GitHub user dominar250 added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from KVM
to SSVM public and private ip address
@weizhouapache As discussed earlier I have separated private and public ip
address with a separate network , Right now I'm not able to ping public ip
ranges from kvm
d ifname cloudbr0 type bridge con-name cloudbr0 autoconnect yes
> nmcli con add type bridge-slave ifname eth0 master cloudbr0 autoconnect yes
> con-name br-eth0
> nmcli connection up cloudbr0
>
> On 2024-07-15 10:27, Fariborz Navidan wrote:
> > Hello Guys,
> >
connection up cloudbr0
On 2024-07-15 10:27, Fariborz Navidan wrote:
Hello Guys,
As CentOS/AlmaLinux 9 has deprecated network-scripts, how do I
configure
cloudbr network bridges for KVM using NetworkManager on AlmaLinux 9?
Please guide me ASAP?
Thank you
Hello Guys,
As CentOS/AlmaLinux 9 has deprecated network-scripts, how do I configure
cloudbr network bridges for KVM using NetworkManager on AlmaLinux 9?
Please guide me ASAP?
Thank you
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Not able to Add
Host . KVM in Ubuntu. Dev code running in Mac.
It's been long that we've used/maintained DevCloud, nowadays most of the
developers DIY something (either docker or VM/appliance based) of their own, or
use Simulator
GitHub user gjosh91 added a comment to the discussion: Not able to Add Host .
KVM in Ubuntu. Dev code running in Mac.
@DaanHoogland Can you please suggest how to do this ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9319#discussioncomment-9934389
GitHub user gjosh91 edited a comment on the discussion: Not able to Add Host .
KVM in Ubuntu. Dev code running in Mac.
@rohityadavcloud thank you sir for your valuable suggestion. I will try the
ubuntu way going forward or the VM way.
Although this is not in the purview of my question
GitHub user gjosh91 added a comment to the discussion: Not able to Add Host .
KVM in Ubuntu. Dev code running in Mac.
@rohityadavcloud thank you sir for your valuable suggestion. I will try the
ubuntu way going forward or the VM way.
Although this is not in the purview of my question
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Not able to Add
Host . KVM in Ubuntu. Dev code running in Mac.
That said, @gjosh91 here's a workaround - you can install/setup an Ubuntu VM on
your OSX machine using UTM or Parallels and setup your development env in it
instead
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Not able to Add
Host . KVM in Ubuntu. Dev code running in Mac.
@gjosh91 your setup will not work as Mac OS isn't a usually supported
development platform for use with remote KVM - you'll need to figure out
yourself how to do
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Not able to Add
Host . KVM in Ubuntu. Dev code running in Mac.
good, nothing wrong there.
Long shot, but can your host reach the storage you have provisioned?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9319
GitHub user gjosh91 added a comment to the discussion: Not able to Add Host .
KVM in Ubuntu. Dev code running in Mac.
My agent is running.
cloudstack-agent.service - CloudStack Agent
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/cloudstack-agent.service; enabled;
vendor preset: enabled
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Not able to Add
Host . KVM in Ubuntu. Dev code running in Mac.
On the mac you can reach 8250 , so that side seems to be functional for this
part.
On the host an agent should be running (check `systemctl status
cloudstack-agent
GitHub user gjosh91 added a comment to the discussion: Not able to Add Host .
KVM in Ubuntu. Dev code running in Mac.
Can you please elaborate. I want to run the Management on Mac . I have not
initiated any management instance seperately and am running the backend code
which as per my
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Not able to Add
Host . KVM in Ubuntu. Dev code running in Mac.
ok, if that is on your mac it is a misconfiguration of the management server
if it is on the host the agent isn't running.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache
GitHub user gjosh91 edited a comment on the discussion: Not able to Add Host .
KVM in Ubuntu. Dev code running in Mac.
@DaanHoogland I have already shared that in my previous comment. It is working
fine when I ping the Mangement server from Host on port 8250.
