RE: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-24 Thread mario.buonopane
21.11 To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations Hi! Just to be clear, what you're saying is that you can't use the same view in more than one conversation at a time? At the moment: yes! As I wrote, this is something we will allow

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-24 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! The user is inserting data for a Claim reading from a paper, receive a call and start to insert a new Claim in a new browser window (or tab). At the moment I have two browser using the same HttpSession, the same function and same shared data and my application does not work! For this,

RE: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-24 Thread mario.buonopane
dialog in differents windows. Do you think I have a chance of success? ( :) ) Thanks in advance Mario -Original Message- From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 aprile 2008 15.03 To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-24 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! I don't know if I understood very well, but I'm going to fix Shale to store data in the current conversationContext. So I can have same dialog in differents windows. Do you think I have a chance of success? ( :) ) Yep, sounds very good! Don't know if Shale allows this easily, though.

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread a clem
Thank's a lot for your response. What I would like to do is to be able to share a page (ant its backing bean) between 2 conversations types, like an activity définition can be shared between 2 process definition in BPM. For exemple, the select customer page can be shared between the 'send mail'

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! Thank's a lot for your response. What I would like to do is to be able to share a page (ant its backing bean) between 2 conversations types, like an activity définition can be shared between 2 process definition in BPM. For exemple, the select customer page can be shared between the 'send

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a clem schrieb: Thank's a lot for your response. What I would like to do is to be able to share a page (ant its backing bean) between 2 conversations types, like an activity définition can be shared between 2 process definition in BPM. For exemple, the select customer page can be shared

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread a clem
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Bernhard Huemer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, although Orchestra is not about pages, it's most likely that the user moves through two different page flows if he has started two different conversations (I'm not talking about two different instances of the

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread a clem
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: a clem schrieb: Thank's a lot for your response. What I would like to do is to be able to share a page (ant its backing bean) between 2 conversations types, like an activity définition can be shared between 2

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread Bernhard Huemer
Hello, although Orchestra is not about pages, it's most likely that the user moves through two different page flows if he has started two different conversations (I'm not talking about two different instances of the same conversation but rather about two different definitions for a

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread a clem
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Thank's a lot for your response. What I would like to do is to be able to share a page (ant its backing bean) between 2 conversations types, like an activity définition can be shared between 2 process

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! Use of tag separateConversationContext allows to start a new conversation but it isn't really a nested conversation context, since it has to be done in a new browser window (no context stack). Am I right? Exactly! This is something we might implement in the (near?) future. This will

RE: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread Kito D. Mann
, training, and mentoring http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info -Original Message- From: Bernhard Huemer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 9:00 AM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! Just to be clear, what you're saying is that you can't use the same view in more than one conversation at a time? At the moment: yes! As I wrote, this is something we will allow in the near future, but it would require to have a page-flow configuration. Hmmm probably the new

RE: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread Kito D. Mann
-Original Message- From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:11 PM To: MyFaces Discussion Subject: Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations Hi! Just to be clear, what you're saying is that you can't use

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! So, for example, while in the Relationships tab, I may want to quickly view or edit a Party. The view/edit Party view is usually in the Party tab. So, essentially I'm reusing the same page in a completely different flow. Now, in reality, I may end up using two different Facelet views

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Mario Ivankovits schrieb: So, for example, while in the Relationships tab, I may want to quickly view or edit a Party. The view/edit Party view is usually in the Party tab. So, essentially I'm reusing the same page in a completely different flow. Oh - and there is a not very well

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread Bernhard Huemer
Hello, In fact, I think that this problem occurs not only when you'd like to reuse certain pages but also when you'd like to reuse certain beans. If you're injecting conversation-scoped beans you're actually injecting a bean being tied to a specific conversation (i.e. you'd also have to copy

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-04-01 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! If you're injecting conversation-scoped beans you're actually injecting a bean being tied to a specific conversation (i.e. you'd also have to copy bean definitions just referencing conversation-scoped beans, not only pages!). This is how spring works, no? You always put a bean in a scope

[Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-03-31 Thread a clem
Hi, I'm currently playing with this great framework Orchestra, trying to build some small examples and a few questions came to my mind: Is it possible to start a new conversation explicitly (programitically). I've looked to the API but there doesn't seem to be something like a begin or start

Re: [Orchestra] Explicit conversation starting and nested conversations

2008-03-31 Thread simon
Hi, On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 22:36 +0200, a clem wrote: Hi, I'm currently playing with this great framework Orchestra, trying to build some small examples and a few questions came to my mind: Is it possible to start a new conversation explicitly (programitically). I've looked to the API but