Re: [ scala ] Just asking for update on Scala for NetBeans

Cool, thanks, I'll give it a whirl tomorrow. Al On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 6:07 PM Brett Ryan wrote: > I’m going to have to give this a try, I did manage building for 8.2 but it > was a lot of trouble. Was hoping i could free my time to help but it’s been > hectic. > > I think the whole big data

RE: Java 8 still on Java.com

Derik, I use Launch4J, then innoSetup to create an installer. Tricky part is the innoSetup for including the JRE. I can share mine, if that would help. Ed From: Derik Devecchio Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 6:06 PM To: Emilian Bold Cc: users@netbeans.apache.org Subject:

Re: Java 8 still on Java.com

Emillian, Thanks for getting back to me.I am not trying to re-invent “write once run anywhere”.I accept that everything is going to need an installer now. The question is, how do I get from “Clean and Build” to .EXE file that includes a JRE? You said "For Windows/macOS you probably

Re: [ scala ] Just asking for update on Scala for NetBeans

I’m going to have to give this a try, I did manage building for 8.2 but it was a lot of trouble. Was hoping i could free my time to help but it’s been hectic. I think the whole big data community has been using intellij for scala (myself included). There’s several reasons there. Python is big

Re: [ scala ] Just asking for update on Scala for NetBeans

I think the most recent development wrt Scala is https://github.com/cbm64chris/nbscala by Chris Luff and the plugin would be at http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/75542/nbscala (added 2019-03-13). So either you register the whole plugin portal update center URL or you download the NBM and add it

[ scala ] Just asking for update on Scala for NetBeans

I've been using NetBeans 11.1 for about a week now. Smooth sailing with all my Java projects I started on NetBeans 8.2. For several months I've been aware of Geertjan Wielenga's 2013 tutorial for installing Scala for NetBeans 7.3.1. But when I only had one computer for programming, I was

Re: Java 8 still on Java.com

Well, there is a public facing Java distribution such as AdoptOpenJDK and many Linux distros provide their own (see http://www.jchoice.eu ). So, at least on Linux, you will have some form of Java in their repositories. Although even there there's nothing stopping you to ship your own runtime (as

Re: Java 8 still on Java.com

> On Sep 30, 2019, at 9:55 AM, Emilian Bold wrote: > > Java is no longer an user-facing product, it's middleware. > Okay, that sounds like an improvement from where I am standing, but… Can Netbeans help me with that now? The last time I looked into bundling the JRE with my program, I

Re: Java 8 still on Java.com

Java is no longer an user-facing product, it's middleware. You are expected to provide Java bundled with your application in the future. Users will not have any Java already available nor will they download any new Java. --emi On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 7:39 PM Derik Devecchio wrote: > > I know

Re: Java 8 still on Java.com

Best to join the mailing lists here and discuss further there: https://openjdk.java.net/ Gj On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 6:40 PM Scott Palmer wrote: > There are no JRE downloads after Java 8. > > You are expected to bundle Java with your application. > > Scott > > > On Sep 30, 2019, at 12:39 PM,

Re: Java 8 still on Java.com

There are no JRE downloads after Java 8. You are expected to bundle Java with your application. Scott > On Sep 30, 2019, at 12:39 PM, Derik Devecchio > wrote: > > I know that the Netbeans’s forum doesn’t maintain Java.com > . But I don’t know anyone else to ask off

Java 8 still on Java.com

I know that the Netbeans’s forum doesn’t maintain Java.com. But I don’t know anyone else to ask off hand. I went to Java.com to find out the “latest public stable release”. I was expecting Java 9 point something.But I was hoping for 10, 11 or maybe 12.

Re: Re[10]: Apache 11.1 - build failed

Different solutions, google around a bit, seems one advice is to do a Clean first and then a Build, read other ideas here and elsewhere: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10519558/createprocess-error-206-the-filename-or-extension-is-too-long-when-running-main/23299746 Gj On Mon, Sep 30, 2019

Re: Re[8]: Apache 11.1 - build failed

In the Options window, go to Java and then Ant and check the verbosity Level, maybe increase the level. Gj On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 5:33 PM Sterpu Victor wrote: > That is weird because when I try to build the project from here: > http://cc123.caido.ro/caido-test2.zip > Apache Netbeans 11.1 and

