[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8

2008-07-23 Thread Silvio Siefke
Hello, I have the Apache 2.2.8 today on my Root Server (Debian etch) compiled. No problems with the Apache by compile. ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-modules=all --enable-ssl --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl --enable-so --enable-rewrite --enable-suexec --with-suexec-caller=www-data

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8

2008-07-23 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Silvio Siefke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I have the Apache 2.2.8 today on my Root Server (Debian etch) compiled. No > problems with the Apache by compile. > > > ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-modules=all --enable-ssl > --with-ssl=/usr/

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8

2008-07-23 Thread Silvio Siefke
Eric Covener schrieb: Configuration, failing URL, and error log would be a better start. I'm sorry, here come the config and Logs: URI: http://www.silvio-siefke.de CGI: http://www.silvio-siefke.de/cgi-bin/mailer/mailer.cgi httpd.conf http://www.silvio-siefke.de/trading/httpd.html extra/http

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 and mod_cband

2008-05-19 Thread Felipe Neuwald
Hi Folks, I'm running Apache 2.2.8 on a FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (i386) machine. Also, I'm running mod_cband-0.9.7.5_1, both installed via FreeBSD ports. When the server is 2-3 day running, I got the follow when do "apachectl configtest": [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# apachectl configtest apache2_mod_cb

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 and mod_cband

2008-05-23 Thread Felipe Neuwald
Hi Folks. A few days ago, I sent these email to the list, and still got no reply. I thanks if there is someone that can help me. I'm running Apache 2.2.8 on a FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (i386) machine. Also, I'm running mod_cband-0.9.7.5_1, both installed via FreeBSD ports. When the server is 2-3 day ru

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + ProxyErrorOverride errors

2008-08-19 Thread Richard de Vries
Hello everyone; it's been a while since I wrote to this list since everything has been smooth sailing so far ... but I did stumble on an issue just now that requires ya'lls expertise. I don't want to go into too much detail on "why" we're trying to do what we're doing, but basically I configured

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 - Segmentation fault

2008-02-26 Thread Andre Hübner
Apache2.2.8/php5.2.5 Suse10.1 Hi List, i have a problem with segfaults in my ApacheInstallation after running a few days/hours I switched LogLevel to debug and thats what i got: [Mon Feb 25 03:22:36 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1670): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child 27415 for worker pr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + ProxyErrorOverride errors

2008-08-20 Thread Nick Kew
Richard de Vries wrote: > (all on one line, so chopped) We recently made some fixes to ProxyErrorOverride, but I don't recollect the details. Googling the dev list would no doubt find it. In the absence of a better solution, you could perhaps default to serving the proxy's error pages, but over

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + ProxyErrorOverride errors

2008-08-20 Thread Richard de Vries
ooking thru the code but have not yet been able to find it. :(    Richard - Original Message From: Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 7:34:47 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + ProxyErrorOverride errors Richard de

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 - Segmentation fault II

2008-02-26 Thread Andre Hübner
Hi, sorry for next quick post, but here better example for segfault. more then 4 hours between scriptstart and segfault, but i found also line where start and kill was between only a few seconds [Mon Feb 25 00:04:49 2008] [debug] proxy_util.c(1670): proxy: grabbed scoreboard slot 0 in child

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 using custom openssl install

2008-04-09 Thread Spangler, Tim
Hello, I'm trying to configure Apache to point to openssl 0.9.8g on a 64bit install of SLES 10. I've installed openssl 0.9.8g to /app/openssl/0.9.8g and /usr/local/ssl with the --shared option, and have added /app/openssl/0.9.8g/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf and run ldconfig. As far as I can tell, the d

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 mod_ssl Vulnerability Notification Assistance

2008-04-21 Thread Mark A Christofferson
Hello, I have asked this question previously on both the FreeBSD Mailing List and the mod_ssl mailing list, but didn't receive a response. I am currently running the Apache 2.2.8 port on the FreeBSD 6.3 platform with mod_ssl enabled. I received the following vulnerability scan results from

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + mod_authnz_ldap + mod_header/env variables

2008-05-19 Thread Arnaud Lesueur
Hi folks, I'm currently using mod_authnz_ldap to process authentication and authorization on LDAP back-end on Apache 2.2.8. This part is doing it's work This authentication is placed in front of a mod_proxy_http in reverse proxy mode. I would like to pass user informations to backend application