Reply I am getting while trying
GitHub user gjosh91 edited a comment on the discussion: Not able to Add Host .
KVM in Ubuntu. Dev code running in Mac.
@DaanHoogland I have already shared that in my previous comment. It is working
fine when I ping the Mangement server from Host on port 8250.
Reply I am getting while trying
GitHub user gjosh91 edited a comment on the discussion: Not able to Add Host .
KVM in Ubuntu. Dev code running in Mac.
@DaanHoogland I have already shared that in my previous comment. It is working
fine when I ping the Mangement server from Host on port 8250.
GitHub link:
https
GitHub user gjosh91 edited a discussion: Not able to Add Host . KVM in Ubuntu.
Dev code running in Mac.
Hi Community,
Need help stuck at adding Hosts through frontend .
I am in a bind and confused at this point . Please guide . This is my setup :
I have setup my cloud Development environment
Hello,
That's essentially an Ampere Altra server. You will need to share a lot
more details.
This may also come in handy:
https://rohityadav.cloud/blog/cloudstack-arm64-kvm/
On 2024-06-26 08:07, Sanjay Kumar wrote:
Hi All,
Does the ARM RL300 server Support Cloudstack? We are facing while
Hi Sanjay,
Generally speaking, we do support ARM-based KVM hosts with CloudStack, but not
platforms may work out of the box and is largely due to libvirt/kvm/qemu
support on them. ARM systems aren't homogenous in the sense how libvirt/qemu
manages to produce the domain XML on them and how qemu
Hi All,
Does the ARM RL300 server Support Cloudstack? We are facing while
installing the Cloudstack agent 4.18.1.0.
Any help would be really appreciated. Thank you!
Thank you
Sanjay Kumar
gt;MISERIAL "
>> - start the vm
>>
>> vm has the following setting, which looks ok
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> MISERIAL
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Apache Software Foundation
>> CloudStack KVM Hypervisor
>>
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from
KVM to SSVM public and private ip address
> @weizhouapache So cloudstack could'nt work with single ip range ?
>
There may be some issues with vm console and ssvm (download template/volume,
etc).
Everythin
GitHub user dominar250 added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from KVM
to SSVM public and private ip address
@weizhouapache Thanks for the suggestion. Is it a good idea to run management,
KVM, and NFS on a single machine? Does this setup cause routing-related issues?
My plan
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from
KVM to SSVM public and private ip address
sounds good @dominar250 , but still a separate ip range for the host and for
the SVMs (and VMs in general) is best.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack
GitHub user dominar250 added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from KVM
to SSVM public and private ip address
@weizhouapache So cloudstack could'nt work with single ip range ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9254#discussioncomment-9772467
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from
KVM to SSVM public and private ip address
> @DaanHoogland Thanks for addressing this issue. From SSVM/consoleproxy i can
> able to ping my kvm machine and management server which is stable . But I
>
GitHub user dominar250 added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from KVM
to SSVM public and private ip address
@DaanHoogland
root@s-55-VM:~# ip a
1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group
default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from
KVM to SSVM public and private ip address
@dominar250
I think it is because your systemvm have two nics/ips in the same range
typically the public and private should use different ip range and vlan/vni.
