apache2 sol 10 x86_64

2005-09-19 Thread Alexander Lazic
Hi, hat schon jemand von euch Erfahrungen mit dem apache2-httpd auf sol10 amd 64? al ;-) -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige

Re: apache2 sol 10 x86_64

2005-09-19 Thread Alexander Lazic
On Mon 19.09.2005 16:08, Paul Puschmann wrote: Viel Erfolg, Paul Danke. al ;-) -- Apache HTTP Server Mailing List users-de unsubscribe-Anfragen an [EMAIL PROTECTED] sonstige Anfragen an

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuExec and symlinks

2005-09-19 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/19/05, Oscar Haeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What I'd like to know is if SuExec somehow prevents me from running scripts via symlinks. I have a webserver with SuExec installed and I'd like to be able to run scripts that resides in other peoples cgi-bin directories. I've tested this

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 1.3.33 not compiling proxy (only problem...at the moment)

2005-09-19 Thread Tom Cat
On 9/16/05, Eric Wagar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But, after the make|make install, I receive these errors: Starting Apache Server for ewm-test.corp.sgi.com /engr/apache/site_conf/ewm-test.corp.sgi.com/start : ewm-test.corp.sgi.com::httpd could not be started Syntax error on line 230 of

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] site refresh

2005-09-19 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/19/05, Muhammad Rizwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Is there any way in apache to refresh just one site instead of restarting whole daemon. If you mean reread the configuration for one virtual host, then the answer is no. But a graceful restart should be painless, so it shouldn't be

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please!! OSX/Unix 1.3 - 2.0 start from scratch ( Uninstall remove)

2005-09-19 Thread Joe Orton
On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 10:56:20PM +1000, Haali Goodsell wrote: configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile ./config.status: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable Something went wrong here. Try it again, and try using the latest version, 2.0.54. joe

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] site refresh

2005-09-19 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/19/05, Muhammad Rizwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for your reply. So i can just reread the configuration of one virtual host. But i can't understand what 'll happen with in case of graceful restart. 'll it destroys all the sessions of other sites or not. Can you plz. provide me

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] site refresh

2005-09-19 Thread Dmitriy Kirhlarov
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 08:33:25PM +0500, Muhammad Rizwan wrote: IS this graceful restart is equal to /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd restart No it's equal to /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd gracefull :) -- Dmitriy Kirhlarov OILspace, 26 Leninskaya sloboda, bld. 2, 2nd floor, 115280 Moscow, Russia P:+7 095

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] site refresh

2005-09-19 Thread Muhammad Rizwan
Another thing is that, why apache can refresh just one virtual domain. Like it be done in IIS, One can restart just one single site while using IIS. Thanks On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 20:40, Joshua Slive wrote: On 9/19/05, Muhammad Rizwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IS this graceful restart is

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] site refresh

2005-09-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Because all the virutalhosts run in the same process, this is not possible. You raise an interesting question, if a per-host MPM was set up to permit this, it would be possible, al la perchild. (Note that the perchild mpm will not support Win32 as written.) Muhammad Rizwan wrote: Another

[EMAIL PROTECTED] unwanted file upload

2005-09-19 Thread John Hammer
I am relatively new to this so if this is not the correct forum I would appreciate being pointed to the right place. Over the weekend I discovered an unwanted program running on my server. In the error_log I found this entry: --13:29:54-- http://www.ozdereklam.com/.xpl/dc.txt =

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] unwanted file upload

2005-09-19 Thread Scott Gifford
John Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am relatively new to this so if this is not the correct forum I would appreciate being pointed to the right place. Over the weekend I discovered an unwanted program running on my server. In the error_log I found this entry: --13:29:54--

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache stops servicing port 80

2005-09-19 Thread Garret Wilson
I have a very strange problem that I can't resolve. I have Apache 2.0.54 running on Red Hat. Apache is serving the following sites: * http://staticpages.example.com - Simple static XHTML pages. * http://jsp.example.com - JSP pages running via proxy on port 9000 on Tomcat 5.5.9 (JDK

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2 and large file support

2005-09-19 Thread Charles E. Heizer
I take that back, it appears to be a firefox browser issue... - Charles On Sep 19, 2005, at 1:15 PM, Charles E. Heizer wrote: Hi Joe, I just tried 2.1.7 and it does not support large files. All I did was issue a ./configurre --prefix=/opt/apache217b and it's truncating the file 2.5 gig

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ldaps auth

2005-09-19 Thread Craig L. Ching
Hi Dmitriy, I've been trying to get this to work for 4 weeks now without any success. I highly suspect that just relying on the configure script to do the right thing doesn't work as I've inspected a few different Linux distributions and all of them have had the same log output (e.g. LDAP: SSL

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] site refresh

2005-09-19 Thread Nick Kew
Muhammad Rizwan wrote: Another thing is that, why apache can refresh just one virtual domain. I haven't tried it myself, but I understand there are modules that will do that. But that's based on storing per-virtual-host config in an SQL database IIRC. -- Nick Kew

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocking harrassment

2005-09-19 Thread Jean-Christophe Montigny
Hello, I've noticed that, for about a week, i am being harrassed by always the same IP, getting my index twenty times in a row but with a sexual-explicit referrer : 69.50.168.130 - - [20/Sep/2005:00:04:38 +0200] GET / HTTP/1.1 200 27087 http://**/; Mozilla/4.0

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache stops servicing port 80

2005-09-19 Thread Garret Wilson
Here's an update---I'm even more confused. I shut down the Tomcat server being proxied. If I then restart Apache, it will serve my staticpages.example.com site just fine---for a few minutes. Then it stops accepting requests, with nothing in the error logs. Nothing in the access logs. Nothing

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocking harrassment

2005-09-19 Thread Joshua Slive
On 9/19/05, Jean-Christophe Montigny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way in apache to refuse serving a given ip? Yes, there is, but it will still appear in the log. I think you are going about this the wrong way entirely. Your problem is garbage in your log (and, by the way, that is the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocking harrassment

2005-09-19 Thread Jean-Christophe Montigny
Hello, Joshua Slive wrote: I think you are going about this the wrong way entirely. Your problem is garbage in your log (and, by the way, that is the whole goal of these requests -- put garbage in your log so that the referer will show up). Solve it by fixing your log analysis. For example,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocking harrassment

2005-09-19 Thread Boysenberry Payne
What about making a rewrite rule in httpd.conf or a .htaccess file something that redirects them to yahoo.com or something similar? Boysenberry boysenberrys.com | habitatlife.com | selfgnosis.com On Sep 19, 2005, at 6:46 PM, Jean-Christophe Montigny wrote: Hello, Joshua Slive wrote: I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocking harrassment

2005-09-19 Thread Rit Jhaveri
HI Jean, try using .htaccess file for your required directory, limit GET allow all deny from 69.50.168.130 /limit *** check permissions according to your requirements. save this file as .htaccess in the required directory n make changes in ur httpd.conf accordingly. write me for more details

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug: apache/mod_svn intermittently creates transaction dirs with incorrect permissions or ownership such that the transaction breaks.

2005-09-19 Thread John Duprey
I'm seeing strange behavior with an apache module (Subversion's mod_svn). Subversion commits through mod_svn are intermittently failing because files and/or directories are being created with ROOT ownership!! or permissions such that the user apache cannot write. This problem happens frequenlty,