On Friday, June 23, 2006, 5:09:55 PM, jdow jdow wrote:
Jeff, it's probably quite good when the lookup is implemented on
spam traps and a small collection of servers. The domain registrars
who are honest might like it. It'd reduce the incentive and value
of domain kiting.
Presumably the list
On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 05:08 -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Friday, June 23, 2006, 5:09:55 PM, jdow jdow wrote:
Jeff, it's probably quite good when the lookup is implemented on
spam traps and a small collection of servers. The domain registrars
who are honest might like it. It'd reduce the
numE wrote:
Now i have just a small issue left.
i use the following /etc/init.d/spamd script:
http://kmail.kde.org/unsupported/spamd
unfortunately now i get the log messages from spamd always on my root
account (displayed in terminal)
how may i change this behavior?
Edit your
Hello all! I am using SA-3.1.0 for OES-Linux (novell distro based on
SLES9); mail server using Hula (Netmail) also a novell product. Clients
are thunderbird.
I guess my first problem is, i don't seem to have SA configured right,
let me explain. I goto my yahoo account and send an email to me
All,
I am getting this type of email:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01)
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_50_60,
HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.3
X-Spam-Level: *
Received: from com
There are some other plugins that i would also like to
implement (for example iXhash and OCR Plugin or OCR scanner
and image validator SA-plugin), but i don't know whether they
work on windows installations. How can i find out if these
are meant to function on windows?
FWIW the ocr plugin
How do I debug the SPF Module during SA Operations?
I have had another email marked as SPF_SOFTFAIL during the first receipt and
the From domain does not have a TXT SPF record. When I isolated the message
and ran it again, it was processed without any errors.
I suspect that there is a problem
Perhaps a problem with trusted_networks setting?
Loren
- Original Message -
From:
Screaming Eagle
To: spam mailling list
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 7:46
AM
Subject: Why does FORGE_RCV_HELO not
working for this email...
All,I am getting this type of
I think I noticed small change in sa-update for 3.13.
It is now using port 8090 for outgoing connections. (or did it always?)
This happened to make it immediately fail on servers in the DMZ which
have a strict set of outgoing egress rules.
I now need to set a proxy server to do sa-updates
Hi, most unlikely, since it is commented out by default.
On 6/24/06, Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a problem with trusted_networks setting?
Loren
- Original Message -
From:
Screaming Eagle
To:
spam mailling list
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006
How do i take my self out of the BAYES_50 test.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Scheidell
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 11:28 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Sa-update and proxy servers
Patch attached. (works here(tm))
In fact, my nightly cronjob runs 'sa-cover' script:
(exit code 4 is for timeouts)
Just in
Then you should perhaps read the documentation on the setting for
trusted_networks.
- Original Message -
From:
Screaming Eagle
To: Loren Wilton
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 8:28
AM
Subject: Re: Why does FORGE_RCV_HELO not
One of our SA 3.1.0 installations is giving BAYES_00=-2.599 for
this definite spam. Does that mean our Bayes database is corrupt?
I'd say that it is at the very least mis-trained as far as this spam is
concerned. Without further evidence I'd hesitate to state outright that it
is corrupt. If
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Jeff Chan wrote:
Michael gives some good possibilities and a discussion of the
difference with greylisting. Note that whois can't really be done
on an automated, high-frequency basis.
Back when I first suggested this a couple of years ago, it was
possible to download a
What about combining this with a whitelist?
I.e. I regularly get emails from target.bifn0.com that contain links that
point to themselves, but say they are target.com And in fact, this is
a 3rd party that Target has contracted to do outsource mailings for them,
so in that respect they are
I get a lot of spam that looks like:
http://pastebin.com/729105
on the alsa-devel mailing list, amongst others... And noticed the
following.
If you decompress the GIF file and decode it into a pixmap image, then
do a color histogram of the image, you notice two things immediately.
There are
-Original Message-
From: Philip Prindeville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 2:10 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: On bichromatic GIF stock spam
I get a lot of spam that looks like:
http://pastebin.com/729105
on the alsa-devel mailing
Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Philip Prindeville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 2:10 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: On bichromatic GIF stock spam
I get a lot of spam that looks like:
http://pastebin.com/729105
on the
On Samstag, 24. Juni 2006 17:14 Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
When spf_timeout is set to 5 (default), during the initial email
receipt, I think that Mail::SPF::Query exceeds the timeout and the
timeout routine does not work properly. The timeout error causes
On Samstag, 24. Juni 2006 17:30 Screaming Eagle wrote:
How do i take my self out of the BAYES_50 test.
man sa-learn
man spamassassin-run
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660/4156531 .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:
Dear users,
I am getting reports that the ifplugin statements in the ZMI_GERMAN
ruleset are making lint errors for SA version 2.64, so some people
seem to use such an old version.
Currently the only use of ifplugin is to find an attachment namen
ebay-rechnung.pdf.zip, which contains a virus.
I thought I had razor2 working. From the debug output, it does not seem
so. Am i missing something? If so, where can I download it and
install it? Thanks.
[4133] dbg: config: read file /usr/share/spamassassin/25_razor2.cf
[4133] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2 from @INC
On Sonntag, 25. Juni 2006 00:55 Screaming Eagle wrote:
sa-learn can unlearn a message, but I do not have that message. Would
this work if I dump out a backup of it and take out any instances of
my email, then use sa-learn to restore back from it. Thanks.
Please keep answers on the list.
Screaming Eagle wrote:
I thought I had razor2 working. From the debug output, it does not
seem so. Am i missing something? If so, where can I download it and
install it? Thanks.
From the looks of it, you enabled the plugin, but you never installed
razor itself.
http://razor.sf.net
[4133]
Hi,
Is there a port which I have to open to allow pyzor to run properly? I keep
having the below error.
[26217] dbg: util: executable for pyzor was found at /usr/bin/pyzor
[26217] dbg: pyzor: pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
[26217] dbg: info: entering helper-app run mode
[26217] dbg:
At 06:51 PM Saturday, 6/24/2006, Somebody wrote -=
Hi,
Is there a port which I have to open to allow pyzor to run properly?
I keep having the below error.
Try opening udp port 24441 ...
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Randomly Generated Quote (474 of 1056):
Every time I close the door
If, after excluding black, we find that 100% of the color map is that
nasty pastel pink or pastel lime green (etc) then it's a spam and we
toss it.
Sound reasonable?
I was thinking about this the other day. I think the concept is reasonable,
but as stated doesn't go far enough, and would be
On 6/24/2006 11:14 AM, Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster wrote:
How do I debug the SPF Module during SA Operations?
I have had another email marked as SPF_SOFTFAIL during the
first receipt and
the From domain does not have a TXT SPF record. When I
isolated the message
and ran it again,
We unfortunately don't have any scripts to deal with version differences.
Our technique has been to make two (or more) versions of a file, typically a
less aggressive version for 2.6x and older, and one using new features for
the newer releases. Its a shame that there is no if clause that is
Loren Wilton wrote:
If, after excluding black, we find that 100% of the color map is that
nasty pastel pink or pastel lime green (etc) then it's a spam and we
toss it.
Sound reasonable?
I was thinking about this the other day. I think the concept is reasonable,
but as stated doesn't go
31 matches
Mail list logo
