's EULA you can install ESX or KVM
on Apple hardware.
Regards,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Tiang
Sent: Wednesday, August 14,
VEEAM and
CloudStack wouldn't know that the backups exist.
Regards
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Trung Pham Minh
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2024 12:09 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Question about Veeam
Hi CloudStack Team,
What are the differences when Veeam is
/addHost.html
* Alex
[photo]<http://www.ussignal.com/>
Alex Dietrich
Senior Network Engineer, US Signal
616-233-5094 | www.ussignal.com<https://www.ussignal.com>
| adietr...@ussignal.com<mailto:adietr...@ussignal.com>
201 Ionia Ave SW, Grand Rapids, MI
49503<https://m
Rohit,
I think Jordan is referring to the KVM Host add process. Per the API
documentation for addHost, it requires username and password and does not
appear to support using SSH keys.
Am I correct in my understanding of your question Jordan?
Thanks,
Alex
[photo]<http://www.ussignal.
-domain.
Is there something I am missing here, or is this currently a limitation of the
permissions around ISOs and templates?
Thanks,
Alex
[__tpx__]
process.
The Agent logs also reflect issues obtaining CPU speed via lscpu, but I am not
convinced that is related.
The only fix I have found so far is to reinstall the agent, then remove and
re-add the host in CloudStack.
Thanks,
Alex
[__tpx__]
sees the management servers as “Down”. That
being said, I can attempt that and keep that as a fix should I run across this
in future upgrade.
* Alex
[__tpx__]
From: Rohit Yadav
Date: Tuesday, July 23, 2024 at 4:52 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Management Server issues
It doesn't sound like it's ACS related.
With access ports it would definitely not work. Have you created all VLANs in
the switch?
Cheers,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Stan
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2024 2:47 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: No
Hi Alessandro,
I'd try removing the hosts from the vCenter inventory and adding again, maybe
with a new name. I had similar issues in the past and that did the trick.
Cheers,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Alessandro Caviglione
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2024 11:32 AM
To:
rom CloudStack via apt.
I haven’t delved too much deeper for other issues, but I am wondering if
something got hosed on the upgrade for one of my management servers. What would
be the recommended course of action to attempt to repair?
* Alex
Hello Jimmy,
There should be the option to “Patch System VMs” from the instance menu in each
System VM. There is a pretty good article on this process in the docs that I
found particularly helpful.
https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/upgrading/upgrade/upgrade-4.18.html
Thanks,
Alex
Hi Piotr,
When attempting to add the NIC did you stop the instance?
I've found to add additional volumes I had to stop the instance to avoid this
error. That being said, I've definitely added a NIC while the instance is
running.
Thanks,
Alex
[photo]<http://www.ussignal.com>
point without any configured
management server to interact with.
* Alex
[photo]<http://www.ussignal.com>
Alex Dietrich
Senior Network Engineer, US Signal
616-233-5094 | www.ussignal.com<https://www.ussignal.com>
| adietr...@ussignal.com<mailto:adietr...@ussignal.co
loses power, any data in
memory might be lost, leading to possible corruption.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Mauro Ferraro - G2K Hosting
Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 3:36 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: NFS Eager Write
Hi all, how are you?
we have been seeing tha
Hi Muhammad,
Are you planning on using VXLAN or bridges? Those are mutually exclusive, with
VXLAN you have a single VLAN interface with an IP which is the VTEP (Virtual
Tunnel EndPoint) for your VXLAN encapsulated traffic.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Muhammad Hanis Irfan
+1 on that, keeping it hypervisor agnostic is key.
-Original Message-
From: Nux
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 10:14 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Storage Filesystem as a First Class Feature
Thanks Piotr,
This is the seco
Hi Piotr,
> Overall, CloudStack has been heading in the right direction lately :-)
That's great to hear :)
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Piotr Pisz
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 8:04 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [
Fair points, thanks for the input.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 4:38 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Wei ZHOU
Cc: Wei Zhou ; Abhisar Sinha
; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Storage Filesystem as a
Hi Ahmed,
The single most important piece of advice I can give you is to make a copy of
your ACS database, load it on a lab MySQL server, setup your current version of
ACS and then run the upgrade in your lab with the production database. That
will help avoid most issues.
