on, re-run with -D option
to see debug output
I run it with -D and I don't see razor mentioned at all.
So, my big question is:
Q: Without being root, can I installed my own version of razor so that
it will work with spamassassin which the web hosting provider is
supporting?
I have cons
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 09:40:42PM -0700, Chris Cooper wrote:
> Is it possible to use Razor 2 for a business email server or is it
> limited to personal use only? Has anyone been able to obtain a
> license to do this or have you discontinued using Razor 2 with
> SpamAssassin? I c
Just post on Razor mailing list:
Folks,In the last few weeks I have received tons of mail from people asking meif they are covered by Razor service policy. Here's some clarification.The spirit of the service policy
Is it possible to use Razor 2 for a business email server or is it limited to personal use only? Has anyone been able to obtain a license to do this or have you discontinued using Razor 2 with SpamAssassin? I couldn't find information on the couldmark web site and I haven't received a r
On Monday 03 October 2005 06:03 pm, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> > With 3.1 since these are all now plug-ins should they still be listed
> > in the local cf?
> >
> > use_razor2 1
> > razor_timeout 10
> > use_dcc 1
> > dcc_timeout 10
>
Chris wrote:
With 3.1 since these are all now plug-ins should they still be listed in the
local cf?
use_razor2 1
razor_timeout 10
use_dcc 1
dcc_timeout 10
dcc_body_max99
dcc_fuz1_max99
dcc_fuz2_max 99
use_pyzor
With 3.1 since these are all now plug-ins should they still be listed in the
local cf?
use_razor2 1
razor_timeout 10
use_dcc 1
dcc_timeout 10
dcc_body_max99
dcc_fuz1_max99
dcc_fuz2_max99
use_pyzor
a fix for this problem. http://www.kluge.net/~felicity/random/handlespam.txt
Seems to report fine now:
(razor) Submitted message to Razor et al
Thanks once again for your contributions...
Ed
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Randomly Generated Quote (335 of 1006):
A woman drove me to d
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 01:15:36PM -0700, Ed Kasky wrote:
> FWIW, from here, I see the error in the results from handlespam on every
> message processed.
Ok, I did some more digging. Apparently in 3.1, we reversed the return code
for report_as_spam() to be correct, ie: 1 is ok, 0 is error, which
At 11:58 AM Monday, 9/26/2005, Theo Van Dinter wrote -=>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:10:19AM -0500, sargon wrote:
> I use Theo's excellent handlespam.pl script for reporting spam. Since
> upgrading to SA 3.1 over the weekend, I see this error when I run the
> script:
>
> (
On Monday, 26-September-2005 13:58, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:10:19AM -0500, sargon wrote:
> > I use Theo's excellent handlespam.pl script for reporting spam.
> > Since upgrading to SA 3.1 over the weekend, I see this error when
> > I run the scr
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:10:19AM -0500, sargon wrote:
> I use Theo's excellent handlespam.pl script for reporting spam. Since
> upgrading to SA 3.1 over the weekend, I see this error when I run the
> script:
>
> (razor) Could not report spam to Razor et al!
>
> I
I use Theo's excellent handlespam.pl script for reporting spam. Since
upgrading to SA 3.1 over the weekend, I see this error when I run the
script:
(razor) Could not report spam to Razor et al!
If I check the Razor log, I see this for the most-recent use of the
script:
Sep 26 11:01:52.0
At 10:48 AM 9/19/2005, Carlos Zottmann wrote:
Hi !!
I am new to SpamAssassin, and I would like some advice on the use os
Razor, Pyzor and DCC ...
Is it good to use all the three of them, or should we select just one?
In the last case, wich one is the best one?
You can use all of them, I use
Hi !!
I am new to SpamAssassin, and I would like some advice on the use os
Razor, Pyzor and DCC ...
Is it good to use all the three of them, or should we select just one?
In the last case, wich one is the best one?
Regards,
Carlos.
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 06:09:38PM +0200, Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
> >> - - Razor: disable Razor2 support by default per our policy, since
> >> the service is not free for non-personal use. It's trivial to
> >> reenable.
