Re: Odd syslog errors.

Ernie Dunbar wrote: Oct 5 13:26:39 pop spamd[19660]: Cannot open bayes databases /home/spamc/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Permission denied Oct The typical cause of this is that the file ownership changed on the bayes files when you converted them to 3.0. At least this was the

Re: dnsbl lookups slow due to sleep 1 in code, plus patch

Jan-Pieter, Can you open a bug against 3.0.0 on bugzilla.spamassassin.org and attach the patches (use the Create a new attachment link after the bug has been opened)? My main concern is the increase in CPU time required (since multiple spamd processes will be running), especially on boxes that

Re: How to rewrite spamc in Perl

Michael Parker wrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:11:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any documentation for the spamd client interface? MIMEDefang can talk to clamd.sock directly, using the commands in man clamd, rather than spawning `clamdscan` processes. I checked man

RE: How to rewrite spamc in Perl

John Rudd wrote: As long as people are thinking about new implementations of spamc/spamd, I'd like to make a couple suggestions: 1) make room for passing a reference to a message instead of the message itself, to reduce network latency when it is not necessary (for example, if the spamd

custom rule

hill all, i'm using spamassassin 2.64, i want to reject body message like this : -- ÅóÓÑ£¡ÄãÓÐûÓÐÔÚÍøÉÏÏë¿´µçÓ°ÓÖÕÒ²»µ½ÕæÕýÃâ·ÑµÄÍøÕ¾µÄ¾­Àú£¿ºÃÈÝÒ×ÕÒµ½Ò»¸öºÅ³ÆÃâ·ÑµÄ¿Éµ½Í·À´ ²»ÊÇÈÃÄãÌîÊÖ»úºÅÂë¾ÍÊÇÈÃÄãÓʾּÄÇ®»òÍøÉÏÖ§¸¶£¬ÏÖÔÚºÃÀ²£¡ÓÐÁËÎÒÌṩµÄÈí¼þ£¬ -- is there custom rule for doing that?

Re: custom rule

Ever since signing up with AllofMP3.com (a Russian MP3 site), I've been getting tons of e-mail like that. --- Gian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hill all, i'm using spamassassin 2.64, i want to reject body message like this : --

Re: How to rewrite spamc in Perl

John Rudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1) make room for passing a reference to a message instead of the message itself, to reduce network latency when it is not necessary (for example, if the spamd chosen just happens to be on localhost (because it's part of a list of servers that are being

Re: custom rule

At 07:26 AM 10/7/2004 +0700, Gian wrote: hill all, i'm using spamassassin 2.64, i want to reject body message like this : -- ÅóÓÑ£¡ÄãÓÐûÓÐÔÚÍøÉÏÏë¿´µçÓ°ÓÖÕÓ²»µ½ÕæÕýÃâ·ÑµÄÍøÕ¾µÄ¾­Àú£¿ºÃÈÝÓ×ÕÓµ½Ó»¸öºÅ³ÆÃâ·ÑµÄ¿Éµ½Í·À´ ²»ÊÇÈÃÄãÌîÊÖ»úºÅÂë¾ÍÊÇÈÃÄãÓʾּÄÇ®»òÍøÉÏÖ§¸¶£¬ÏÖÔÚºÃÀ²£¡ÓÐÁËÎÓÌṩµÄÈí¼þ£¬ --

3.0.0 can't install on FreeBSD

Dear SpamAssassinators, My spamassassin began to fail suddenly. I have been trying to update/fix it without success. I keep getting messages with --version in them, such below. Please help! --- . . . /usr/bin/perl build/preprocessor

Re: 3.0.0 can't install on FreeBSD

Wayne M Barnes wrote: Dear SpamAssassinators, My spamassassin began to fail suddenly. I have been trying to update/fix it without success. I keep getting messages with --version in them, such below. Please help! version.h.pl: version.h.pl: Can't locate Digest/SHA1.pm in @INC (@INC You