Cheers
Alez
Alex
would the benefits
be? (I've quickly looked at Wido's links, but I rather get info from you guys
directly).
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 10:50 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Abhisar Sinha
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Storag
x27;d like to keep this one as simple as we can for now.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 6:43 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; Abhisar Sinha
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Storage Filesystem as a First Class Feature
Op 04/06/202
That's a major technical debt that should have been addressed years ago. Am
glad to see it is being addressed now.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Abhisar Sinha
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2024 6:04 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [Proposal] Storage Filesystem
on to allow end users to use the more advanced features.
Without an SDN end users are limited to creating IPSEC tunnels between VPCs.
With operator intervention you could potentially set up routing between VPCs
using private gateways.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Ré
quot; state after a
kernel panic, which is preventing VM HA from functioning properly?
Alex.
level
> - override on network level
> AS number pool
> - networks refer to this pool
>- BGP multihop enabled yes or no
> - zone level
> - network level override
>- BGP password
Definitely how we want to implement it, with a few additions, thanks for the
input.
Cheers
Alex
upstream but also give the ability to either peer with an user
managed VNF upstream or an operator provided router.
I hope this way we can cater for most use cases, at least with a first simple
implementation.
Will definitely keep multihop in mind.
Cheers,
Alex
-Original Message-
F
If you are 100% FC/NVME then OCFS2 is probably the best (or least bad) option.
I personally always tried to stick to NFS for KVM, it just works.
Reliability wise, I personally consider CEPH to be more reliable (and
supportable) than OCFS2.
Regards
Alex
From: Kristian Liivak
Sent: Monday, May
connectivity.
The other mechanisms to create a shared mountpont were not tested as we pivoted
away from the idea given our experience with OCFS2.
Thanks,
Alex
[__tpx__]
From: Kristian Liivak
Date: Monday, May 20, 2024 at 8:48 AM
To: users
Subject: KVM FC shared storage
EXTERNAL
Hi All
Currently
Hi Alex,
In this scenario:
>I think adding the ability to add network specific peers as mentioned in one
>of >your prior replies would still allow the level of control some operators
>(myself >included) may desire.
How do you propose network specific peers to be implemented
/en/4.19.0.0/adminguide/templates.html#creating-a-linux-template
*
https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.19.0.0/adminguide/templates/_cloud_init.html
Thanks,
Alex
[photo]<http://www.ussignal.com/>
Alex Dietrich
Senior Network Engineer, US Signal
616-233-5094 | www.ussignal.com
Hi Alex,
This may be a difference in perspective in implementation of BGP at the tenant
level. I see the ability this would provide to seamlessly establishing those
peering relationships with minimal intervention (helping scalability).
I think adding the ability to add network specific peers
Hi Alex,
> I am not convinced that specifying BGP peers at the zone level is a good idea
> given the impacts BGP can have on a given network. I would much rather see
> both peer and AS specification handled at the >network configuration, or
> another more specific level.
I don
ikely to be there from day one.
> On the VR you just need to make sure you properly configure the BGP daemon
> and it points to the right upstream routers.
Indeed, and we plan to use FRR for that.
Thanks for the link to the doc, I'll review it.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Mess
ill be connected at
the guest network which is cloudbr2.
> Try network with vlan = "vlan://untagged"
>
For some reason all guest networks get a VLAN from the guest VLAN range
defined at the initial zone creation. There does not seem to be a way to
avoid this.
>
>
>
>
&
I understand this is not possible in cloudstack?
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 3:57 PM Alex K wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is it possible to create untagged guest networks in cloudstack and have
> them assigned to different OVS bridges?
>
> I have created several OVS bridges at the KVM host
testing now with an edge zone with a KVM server.
Thanks for any input.
Alex
Hello Alex,
I appreciate this back and forth as I am excited about the potential this
feature would hold.
* This is a very valid point. We could add network specific BGP peers as
well, which would override the automatic AS allocation, in the same way that we
now allocate DNS servers in
Hi Alex,
> Would zone-level BGP peers be those used by default for establishing new BGP
> peers in networks where dynamic routing is enabled?
Correct, so far we plan to allow for up to 4 BGP peers for a zone, with the
possibility to setup different metrics to each peer.
> This could
Hi Alex,
I appreciate the clarity!