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 Windows Compile Issue/Failure

2008-02-11 Thread Stusynski, Dan
Hello all, Hopefully someone can provide guidance or has seen this problem before since google didn't dredge up anything useful. During my Win XP build of Apache 2.2.8 using MSCV++ 6.0 I've run across an issue I can't immediately resolve. The build fails towards the end of the build when the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 - Segmentation fault II

2008-02-26 Thread Joshua Slive
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:05 AM, Andre Hübner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > sorry for next quick post, but here better example for segfault. more then 4 > hours between scriptstart and segfault, but i found also line where start > and kill was between only a few seconds > > [Mon Feb 25 0

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 VirtuaHost and a NAS

2008-03-03 Thread Brian
I have windows XP SP2 and have just upgraded to Apache 2.2.8 and have all of the settings running for my existing websites on local hard drives. However, due to a large increase in multimedia content I have added a 2TB NAS device and have it mapped as a drive letter 'L:' for the local machine that

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 hangs on Solaris 9: Deadlock?

2008-04-15 Thread Laurent Blume
Hi all, Okay, the title isn't very descriptive, but I haven't much to work with :-/ We're having a recurrent problem with Apache 2.2 on two Solaris 9 boxes: it hangs, and becomes unresponsive. Connecting to the port 80, the connection is established, but stays stuck, and send no data at all. I t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 mod_ssl Vulnerability Notification Assistance

2008-04-21 Thread Joshua Slive
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Mark A Christofferson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am currently running the Apache 2.2.8 port on the FreeBSD 6.3 platform > with mod_ssl enabled. I received the following vulnerability scan results > from my organization: > > > > Vulnerability: mod_ssl Off-By-

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + mod_authnz_ldap + mod_header/env variables

2008-05-19 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Arnaud Lesueur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My interpretation is that my directives (SetEnvIf and RequestHeader) > are being executed before the authentication/authorization process. Is > it true ? Can we force the order ? I think only the SetEnvIf is running t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 + mod_authnz_ldap + mod_header/env variables

2008-05-19 Thread Arnaud Lesueur
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Arnaud Lesueur > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > My interpretation is that my directives (SetEnvIf and RequestHeader) > > are being executed before the authentication/authorization pro

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 Windows Compile Issue/Failure

2008-02-11 Thread Stusynski, Dan
default install location rectified the error. I would assume it does however. Dan From: Stusynski, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:22 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 Windows Compile Issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8, SNI, SSL and Virtual Hosts

2008-02-17 Thread Norman Khine
Hello, I have some virtual hosts and would like to run SSL with different certificates on each. Having followed the following how-to, http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Apache_with_Name_Based_Hosting_and_SSL and rebuilding apache with SNI support, I am having some issues in that domain2.com only ret

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 VirtuaHost and a NAS

2008-03-04 Thread Graeme Fowler
Hi On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:10 -0900, Brian wrote: > DocumentRoot "L:/test" Wouldn't that be "L:\test", with a backslash? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http://httpd.apache.org/

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 VirtuaHost and a NAS

2008-03-04 Thread Joshua Slive
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:13 AM, Graeme Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:10 -0900, Brian wrote: > > DocumentRoot "L:/test" > > Wouldn't that be "L:\test", with a backslash? No, all paths in httpd.conf should use forward slashes. The problem of not being able t

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 VirtuaHost and a NAS

2008-03-04 Thread Brian
MAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 3:13 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 VirtuaHost and a NAS Hi On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:10 -0900, Brian wrote: > DocumentRoot "L:/test" W

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 VirtuaHost and a NAS

2008-03-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Joshua Slive wrote: On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:13 AM, Graeme Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:10 -0900, Brian wrote: > DocumentRoot "L:/test" Wouldn't that be "L:\test", with a backslash? No, all paths in httpd.conf should use forward slashes. The problem of no

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 VirtuaHost and a NAS

2008-03-04 Thread Brian
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >Joshua Slive wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:13 AM, Graeme Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 21:10 -0900, Brian wrote: >>> > DocumentRoot "L:/test" >>> >>> Wouldn't that be "L:\test", with a backslash? >> >> No, all paths i

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 hangs on Solaris 9: Deadlock?

2008-04-15 Thread Krist van Besien
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any idea? Two questions: - Are you using any "third party" modules (ie, modules that didn't come with the apache source itself)? - Is any part of your apache install on an NFS share? Krist -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 hangs on Solaris 9: Deadlock?

