Re: Increase of spam?

On Thu, 3 May 2007, Jerry Durand wrote: All DSL/dialup accounts get a 554 from us (using a couple of RBLs), so I've actually seen our spam decrease lately. I've used RBLs too, in the past. However, i've noticed legitimate mailservers sometimes turn up in such lists so we were "missing" mails,

Insecure Dependency

Hi Can anyone tell me why this message is appearing Insecure dependency in `` while running with -T switch at /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Sys/Hostname/Long.pm line 91, line 86. Regards Yadwendra Verma <>

Re: unsubscribe

At 09:19 PM 5/3/2007, Thiva Charanasri wrote: unsubscribe As the headers say: list-unsubscribe:

unsubscribe

unsubscribe

notice diff between using 3.1.8 and 3.2.0 ?

Greetings, Is anyone noticing small, medium, or large improvements in how well 3.2.0 does it's job compared to 3.1.8 ??? - rh -- Abba Communications Spokane, WA www.abbacomm.net

Re: Spamassassin 3.2.0 LONG -D --lint times and load times

James Lay wrote: > > So my upgrade of Spamassassin takes a full five minutes to -D --lint > and about the same time to load up. Here's my local.cf file: > > required_score 4.0 > rewrite_header Subject *SPAM* > report_safe 0 > use_bayes 1 > use_

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available

Michael Scheidell writes: > Jakob Hirsch wrote: > > Michael Scheidell wrote: > > > > > sa-compile didn't show any errors (which is bad, I'd say). > > > > see > > http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5435 > > and > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1708

SpamAssassin removing X-Spam-Flag header

We recently put an Ironport anti-spam appliance in front of our SpamAssassin installation for evaluation, and I have noticed a problem. I configured the Ironport to add the "X-Spam-Flag: YES" header to messages that it determines to be spam, as we have already trained our user population to look

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available

Jakob Hirsch wrote: Michael Scheidell wrote: sa-compile didn't show any errors (which is bad, I'd say). see http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5435 and http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1708378&group_id=96864&atid=616200 re2c 12.0 works for me.

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available

Michael Scheidell wrote: > Still get this on Freebsd, sa-compile SEEMS to run fine, but this > happens > > [97520] dbg: rules: compiled one_line_body tests > [97520] dbg: zoom: run_body_fast_scan for body_0 start > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: > /var/db/spamassassin/compiled/3.002000/auto/Mail/SpamAssas

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available

I just ran into a big problem.. [25735] warn: bayes: database version is different than we understand (3), aborting! at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/SQL.pm line 136 Any ideas please? Anders Craig Carriere skrev: I receive the exact same error on SL

RE: TMP Files

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 4:25 PM > To: Theo Van Dinter > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: TMP Files > > > It does sound like that, alright. The change was to support > win32, which > doesn'

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available

Craig Carriere wrote: I receive the exact same error on SLES10 FWIW. I am assuming it's something to do with loader paths', but I haven't figured it out yet. as for the FREEBSD port (which I maintain) I think I am going to publish the package without sa-compile, so it gets out there (any f

Re: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available

I receive the exact same error on SLES10 FWIW. Michael Scheidell wrote: -Original Message- From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 8:43 AM To: users@SpamAssassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ANNOUNCE: Ap

SA 3.2.0 URIBL header reporting

Since upgrading to SA 3.2.0 yesterday, I am noticing that the header reporting for URIBLs has changed (I had to rename the original domain names with "1.example.com & 2.example.com" names as my first message to the list was rejected). With SA 3.1.8: * 2.5 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed

RE: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available

> -Original Message- > From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 8:43 AM > To: users@SpamAssassin.apache.org; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ANNOUNCE: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 available > > Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.0 is now availab

Re: pre-release of SA 3.18_2 Freebsd port

Michael Scheidell writes: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:55 AM > > To: Michael Scheidell > > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: pre-release of SA 3.18_2 Freebsd port > >

Re: Logging with Syslog

sa-list wrote: > The current SA install was from my initial install of RHEL 4 and using > up2date to get the packages all current. I figured I would stop using > up2date from this point on and switch to CPAN upgrades in the future. Be sure to *uninstall* the RPM package before installing from CPAN

RE: pre-release of SA 3.18_2 Freebsd port

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:55 AM > To: Michael Scheidell > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: pre-release of SA 3.18_2 Freebsd port > > > Michael Scheidell writes: > > Fix

Re: Increase of spam?