Excuse my ignorance if I am misunderstanding the intention of specifying BGP
peers at the zone level.
Would zone-level BGP peers be those used by default for establishing new BGP
peers in networks where dynamic routing is enabled?
This could affect a multi
Hi Alex,
Answers inline below with >
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Dietrich, Alex
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 3:12 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dynamic routing for routed mode IPv6 and IPv4 Isolated and VPC
networks
Hello A
Hello Alex,
I appreciate you taking on this initiative as I’d like to see similar
functionality made available in CloudStack.
I do have some feedback on your implementation approach:
1 - Operator configures one or more BGP peers for a given Zone (with different
metrics)
What is the intention
we do
for VLANs)
3 - When a network is created with an offering which has dynamic routing
enabled an AS number is allocated to the network
4 - ACS configures the BGP session on the VR (using FRR), advertising all its
connected networks
Any and all input will be very welcome.
Cheers,
Alex
mgmt server/cluster
>
Thanks for your reply.
>
> While we do support CloudStack mgmt server clustering, latency can have
> impact on mgmt server.
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
> ____
> From: Alex K
> Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 1:15:15
.
Is this supported or the different instances will lead to conflict?
Thanks,
Alex
On Fri, 3 May 2024 at 12:17 AM, Mercado wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I have a CloudStack 4.17 cluster x86_64 using KVM/QEMU as a hypervisor.
> I've been exploring the possibility of using a Raspberry Pi as a host,
> as an alternative to conventional servers. Following the steps of this
> tutorial [h
You can set your upstream router with a static ARP entry for the public IP,
this way if your user changes the IP they'll simply lose their own
connectivity. Should be quite easy to automate.
-Original Message-
From: K B Shiv Kumar
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 4:30 PM
To: users@clou
traffic? If so, does anyone have any examples how they’ve leveraged that to
configure the management IP addresses for the KVM hosts?
Does a single cloudbr with the various traffic labels assigned make sense for
all traffic in the VXLAN use case?
Thanks,
Alex
notice a host
failure.
Given this, what I envision is a Zabbix or ping source that can check host
status and perform a series of API interactions if it fails the external
monitoring action.
Thanks,
Alex
From: m...@swen.io
Date: Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 11:27 AM
To: users
u: @Wei Zhou<mailto:wei.z...@shapeblue.com>
@Wido den Hollander<mailto:w...@widodh.nl> @Kristaps
Čudars<mailto:kristaps.cud...@telia.lv>
Cheers,
Alex
despite being unreachable.
Is there a knob I am missing on speeding up the detection?
Thanks,
Alex
[__tpx__]
Thanks Wei,
I did yum clean all + vm reboot and it worked.
Alex
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 2:16 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> It works for me.
>
> Can you run "yum clean all" and retry ?
>
> -Wei
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:39 AM Alex Paul
> wrote:
download. Suggestion: run yum
--enablerepo=cloudstack clean metadata
Cleaning yum metadata does not help
Alex
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 2:52 AM Francisco Arencibia Quesada <
arencibia.franci...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot guys, now it works like a charm.
>
>
> Kind
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 12:28 PM, Francisco Arencibia Quesada <
arencibia.franci...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good morning guys,
>
> Is there any guide to install cloudstack in prod using docker?
seems there is sth at the official docs:
https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.14.0.0/installguide/primate.
nds to restore ACS VM then jump into ACS UI to do the
rest.
> --
> Jimmy
>
> Van: Alex K
> Datum: donderdag, 28 maart 2024 om 11:51
> Aan: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Onderwerp: Apache CloudStack as HCI
> Hi All,
>
> I understand that ACS is meant to run on a separate
kubernetes plugin) and low hardware footprint is important for the outcome.
Thanks,
Alex
need to
rename my ethernet interface to something like "eth0"
Regards,
Alex
to The uuid you supplied
was invalid.].2024-02-27 11:24:04,487 WARN
[c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-5ab127f5
job-12670/job-12671 ctx-02929e21) (logid:97976fdd) Unable to contact
resource.
Alex
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 2:08 PM Slavka Peleva
wrote:
> Forgot to men
Hi Wei,
No tags are there. I think in logs also its not printing to any tags:
Found pools [[Pool[1|PreSetup]]] that match with tags [[]].