GitHub
GitHub user dominar250 added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from KVM
to SSVM public and private ip address
[system_vm-ip.txt](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/15823200/system_vm-ip.txt)
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9254#discussioncomment
GitHub user dominar250 added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from KVM
to SSVM public and private ip address
@DaanHoogland Thanks for addressing this issue. From SSVM/consoleproxy i can
able to ping my kvm machine and management server which is stable . But I can't
get constant ping
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from
KVM to SSVM public and private ip address
@dominar250 I cleanup the description a bit, please let me know if i messed it
up. I do not understand your full scenario yet. you are pinging the console
proxy
GitHub user boring-cyborg[bot] added a comment to the discussion: packet loss
from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9254#discussioncomment
ine id=2446f9d9-83ad-4b4c-bf3e-df041a390fcf
extraconfig=" MISERIAL "
- start the vm
vm has the following setting, which looks ok
MISERIAL
Apache Software Foundation
CloudStack KVM Hypervisor
2446f9d9-83ad-4b4c-bf3
"
> - start the vm
>
> vm has the following setting, which looks ok
>
>
>
>
> MISERIAL
>
>
>
>
> Apache Software Foundation
> CloudStack KVM Hypervisor
> 2446f9d9-83ad-4b4c-bf3e-df041a
update extra config of vm
cmk update virtualmachine id=2446f9d9-83ad-4b4c-bf3e-df041a390fcf
extraconfig=" MISERIAL "
- start the vm
vm has the following setting, which looks ok
MISERIAL
Apache Software Foundation
CloudStack KVM
I tried with this but it stuck libvirt
https://github.com/atomspring/KVM-BIOS-SerialNo
:(
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 9:59 AM Francisco Arencibia Quesada <
arencibia.franci...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yes that would be great.
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 9:58 AM Wido den Hollander wr
; > Op 11/06/2024 om 16:29 schreef Francisco Arencibia Quesada:
> > > Good morning guys,
> > >
> > > When I run on Windows wmic bios get serialnumber, I receive a
> > blank serial
> > > number, I have tried
> > >
number, I have tried
> running virsh edit VM, and setting :
>
>
>
> Apache Software Foundation
> CloudStack KVM Hypervisor
> MISERIAL
> 166f6f56-a8a3-4ab9-82f3-467bf90b0126
>
>
>
Op 17/04/2024 om 14:29 schreef Dietrich, Alex:
Hello CloudStack Community,
I am attempting to establish full Layer 3 connectivity between the KVM hosts in
my CloudStack deployment. I have found a few resources to assist in the
process, including the modifyvxlan.sh script necessary
Op 17/04/2024 om 14:29 schreef Dietrich, Alex:
Hello CloudStack Community,
I am attempting to establish full Layer 3 connectivity between the KVM hosts in
my CloudStack deployment. I have found a few resources to assist in the
process, including the modifyvxlan.sh script necessary
Op 11/06/2024 om 16:29 schreef Francisco Arencibia Quesada:
Good morning guys,
When I run on Windows wmic bios get serialnumber, I receive a blank serial
number, I have tried
running virsh edit VM, and setting :
Apache Software Foundation
CloudStack KVM Hypervisor
> running virsh edit VM, and setting :
>
>
>
> Apache Software Foundation
> CloudStack KVM Hypervisor
> MISERIAL
> 166f6f56-a8a3-4ab9-82f3-467bf90b0126
>
>
>
> but still the same.
> Any guidance? For us it is important to have the se
Good morning guys,
When I run on Windows wmic bios get serialnumber, I receive a blank serial
number, I have tried
running virsh edit VM, and setting :
Apache Software Foundation
CloudStack KVM Hypervisor
MISERIAL
166f6f56-a8a3-4ab9-82f3-467bf90b0126
but still the same
Good morning guys,
Has anyone tried to create virtualized KVM nodes with nested virtualization?
If yes, how did you manage to deal with networking in this scenario?
Kind regards
--
*Francisco Arencibia Quesada.*
*DevOps Engineer*
GitHub user andrijapanicsb added a comment to the discussion: KVM not listing
Unmanaged Instances
Please read the documentation. It lists's only stopped VMs and it requires
listen_tcp=1 in the libvirtd config
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9156
Indeed, Xenserver is good and our primary choice. We allready have it up and
running..
Why i ask KVM cluster its cloudstack lacks kubernetes csi driver support for
xenserver.
And we want to use kubernetes. My idea is just make one kvm cluster for
kubernetes users.
Of cource we will check
> Am Mon, May 20, 2024 at 03:48:12PM +0300 schrieb Kristian Liivak:
>> Hi All
>>
>> Currently, we can see from the documentation that KVM supports Fiber Channel
>> via shared mountpoints.
