That is the same thing I observed here after adding that plugin. I
am not sure if it is in the dnsbl code or the way ClamAV-plugin
uses the dnsbl code. Regardless it would be nifty were it to be
fixed.
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: Steve Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, in fact and
From: suresh kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
Thanks for the response for my earlier question.
I don't want the spam mails to be delivered to my
mailbox and to block from the mailclient using the
filters . I want to discard those spam mails when they
are identified as spam by spamassassin
Depending upon what MTA you're using, I have used the Spamass-Milter
successfully to block emails that rate at or above the required_hits
level (now named required_score).
Though I'm having some trouble with SA as per my last post ;-)
jdow wrote:
From: suresh kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi ,
I am using spamassassin with sendmail and
spamassassin-milter. I want to know how I can customize the message rapports
which can be sent to the sender of the spam generator.
I am getting the following error:
reason: 550 5.7.1 Blocked by SpamAssassin.
even if email was
At 11:26 PM 8/22/2005, you wrote:
Hi ,
I am using spamassassin with sendmail and spamassassin-milter. I
want to know how I can customize the message rapports which can be
sent to the sender of the spam generator.
I am getting the following error:
reason: 550 5.7.1 Blocked by SpamAssassin.
I am using sendmail as my MTA. Is there any option
or additional packages to block the spam mails or to
move it some folder instead of user's mailbox when
identifying as spam mail.
Suresh
--- Forrest Aldrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depending upon what MTA you're
How are you running SpamAssassin? If you are calling it from procmail
then there are innumerable scripts floating around for doing the
bad message diversion. (If you are doing it on mail just before it
is fetched by your mail reader, say OutlookExpress, then No way
comes to mind. It becomes a
I am using procmail with spamassassin for sendmail
MTA. Where I can get the procmail scripts for the mail
diversion? Or Is it a better choice to user milter and
mimedefang integrated with spamassassin for spam
handling and diversion.
Suresh.
--- jdow [EMAIL
jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 08/23/2005 08:55:26 AM:
Basically, sir, it is time to break down and read that fed
manual.
{^_^}
Potty mouth! Potty mouth! Surely you meant
that FINE manual. :-D
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Anthony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 6:40 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: question on meta rules
Is there something special about meta rules?
Could someone explain what appear to be anomolies between
Chris Santerre wrote:
1. I tried the following rule on some test emails:
meta TOO_MANY_URIBLS URIBL_OB_SURBL URIBL_JP_SURBL
..^ Modifier missing?
Modifier? What's a modifier?
While it might be more common to see someone using parentheses, AFAIK they
aren't required:
From: Andy Jezierski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/23/2005 08:55:26 AM:
Basically, sir, it is time to break down and read that fed manual.
{^_^}
Potty mouth! Potty mouth! Surely you meant that FINE manual. :-D
I LOVE leaving things like that to other people's
I find this one issue just about the most annoying 'non-feature' of SA. I
have a site-wide config (procmail does not work sitewide) and I don't want
the overhead and problems of a huge milter program laying in front of SA
just to block any email over 15 stars. I like to keep it simple stupid.
I
At 12:07 PM 8/23/2005, you wrote:
I find this one issue just about the most annoying 'non-feature' of SA. I
have a site-wide config (procmail does not work sitewide) and I don't want
the overhead and problems of a huge milter program laying in front of SA
just to block any email over 15 stars. I
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 20:07, Greg Allen wrote:
Do you have any links to a how-to for the Spamass-Milter? Or does it have
good install info in the docs? If it does a good job and is relatively
easy and light-weight, I would like to try it. I have spent days looking
for something more
Have you looked at MailScanner? It integrates nicely with SpamAssassin and
your favorite MTA (sendmail / postfix / exim / zmailer) and can also call a
virus scanner. You can set SA score thresholds and delete, forward,
quarantine, mark, or just pass emails based on score. You can also block
At 12:07 PM Tuesday, 8/23/2005, Greg Allen wrote -=
I find this one issue just about the most annoying 'non-feature' of SA. I
have a site-wide config (procmail does not work sitewide) and I don't want
the overhead and problems of a huge milter program laying in front of SA
just to block any
bump. can anyone answer at least the questions about dcc and razor?
Exellent. This is the information I needed! Is there any chance of
getting
an updated release schedule (I checked the wiki, but the schedule info for
3.1.0 seems out of date)?
Might also be nice to see some pointers in
As referenced in the UPGRADE file:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UpgradeTo310
email builder wrote:
bump. can anyone answer at least the questions about dcc and razor?
Exellent. This is the information I needed! Is there any chance of
getting
an updated release schedule (I checked
Might also be nice to see some pointers in the docs about how to
reenable
the
DCC and Razor plugins for those of us who will continue to use those
tools.
Look in init.pre or v310.pre for loadplugin calls to functions to perform
these actions. By default the loadplugin lines will be
I just changed my init.pre to include:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2
and kept the pre 3.1.0 settings in the local.cf. It's working fine except
for some Razor _alarm_ messages once in a while...
At 12:51 PM Tuesday, 8/23/2005, Stuart
Hallo und Guten Abend email,
Heute (am 23.08.2005 - 21:47 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
bump. can anyone answer at least the questions about dcc and razor?
you mean the problems with the zombies?
--
Viele Grüße, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ #277289867
PGP: 54C9 1A46 D3B2 95B6
Mailscanner and Amavis-new have way too much overhead IMO. For production,
I already have to maintain latest SA releases and Postfix releases, and I
know these programs very well. I would rather not put another complex
layer that requires updates and seperate config over top of SA if I don't
have
I have a motive for my madness. I installed the Clamav plugin for postfix
and it works great. Only problem with it is that it can not dump viruses,
it only tags them with a score. So, I want to tell SA to score any message
tagged by Clamav for a score of 100 (or whatever) Then, when I dump high
Chris Santerre wrote:
-- Bizzaro-Chris (I know all of the real Chris's dark secrets!)
Bizarro! Bizarro! Bizarro!
eom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Greg Allen wrote:
I have a motive for my madness. I installed the Clamav plugin for postfix
and it works great. Only problem with it is that it can not dump viruses,
it only tags them with a score. So, I want to tell SA to score any message
tagged by Clamav for a score of 100 (or whatever) Then,
On 23 Aug 2005 at 15:20, Greg Allen wrote:
Mailscanner and Amavis-new have way too much overhead IMO. For production,
I already have to maintain latest SA releases and Postfix releases, and I
know these programs very well. I would rather not put another complex
layer that requires updates and
What version of Postfix are you using?
I am using the latest version 2.2 of Postfix
What method of integration are
you using for SA and Clamav?
SA is called similar to this.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedSpamdInPostfix
Clamav is called like this.
You the man! My high score Spam and my Clamav Viruses are now gone, gone,
gone. And no milter/scanner front end software added! Now that is a good
deal.
Excellent!
So far so good. Just tested and worked like a charm. This is the way to go
with sitewide config IMO. No darn milter or scanner even
First time I've ever seen this, can someone explain what it means? Running SA
3.0.4
Parsing of undecoded UTF-8 will give garbage when decoding entities
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm line 182, GEN5
line 1117.
--
Chris
Registered Linux User 283774
I have a motive for my madness. I installed the Clamav plugin for postfix
and it works great. Only problem with it is that it can not dump viruses,
it only tags them with a score. So, I want to tell SA to score any message
tagged by Clamav for a score of 100 (or whatever) Then, when I dump
31 matches
Mail list logo