The VM deployments were fine 2 days before. All in a sudden it started
failing.
Alex
On Wednesday, February 28, 2024, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Ag
Hi Slavak,
No. The cluster is enabled. Tried adding new temporary primary storage and
deployments are fine there.
Alex
On Wednesday, February 28, 2024, Slavka Peleva
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Sorry for the question but is it possible that the cluster is disabled? I
> have faced a sim
Hi Swen,
Yes, only 3TB used out of 15TB and double checked the threshold is at 85%.
:(
Alex
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 7:32 PM wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> is there enough free space on the storage? Check your thresholds in global
> settings.
>
> Regards,
> Swen
>
> -
Hello Team,
We've encountered an issue with our cloudstack setup on 3 XCP-ng hosts.
Suddenly, VM deployments are failing.
Our configuration includes a primary storage of type 'presetup' using HBA.
Interestingly, the storage functions properly in the XEN cluster, allowing
us to deploy VMs directly
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 1:50 PM
To: dev
Cc: users
Subject: [VOTE] next version 20 instead of 4.20
LS,
This is a vote on dev@c.a.o with cc to users@c.a.o. If you want to be counted
please reply to dev@.
As discussed in [1] we are
/document/d/1jQ-XbMZnfZN0EjtfuSrfGu5jFBh-_HuTe5aF9L_TUp4/edit
And a recording of the first meeting:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1e4C4HRPu4-LMy06TJbTxjlNAf1syopEV/view
Compatibility with the ACS plugin should remain unchanged.
Cheers,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Rahul Rai
Sent: Tuesday,
Hi Tobias,
I'm not sure if it fits your use case (and Wido already gave you all the
necessary advice on Shared networks and IPv6), but I'd like to highlight that
there's support for IPv6 in Isolated Networks and VPCs as well.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Tob
There’s a feature to pass a vlan range to an interface, but unfortunately
that’s VMWare. There’s no way that I know of to do that in KVM at the moment,
but it would be a great features.
From: Lewis Di Ciacca
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2023 11:44 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE
+1 to that
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Bienek
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 9:15 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: VM Firewalls In Between Subnets
Hi Bryan,
sure you can, for example using multiple L2 networks connected to your virtual
appliance.
L2 network w
he "public" range and then re-enable the zone.
Regards,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Tiang
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2023 2:17 PM
To: Vivek Kumar via users
Subject: Re: Swapping Public IP Addresses
Hi Community,
Our current Cloudstack is setup with old pu
Adding to that, from ACS 4.19 volume snapshots can be copied to other zones
(SnapshotsCopy)
Regards,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: m...@swen.io
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 9:58 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: AW: Difference between VM Snapshot and Snapshot
One
I have, with VMWare.
The setup of the cards was done between VMWare and the NICs, CloudSstack didn't
really need to know anything about it.
With KVM you can maybe do the same
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Tiang
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 3:12 PM
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 6:35 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Palo Alto VM Firewall with Cloudstack
Hey Alex,
Thanks for the response.
I’ll try to get a trial VM Firewall from Palo Alto and see if it still works
with Cloudstack 4.18. Will u
I've deployed PaloAlto firewalls as VNFs in CloudStack, but didn't use the
integration, it seems to have been abandoned as it didn't work with the version
of PAN-OS I was using. That was back with ACS 4.11, didn't try with later
versions.
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Tiang
Sen
Does this PR fix the issues with VRRP?
-Original Message-
From: gabriel.fernan...@scclouds.com.br
Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2023 3:32 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Redundant router - Isolated Network
Hello Cristian,
This feature was removed from the UI due to c
Hi.
I use 1 management and 2 kvm hosts (local storage) (Apache Cloudstack 4.18.).
Is it possible for each host to add an additional primary storage with a
different mount point.
ow to implement it.
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, July 21st, 2023 at 20:09, Alex Fredman
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I use 1 management and 2 kvm hosts (local storage) (Apache Cloudstack 4.18.).
> Is it possible for each host to add an additional primary storage with a
> different mount point.
Hi.
I use 1 management and 2 kvm hosts (local storage) (Apache Cloudstack 4.18.).
Is it possible for each host to add an additional primary storage with a
different mount point.