>> Can someone recommend or share their experience with usable solutions f
300 schrieb Kristian Liivak:
> Hi All
>
> Currently, we can see from the documentation that KVM supports Fiber Channel
> via shared mountpoints.
> Can someone recommend or share their experience with usable solutions for
> shared mountpoint technical solutions? It seems
If you are 100% FC/NVME then OCFS2 is probably the best (or least bad) option.
I personally always tried to stick to NFS for KVM, it just works.
Reliability wise, I personally consider CEPH to be more reliable (and
supportable) than OCFS2.
Regards
Alex
From: Kristian Liivak
Sent: Monday, May
,
the reliability of varying components re-establishing connectivity was not up
to par with the reliability of the underlying storage technology (iSCSI). In a
few cases, I found OCFS2 unable to establish peers with the other KVM
hypervisors, which required rebuilding the OCFS2 cluster to re-establish
Hi All
Currently, we can see from the documentation that KVM supports Fiber Channel
via shared mountpoints.
Can someone recommend or share their experience with usable solutions for
shared mountpoint technical solutions? It seems there are quite a few options,
such as shared/clustered file
I also forgot to mention - we also add these lines into our agent.properties
file on the KVM hosts so that we get better display resolution and use virtio
for the graphics driver
vm.video.ram=65536
vm.video.hardware=virtio
and of course the virtio drivers and qemu agent are installed into all
Hi Gary,
Yes we are using cloud-init and in our case we are removing the recovery
partition, with XCP templates all good, now we are testing the same with
KVM.
Thank you for your feedback :)
Regards
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:48 PM Gary Dixon
wrote:
> Hi Fransisco
>
> Be caref
Bredbury Park Way, Bredbury, Stockport, SK6 2SN
From: Francisco Arencibia Quesada
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2024 11:35 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Windows templates KVM
Good morning guys,
Is there any updated guide to build windows templates for KVM? I have one but
I'm just
Good morning guys,
Is there any updated guide to build windows templates for KVM? I have one
but I'm just checking with you guys the best approach. It is also required
to install virtio drivers and qemu guest agent right?
I have found the latest version of both, is this enough?
https
s with VNC might be because of CPVM and its host time aren't synced.
I've set the host is configured with Asia/Kuala_Lumpur meanwhile CPVM is
configured with UTC. My question is what's the best practice in setting up
time zone for MS, KVM hosts etc?
Do I leave everything to UTC?
Is there a
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: UEFI VMs on KVM
throwing error "No enum constant
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtVMDef.WatchDogDef.WatchDogModel.ITCO"
> > @sghazra21 4.19.0.1 does not have the fix.
>
> Is the fix planned for this ve
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: UEFI VMs on KVM
throwing error "No enum constant
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtVMDef.WatchDogDef.WatchDogModel.ITCO"
Please note, this issue has been fixed by #8282
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: UEFI VMs on KVM
throwing error "No enum constant
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtVMDef.WatchDogDef.WatchDogModel.ITCO"
@sghazra21
4.19.0.1 does not have the fix.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/
GitHub user sghazra21 added a comment to the discussion: UEFI VMs on KVM
throwing error "No enum constant
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtVMDef.WatchDogDef.WatchDogModel.ITCO"
> @sghazra21 4.19.0.1 does not have the fix.
Is the fix planned for this version or
GitHub user boring-cyborg[bot] added a comment to the discussion: UEFI VMs on
KVM throwing error "No enum constant
com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtVMDef.WatchDogDef.WatchDogModel.ITCO"
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!
G
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Apache Cloud
Stack Bug Report - KeyStore KVM Hosts ( Urgent )
@therev3l4 did you allow root ssh based login with password or ssh-key? What
installation guide or steps have you followed ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache
GitHub user rohityadavcloud added a comment to the discussion: Apache Cloud
Stack Bug Report - KeyStore KVM Hosts ( Urgent )
@therev3l4 the general steps to debug this is to look at the management-server
and agent logs to see why it failed. Since this looks like an initial setup
issue
GitHub user dR3b added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM
hosts?
