Officially, CephFS is NOT production ready - that being said by the Intank
- you get your answer :)
On 4 November 2014 08:21, Stephan Seitz
wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 04.11.2014, 09:07 +0200 schrieb Vladimir Melnik:
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > Did anyone compare CephFS and GFS2 or did anyone rea
file system corruption ?
do: du -hs /export/secondary/*
that will list each subfolder size inside SECONDARY folder.
BTW, are you maybe also using /export/PRIMARY for Primary storage - that
might take you space - if it is shared space by bith primary and secondary
storage...
On 4 November 2014
Hi Sun,
Make sure you've set the Egress rules for the protocols and ports you're trying
to allow out (or ALL). Under Networks, enter the Isolated Network you're
interested in and select the Egress rules tab. To configure for "allow all
out", set Source CIDR to 0.0.0.0/0, Protocol "All".
Kind
1. The article is just a reference, but if we use a known security scanner the
combination of ssl protocol and cipher suites used identifies these
vulnerabilities on a given machine with available TLS lower versions, check for
some thing like beast attack.
2. The conf file changes done will not
Hi,
> On 04-Nov-2014, at 1:49 pm, Santhosh Edukulla
> wrote:
>
> 2. The conf file changes done will not countermeasure the sytemplate vuln
> issue i believe, we may still wanted to confirm that its indeed the
> httpd.conf which needs to be changed for apache2 as well for the particular
> temp
Regarding the configurations in httpd.conf, they don't apply to apache server
running in our system vms.
We need to put the configuration in “/etc/apache2/mods-enabled/ssl.conf”, if
you see apache2.conf it includes ssl.conf “Include mods-enabled/*.conf" not
httpd.conf.
I tried using namp, it w
Hi,
The CentOS templates are built using virt-install with the aforementioned
kickstarts[1]. Everything is scripted.
The FreeBSD and OpenBSD ones are built by hand due to lacking of automation
tools.
I'm in the process of adding all of the above in a publicly accessible jenkins
instance so the
+1, works for me in basic tests
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav"
> To: "dev"
> Cc: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 November, 2014 07:35:05
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMo
Hi Hari,
> On 04-Nov-2014, at 2:21 pm, Harikrishna Patnala
> wrote:
>
> Regarding the configurations in httpd.conf, they don't apply to apache server
> running in our system vms.
>
> We need to put the configuration in “/etc/apache2/mods-enabled/ssl.conf”, if
> you see apache2.conf it includes
I am sure you can find a lot of different articles about Gluster/Ceph
performance. Here is one of them:
http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/513/4/042014/pdf/1742-6596_513_4_042014.pdf
I think it is not good to use CephFS with CS as it is FUSE and require
additional layer to perform. As Andrija
Rohit,
As well, we may want to just revert the previous changes done to httpd.conf to
keep the configuration of ciphers consistent across files.
There we mentioned to support only TLS1...etc through + logic
Here, we are excluding few protocols from all.
Regards
Santhosh
__
> On 04-Nov-2014, at 2:52 pm, Santhosh Edukulla
> wrote:
>
> As well, we may want to just revert the previous changes done to httpd.conf
> to keep the configuration of ciphers consistent across files.
Sure that was a mistake.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30
Hi!
Am 30.10.2014 17:04, schrieb Martin Emrich:
I wonder why this IP address for the GRE tunnel was chosen? The IP belongs to
one of my iSCSI storage networks, and should never be used for guest or public
traffic.
While thinking about it, I noticed that I never assigned IP addresses to the
+1 from me again.
Was able to upgrade to the latest and run some api calls.
~Rajani
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Nux! wrote:
> +1, works for me in basic tests
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Rohit
2014.11.04. 10:32 keltezéssel, Martin Emrich írta:
I reinstalled CloudStack, this time it chose my management network for GRE
You can set it on the first pages of an advanced setup (down, where you
see domain also), if i remember well.
BTW, I think, you can use this subnet for guests, cause gues
Hi!
Am 04.11.2014 10:49, schrieb Erdősi Péter:
You can set it on the first pages of an advanced setup (down, where you
see domain also), if i remember well.
BTW, I think, you can use this subnet for guests, cause guest GRE
tunnels will never connect to storage network...
I do not mean the sub
Hi all,
some time ago I installed version 4.3.0 now I have seen that version
4.3.1 is present in the repository.
I would like to understand what is the correct upgrade procedure, if it
is best to first upgrade the management software or the various agents.
