Hi,
SpamAssassin version 3.1.0 running on Perl version 5.8.0
With Exim 4.43
I upgraded my SA to 3.1 recently and am having trouble with the
bayes_path. My local.cf had the full path to my bayes as
/usr/exim/.spamassassin. I had received a couple of warnings about
this when I ran lint so
Hi,
I use qmail+qmail-scanner+fast_spamassassin, this is an example of my x-spam
headers:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=28.3 required=5.0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Report: SA TESTS
2.2 SARE_SUB_MEDS_LEO obfuscated subject header
3.2 FUZZY_PRICES BODY:
We've been running SpamAssassin on a Fedora server successfully for
about a year now. About a month ago, we all noticed a spike in the
number of spam getting through. I upgraded to 3.1.0 but that does not
seem to help. I'm beginning to suspect that some local database or the
learning has
mouss wrote:
run the message through spamassassin -t (under the same uid as amavisd)
and look at which rules were hit.
also, put the message on a web page and post the url, so that we check
it on our configs. you may be missing some custom rules.
..sorry but pheraps I don't understand that
Fran Fabrizio wrote:
We've been running SpamAssassin on a Fedora server successfully for
about a year now. About a month ago, we all noticed a spike in the
number of spam getting through. I upgraded to 3.1.0 but that does not
seem to help. I'm beginning to suspect that some local database
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] stated:
Which begs the question I don't remember anybody asking: What the
censored is DomainKeys and why should it experience a special
exception to sane ordering if header information with time of
application ordered message tags?
It's a scheme whereby
SprintPCS Phone email causes this:
They are sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED], where N is a number
for phone.
Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
0.2
I suspect that Sprint is doing this to save on text messaging characters
from Cell Phones.
I beleive the message ID is RFC, the subject is just curtesy..
SprintPCS Phone email causes this:
They are sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED], where N is a number
for phone.
Content analysis details:
I'd think sprint would take care of the missing SUBJECT header and Messege
ID! Isn't that an RFC requirement? Or just common email curtesy?
By RFC2822 section 3.6, the only required header fields are the date
and originator address. The Subject field is optional. The Message-ID
SHOULD be
After having used Spamassassin with mime-defang for some considerable
time, with no problems, we are suddenly experiencing serious performance
problems.
Last thursday, after effectively being mail bombed, which caused max
mimedefang children to be spawned, and mail coming in at such a rate that
John Hodson wrote:
After having used Spamassassin with mime-defang for some considerable
time, with no problems, we are suddenly experiencing serious performance
problems.
Last thursday, after effectively being mail bombed, which caused max
mimedefang children to be spawned, and mail coming in
Dermot Paikkos wrote:
Hi,
SpamAssassin version 3.1.0 running on Perl version 5.8.0
With Exim 4.43
I upgraded my SA to 3.1 recently and am having trouble with the
bayes_path. My local.cf had the full path to my bayes as
/usr/exim/.spamassassin. I had received a couple of warnings about
this
With 3.1 since these are all now plug-ins should they still be listed in the
local cf?
use_razor2 1
razor_timeout 10
use_dcc 1
dcc_timeout 10
dcc_body_max99
dcc_fuz1_max99
dcc_fuz2_max99
Chris wrote:
Thanks Daryl for this and the info on the tags placement. I hate being a
PITA but I've another question regarding Razor checks:
1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.5
Chris wrote:
With 3.1 since these are all now plug-ins should they still be listed in the
local cf?
use_razor2 1
razor_timeout 10
use_dcc 1
dcc_timeout 10
dcc_body_max99
dcc_fuz1_max99
dcc_fuz2_max 99
use_pyzor
Hi,
I noticed that spamd has been tending to log more and more things with
each new release. I'm not complaining, it's very useful when I run into
problems.
However, it would be nice to be able to tone it down a little bit when
things are running smoothly. Looking at the spamd manpage, I
On Monday 03 October 2005 06:03 pm, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Chris wrote:
With 3.1 since these are all now plug-ins should they still be listed
in the local cf?
use_razor2 1
razor_timeout 10
use_dcc 1
dcc_timeout 10
dcc_body_max
I would assume someone has already solved this, but it seems hard to search for.
I would like to setup SA site wide, so that all the users can use it. However,
users are not very technical, so it would be nice if they could have an easy
method to train their own DBs.
I envisioned that a
Ralph Seichter said:
Hi,
first I want to thank you for keeping up all the good work and
updating the rule files. Unfortunately, some of the PGP signatures
don't seem to match their rule files (i.e. 70_sare_genlsubj.cf.sig,
70_sare_header.cf.sig), and Matt's Key 0x1129F0D3 used for signing
Good evening, Jorgen,
On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
I would assume someone has already solved this, but it seems hard to search
for.
I would like to setup SA site wide, so that all the users can use it.
However, users are not very technical, so it would be nice if they could
I believe that only works with a redirect/bounce though and outlook express
doesn't support it. dunno about your users but with mine that represents
about 95% of the users. What about IMAP? If you have your users switch to
IMAP you can just have a Spam folder for each account. Can't think
Thanks,
Stearns mail gives ground work, but the bounce requirement is not acceptable
as Lenz points out. Nor do sufficient enough people run imap (less than 1%).
Naturally this can be done, it is just complicated. Perhaps if I assume the spam
mails are always forwarded inline I can strip
22 matches
Mail list logo