@weizhouapache
```
root@nuc1:/# apt install cloudstack-agent
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
The following additional packages
GitHub user dR3b edited a comment on the discussion: Same network for VMs as
KVM hosts?
@weizhouapache Thanks! This works, but deletes all the IPtable rules on the
host. I have not created any rules myself. These rules must be from Cloudstack
or UFW.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache
GitHub user dR3b added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM
hosts?
@weizhouapache Thanks! This works, but deletes all Iptables rules on the host.
I have not created any rules myself. These rules must be from Cloudstack or UFW.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Same network for
VMs as KVM hosts?
@dR3b
a user has replied to to this thread in the users mailing list, no idea why it
is not present here
, dR3b (via GitHub) wrote:
>
> GitHub user dR3b edited a comment on the discussion: Same network for VMs as
>
GitHub user dR3b edited a comment on the discussion: Same network for VMs as
KVM hosts?
@weizhouapache
Thanks! After several pages in the documentation[1], I was able to complete the
installation.
- [x] System-VM consoleproxy, Up and running
- [x] System-VM secondarystoragevm, Up
GitHub user dR3b added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM
hosts?
Yes!
```
root@nuc1:/# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
1
```
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8998#discussioncomment-9258076
This is an automatically sent email
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Same network for
VMs as KVM hosts?
@dR3b
Is IP forwarding enabled?
The following command should return 1
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8998#discussioncomment
GitHub user dR3b added a comment to the discussion: Same network for VMs as KVM
hosts?
@weizhouapache
Thanks! After several pages in the documentation[1], I was able to complete the
installation.
- [x] System-VM consoleproxy, Up and running
- [x] System-VM secondarystoragevm, Up
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: Same network for
VMs as KVM hosts?
I think a shared network with vlan=untagged is what you need.
You can use an advanced zone or advanced zone with security groups, or even a
basic zone.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache
llo,
> We need to know about below two possibilities for setting up the cloud
> stack environment.
>
> 1. Can we setup the 'Cloudstack Management Server' as a VM hosted on
> the same set of KVM hypervisor cluster that we need to manage in CloudStack?
> 2. How do we recover the c
Hello,
We need to know about below two possibilities for setting up the cloud stack
environment.
1. Can we setup the 'Cloudstack Management Server' as a VM hosted on the
same set of KVM hypervisor cluster that we need to manage in CloudStack?
2. How do we recover the cloud stack
specific secondary
> storage. For example, refer the seeding steps for arm64 here -
> https://rohityadav.cloud/blog/cloudstack-arm64-kvm/#storage-setup
>
> 3.
> Arch-specific installation (or region):
> The cleanest approach could be you keep two separate ACS regions, or
> inst
. For example, refer
the seeding steps for arm64 here -
https://rohityadav.cloud/blog/cloudstack-arm64-kvm/#storage-setup
3.
Arch-specific installation (or region):
The cleanest approach could be you keep two separate ACS regions, or
installations; one for arm64 and another for x86.
I think
different clusters should be fine.
maybe @Rohit Yadav can give some advice.
-Wei
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 4:56 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> good point Rishi,
> I think you would have to separate the hardware into different
> clusters at least, but maybe even separate zones. I never heard of
>
good point Rishi,
I think you would have to separate the hardware into different
clusters at least, but maybe even separate zones. I never heard of
anybody doing a setup like yours.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 6:56 PM Rishi Misra wrote:
>
> Can a CloudStack instance running on x86 manage deployments
;
> We are using Cloudstack 4.19.0.1 with Debian12 KVM host as hypervisor.
