om mailing lists is not
filtered by SA...
I do this too, for some lists (although not all).
Some lists can even unsubscribe user after receiving bounces ...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varo
. Also, it has much different meaning than not scanning mail from
those hosts.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
The 3 bi
-milt:189.
Sep 11 16:54:46 localhost spamd[8205]: spamd: result: Y 7 -
BAYES_99,BAYES_999,DKIM_SIGNED
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akuk
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 -1.772 0.001 -1.772
score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 -0.010 0.001 -0.010
score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 0.001 -0.010 0.001 -0.010
score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 0.001 -1.000 0.001 -1.000
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-ma
atistics (would be interesting) ? :
1. For messages bigger than 250 KB . SPAM / HAM %
no...
2. Compare how many SPAM was catched (in %) is < 250 KB and > 250 KB
12 of 40 this year, ~100 out of ~7000 since I save them...
(I don't count those rejected with score >10)
--
Matus UHLAR - fa
th SA and it did catch much of spam.
unfortunately there IS spam >256K...
yes, it _needs_ much memory and CPU power...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NE
Am 05.09.2014 um 09:04 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
and I see more things that are way too much
5.0 BAYES_95
tag-level=4.5
On 05.09.14 09:13, Reindl Harald wrote:
# adjust IADB scoring (way too high defaults)
score RCVD_IN_IADB_VOUCHED -0.5
score RCVD_IN_IADB_DOPTIN -0.8
score
BAYES_95 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 95 to 99%
* -1.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches, handover relay domain
and I see more things that are way too much
5.0 BAYES_95
tag-level=4.5
...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to
Likewise, FN should adjust AWL upwards on manual
training, no?
I am not sure how should the manual training be done when talking about AWL.
The only way I think is to remove the address from AWL.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receiv
flag, you should check for failures and
exit with tempfail..
at fourth, can't you plug SA directly in your MTA?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akuko
od training, and using
hapaxes (enabled by default) it can even help detecting the spam.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
42.7 perc
ly never had a need for pastebin working 11 years
yes, because you post attachments to the list, which is not very polite...
looks like in case of the SA-list i start to use it in the future
good...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NO
file status can break this feature,
e.g. a backup system that reads files and resets atime back will cause
resetting the ctime. Setting it _not_ to reset atime (nobody uses atime
nowadays) should fix the problem.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish
black list due to this 'out of office'|'vacation'
messages.
I am aware of the RFC3834 but not sure if our
Exchange server is following it.
Of course is does not. Microsoft does not follow standards.
It does violate them, break them, misinterpret them...
--
Matus UHLAR - fant
score: 0.5000]
it's apparently your MUA that re-formats thhose headers.
fix the MUA, complain to authors or get other one.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem
around this by configuring
add_header all Report _REPORT_
so the X-Spam-Report is added to every message, not just spam...
not sure if this works with amavis, It seems that amavis only adds
x-spam-report only when mail is spam, configurable with "tag2 level".
--
M
properly.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Your mouse has moved. Windows NT will now restart for changes to take
to take effect. [OK]
the fact SA is not as effective
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
WinError #9: Out of error messages.
n Debian definition.
(you need own server if you process ofer 100k messages daily, and license if
you have internal checksum database)
you can get the source, build and run in most of cases freely.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive
you are complaining about low scores... silly.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Silvester Stallone: Father of the RISC concept.
-02-07) on vps81276.ovh.net
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=3.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,MISSING_DATE,
MISSING_MID,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
this does not say it's spam. it says it is NOT spam.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fan
=-0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
This one is actually amavisd header, which means that the MTA uses
spamassassin indirectly. Just FYI.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address
rking this as ham (and running "sa-learn --ham")
but this has surprisingly little effect.
are you training as the correct user?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tut
On 2014-08-13 07:14, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
call an unsubscribe-hook _and_ train as spam.
Should be viable for both solicided an unsolicited mail.
Or, does anyone think that unsubscribing spam is counter-productive
still?
On 13.08.14 11:06, Dave Warren wrote:
In short, yes, it is
On Wednesday 13 August 2014 at 16:14:06 (EU time), Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
call an unsubscribe-hook _and_ train as spam.
Should be viable for both solicided an unsolicited mail.
Or, does anyone think that unsubscribing spam is counter-productive still?
On 13.08.14 16:43, Antony Stone
nd_ train as spam.
Should be viable for both solicided an unsolicited mail.
Or, does anyone think that unsubscribing spam is counter-productive still?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovan
SA marked it as spam
actually, not SA, but amavis. Yes, amavis uses SA engine but it's not SA.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu
using a 5.0 threshold but given your example
I guess I should push it up to 8.0.
if you use quarantine and watch the statistics, you can catch spam outbreaks
without unnecessary delaying mail. Note that your users might see manual
review as breaking their privacy...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh
ted servers for hitting 7.0...