I state that I can not stop the vi
Hi,
You should read:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.3.1/rnotes.html
Ideally, it’s a good idea to do a test upgrade on a test infra/setup that is as
close to your production deployment. 4.3.1 is a good release, there are no
significant upgrade issues re
Hi Rohit,
one issue I found is that you are in 5.3.0 using the 'requests.get'
method for the API requests, and this implements
certificateverification by default.
This fails (we think) on my company CloudStack setup because the API
server is put behind both a proxy and a load balancer and there i
2014.11.04. 11:04 keltezéssel, Martin Emrich írta:
I do not mean the subnet for the guests
Hmm.. you mean isolated guest network right?
If yes, the IP subnet can be changed, if the user define guest network
(not auto, when first vm started)
There is an option to: Guest Gateway, and Guest Netma
Do you find any wrong config with this ?
Now it seems the 2 mgmt servers are going fine in cluster config (seeing
mgmt logs servers) but the problem i have is with the cpvm vm.
It seems it keeps a hard link with node02 while trying to access it with
the web ui (at this moment using the node01).
Dear Rohit,
I confirm the new config key 'verifysslcert' is working.
Thanks very much, Philip
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi Phillip,
>
>> On 04-Nov-2014, at 4:16 pm, Phillip Kent wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rohit,
>>
>> one issue I found is that you are in 5.3.0 using the 'reque
Hypothetically speaking, if someone lost the management server say to a
fire or catastrophic RAID failure (no management filesystem backup), but
had a complete up to date backup of the management databases (cloud,
cloud_usage, cloudbridge), how could one restore the CloudStack management
system?
B
Hi Adam,
I haven't had to do this yet, but my steps would be:
- install cloudstack-management
- setup databases
- setup management
- drop and import db
- start services
HTH
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam"
> To:
Hi!
Am 04.11.2014 12:46, schrieb Erdősi Péter:
Hmm.. you mean isolated guest network right?
If yes, the IP subnet can be changed, if the user define guest network
(not auto, when first vm started)
There is an option to: Guest Gateway, and Guest Netmask, and if it
filled, the sysvm will use that
Thank you everyone for voting/testing.
There were two more issues reported and fixed in this round. I did testing from
my side after fixing the issues, in this case I’ll have to call of this round
again :( and hope the next voting round will be the last one.
> On 04-Nov-2014, at 3:13 pm, Rajani
Better thorough than sorry. :-)
Good job!
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav"
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 November, 2014 13:08:25
> Subject: Re: [VOTE]
Hi All,
I've created a 5.3.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts up
for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/5.3
Commit: 24faf56d5ab41cef1e9f7fc294f7cf1ab5e3a742
List of changes:
https://g
Thanks Andrija,
when I first install Cloudstack 4.4.0, XenServer templates did not work for
windows, every time I tried to build a template, ACS would allocate in
Secondary Storage but the process never completed. That's the reason I had
a lot of empty folders in Secondary storage. Since I upgraded
+1
All previous issues have been fixed - Well done Rohit
Tested the following using scripts:
Install CloudMonkey and setup Profile
Deploy new complete Advanced Zone
Update Global Settings
Create Domains and Users
Delete default Service Offerings and Add new ones
Deploy new Network and VMs, setup
Hello!
I have a Cloudstack version 4.3 running with XEN and I need to offer disk
resizing.
Having said that, what is the best solution for root disk resizing? I know
I can do this on version 4.4 with KVM but I wouldn't like to use another
hypervisor.
I know I can also use data disk but it doesn'
+1 still works for me, good job
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Geoff Higginbottom"
> To: [email protected], "dev"
> Sent: Tuesday, 4 November, 2014 14:46:46
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack C
Update:
I've reinstalled everything below just incase I missed something but still no
luck with my test instance coming up on my second xen host once the network
cable has been yanked.
Any recommendations or points will be greatly appreciated.
Pulling my hair out here...
side note: This reci
Hi,
When I tried to delete a Zone in the UI, it returns an error as:
"The zone is not deletable because there are physical networks in this zone".
What does this mean and how to delete the Zone?
Cheers,
Dan
Dan,
have you deleted any networks you created?
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Dan Dong wrote:
> Hi,
> When I tried to delete a Zone in the UI, it returns an error as:
> "The zone is not deletable because there are physical networks in this
> zone".
> What does this mean and how to delete the
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> It should be, yes.
>
> BTW the link you sent - it's changing existing VR offering...
>
> To make another system offering a DEFAUTL offering, use the stuff explained
> here:
>
> http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/servi
Hello all.
I have 2 PrimaryStorage and some Virtual Routers installed on one of then,
and now I have to move this Virtula Vouters to another PrimaryStorage.