2008-04-15 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Fri Apr 11 18:53:07 2008] [emerg] (45)Deadlock situation > detected/avoided: apr_proc_mutex_lock failed. Attempting to shutdown > process gracefully. http://marc.info/?t=11875374893&r=1&w=2 If apachectl -V says f

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 hangs on Solaris 9: Deadlock?

2008-04-15 Thread Laurent Blume
Krist van Besien a écrit : > Two questions: > - Are you using any "third party" modules (ie, modules that didn't > come with the apache source itself)? Yes, PHP 4.4.8. > - Is any part of your apache install on an NFS share? No, all of it is local, including pages, logs, conf, etc. Laurent --

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 hangs on Solaris 9: Deadlock?

2008-04-15 Thread Laurent Blume
Eric Covener a écrit : > http://marc.info/?t=11875374893&r=1&w=2 > > If apachectl -V says fcntl is the default (APR_USE_FCNTL_SERIALIZE?) > you can hit this if you have two apache components using the default > type of lock. Yes, it's fnctl(), I understand it's the default on Solaris. > Some

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 hangs on Solaris 9: Deadlock?

2008-04-15 Thread Krist van Besien
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll look for how to change the mutexes I can change. Any other hint > will be welcome. You could indeed use: AcceptMutex pthread However, your problem might be PHP. Running PHP in a multithreaded apache is not recommen

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 hangs on Solaris 9: Deadlock?

2008-04-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Krist van Besien wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll look for how to change the mutexes I can change. Any other hint will be welcome. You could indeed use: AcceptMutex pthread However, your problem might be PHP. Running PHP in a multithreade

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 hangs on Solaris 9: Deadlock?

2008-04-15 Thread Laurent Blume
William A. Rowe, Jr. a écrit : > Krist van Besien wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'll look for how to change the mutexes I can change. Any other hint >>> will be welcome. >> You could indeed use: >> AcceptMutex pthread >> >> However,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 hangs on Solaris 9: Deadlock?

2008-04-15 Thread Krist van Besien
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, Krist, William. I knew about the PHP reluctancy regarding > threads, but it had worked for years, so I didn't think about it. It > definitely seems like a plausible culprit. I can at least easily try the > pref

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 SSL is not working on RHEL5.1

2008-05-22 Thread Vinay Purohit
I have developed a apache connector that makes SSL connection to my back-end Application. This connector seems to be working fine on RHEl4.5 but it is not working on RHEL5.1. Do I need to add some rpm/package specifically required to make SSL connection on RHEL5.1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 on solaris 10 in chroot problem

2008-05-22 Thread Justin Maguire
Hello All, I am currently in the process of upgrading from Apache/2.0.63 (Unix) to Apache/2.2.8(Unix)to take advantage of mem caching. But when I complie and run the Apache 2.2.8 I am facing two issues that I believe are related to a lib that maybe missing or incorrect(cant seem to find it). Firs

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 / Win2003 - Non Paged Pool blows up

2008-06-14 Thread Nick Knack
Hi, We've been trying to diagnose an issue showing up for the past several months on our Windows Server 2003 machines (both x32 and x64) running Apache 2.2.8 (with SSL). Just using it for PHP scripts - PHProxy and the like. 1. After some period of time (every 2 hours yesterday for example), the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 compile files on x86_64 SLES 10

2008-01-22 Thread Spangler, Tim
Hello All, I'm attempting to build Apache on a 64 bit install of SLES 10. Its been an interesting ride so far, and I had to solve an expat error already, but now I'm stuck on what appears to be an openssl / apache issue. I'm running openssl 0.9.8e which I have compiled and installed into /produc

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8, SNI, SSL and Virtual Hosts

2008-02-17 Thread solprovider
What browser are you testing? The server may be working fine, but few browsers are SNI-capable. From the page you linked: Supported Browsers SNI has only recently gained support in browsers. The browsers that have been confirmed to support SNI by this author are: * Firefox 2.0.0.12 * Int

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8, SNI, SSL and Virtual Hosts

2008-02-17 Thread Norman Khine
I am testing this on FF 2.0.0.12 and Safari 3.0.3, I don't have access to IE7 ON FF I get the right certificate for domain_one, but on the second site I only get the test certificate of the server. Is there a way to test SNI that is working correctly. Thank you Norman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8, SNI, SSL and Virtual Hosts