Re[8]: Apache 11.1 - build failed

That is weird because when I try to build the project from here: http://cc123.caido.ro/caido-test2.zip Apache Netbeans 11.1 and 11.2-beta1 gives me no missing dependencies, just this message appears: "ant -f E:\\Users\\victor\\NetBeansProjects\\caido-test2 -Dnb.internal.action.name=rebuild clean

Re[6]: Apache 11.1 - build failed

I made a minmal project with this problem, the project is here: http://cc123.caido.ro/caido-test2.zip The project starts to compile immediatly if I delete the folder lib/jetty-distribution-9.3.9.v20160517, actually if I delete almost any folder or file from the lib folder the problem disappears.

Re: Re[6]: Apache 11.1 - build failed

Also, unless you have a special reason for not doing so, it would be best to use a Maven project rather than Ant, which will help solve your dependency issues and also help you to identify problems more easily. Gj On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 4:22 PM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Also, best not to

Re: Re[6]: Apache 11.1 - build failed

Also, best not to have your class in the default package -- create a new package and put the source file there. Gj On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 4:21 PM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Indeed, the dependencies are not there so when I try to build, there are > many missing dependencies and the error

Re: Re[6]: Apache 11.1 - build failed

Indeed, the dependencies are not there so when I try to build, there are many missing dependencies and the error messages shows them and then the Output window ends with this: 50 errors BUILD FAILED (total time: 5 seconds) Gj On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 4:12 PM Sterpu Victor wrote: > I made a

Re: Re[4]: Apache 11.1 - build failed

Great, though being Mavenized is not a requirement. Happy to take a look at the original project to see what the problem is/was. Gj On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 3:44 PM Sterpu Victor wrote: > Is not on GitHub. > My original project wasn't mavenized and I think this was the problem. > I tried to

Re[4]: Apache 11.1 - build failed

Is not on GitHub. My original project wasn't mavenized and I think this was the problem. I tried to create a new maven project and copy the source files and it seems that this was the problem, I can compile with a lot of errors right now because I didn't linked all the libraries yet, but I think

RE: Apache 11.1 - build failed

I think I accurately described my experience and my limitations. I think that's a point of view that should not be suppressed. -Original Message- From: Geertjan Wielenga Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 8:23 AM To: Walter Oney Cc: Sterpu Victor ; users@netbeans.apache.org Subject: Re:

Re: Re[2]: Apache 11.1 - build failed

Is the project available somewhere, e.g., on GitHub, so we can take a look? Gj On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 14:24, Sterpu Victor wrote: > Thank you for the quick answer. > I tried Apache Netbeans version 11.2 beta 1 but the result was tha same. > I tried many things, all rezulting in the same

Re[2]: Apache 11.1 - build failed

Thank you for the quick answer. I tried Apache Netbeans version 11.2 beta 1 but the result was tha same. I tried many things, all rezulting in the same error(BUILD FAILED without any specific message): - JDK 13 + Netbeans versions 11.2 beta 1 - JDK 12 + Netbeans versions 11.2 beta 1 - JDK 11 +

Re: Apache 11.1 - build failed

Walter, You’ve seen in the responses you received that you appear to have configured multiple JDK’s on your path, JDK 8 being the first of these, which is why JDK 8 was picked up when you tried to run a JavaFX sample targeted for JDK 13. Can you focus on configuring your environment correctly,

RE: Apache 11.1 - build failed

From: Sterpu Victor > I want to migrate from a old Netbeans 8 version to Apache Netbeans 11.1. I > use JDK 13. First off, I am a highly unofficial interloper on this list -- a hobbyist and newbie user of Java and NetBeans. So take everything I say with a huge dose of skepticism. Second, I

Re: Apache 11.1 - build failed

Well, 11.1 does not support JDK 13. Try reproduce the problem on 11.2 beta1: bit.ly/apache-netbeans-11-2-beta-1 Gj On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 13:53, Sterpu Victor wrote: > Hello > > I want to migrate from a old Netbeans 8 version to Apache Netbeans 11.1. I > use JDK 13. > The project works in

Apache 11.1 - build failed

Hello I want to migrate from a old Netbeans 8 version to Apache Netbeans 11.1. I use JDK 13. The project works in Netbeans 8 but when I try to compile the project in Netbeans 11.1 I receive a build failed without any other error messages, like this: "ant -f