I doesn’t necessarily get throttled, the added latency will definitely impact
the maximum bandwidth achievable per stream, especially if you are using TCP.
In this case a bandwidth delay calculator can help you find the maximum
theoretical bandwidth for a given latency:
https://www.switch.ch/net
> all snapshots make a local copy to the management server disk before sending
> it to the secondary storage locations, yes.
What exactly do you mean by that?
From: Granwille Strauss
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 1:21 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Nikolaos Tsinganos
Subject: Re: Async b
Not at the moment.
What's your use case there?
-Original Message-
From: m...@swen.io
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 5:31 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: dedicated secondary storage
Hi all,
is it possible to create a secondary storage dedicated to a domain? Thx for a
That's correct, the networks need to be created in CloudStack first.
-Original Message-
From: Jafar Aghabalayev
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 12:53 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: VMWare dvSwitch - import port groups to Cloudstack
Hello Rohit,
Thank you for prompt r
Hi Remi,
There isn't much, but I'll be giving a presentation on how Tungsten works with
ACS this Thursday (4th) for the CS European User Group. Sign-up and watch, then
if you still have any questions let me know and I can give you more guidance.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message
rom.
I'd be really surprised if anyone had any serious and non-niche use case where
OpenStack is actually a better fit than CloudStack.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Axel Baudot
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2023 11:11 PM
To: users
Subject: Re: Arguing for Cloudstack fo
Adding my 2cents. Inline with your questions.
-Original Message-
From: Axel Baudot
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2023 1:14 AM
To: users
Subject: Arguing for Cloudstack for a HPC oriented datacenter
Hello dear CloudStack users,
As a team sitting at a crossroad to chose a solution to prov
Interesting, I wonder why it doesn't work on VMWare, where you can actually set
a limit in MHZ
-Original Message-
From: Nux
Sent: 22 March 2023 17:58
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Alex Mattioli
Subject: Re: Adding Tags to Service Offerings in use
The MHz has 2 uses t
I think it's supposed to limit the frequency of the CPU, but I've never seen it
actually do anything.
-Original Message-
From: Christian Reichert
Sent: 22 March 2023 16:49
To: 'users@cloudstack.apache.org'
Subject: AW: Adding Tags to Service Offerings in use
H
t: 22 March 2023 08:23
To: 'users@cloudstack.apache.org'
Subject: AW: Adding Tags to Service Offerings in use
Hi Alex,
thanks for the feedback, I will try it.
Do you see any problem when doing the same with compute offerings?
Best regards,
Christian
-Ursprünglich
Hi Christian,
If you do add the same tags to the corresponding primary storages and migrate
all relevant volumes to those same primary storages then it should be fine.
I've done exactly that in the past without issues.
Cheers
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Christian Rei
Indeed you can only do that in the DB afaik.
As any other manual DB manipulation, you need to be extremely careful.
Which tags are you planning on adding and what for exactly? That will help
evaluate how dangerous (or not) it's likely to be.
Cheers
Alex
From: Christian Reichert
Sent: 21
Stephan's idea definitely works. That's one of the most popular use cases of
this feature.
-Original Message-
From: Stephan Bienek
Sent: 24 February 2023 11:39
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Multiple public networks per zone ?
Might the available functionality to res
Welcome to the community Vishesh.
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Vishesh Jindal
Sent: 01 February 2023 16:45
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Hello
Hi All,
This is Vishesh. I have recently joined ShapeBlue. I am looking forward to
contributing to the cloudstack project and
+1 on that, and especially useful for Edge zones.
-Original Message-
From: Nux
Sent: 24 January 2023 14:43
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Apache CloudStack Marketing
Subject: Re: CloudStack and Tungsten Fabric Solution Brief
Thanks Ivet, this is am
Amazing @Jamie Pell!! That's probably the most amazing location possible in
London.
-Original Message-
From: Ivet Petrova
Sent: 18 January 2023 08:33
To: Apache CloudStack Marketing
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Official event location - CloudStack European Users Gro
t; > Yes, another physical network.
> > > > I tried to bridge eth0 and eth2 ( both are flat networks, not
> > > > VLANs),
> > but
> > > > got blocked by the telco provider in the datacenter, as eth2 is
> > > > a
> > > physical
>
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