You can still use RBL checks like RCVD_IN_SORBS_*, RCVD_IN_XBL, URI BL's,
and razor/pyzor/dcc
However, I would try using BAYES, at least when you get some outbreaks.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish N
out of sync, some define score for RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4
but do not define the rules...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Nothing
er to change user you train on, than change user under
which SA/whatever daemon/service runs as.
You can cause permission issues etc.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu
klist effective immediately.
I got the same answer. I am considering the same.
On 02.08.14 18:54, The Doctor wrote:
I blog spam from Yahoo, Google and Hotmail.
Feel free to use my blog http://www.nk.ca/blog/ as proof.
serendipity error: unable to connect to database - exiting.
--
Matus UHLAR
y got the answer (and it's in the manual)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"They say when you play that M$ CD backwa
, more filters, more overhead, more wasted
CPU time and bandwidth.
You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If...
The FUSSP involves replacing SMTP.
http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html#programmer-11
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish N
aid it was localhost address.
Do you have *@iqm.unicamp.br in whitelist_from?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
2B|!2B, that's a question!
at happens when you whitelist something you should not
whitelist. Do not whitelist your domain, localhost, localdomain etc.
The spammer did exactly what spammers do to usestupid whitelists: set From:
to something you have whitelisted.
Without your whitelist, the score would be 14.
--
Matus UHLAR
ts, e.g. when final score is over 10 (or
whatever you configure)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"The box said 'R
I'd only use Sought rules, not
SMF_BRACKETS_TO
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
There's a long-standing bug relat
o two checks, one at SMTP time (with sane defaults), and second
(user-personalized) at delivery time.
single recipient e-mails can be scanned with user preferences at SMTP time
and you can skip the latter step for them.
Of course, spam rejected at SMTP time won't be scanned with per-user
se
trowing it away (imho, if you accept the mail, you should
keep track, just for sure, so it doesn't get lost in /dev/null).
the "spam" directory is a good idea, e.g. with courier's imap and its
emptytrash feature (set to 91 at my former employer)
--
Matus UHLAR - fant
ists and
move mail to /dev/null.
you should reject the mail instead. see the programs above.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklam
On 16.07.14 19:36, Chris wrote:
>installed via CPAN as I always have
On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 09:13 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
yes, that's why we have package distributions, to install packages in a
semi-manual way.
first check if you have installed spamassassin as ubuntu pack
distributions, to install packages in a
semi-manual way.
first check if you have installed spamassassin as ubuntu package, and if so,
remove one of them...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varova
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2014-07-13 17:14:
What do I (or the others) miss here?
On 13.07.14 18:27, Benny Pedersen wrote:
i yet to see that pbl ips with smtp auth here
any dynamic - dialup, DSL, cable ... ?
they are supposed to use authentication and should not get
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2014-07-13 12:30:
isn't the whole point of authentication to avoid scanning the
authenticated
IP in blacklists?
On 13.07.14 15:04, Benny Pedersen wrote:
that would be a fault, since when its sent via smtps or submission it
would be in trusted_net
rent 0.2)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Remember half the people you know are below average.
till don't understad the point:
isn't the whole point of authentication to avoid scanning the authenticated
IP in blacklists?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adr
trusted hosts ?
isn't the whole point of authenticaTION to avoid scanning the authenticated
IP in blacklists?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOS
On 07/04/2014 07:02 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have read the man page multiple times. spamass-milter passes the local
part of mail recipient to spamd, which is not necessarily a username.
spamass-milter even can call "sendmail -bv" to get the user, but it still
may not be
On 07/04/2014 05:27 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I repeat: spamass-milter does not (and can not) know about local users.
On 04.07.14 06:30, Steve Bergman wrote:
SPAMASS_MILTER(8)
I have read the man page multiple times. spamass-milter passes the local
part of mail recipient to spamd
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995
On 07/03/2014 09:38 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I see you are next person (after me) who encountered this issue. Maybe you
could comment (or at least +1) the bug.
On 03.07.14 09:57, Steve Bergman wrote:
What do you think
On 03.07.14 09:28, Steve Bergman wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6995
On 07/03/2014 09:17 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have explained my position in the bug, link to which you removed.
Yes. I saw that you did.
then you should understand why I do not
On 07/03/2014 07:53 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Aha, this seems to be spamd fallback to 'nobody' user, usually with homedir
/nonexistent. spamc and spamass-milter have nothing to do with it.
I have modified my spamd to use different user as fallback.
On 03.07.14 08:43, Ste
On 07/03/2014 02:31 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
pardon me, but spamass-milter uses spamc, so pyzor is called from spamd.
That means, the above should apply for spamd, not spamass-milter.