Re: dnsbl lookups slow due to sleep 1 in code, plus patch

(FreeBSD 4.10 and Debian linux unstable), but this might have issues on inferior OSes from the Evil Empire. I haven't checked this. If it does, however, I suggest adding a test for $Config{'osname'} eq 'MSWin32', and just calling sleep in that case. The changes work equally well on the superior

Re: [Fwd: Better check your sig now you are a spammer :-)]

On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 16:54, Matt Kettler wrote: At 09:01 AM 10/6/2004, Ron McKeating wrote: Nigel M kindly sent me this. we will have to think of new job titles unless SA can detect the difference between specialist and cialis. Ooops now nobody will see this email. SA can, does and will

Re: dnsbl lookups slow due to sleep 1 in code, plus patch

If it's necessary then it should be added, but someone already posted here that it works fine on Win2k (so I expect Win2k3 works too, and it probably even works on older WinNT). It might still have issues on Win98 (and derivatives like WinME) and possibly on WinXP. If it works on W2K it will in

Re: Rule for words with multiple punctuation characters?

On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:42:48 -0700, Loren Wilton wrote: Haven't seen these myself, but if they are drug spams, make sure you have the obfu drug rules installed and maybe up the score on some of them. Should have gotten about 4 hits in that first sentence. Yes, the drug rules are catching them,

Antwort: Re: How to rewrite spamc in Perl

-Michael Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: -MichaelPS ignore the learn method for now, that's from something else I'mworking on.Hello Michael,how far is your engagement in enhance the learn method to spamc/spamd?As i stated here http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201i would

Re: Level _STARS(*)_

I resolved my issue. The problem was related to qmail-scanner and not spamassassin (--scanner=verbose VS. fast spamassassin). Sorry about that. Jean Jean Caron writes: I read everything I could find... still doesn't work. I don't get it. I want to enable the header Level _STARS(*)_. The

How to find out installed modules?

How do I find out which modules are installed for SA on my server? Where do I find a list of all available modules I can install with links to those modules? Thanks, Brett

[SA-LIST] Subject not changed

We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had a message this morning that I do not understand why the subject was not changed. Here is the header info. Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

-Original Message- From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:42 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had a message this morning that I do

Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

Carnegie, Martin wrote: We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had a message this morning that I do not understand why the subject was not changed. Here is the header info. X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=16.9 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_DATE,

RE: How to find out installed modules?

-Original Message- From: Brett Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:37 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: How to find out installed modules? How do I find out which modules are installed for SA on my server? Where do I find a list of all

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

-Original Message- From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:00 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed Carnegie, Martin wrote: We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had a

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick :-) --Chris So this would be expected that the subject would not get changed? I must be missing something. Martin Carnegie

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

There was no subject on the original; so the header couldn't be rewritten. Dallas posted a patch on Bugzilla: 3605. -Original Message- From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:42 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: [SA-LIST] Subject

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

-Original Message- From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:04 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick :-) --Chris So

Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

Carnegie, Martin wrote: Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick :-) --Chris So this would be expected that the subject would not get changed? I must be missing something. Martin Carnegie The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is a feature, not a

Re: How to find out installed modules?

- Original Message - From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Brett Romero' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:03 AM Subject: RE: How to find out installed modules? -Original Message- From: Brett Romero [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

Jim Maul wrote: The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is a feature, not a bug. -Jim Just out of curiosity, what benefit is provided by this feature? -tom

Re: Book has gone to press

Chris Santerre wrote: http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassassin How does this book compare to the O'Reilly book, by Schwartz? -ste

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is a feature, not a bug. -Jim Just out of curiosity, what benefit is provided by this feature? You could flat out reject mail without a subject header. -- Dallas Engelken NMGI

Re: Book has gone to press

On 2004-10-07 10:37:32 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassassin Release date November 1999 Yes, it should be at the press by now. :-) Best regards Martin PS: If it applies to SA3, the description should mention that. -- Martin Schröder,