On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 09:13:33AM -0800, John Andersen wrote: > On Thursday 03 May 2007, Bob McClure Jr wrote: > >  If he has a legit mail > > server, then he should trace back to the client > > Yes, its widely known that every mail system administrator has > hours of idle time on his hands to tr

RE: Increase of spam?

> -Original Message- > From: John Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 1:14 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Increase of spam? > > On Thursday 03 May 2007, Bob McClure Jr wrote: > >  If he has a legit mail > > server, then he should trace

Re: Increase of spam?

On Thursday 03 May 2007, Bob McClure Jr wrote: >  If he has a legit mail > server, then he should trace back to the client Yes, its widely known that every mail system administrator has hours of idle time on his hands to track this stuff down manually and handle each case personally. You, sir, ar

Re: Increase of spam?

At 08:39 AM 5/3/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The mails are coming from all kinds of hosts, all kinds of countries but mostly from dialup or adsl accounts (so, not hijacked corporate mailservers). All DSL/dialup accounts get a 554 from us (using a couple of RBLs), so I've actually seen our s

Re: Increase of spam?

On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 11:51:36AM -0400, Rob McEwen wrote: > K. asked: > >A while ago I implemented graylisting, which works quite well. But since 2 > >days ago I'm seeing loads of mails which are passing by the greylisting > >(so they are being sent again by a "real" mailserver). > > > >Anybody

Re: Increase of spam?

K. asked: >A while ago I implemented graylisting, which works quite well. But since 2 >days ago I'm seeing loads of mails which are passing by the greylisting >(so they are being sent again by a "real" mailserver). > >Anybody knows if there is a new windows virus on the loose that retries to >de

Re: SARE rules

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry for the thread hijacking... I tested the rules with spamassassin --lint and everything is OK, but stops scoring. Max de Mendizábal [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subdirección de Informática Universidad Pedagógica Nacional Carretera al Ajusco No. 24 Col. Hér

Re: Increase of spam?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi list, > > Not sure if it's entirely on-topic, but at least I want to monitor it > closely. > > A while ago I implemented graylisting, which works quite well. But since > 2 days ago I'm seeing loads of mails which are passing by the > greylisting (so they are being se

Increase of spam?

Hi list, Not sure if it's entirely on-topic, but at least I want to monitor it closely. A while ago I implemented graylisting, which works quite well. But since 2 days ago I'm seeing loads of mails which are passing by the greylisting (so they are being sent again by a "real" mailserver).

Re: Logging with Syslog

The current SA install was from my initial install of RHEL 4 and using up2date to get the packages all current. I figured I would stop using up2date from this point on and switch to CPAN upgrades in the future. The CPAN method is what I had used before and it worked nicely, plus I can stay more

Spamassassin 3.2.0 LONG -D --lint times and load times

So my upgrade of Spamassassin takes a full five minutes to -D --lint and about the same time to load up. Here's my local.cf file: required_score 4.0 rewrite_header Subject *SPAM* report_safe 0 use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_l

RE: SARE ADULT easily worked around?

I haven't seen a porn spam in about a year! Hard to write rules when I don't have any. I'm pretty sure I got listwashed and RBL Rejects take care of the rest. --Chris -Original Message- From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 1:35 PM To: users@spamassass

Re: Logging with Syslog

sa-list wrote: > Thanks! > Instead of messing with the /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin file, I just > commented out those lines. Any reason to keep this configuration, other > than wanting more headaches in the future when I try to figure this out > again? Well, like I said, /etc/init.d/spamassassin w

SARE rules (was: Re: SA Not Scoring)

Max de Mendizabal schrieb: Dear all, I have a very rare problem: if I do not use the SARE rules everythings works ok but... If I run sa-update Then spamassassin stops working. If I check it with spamassassin -D < spam-mail.txt Works ok, but if I use spamc < spam-mail.txt Shows the spama

Re: Per User

qmail + vpopmail + mysql, users information stored in mysql. On 5/3/07, Matthias Haegele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ali Hameed schrieb: > I didnt find any help on the specified link, did u? > Also what prevents you from giving me some specific link?If u cant help > then > you should not reply.I

Re: Per User

Ali Hameed schrieb: I didnt find any help on the specified link, did u? Also what prevents you from giving me some specific link?If u cant help then you should not reply.I need help if any one can. As Magnus asked u could perhaps provide some additional information, afaik (i dont use it on pe

Re: Per User

On Thursday 03 May 2007 12:50, Ali Hameed wrote: > I am using spamd on my linux system, I now want to give our users > choice that they want to use spamd or not, if yes they can write their own > rules, please help! This is a very general question. What MTA do you have and how do you call spamd f

Re: Per User

I didnt find any help on the specified link, did u? Also what prevents you from giving me some specific link?If u cant help then you should not reply.I need help if any one can. On 5/3/07, Matthias Haegele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ali Hameed schrieb: > I am using spamd on my linux system, I

Re: Per User

Ali Hameed schrieb: I am using spamd on my linux system, I now want to give our users choice that they want to use spamd or not, if yes they can write their own rules, please help! What prevends you from reading:? http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ -- Grüsse/Greetings MH Dont send mai

Re: SPF upgrade errors for SpamAssassin 3.2.0

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Lay wrote: > Trying to upgrade SPF and here's what I see: > > * ERROR: Version 0.002.2 of Net::DNS::Resolver::Programmable is > installed, but we need version >= 0.002001 > ERRORS/WARNINGS FOUND IN PREREQUISITES. You may wish to install the >

Re: SA Not Scoring

Dear all, I have a very rare problem: if I do not use the SARE rules everythings works ok but... If I run sa-update Then spamassassin stops working. If I check it with spamassassin -D < spam-mail.txt Works ok, but if I use spamc < spam-mail.txt Shows the spamassassin version on the heade

Per User

I am using spamd on my linux system, I now want to give our users choice that they want to use spamd or not, if yes they can write their own rules, please help!

RE: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 and ImageInfo.pm

> -Original Message- > From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 4:11 AM > To: SpamAssassin > Subject: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 and ImageInfo.pm > > Hi All, > > Is anyone else that uses ImageInfo.pm getting the following errors > after updating to 3.2.0? >

Re: KAM.cf ham

On Wed, 2 May 2007, Henrik Krohns wrote: I guess this doesn't hurt, but Bayes should already handle it. Most mails on my server are BAYES_00, since there is practically no spam in our language. Well, I don't entirely agree. In theory bayes can handle things ofcourse, but I have words in my m

Two Mysql Servers in spamassassin Machine

Hi, Since today I'm using Spamsassasin 3.1.8 in a machine with two mysql servers, one in port 3306 (socket: /tmp/mysql.sock) and another in port 3308 (socket: /tmp/mysql.sock2) with no problems. Mysql stores the Scores, Autowhitelist and bayes information and I configure this in "local.c

RE: SA Not Scoring

Hi Matthias, Many thanks for this, I'm very new to SA and your distribution is much appreciated. Cheers Keith -Original Message- From: Matthias Haegele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 May 2007 10:08 To: Keith De Souza Subject: Re: SA Not Scoring Keith De Souza schrieb: > Hi Matthi

SpamAssassin 3.2.0 and ImageInfo.pm

Hi All, Is anyone else that uses ImageInfo.pm getting the following errors after updating to 3.2.0? I've tried upgrading ImageInfo with no difference. I'm going to try upgrading the Perl modules now to see if any of those are out of date. >[3168] warn: Subroutine new redefined at /etc/mail/spama

RE: SA Not Scoring

Hi Matthias, Thanks for you input with this, I will be reading it soon. Cheers Keith -Original Message- From: Matthias Haegele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 May 2007 07:40 To: Keith De Souza Subject: Re: SA Not Scoring Keith De Souza schrieb: > Hi Jason, > > Thanks for this, I'