2008-02-17 Thread Norman Khine
Eric Covener wrote: On Feb 17, 2008 8:37 AM, Norman Khine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I have some virtual hosts and would like to run SSL with different certificates on each. Having followed the following how-to, http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Apache_with_Name_Based_Hosting_and_SSL and reb

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8, SNI, SSL and Virtual Hosts

2008-02-17 Thread Eric Covener
On Feb 17, 2008 8:37 AM, Norman Khine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I have some virtual hosts and would like to run SSL with different > certificates on each. Having followed the following how-to, > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Apache_with_Name_Based_Hosting_and_SSL and > rebuilding apache

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8, SNI, SSL and Virtual Hosts

2008-02-18 Thread Norman Khine
Hello, OK, I have this working on FF. But I would like to now add an entry in the conf file for users who's browsers do not support SNI and was wondering how to generate this message? As per how-to "..If a user's browser does not support SNI then the first SSL site in the configuration file w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8, SNI, SSL and Virtual Hosts

2008-02-18 Thread Krist van Besien
On Feb 17, 2008 2:37 PM, Norman Khine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now my issue is that everything seems to work OK for domain_one.com but > everytime I try to access domain_two.com I get the certificate for the > machine, that is server.ctr and not domain_two.ctr. > > This is not the case in doma

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8, SNI, SSL and Virtual Hosts

2008-02-18 Thread Krist van Besien
On Feb 18, 2008 11:25 AM, Norman Khine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For now, the next step is to figure out how to generate the message if > the client does not support SNI. That's easy. If the client does not support SNI, it gets the first site. So the first site is where you put the information

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8, SNI, SSL and Virtual Hosts

2008-02-18 Thread Norman Khine
OK, by first site I am presuming they get the first site's certificate, in this case the server.crt This is what is happening now! I have a virtual host entry __default with a certificate entry to server.crt What I can't see is how/where I put this message, without taking the user from one sit

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 hangs on Solaris 9: Deadlock? [SOLVED]

2008-04-23 Thread Laurent Blume
Guys, since I rebuilt Apache with prefork, the problem hasn't appeared, so it seems the issue was definitely PHP + threads. Thank you all who helped! Laurent -- / Leader de Projet & Communauté| I'm working, but not speaking for \ G11N http://fr.opensolaris.org | Bull Services http://www.bu

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 SSL is not working on RHEL5.1

2008-05-22 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Vinay Purohit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have developed a apache connector that makes SSL connection to my back-end > Application. This connector seems to be working fine on RHEl4.5 but it is > not working on RHEL5.1. > Do I need to add some rpm/package specific

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 SSL is not working on RHEL5.1

2008-05-22 Thread Vinay Purohit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 5:39 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 SSL is not working on RHEL5.1 On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:26 AM, Vinay Purohit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have developed a apache connector that makes SSL conn

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 / Win2003 - Non Paged Pool blows up

2008-06-14 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Nick Knack wrote: Thanks for any responses/suggestions. We aim at getting sufficient info to file a bug report. First off you didn't mention which module you used to connect to httpd, would look there first. Also, pick up 2.2.9 and see if these patches that are in that release don't solve yo

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 / Win2003 - Non Paged Pool blows up

2008-06-14 Thread André Warnier
Nick Knack wrote: Hi, 1. After some period of time (every 2 hours yesterday for example), the Non Paged Pool usage of Apache surges to (on x64) 18TB or thereabouts - Maybe you'd like to try : Setting MaxRequestsPerThread to a non-zero limit has two beneficial effects: * it limits the a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 / Win2003 - Non Paged Pool blows up

2008-06-14 Thread Eric Covener
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:39 AM, Nick Knack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > We've been trying to diagnose an issue showing up for the past several > months on our Windows Server 2003 machines (both x32 and x64) running Apache > 2.2.8 (with SSL). Just using it for PHP scripts - PHProxy and the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 / Win2003 - Non Paged Pool blows up

2008-06-20 Thread Nick Knack
Thanks to William/Andre for replying. Eric, that patch did the trick - seems to have fixed the issue, no crashes since the patch was installed. Thanks! On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Eric Covener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:39 AM, Nick Knack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wr

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 compile files on x86_64 SLES 10