Re: Book has gone to press

Martin Schröder wrote: On 2004-10-07 10:37:32 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassassin Release date November 1999 Yes, it should be at the press by now. :-) Best regards Martin PS: If it applies to SA3, the description should mention that. Hmm. When

Re: Book has gone to press

On 2004-10-07 10:48:53 -0400, Shaun T. Erickson wrote: Hmm. When I go to that link, it says the release date is October 2004. What are you looking at? An older version. :-) Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ArtCom GmbH, Lise-Meitner-Str 5,

RE: Book has gone to press

-Original Message- From: Shaun T. Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:39 AM To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: Re: Book has gone to press Chris Santerre wrote: http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassassin How does this book compare to the

bug? bayes_path ~user/something doesn't work?

Hi, I had bayes_path ~spamd/bayes in my local.cf until I noticed, that the part between ~ and / is ignored, resulting in a bayes_path of ~/bayes. It's not a big deal to give the full path, but that should be in the docs. Regards, Jakob

RE: How to find out installed modules?

-Original Message- From: Brett Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:27 AM To: Chris Santerre; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: How to find out installed modules? - Original Message - From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Brett

Re: How to find out installed modules?

- Original Message - From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Brett Romero' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:59 AM Subject: RE: How to find out installed modules? -Original Message- From:

Re: How to find out installed modules?

Brett Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/07/2004 09:27:10 AM: - Original Message - From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Brett Romero' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:03 AM Subject: RE: How to find out installed

Re: How to find out installed modules?

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:03:33AM -0400, Brett Romero wrote: However, when I analyze a file with spamassassin -tD filename.html I get these lines: debug: config: read file C:\Perl\site/share/spamassassin/25_spf.cf debug: SPF: message was delivered entirely via trusted relays, not

RE: bug? bayes_path ~user/something doesn't work?

Jakob Hirsch wrote: Hi, I had bayes_path ~spamd/bayes in my local.cf until I noticed, that the part between ~ and / is ignored, resulting in a bayes_path of ~/bayes. It's not a big deal to give the full path, but that should be in the docs. I don't think it's a bug... what does ~spamd/

RE: bug? bayes_path ~user/something doesn't work?

Matthew.van.Eerde wrote: I don't think it's a bug... what does ~spamd/ mean? I'm not familiar with that kind of syntax. ~ usually means home directory of the calling user... and that's expanded for you... There's an idiom in the web world of calling personal user folders /~user (as in

Re: dnsbl lookups slow due to sleep 1 in code, plus patch

Jan-Pieter Cornet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, done, bug #3881. Thanks. My secondary concern is that you'll never almost get responses from other blacklists and this might result in a lower hit rate (since a negative response is still a response). That should probably be addressed via

Re: How to rewrite spamc in Perl

On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:11:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there any documentation for the spamd client interface? MIMEDefang can talk to clamd.sock directly, using the commands in man clamd, rather than spawning `clamdscan` processes. I checked man spamd and man spamc

Re: more spam since upgrade

Vivek Khera said: I'm not using Bayes since the filtering is site-wide at the smtp server level. I use bayes sitewide for 600 users, and have processed a few million messages. Bayes sitewide works well, as the spam email is obviously unlike the normal mail anyone receives. I would enable bayes

RES: All_Spam_to question

Matt : I use the postfix(MTA)+ amavisd+ S.Assassin solution. If I understood what you wrote its impossible to block it (based in my solution), is it ? Ps. If your answer is yes; could we consider it a S.Assassin?s flaw ? -Mensagem original- De: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: All_Spam_to question

Daniel A. de Araujo wrote: Matt : I use the postfix(MTA)+ amavisd+ S.Assassin solution. If I understood what you wrote its impossible to block it (based in my solution), is it ? Ps. If your answer is yes; could we consider it a S.Assassin?s flaw ? SMTP conversation goes like this -