> When we try to create an instance (Debian12) with Terraform (version of
> provider module 0.4.0), the additional disks are not being created in the
> specific order we set:
>
> resource "cloudstac
Hello CloudStack Community,
I am attempting to establish full Layer 3 connectivity between the KVM hosts in
my CloudStack deployment. I have found a few resources to assist in the
process, including the modifyvxlan.sh script necessary to establish the
appropriate network bridge configuration
@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: AW: Handling KVM host failure
EXTERNAL
We are monitoring our hosts via Zabbix and take manual actions when a host
fails. If a host is in state "Disconnected" or "Alert" you can declare a
host as degraded via api
(https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cloudstack.ap
Hi everyone,
We are using Cloudstack 4.19.0.1 with Debian12 KVM host as hypervisor. When
we try to create an instance (Debian12) with Terraform (version of provider
module 0.4.0), the additional disks are not being created in the specific
order we set:
resource "cloudstack
in NFS.
When the KVM host has a virtualized instance running (with NFS primary
storage) and this host suddenly loses power, the HA scheme only works
if before marking the host as degraded I restart the NFS service to
unlock the machine's file virtual. Doing it this way, I restart the
NFS
Complementing the case... I did a new test and found that the problem
really lies in the lock generated in NFS.
When the KVM host has a virtualized instance running (with NFS primary
storage) and this host suddenly loses power, the HA scheme only works if
before marking the host as degraded I
t; Regards,
> Swen
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Murilo Moura
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. April 2024 06:31
> An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: Manual fence KVM Host
>
> Hello Guto!
>
>
> I carefully checked the instructions that you and Dan
You can restart the SSVM or the ‘cloud’ agent in SSVM to trigger downloading.
-Jithin
From: Embedded
Date: Monday, 15 April 2024 at 10:16 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM) Not Ready
On Monday 15 April 2024 11:28:11 AM (+07:00), Jithin Raju wrote
HI Murilo,
just checking, the user instance you are talking about are using a service
offering with HA enabled, correct?
Regards,
Swen
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Murilo Moura
Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. April 2024 06:31
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Manual fence KVM
; Date: Monday, 15 April 2024 at 9:00 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM) Not Ready
> just deployed a fresh cs 4.19 got the host up, system vms are running, but
> template vm says
>
> CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM) Not Ready
>
>
Hi,
Can you check the progress it must be still downloading.
-Jithin
From: Embedded
Date: Monday, 15 April 2024 at 9:00 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM) Not Ready
just deployed a fresh cs 4.19 got the host up, system vms are running, but
template vm
just deployed a fresh cs 4.19 got the host up, system vms are running, but
template vm says
CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM) Not Ready
ideas? did i miss something?
--
Sent with Vivaldi Mail. Download Vivaldi for free at vivaldi.com
ot; command I cannot read the volume file of this
instance (error: Failed to get shared "write" lock).
Is there any way to execute unlock or even another parameter that makes kvm
start a VM without locking the volume on the primary storage in NFS? (I
tried to put the NFS storage in version
n).
Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi) also provided a very good explanation on 10th
of April in a response to similar question.
Regards,
Swen
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dietrich, Alex
Gesendet: Freitag, 12. April 2024 17:46
An: users
Betreff: Handling KVM host failure
Hello All,
How are fol
Hello All,
How are folks handling KVM host failure in CloudStack?
For example, when a host has a loss of power or hard power off, CloudStack
takes nearly 15 minutes to detect that the host is offline. This creates a
challenge as VMs are considered to be running in CloudStack during that time
? If
not, could you provide more details about your configurations and the
environment state?
Depending on what you have in your setup, the HA might not work as
expected. For VMware and XenServer, the process is expected to happen at
the hypervisor level. For KVM, ACS does not support HA; what
Can a CloudStack instance running on x86 manage deployments on both x86 and
Raspberry Pi (or any other archs)?
I am not sure how it will affect management SystemVMs given the different
archs in the mix?
Any pointers are greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
l VM with HA enabled on other hosts, if storage is
accessible.
Regards,
Swen
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Murilo Moura
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. April 2024 02:10
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Manual fence KVM Host
hey guys!
Is there any way to manually fence a KVM host and then
1 - 100 of 2181 matches
Mail list logo