2008-01-23 Thread Foster, Stephen (ASPIRE)
From: Spangler, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 January 2008 00:38 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 compile files on x86_64 SLES 10 Hello All, I'm attempting to build Apache on a 64 bit install of SLES 10. Its been an interesting ride so far, and I had t

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 on Solaris 10 (libgcc_s.so problems after compiling)

2008-03-05 Thread Greg W. Smith
All -- I know there have been some messages in the past, however I have not run into this problem until I upgraded from Solaris 2.9 to Solaris 2.10. Everything seems to compile correctly however upon closer inspection libgcc_s.so.1 is not found at runtime. I am currently using gcc version 3.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 on Solaris 10 (libgcc_s.so problems after compiling)

2008-03-05 Thread Lloyd Parkes
Greg W. Smith wrote: libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found) libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found) libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc is sometimes found. Here are my compile options: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --enable-so --ena

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 on Solaris 10 (libgcc_s.so problems after compiling)

2008-03-05 Thread Greg W. Smith
Lloyd -- thanks for the information. I actually tried the LD_OPTIONS='-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib' as well with no luck. I got the same output as you noted in your message. Greg Lloyd Parkes wrote: Greg W. Smith wrote: libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found) libgcc_

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 on Solaris 10 (libgcc_s.so problems after compiling)

2008-03-05 Thread Lloyd Parkes
Greg W. Smith wrote: Lloyd -- thanks for the information. I actually tried the LD_OPTIONS='-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib' as well with no luck. I got the same output as you noted in your message. If you run a Solaris program with LD_DEBUG set to suitable values, the runtime linker will

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 on Solaris 10 (libgcc_s.so problems after compiling)

2008-03-06 Thread Greg W. Smith
Lloyd -- thanks for all your help. Lari revealed the following: # lari httpd libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found) libgcc_s.so.1 => (file not found) [2:0]: __ashldi3(): /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 [2:0P]: __ashldi3(): httpd [2:0]: __ashrdi3(): /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 [2:0P]: __ashrdi3(): httpd

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 serves nothing or garbled directory lists or image file name

2008-05-11 Thread Frank Huddleston
Greetings, I'm running NetBSD 4.0. I used pkg_add to install apache-2.2.8, but had mod_ssl.c compiled in and wanted that to start. I would rather not deal with SSL just now: I don't need it, so I downloaded the source, configured a different httpd and put it in /usr/local (pkg_add had put th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 serves nothing or garbled directory lists or image file name

2008-05-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Frank Huddleston wrote: Greetings, I'm running NetBSD 4.0. I used pkg_add to install apache-2.2.8, but had mod_ssl.c compiled in and wanted that to start. I would rather not deal with SSL just now: I don't need it, so I downloaded the source, configured a different httpd and put it in /usr/l

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 serves nothing or garbled directory lists or image file name

2008-05-11 Thread Frank Huddleston
OK: I added those directives: results look unchanged. Result of the apr-1-config command: $ apr-1-config --version 1.2.9 I also noted that, using the Safari browser instead of FireFox, the URL of the image file is not displayed: nothing is displayed. Also, I have "fancy" directory listing enabl

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 serves nothing or garbled directory lists or image file name

2008-05-11 Thread Lloyd Parkes
Is it possible that the web server is speaking HTTPS and the web browser is speaking HTTP? Cheers -- Lloyd Parkes Senior Systems Programmer Open Systems Ph: +64 4 890 2437 - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 serves nothing or garbled directory lists or image file name

2008-05-11 Thread Frank Huddleston
Well, the messages that the server sends, such as status messages, error messages, and the headers for the directory listings, all come out OK. Wouldn't everything be encrypted if it were speaking https? There's this at the bottom of the httpd.conf file, but as I don't have mod_ssl compiled in,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 serves nothing or garbled directory lists or image file name

2008-05-12 Thread Frank Huddleston
I just realized that I didn't answer all of your questions: The NetBSD computer on which this apache is installed is part of my home LAN, so I'm not running a browser on the machine running the server: I'm running the browser on a laptop in the other room. Regards, Frank H. William A. Rowe,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.8 serves nothing or garbled directory lists or image file name

2008-05-14 Thread Frank Huddleston
Further work on this problem: I removed the existing apache22 installation which pkg_add had created (in /usr/pkg), set up pksrc, and built another apache 2.2.8 (httpd) from source. This one has mod_ssl in it, but it complains only slightly about missing ssl stuff. Results are the same, kind of: