domain.
Regards,
Lee
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 4:27 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: DKIM Score
On 16.08.16 08:18, Chris Lee wrote:
>Besides, it is possible to just whitelist or blacklist s
Hi Merijn,
Still digest your solution, look like it rather complex to me.
Besides, it is possible to just whitelist or blacklist some email address for
DKIM checking?
Regards,
Chris Lee
-Original Message-
From: Merijn van den Kroonenberg [mailto:mer...@web2all.nl]
Sent: Tuesday
lots of domain to handle.
Regards,
Lee
-Original Message-
From: Merijn van den Kroonenberg [mailto:mer...@web2all.nl]
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 7:19 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: DKIM Score
> Hi,
>
> How to setup to give high score for specific domain cannot
,
Lee
This message and its attachment (if any) are strictly confidential and sent to
the designated recipient(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender by e-mail and delete this message and its attachment (if any)
from your computer system immediately . Century
no idea, I read emails from both you and him and didn't see anything amiss.
Benny's signature does not parse as English so it's hard to say what it
means.
I wouldn't worry about it.
-lee
On 5/7/2013 8:56 AM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Whatever that means.
I think that if someone has cause
some folks are preachy and sensitive... like those bottom posters who
seem to like telling top posters how wrong they are.
I wouldn't worry about it.
But it was interesting to hear the history of the word plonk.. that
was cool.
-lee
On 5/7/2013 12:06 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
John Hardin
On 5/7/2013 12:11 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 j...@j4computers.com wrote:
What I did not get was why my attempts to clarify whatever offense
was taken were met by reject messages.
Quite simply put, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wants you to respect
On 4/11/2012 8:23 PM, Julian Yap wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Lee Dilkie l...@dilkie.com wrote:
On 4/10/2012 10:50 PM, Julian Yap wrote:
Hmm, thanks for the info. It certainly explains things. Yeah, SpamAssassin
previously used to blaze through mail scans (everything scanned
no way to stop it
because older versions of Perl get deprecated. - Julian
I've found that bsdpan-Mail-SpamAssassin-CompiledRegexps makes a vast
improvement in rules regex scanning.
-lee
Well, it is not easy to quote properly from hotmail. Excuse my mess up and top
posting.
Bottom line is... I got rid of this chinese crap.
Thank you all for the help SA users.
Jenny
-
Subject: Re: Help with blocking Chinese Spam
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:40:16 +
Jenny Lee
Dear SA Users,
I am getting this chinese spam every hour. I tried, ok_locales, ok_languages
with texcat plugin... I tried matching the subject... but these people are
always getting through.
http://www.pastebin.ca/2127622
What rules/modifications do I need to do to get rid of this?
J
Dear SA Users,
I am getting this chinese spam every hour. I tried, ok_locales, ok_languages
with texcat plugin... I tried matching the subject... but these people are
always getting through.
http://www.pastebin.ca/2127622
What rules/modifications do I need to do to get rid of this?
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 08:25:21 -0400
From: d...@roaringpenguin.com
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with blocking Chinese Spam
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:48:37 +
Jenny Lee bodycar...@live.com wrote:
I am getting this chinese spam every hour. I tried, ok_locales
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:19:38 +
From: rwmailli...@googlemail.com
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with blocking Chinese Spam
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:14:36 +
RW wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:48:37 +
Jenny Lee wrote:
Dear SA Users
Subject: Re: Help with blocking Chinese Spam
From: mar...@gregorie.org
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:09:19 +
On Tue, 2012-03-13 at 09:48 +, Jenny Lee wrote:
Dear SA Users,
I am getting this chinese spam every hour. I tried, ok_locales
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 05:47:03 -0700
From: le...@jam-software.com
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Help with blocking Chinese Spam
Jenny Lee-2 wrote:
I did turn it on in the .pre. It is also supposed to add a header, but it
does not. How can I check
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 09:14:10 -0400
From: d...@roaringpenguin.com
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with blocking Chinese Spam
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:40:16 +
Jenny Lee bodycar...@live.com wrote:
Will give this a go. What I don't understand is that... Why
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:42:05 -0700
From: jhar...@impsec.org
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with blocking Chinese Spam
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, David F. Skoll wrote:
PS: I haven't looked at SA's Bayes implementation. Can it handle
words in non-western character
From: list...@abbacomm.net
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: real world spamassassin experiences re: processing on servers
emailing from .info domains
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:15:13 -0700
greetings SA users
there sure seems to be a
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:10:28 -0400
From: dar...@chaosreigns.com
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why doesn't anything at all get these botnet spammers?
On 10/15, Jenny Lee wrote:
fwoicka odrp jbguybf etvwmbwm
i aluawj ggn. http://[redacted].tumblr.com/ poxpzafxc, cl
Every 2nd of my emails to this list from hotmail is returning as a
nondeliverable. Hotmail does not give any info as to what failed but I am
assuming it is the SPAM filters of the mailing list. Well done!
Also how ironic is it to write: users -at- spamassassin.apache.org on the
website!!!
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:26:21 +0100
From: n...@unixmail.co.uk
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why doesn't anything at all get these botnet spammers?
On 17/10/11 19:07, Jenny Lee wrote:
Every 2nd of my emails to this list from hotmail is returning
One way you can get rid of about 1/4 of your botnet spam is to set your
highest numbered MX record as follows:
tarbaby.junkemailfilter.com
Why bother trying to defeat 1/4 of botnet SPAM? I was getting rid of *all* of
it with greylisting since 3-4 years. No need for bothering with MXes.
, Jenny Lee wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Is there any way to get these people?
Subject: T !r (a -n*n =le ` S !e .x|
Subject: Se^x M-o ^v ~l e -
What about something like:
header POX Subject ~= /[!\(-*\.^~]\w *[!\(-*\.^~]\w/
Check out SUBJ_OBFU_PUNCT in my sandbox. Awaiting masscheck
Hello Everyone,
Is there any way to get these people?
Instead of doing greylisting, I started doing SA+Greylisting 3 months ago.
Since then, this guy always gets through until I modify our custom ruleset to
block his URLs.
Currently I have:
uri OUR_CUSTOM_URI
. (ie. the
first hop was ipv4, the second was ipv6).
-lee
On 7/2/2011 4:06 AM, Yves Goergen wrote:
On 30.06.2011 13:06 CE(S)T, Matthew Newton wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:59:52PM +0200, Yves Goergen wrote:
Received: from sp***ck.di***ie.com ([2001:***::40])
by do***rd.de with esmtps
it's IPv4.5
-lee
On 3/31/2011 1:47 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 31/03/2011 1:29 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
'from' dhl.com
(come on ups/dhl.. I know SPF is broken, but in this case it would
sure help is decide if the sending ip is authorized to send on your
behalf)
with some pretty
trigger it here:
http://pastebin.com/iGQ2RJ6v
Works here, compiled rules, freebsd 7.3, amd64, perl 5.10, re2c, 0.13.5
fails for me, loops, freebsd 7.3, intel, perl 5.12.3, SA 3.3.1, re2c 001305
what rule should we comment out until this is fixed?
-lee
. But is it allowed, in the rfcs, to be a
send-only domain (no MX record) even if that means DSN's cannot be
delivered? good question.
-lee
On 2/23/2011 12:51 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Henry | Security Division,
Am 2011-02-23 13:50:19, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
This is also very
that the other spam-catching filtering is
doing a much better job than it was years ago and turning off
greylisting didn't adversely affect the amount of spam that got through.
-lee
On 1/18/2011 5:41 PM, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
On 01/18/2011 12:31 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:18:20
On 1/19/2011 10:02 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:56:47 -0500
Lee Dilkie l...@dilkie.com wrote:
The second was that I've found that the other spam-catching filtering
is doing a much better job than it was years ago and turning off
greylisting didn't adversely affect
their own RDNS lookups.The
owner of the address block wouldn't be able to modify the upstream's
RDNS zone files so that's why the upstream has put in CNAME records, to
force the resolver to the owners zone file.
and if it is... most certainly not a dynamic ip.
-lee
host -t ptr 212.25.14.40
40.14.25.212
:)
love your style.
-lee
On 9/26/2010 8:00 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
*Might* have been a dev question, but it actually is not. Not even close
to it. ;)
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 17:29 -0400, Lee Dilkie wrote:
Use of goto to jump into a construct is deprecated at
/usr/local/lib/perl5
the rule is flagging the fact that the servers are using
non-assigned address space.
On 6/17/2010 2:19 PM, gwilodailo wrote:
Hello all,
I've discovered that some mail between two of my clients (on separate hosts)
is getting flagged as spam, because of this rule (FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA).
noticable for the mails that
process quicker?
- Charles
Are you folks using sa-compile? I found a vast improvement in body scan
performance by switching to it.
-lee
, outright, based on
something so false-positivity as a db for dynamic ip's is
irresponsible on the part of the admin. Sure, add some spammy points and
do a scan but an outright rejection?
-lee
no problem since and the original
sa-update has been used since my one time hack.
-lee
Personal Técnico wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this error when I run sa-update:
config: failed to parse line, skipping, in
/tmp/.spamassassin26787Cjo628tmp/72_active.cf: mimeheader
__TVD_MIME_ATT_AOPDF Content-Type
Chris,
Do you use sa-compile? I found that made a tremendous difference for me.
-lee
Chris wrote:
I've posted two files below, one is the time output for a spam and one
for ham. Seems like over the past few weeks SA scan times have become
slower and slower. For instance stats from last night
matter too much to scan the odd email that's large I'll have
to monitor my stats.
-lee
checks???)
And I checked (copied the warn line to above the open), the file
/var/log/FuzzyOcr.log is owned and writable by the user (mailnull in my case
as I'm running on freebsd).
TIA,
-lee
([127.0.0.1] helo=freecycle.org)
by bulkmail2.freecycle.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
was this a forwarded email? from mscip02.mailsentry.net.au to
chestnut2.exetel.com.au? I don't think you can apply an SPF check after
it's been forwarded.
-lee
Mark Martinec wrote:
Phill,
def_whitelist_from_rcvd
of other changes too). Not sure why the gremlins were banished.
Interesting mystery.
-lee
Lee Dilkie wrote:
Final update folks, sorry for the noise if it's bothersome...
commented out the three offending lines in 72_active.cf and --lint
passed and I'm back up and running.
No idea what
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 18:44 -0500, Lee Dilkie wrote:
For what ever reason, my sa-update to 3.30 has buggered itself. In my
efforts to debug it's now at the situation that SA has no rules to run
and I'm getting swamped.
The first sentence is seriously
?? Is there an archive I
can download? (I'm thinking of modifying sa-update to comment-out where
it removes the tmp files)
-lee
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 06:45 -0500, Lee Dilkie wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Anyway, what comes to mind: Did you run sa-update after
Subject =~ /Approve/i^M
header __SUBJ_RE Subject =~ /^R[eE]:/^M
-lee
Lee Dilkie wrote:
no joy.
doesn't look like the ports version of SA comes with any stock rules
(nothing obvious in the ports dir tree, the work/ directory had en empty
72_active.cf file)... I deinstalled
Final update folks, sorry for the noise if it's bothersome...
commented out the three offending lines in 72_active.cf and --lint
passed and I'm back up and running.
No idea what the issue is, those lines looked fine to me. I'm running
perl 5.8.9, could that be an issue?
-lee
details: ##lee
::CompiledRegexps::body_0
Hmm. This is probably a flaw in sa-update, but probably doesn't affect
your issue. For fun, try rm'ing /var/db/spamassassin/compiled/ and run
sa-update again.
Tied that Daryl and still no good, same error
Thanks for lending a hand.
-lee
'sa-update-keys' under
'/usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin'
should they have been installed with the SA package (I'm running on
FreeBSD).
$ sa-update -V
sa-update version svn897929
running on Perl version 5.8.9
-lee
nevermind, it eventually created the directory and jeyring files... not
quite sure how that happened..
Lee Dilkie wrote:
On getting pgp to work... Following HOWTO at
http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-sa-update-howto.txt
wget http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/GPG.KEY; worked
-compiling did
not work. SA is still looking for 3.3 rules and as it finds none, is
letting everything through.
TIA
-lee
http://www.fuelly.com/driver/dilkie/golf
a hardfail record, it should be trusted.
SPF_PASS shouldn't be trusted as far as spam processing, as we all know,
as spammers can setup valid SPF records. But it does help against
spambot's, doesn't it? It's hard to setup valid SPF records when you're
sending spam from a million infected machines.
-lee
no plans to
increase that load and all I am doing is handling personal non-business
email.
Feel free to email me off-list, should you want to.
Many thanks,
Lee
UK
Thanks very much for the various replies on this, both on and off list.
I'm very grateful and am considering things.
Lee
Thanks for the below, Martin.
Maybe so far I missed it on the web, but that's the clearest description
I've come across and actually makes sense to me.
:)
Lee
Martin Gregorie wrote:
The main benefit for low volume (personal) mail is that using
spamc/spamd avoids the considerable start/stop
what I'm looking for.
Kevin Parris wrote:
This part of your message has really confused me about what you are trying to
accomplish:
Lee 06/28/09 9:45 PM
I need the ability for SA to connect to SSL connections as well as insecure
ones, so I don't know if I have to install extra
until a mystical time when a new XP/Vista desktop
SAproxy/client gets made.
:)
Lee
of thought any further.
I appreciate one or two posters have already said / implied this.
Lee
UK
be achieved, explicitly with a section on
using a suitable pop3proxy script/program through to a desktop client,
so you're not left with SA and nowhere to go with it. :)
Lee
of course
is, to make it worthwhile, we trust the host has correctly installed and
fully configured SA for it to work optimumly (if that word exists).
Lee
René Berber wrote:
Lee wrote:
[snip]
I appreciate however those instructions may be aimed at a mindset and
application at server level rather
by
SpamAssassin', which I _assume_ is the equivalent of manually making a
filter to act on the header X-Spam-Status if present. I haven't tried it
... maybe I should! (I made my own filter looking for X-Spam-Status: Yes).
Lee
.
Lee
UK
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
Lee
I'd advise you not to try this path much longer. The effort to get the
full functionality is not worth it. You will never get it all, unless
you're prepared to port a lot of the stuff to W32 (been there - done
(part) of it - never again)
Suggest you look
My Spam assassin is run from /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter via the perl
module.
Initialized using:
spam_assassin_init()-compile_now(1) if
defined(spam_assassin_init());
And checked with:
my($hits, $req, $names, $report) = spam_assassin_check();
When running sa-update, do I need
From: mouss [mailto:mo...@ml.netoyen.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 6:30 PM
At question is the statement
dbg: channel: current version is 752903, new version is 752903,
skipping channel
$ host -t txt 3.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org
3.2.3.updates.spamassassin.org descriptive text
I'm a new administrator at a site and have been tasked with updating
Spam Assassin, something I have never worked with before.
I am running /usr/perl5/5.8.4/bin/sa-update daily as a cronjob, but I'm
not sure if this is accomplishing anything.
I have read through FAQs and documentation, but
will be on vacation from June 23, 2007 through July 8, 2007.
--
Lee Leahu RICIS, Inc.
Internet Technology Specialist 866-RICIS-77 Toll Free Voice (US)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 708-444-2690 Voice (International)
http://www.ricis.com/ 866-99-RICIS Toll Free
, 2007.
--
Lee Leahu RICIS, Inc.
Internet Technology Specialist 866-RICIS-77 Toll Free Voice (US)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 708-444-2690 Voice (International)
http://www.ricis.com/ 866-99-RICIS Toll Free Fax (US
, you want the email, period, regardless of content. -- Lee Manevitch Bradenton, FL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
message. I ran
one such file through giffix and then through gocr, and I didn't get
anything meaningful back - so I guess the underlying problem is with
gocr instead.
Comments?
--
Lee Manevitch
Bradenton, FL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lee
n:Lee;Jay
org:Philadelphia Biblical University;Information Technology Dept.
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Network / Systems Administrator
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
Bazooka Joe wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=3.0
tests=BAYES_60 autolearn=ham
version=3.0.4
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4
(2005-06-05) on agwebinc.com
I have required of 3
The message you sent directly to me hit the following:
* 0.5 HTML_40_50 BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
* 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* 1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
* above 50%
*
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Jason Haar wrote:
Has anyone done this, and if so, what sort of tools allow it?
A Linux mail relay in front of the Exchange server. :)
That wouldn't allow messages to be put in a subfolder instead of inbox,
just to do the
wrote:
| But.
|
| There are some spammers who run subscribe to mailing lists.
|
| I got spam at home the other day from ediets.co.uk, for example.
|
| I call this stuff subscription spam and would block most of it anyway.
|
| Cheers,
|
| Phil
Easier said than done when you have a
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, mouss wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea a écrit :
David Lee wrote:
If, conversely, it is not in breach, then SA has a problem: it shouldn't
be marking it INVALID_DATE. Incidentally, it is this aspect (rather
than any other) of the date that is triggering this SA rule
reason; this
would give them a way out.)
--
: David LeeI.T. Service :
: Senior Systems ProgrammerComputer Centre :
: Durham University :
: http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/South
not
unheard of for spammers to use this technique too. I've not seen a SA
rule that triggers on this specifically. Any thoughts?
Jay
begin:vcard
fn:Jay Lee
n:Lee;Jay
org:Philadelphia Biblical University;Information Technology Department
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Network / Systems
Hi
I'm running SpamAssassin 3.0.2 on a dedicated linux server. Spamd is
running as a daemon and allowing connections from 4 mail servers.
Every few hours, spamd will just stop responding, without any errors in
its logfiles. Whenever this happends I run a netstat -an on the server
and I see lots
. To each his
own I guess, but I agree with the first respondant that your missing out
by turning off negative scoring...
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
. It's really the only option when processing this
much mail. Switch and watch your load drop dramatically.
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
on the declared helo or dns lookup of the
connecting server.
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
scams. I did bump the scores for these rules up somewhat to help them
along...
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
anymore and what does the SA report say? We need more details to help you.
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
Are they any rules to stop this type of spam? It is continually
growing and doesnt ever let up.
Thanks,
Jeff
Mark Williams wrote:
I have just installed spamassassin v3.0.4 in a test environment (which
is a mirror of the live environment) and have a number of questions,
which I can not see within the manuals/support documentation.
Firstly, this is my configuration:
Server: Linux (RH9.0), with
try communigate pro
www.stalker.com
On Jul 16, 2005, at 9:21 PM, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
OS X uses Postfix by default (at least it does on my Powerbook
running Tiger). While it's not graphical per-sea, it's not
difficult to set up. I'm sure someone out there has written a
GUI for
based on X-Spam-Level headers. If 8 is certainly spam then
have your server side filter or client filter look for 8 *s, then look
for 5 *s for probably spam. Very simple, no code changes needed.
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical
large No scores also?
It's just easier for most filtering languages to look at the stars,
that's why there there. The yes/no only gives you a black/white world,
the score number is easy for humans to read but hard for programming
languages.
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
is it being called
within your mail path?
We can't help you if you don't help us.
I think you meant Help me, help you!
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
We've had some false
positives with the X_LIBRARY, MIME_BOUND_RKFINDY rules being tripped on e-faxes
received through www.myvfm.com. Fairly obviously the
service has been built using the Indy.Sockets library (www.indyproject.org).
The Indyproject
knowledge base admits that headers similar
What an interesting spam !
Which suggests a novel test, search for more than one 'From' or 'Subject'
header in an email. But how can I do this in SA ?
I know how to search the contents of the From or Subject headers which SA
makes available to me. But is it possible to write regexps to search
isn't doing something stupid then there should be no
way for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to discover the message was BCCed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jay
--
Jay Lee
Network / Systems Administrator
Information Technology Dept.
Philadelphia Biblical University
--
Has anyone been getting these emails? I have received thirteen today on non existent accounts.
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: April 6, 2005 1:03:10 PM CDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HELLO
ALERT!
This e-mail, in its original form, contained one or more attached files
Not only sendmail, you can plug Milter filters into Perl programs using
Net::Milter from CPAN.
I've not tried plumbing it in yet, but it should certainly be possible.
Martin
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Bochmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 March 2005 18:51
To:
I understand that. How then does SA treat messages mainly made up of
images?
On Jan 26, 2005, at 10:59 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 11:47 AM 1/26/2005, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
I have been using sa-learn religiously with ALL spam and ham on my
server. However, I keep getting repeat spam with low scores
I have been using sa-learn religiously with ALL spam and ham on my
server. However, I keep getting repeat spam with low scores. How can I
increase the sa-learn points? So that when I learn a message instead
of increasing some point by .1 or .2 it will increase by .5 or .6?
Thanks,
Jeffrey Lee
:
At 11:47 AM 1/26/2005, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
I have been using sa-learn religiously with ALL spam and ham on my
server. However, I keep getting repeat spam with low scores. How can
I increase the sa-learn points? So that when I learn a message
instead of increasing some point by .1 or .2
Spammers don't go to Cybercafés to send spam.
Oh yes they do !
We see lots of phishing and 419 / lottery scams coming from Cybercafes.
The average spammer likes to work from home, the average scammer likes the
anonymity of Cybercafes.
Cigan - you have a very difficult problem. If you scan
.
Thanks,
Jeffrey Lee
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