On 03.07.14 07:26, Steve Bergman wrote:
The issue seems to be spamc (and thus pyzor) running as the
lter uses spamc, so pyzor is called from spamd.
That means, the above should apply for spamd, not spamass-milter.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT aku
?
paste full headers on pastebin. OR, did you already?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Windows found: (R)emove, (E)rase
On 27.06.14 07:50, motty cruz wrote:
X-Quarantine-ID: <4QFxoaNchYOk>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fqdn.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, MIME error: error: unexpected end of
header
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
This might explain much.
-0ubuntu2
ancient, buggy, EOL version
for both issues, you should ask help on ubuntu. I have no idea whether 10.04
is supported still (is that LTS version?) but ubuntu should take care about
such issues if it's supported (well, that's what "support" means)
--
Matus UH
dkim signed mails if this headers is dkim signed, its
this really why T_DKIM_INVALID exists ?
only if admins would as X-Spam headers before DKIM-signing the mail.
yes i know its not sa fault some admins just sign all headers :(
I think that would be an extremely bad idea.
--
Matus UHLAR
x27;t have a lot of time?
Reply-To:
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="b89161365ddc621bf5b4340f2659783e69.692014062755451"
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail a
NCEMENT2 1.513
score DRUGS_ERECTILE 3.513
score DRUG_ED_SILD 2.013
score HELO_DYNAMIC_DHCP 2.513
score HS_INDEX_PARAM 1.513
score ONLINE_PHARMACY 3.013
score RDNS_DYNAMIC 1.013
score RDNS_NONE 2.013
score STOX_REPLY_TYPE 2.013
score SUBJ_BUY 2.013
score TVD_VISIT_PHARMA 2.913
score TVD_SPACE_RATIO 1.
data: last expire reduction c
Jun 25 07:53:29.670 [13397] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/W
/var/lib/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
Jun 25 07:53:29.672 [13397] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/W
/var/lib/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_seen
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ;
,
def_whitelist_* by -15.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I don't have lysdexia. The Dog wouldn't allow that.
is not what I want. I just want to downscore
mails from this server because I don't trust them.
downscore? because you don't trust them?
I'm kinda lost now...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising
t.
they can only tag or reject mail detected as spam.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"Two words: Windows survives." -
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 16:42:50 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> I would not be surprised... I have already met people having
>> problem because of djbdns (and that's why I don't recommend using
>> it)
RW wrote:
> What problem did they have specificall
On 09.06.14 09:47, Ben Stover wrote:
As far as I found out SpamAssassin calculates the spam score and puts the
value into the email header.
What is the maximum range of the score?
-10,,+10
I don't think it has limits. Maybe just limist for integer.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantoma
changes for tomorrow.
--- lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm (revision 1601300)
+++ lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm (working copy)
@@ -582,6 +582,7 @@
}
sub time_to_rfc822_date {
+ my $pms = shift;
my($time) = @_;
my @days = qw/Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat/;
--
Matus UHLAR - fantom
On 06/05/2014 09:25 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Seems the only problems Daniele could solve are obsolete rules and
mistrained BAYES database.
On 06.06.14 18:06, Daniele Paoni wrote:
I deleted the bayes database and trained it using real spam&ham
I would not clear the BAYES DB so
. I have already met people having problem because
of djbdns (and that's why I don't recommend using it)
I still find having supported and recent version of DNS server better
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote
djbdns?
I really wonder, when more alternatives were advised to you,
why did you choose the oldest, worst, most buggy and years unsupported
alternative?
On 06.06.14 02:11, zespri wrote:
Well, on the page that the original link led to this page was linked:
http
ing supported.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"One World. One Web. One Program." - Microsoft promotional adve
On 06.06.14 00:28, zespri wrote:
Thank you all. I've installed djbdns and now the URIBL_BLOCKED is gone! Yay!
djbdns?
I really wonder, when more alternatives were advised to you,
why did you choose the oldest, worst, most buggy and years unsupported
alternative?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantoma
mass-milter is not enough for you.
Original Message ----
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Sent: June 3, 2014 2:26:39 AM CDT
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Don't modify body - just add headers?
On 02.06.14 18:45, Patrick Thomas wrote:
Call Method: Mail => Po
is rule in 3.3.2 (I use Debian's spamassassin so I have 3.3.2 for
now).
Seems the only problems Daniele could solve are obsolete rules and
mistrained BAYES database.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising
ing spamc instead of spamassassin (shortens startup time).
- even better, run spam filter as postfix filter, using spamass-milter or
other pre-queue filter. You could reject spam already at SMTP level
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to recei
MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RDNS_NONE=2.013, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01,
URIBL_BLACK=1.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO=-6] autolearn=no
Why is this user whitelisted if you consider it to be spam?
it's the recipient that is whitelisted. In such case it is really silly to
blame SA for not marking
forwarders? If so, removing the forwarder configuration
should help.
because forwarding defeats the main reason we recommended you having own
nameserver for doing lookups from your own IP that won't get blacklisted
(with forwarding, the lookups come from your forwarders that may be b
On 19.05.14 11:06, Jeff Mincy wrote:
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 11:06:24 -0400
From: Jeff Mincy
To: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
please, avoid personal replies.
