On 4/16/2014 6:01 AM, Adam Tkáč von...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-02 13:19 GMT+02:00 Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com
mailto:cmar...@media-brokers.com:
On 4/1/2014 7:25 AM, Adam Tkáč von...@gmail.com
mailto:von...@gmail.com wrote:
4. What are these 'Outlook Redemption
On 03/26/2014 03:40 PM, Adam Tkáč wrote:
I would like to announce GetOut - fork of the Funambol Outlook connector:
Thanks for letting us know!
The GetOut currently works with SOGo Funambol v10 server but in future
I plan to add support for CalDav and CardDav protocols to avoid Funambol
On 4/16/2014 5:11 PM, Helge Hess helge.h...@opengroupware.org wrote:
Replacing Redemption would be a major effort. AFAIK Redemption is essentially a
reimplementation of the model layer of Outlook on top of plain MAPI. I have a
hard time to believe this could be done in a few months (and there
2014-04-16 13:21 GMT+02:00 Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com:
On 4/16/2014 6:01 AM, Adam Tkáč von...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not licensing expert but I think it's OK to use Redemption with open
source licensed projects.
Thanks (again) Adam... :)
One last question on these
2014-04-02 13:19 GMT+02:00 Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com:
On 4/1/2014 7:25 AM, Adam Tkáč von...@gmail.com von...@gmail.comwrote:
4. What are these 'Outlook Redemption libraries' - which are non-free,
commercially licensed - that are required for installation, why are they
On 4/16/2014 6:01 AM, Adam Tkáč von...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not licensing expert but I think it's OK to use Redemption with open
source licensed projects.
Thanks (again) Adam... :)
One last question on these libraries...
You had said you were planning on eliminating the need for these
On Apr 16, 2014, at 1:21 PM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 4/16/2014 6:01 AM, Adam Tkáč von...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not licensing expert but I think it's OK to use Redemption with open
source licensed projects.
You had said you were planning on eliminating the need for
Would love a response, Adam...
On 4/2/2014 7:19 AM, Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com wrote:
On 4/1/2014 7:25 AM, Adam Tkáč von...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-03-28 11:01 GMT+01:00 Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com
mailto:cmar...@media-brokers.com:
On 3/26/2014 6:40 PM, Adam
On 3/28/2014 8:05 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
My understanding (could be wrong) is GetOut would obviate the need for
both Funambol AND Openchange for Outlook 2013...
Openchange is a huge layer of complexity that is not needed if you don't
need to run a full Samba DC...
That's the issue we're
2014-03-28 11:01 GMT+01:00 Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com:
On 3/26/2014 6:40 PM, Adam Tkáč von...@gmail.com wrote:
The GetOut currently works with SOGo Funambol v10 server but in future
I plan to add support for CalDav and CardDav protocols to avoid Funambol
server at all and sync
2014-03-28 13:05 GMT+01:00 Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org:
On 3/28/2014 7:13 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote:
Still don't get it. My understanding is:
- Openchange and Outlook Anywhere setup should be used for Outlook 2010
- SOGo built-in ActiveSync for Outlook 2013
- SOGo
Hi,
we tested the Bynari and it runs quite good, but: it is licensed on a
subscription base ...
Greetings,
Martin
Am 01.04.14 07:50, schrieb Thomas Harold:
For the few hold-outs who refuse to ditch Outlook 2007/2010/2013, we're
probably going to go with a paid connector. Either the
On 3/26/2014 6:40 PM, Adam Tkáč von...@gmail.com wrote:
The GetOut currently works with SOGo Funambol v10 server but in
future I plan to add support for CalDav and CardDav protocols to avoid
Funambol server at all and sync Outlook directly with SOGo (note that
I wasn't able to find any open
2014-03-27 17:27 GMT+01:00 Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com:
On 3/27/2014 11:40 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote:
Hi,
Isn't this addressed by new, native, built-in SOGo Active-Sync support?
That only works for Outlook 2013+...
Right, ActiveSync is usable only for
On 3/28/2014 6:42 AM, Adam Tkáč von...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, ActiveSync is usable only for Outlook 2013.
However there is another reason to have SyncML/CalDav/CardDav
alternative for proprietary ActiveSync protocol even for Outlook 2013
- potential patent and legal issues. ActiveSync itself
On 28 Mar 2014, at 11:42, Adam Tkáč von...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-03-27 17:27 GMT+01:00 Charles Marcus cmar...@media-brokers.com:
On 3/27/2014 11:40 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote:
Hi,
Isn’t this addressed by new, native, built-in SOGo Active-Sync support?
That only works for
On 3/28/2014 7:13 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote:
Still don’t get it. My understanding is:
- Openchange and Outlook Anywhere setup should be used for Outlook 2010
- SOGo built-in ActiveSync for Outlook 2013
- SOGo built-in ActiveSync for Android and iOS devices
- IMAP/CalDav/CardDav
Hi all,
I would like to announce GetOut - fork of the Funambol Outlook connector:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/getout/
We extensively use SOGo in our company and syncing Outlook's contacts and
calendar (especially Outlook 2013) to SOGo was the last piece which didn't
work fine. Since it
Hi,
Isn’t this addressed by new, native, built-in SOGo Active-Sync support?
Regards
Martin.
On 26 Mar 2014, at 23:40, Adam Tkáč von...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to announce GetOut - fork of the Funambol Outlook connector:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/getout/
We
On 3/27/2014 11:40 AM, Martin Simovic mar...@netson.sk wrote:
Hi,
Isn’t this addressed by new, native, built-in SOGo Active-Sync support?
That only works for Outlook 2013+...
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
20 matches
Mail list logo