Re: RES: All_Spam_to question

At 12:01 PM 10/7/2004, Daniel A. de Araujo wrote: Matt : I use the postfix(MTA)+ amavisd+ S.Assassin solution. If I understood what you wrote its impossible to block it (based in my solution), is it ? Pretty much. Unless amavisd has some clever tricks up it's sleeve to split the message into

RE: All_Spam_to question

At 12:08 PM 10/7/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SMTP conversation goes like this - server responses in parentheses (ESMTP spam-server.example.org - welcome!) EHLO spam-server.example.com (OK) MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OK) RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OK) RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OK) DATA

Re: SA 3.0 is eating up all my memory!!!

On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: In my setup this is not an option, because I run SA as a milter, via spamass-milter. If every process has to die after the scan, it cannot pass the results of the scan to Sendmail (at least, this is what happened after I tried this option, so I kept on

Re: Memory footprint of spamd 3.0

On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Michael Parker wrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:19:17AM -0300, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: In my specific case, the ponit isn't only woth the big memory usage jumps, but with SA keeping the memory, and never releasing it. Highwater marks, common in most perl applicatios, don't

Re: Memory footprint of spamd 3.0

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:53:30AM -0600, Jon Trulson wrote: FWIW, in our case a child would go to 320MB and just stay there until the child was terminated (even after finishing a message). We do use AWL and bayes. Is it possible to try and find the msgs that was being scanned at

Re: Odd syslog errors.

Keith Hackworth wrote: Even though you run this in mysql now, it still DOES matter who you run it as. I found out the hard way that it records the user that is logged in as the user the bayes applies as in the database. I had to actually set the bayes_sql_override_username in my local.cf. I

RE: bug? 'bayes_path ~user/something' doesn't work?

It works if the user's profile is loaded. Usually sa is run from some startup daemon. Daemons are usually started with a very minimal environment - maybe a little bit of path, and some OS type settings and they rarely execute some .login/.cshrc script to load the environment. With no true user

Re: Memory footprint of spamd 3.0

On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Michael Parker wrote: On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:53:30AM -0600, Jon Trulson wrote: FWIW, in our case a child would go to 320MB and just stay there until the child was terminated (even after finishing a message). We do use AWL and bayes. Is it possible to try and find the

Obvious spam gets a score of 0.0???

Here is an odd spam header: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,CLICK_BELOW, DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,DCC_CHECK,FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN, FORGED_THEBAT_HTML,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

It works great. Thank you very, very much Slava MadritGlobal Network ManagerS A L A N S[EMAIL PROTECTED]+1.212.632.8311 "Dallas L. Engelken" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/7/2004 10:07:18 AM -Original Message- From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 07,

score changes in local.cf not recognized.

I am running Postfix 2.1 with a content_filter (latest amavisd-new) which sends all mail through SA 2.64. I understand *some* variables that are defined explicitly in amavisd-new are special, and thus have no effect when defined (differently) in local.cf. AFAIK, scores are not included in this

Re: score changes in local.cf not recognized.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running Postfix 2.1 with a content_filter (latest amavisd-new) which sends all mail through SA 2.64. I understand *some* variables that are defined explicitly in amavisd-new are special, and thus have no effect when defined (differently) in local.cf. AFAIK, scores

Re: score changes in local.cf not recognized.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/07/2004 03:35:07 PM: I am running Postfix 2.1 with a content_filter (latest amavisd-new) which sends all mail through SA 2.64. I understand *some* variables that are defined explicitly in amavisd-new are special, and thus have no effect when defined

Re: score changes in local.cf not recognized.

Quoting snowjack [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ...Did you restart amavisd-new after making the change? Yes. :-) -- Sahil Tandon

Re: score changes in local.cf not recognized.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting snowjack [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ...Did you restart amavisd-new after making the change? Yes. :-) Is there any evidence that local.cf is getting read at all?