I am not subscribed to mailing list to get personal mail from people there.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http
s ^.*\@.*buy\.com$ entry
>May 8 18:21:27.859 [22058] dbg: spf: whitelist_from_spf:
amandarodriq...@odysseyshop.ribsbuy.com is in user's WHITELIST_FROM_SPF and passed
SPF check
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 18:22:49 +0200
According to the documentation, they are
}) {
if ($scanner->{sender} =~ qr/$regexp/i) {
##New dbg output here:
dbg("spf: $param: $scanner->{sender} matches $regexp entry");
return 1;
I assume the contents of *_networks is modified before RE matching, so you'd
wonder what is the content...
>On 4/24/2014 6:12 AM, emailitis.com wrote:
>>Also, in the maillog, I would like to see spamd show not just the
>>tests, but the scores of each.
On Sunday 27 April 2014 at 19:03, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
add_header all Report _REPORT_
On 27.04.14 19:10, Antony Stone
the option, etc. though. Always love people submitting
patches!
I believe that
add_header all Report _REPORT_
in your user_prefs does what you want (the scores are rounded to 1
decimal plave but is should be OK for most cases)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.
does not mean it's not spam, only because millions of @gmail.com ham
comming from gmail.com are ham...
this logic is braindead to me
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na t
, so
even if that rule seems incorrect hitting then it corrected by other
rules
it's not corrected, that's the point...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adr
will still be checked for
blacklist that contain hacked, zombie and other abusing IPs.
...of course, all with properly set up SA or similar spam filter.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varo
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 11:49 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
and now I must tell that the workaround does not work.
Unfortunately I still get DATE_IN_* issues for mail received via SMTP/SSL
On 06.03.14 11:15, Martin Gregorie wrote:
Is there any chance that this is due to a man-in-the
On 19.02.14 17:32, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
some time ago I was wondering if sendmail changes the Date: header.
The reason was that I've been receiving mail that fired DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q
when being received at SMTP level, but not later.
Now I found out that when the same mail is rec
ause it's the lowest level
possible. Facility "*" has logic, but level "*" has the same meaning as
"debug".
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto
On 19.02.14 17:32, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
some time ago I was wondering if sendmail changes the Date: header.
The reason was that I've been receiving mail that fired DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q
when being received at SMTP level, but not later.
Now I found out that when the same mail is rec
body parts
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on fantomas.fantomas.sk
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek
On 02/17/2014 02:43 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
seems after last rule update we've got new rule BAYES_99 in 72_scores.cf
but without score (and thus default 1.0) in 50_scores.cf.
... a mistake happened apparently?
On 17.02.14 15:07, Axb wrote:
BAYES_999 is *not* BAYES_99
sorry
Hello,
seems after last rule update we've got new rule BAYES_99 in 72_scores.cf but
without score (and thus default 1.0) in 50_scores.cf.
... a mistake happened apparently?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advert
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:37:48 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I heave received a ham message, that hit BAYES_50 at the time I
received it. After feeding to "spamassassin -k" and rechecking it
gives BAYES_99:
On 20.01.14 12:10, RW wrote:
This is the odd bit.
So, after SpamAssa
l later. So, spamd apparently sees something different than
you do.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"Two words: W
\n \s etc.
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
isn't this the first Received: header? spamd may not receive it when MTA
first transfers message to SA and THEN adds the Received: header...
e.g. milter behaves like this
On 06.02.14 13:52, David B Funk wrote:
Any worthwhile mil
\n \s etc.
isn't this the first Received: header? spamd may not receive it when MTA
first transfers message to SA and THEN adds the Received: header...
e.g. milter behaves like this
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail adve
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 21:32:33 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
After repeated learning as ham I get BAYES_50 at least for the latter
message, but I still wonder, how exactly does spamassassin identify
messages that do not contain Message-Id?
On 02.02.14 13:12, RW wrote:
It never uses
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:37:48 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I heave received a ham message, that hit BAYES_50 at the time I
received it. After feeding to "spamassassin -k" and rechecking it
gives BAYES_99:
On 20.01.14 12:10, RW wrote:
This is the odd bit.
I think I have foun
times are within a couple of seconds - so my question
is: why SA adds DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q?
Am 31.01.2014 um 15:44 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
I have seen that often too.
I have feeling that sendmail changes Date: to current if it's in the future.
On 31.01.14 16:09, Rainer Sokoll
1101 - 1200 of 2533 matches
Mail list logo