How can i do that ?
I tried creating a new service offering for software virtual router and
then re-create the virtualrouter with my new se
Updated system last night and now I'm getting the following error after
about 30 minutes of runtime:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread
At that point there's still 1.5GB of RAM in the management system and
there's very little load so I'm guessing I need to enable more
Also not sure if it has anything to do with it but getting a lot of these
messages on the console:
Queue (queue id, sync type, sync id) - (811,VmWorkJobQueue, 28) is
reaching concurrency limit 1
and
vbdmetrics doesn't exist
The latter appears to be from VMs that haven't been restarted yet, th
how much memory does the management server have?
Usually it worked best with 8GB.
PL,
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Ian Service wrote:
> Also not sure if it has anything to do with it but getting a lot of these
> messages on the console:
>
> Queue (queue id, sync type, sync id) - (811,VmW
It's got 4GB + 4GB of swap.
But there's still lots of resources available. I've upped the number of
threads to 4096 to see if that helps.
Anyone running a functional cloudstack 4.4.1 that could check this number?
ps -L -u cloud | wc -l
- Ian
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wro
No, I will try to delete it. Thanks Motty.
2014-11-04 10:20 GMT-06:00 motty cruz :
> Dan,
> have you deleted any networks you created?
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Dan Dong wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > When I tried to delete a Zone in the UI, it returns an error as:
> > "The zone is not deleta
Hello All,
I have a VM instance in expungning state, I tried to delete it in the DB
but I was not successful.
mysql> DELETE from vm_instance where name='hd01';
ERROR 1451 (23000): Cannot delete or update a parent row: a foreign key
constraint fails (`cloud`.`user_ip_address`, CONSTRAINT
`fk_user_i
Hi, All,
On my ubuntu openstack 4.4, after I registered my iso, the "Ready"
status is "No", and when I tried to create an instance from this iso, I
just could not see it in the "My ISOs" tab, do you know what's the possible
problem? Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Dan
Forgot to mention that the iso image was downloaded manually and put under
secondary storage path on the Management Server(192.168.0.5) as:
/mnt/secondary/iso/ubuntu-14.04.1-server-amd64.iso.
While in the "Add ISO" screen, for the "URL" field, I put "
http://192.168.0.5/mnt/secondary/iso/ubuntu-14
> Op 4 november 2014 om 22:31 schreef Dan Dong :
>
>
> Forgot to mention that the iso image was downloaded manually and put under
> secondary storage path on the Management Server(192.168.0.5) as:
> /mnt/secondary/iso/ubuntu-14.04.1-server-amd64.iso.
> While in the "Add ISO" screen, for the "URL"
Hey Motty,
I just update the removed field to remove instances stuck in Expunging.
UPDATE vm_instance SET removed=NOW() WHERE name="hd01";
- Ian
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:28 PM, motty cruz wrote:
> Hello All,
> I have a VM instance in expungning state, I tried to delete it in the DB
> but I wa
Thank Ian,
That worked perfectly!
Thanks,
-Motty
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Ian Service wrote:
> Hey Motty,
>
> I just update the removed field to remove instances stuck in Expunging.
>
> UPDATE vm_instance SET removed=NOW() WHERE name="hd01";
>
> - Ian
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:28 PM,
Yeah but the Agent State doesn't show so definitely the agent hasn't come up
which is needed for downloading the iso
Troubleshoot using
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
Thanks,
-Nitin
From: Dan Dong mailto:dongda...@gmail.
Hello everyone,
I am new to CloudStack and recently I am trying add two XenServers to
CloudStack.
According to document there are three steps:
1. Management Network bonding
2. Add additional server to pool
3. Execute cloud-setup-bonding.sh
My question is because that my hosts have only one NIC,
Hi Yan,
That's fine to have only one NIC on XenServer, as long as is name is the
same as the "XenServer traffic Label" in CloudStack.
Pierre-Luc
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Yan Bai wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am new to CloudStack and recently I am trying add two XenServers to
> CloudSt
Hi,
Are you using the proper traffic labels for all the traffic types in the
physical network?
Since you have multiple PIFs on XenServer you must specify traffic labels on
zone's physical network for different traffics(guest,management,public and
storage) to go through the intended PIFs on XenS
Hi!
Am 05.11.2014 05:20, schrieb Sanjeev Neelarapu:
Hi,
Are you using the proper traffic labels for all the traffic types in the
physical network?
Since you have multiple PIFs on XenServer you must specify traffic labels on
zone's physical network for different traffics(guest,management,publi
53 matches
Mail list logo