>
> But is that correc
Dan Kohn wrote:
> Justin said:
>
>> - - Razor: disable Razor2 support by default per our policy, since
>> the service is not free for non-personal use. It's trivial to
>> reenable.
But is that correct? As far as I can know, it is free to use for
non-person
Justin said:
>- - Razor: disable Razor2 support by default per our policy, since the
> service is not free for non-personal use. It's trivial to reenable.
Could you please change that to:
"It's trivial to reenable by uncommenting the appropriate lines in
/etc/mail/
ent as smooth as silk.
>
> Installed Razor 2.75. Very much unlike my previous attempt to install Razor
> 1.x, this also went very smoothly. It took me about 2 hours to download the
> software, upgrade SA, install Razor, read the docs and configure everything
> to work together.
>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 08:09:55AM -0700, James Bucanek wrote:
> But what does the RAZOR2_CHECK score mean? Poking around, I would guess that
> it means that Razor has determined the "confidence" value for the message is
> higher than the threshold I've configured in the
Greetings,
My weekend spam assassination resumed yesterday, when I found a few hour to
implement the suggestions from the list last month (well, some of them -- there
were so many good suggestions).
I upgraded SA to 3.0.4. That went as smooth as silk.
Installed Razor 2.75. Very much unlike
Dr Robert Young wrote:
> If I have a spam with a RAZOR2_CHECK score of 1.5, can I user the syntax
> ( in local.cf)
>
> score RAZOR2_CHECK 3.0
>
> to increase the test's "score" when it is hit?
>
> I know this works for the normal "rule based&qu
If I have a spam with a RAZOR2_CHECK score of 1.5, can I user the syntax ( in local.cf) score RAZOR2_CHECK 3.0 to increase the test's "score" when it is hit? I know this works for the normal "rule based" tests, but I was unsure about
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 07:24:02PM -0500, Kenneth S. wrote:
> Skip DNS tests (Default option = 0)
> ->Skip Razor, Pyzor and DCC checks and the above tests (option = 1)
> ->Skip all checks (option = 2)
>
> How does that look? Also what would the option be called?
This
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:33 AM
To: Theo Van Dinter
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: ALL_TRUSTED and Razor, DCC and Pyzor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 04:34:03PM -0500, Kenneth
gether. I was thinking of putting an option in local.cf that would skip
checks as follows.
Skip DNS tests (Default option = 0)
->Skip Razor, Pyzor and DCC checks and the above tests (option = 1)
->Skip all checks (option = 2)
How does that look? Also what would the option be calle
massassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ALL_TRUSTED and Razor, DCC and Pyzor
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Theo Van Dinter writes:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 04:34:03PM -0500, Kenneth S. wrote:
> > > Is there anyway to configure SA s
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 04:34:03PM -0500, Kenneth S. wrote:
Is there anyway to configure SA so that if the ALL_TRUSTED rule is hit it
skips the Razor, DCC and Pyzor tests?
Not without modifying code.
You could probably create a set of meta-rules to counteract the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 04:34:03PM -0500, Kenneth S. wrote:
> > Is there anyway to configure SA so that if the ALL_TRUSTED rule is hit it
> > skips the Razor, DCC and Pyzor tests?
>
> Not without mod
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 04:34:03PM -0500, Kenneth S. wrote:
> Is there anyway to configure SA so that if the ALL_TRUSTED rule is hit it
> skips the Razor, DCC and Pyzor tests?
Not without modifying code.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"It is far more impressive when others discove
Is there anyway to configure SA so that if the ALL_TRUSTED rule is hit it
skips the Razor, DCC and Pyzor tests?
Thanks,
Kenneth
>...
>
>On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 16:48:22 +
>Ronan McGlue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> what is the official stance on using razor/dcc for not personal use.
>> I've looked at the 3.1 docs and its off by default. I cant seem to
>> find any liscencing in
not paying license fee's has absolutely no guarentee that the service
>>will remain reliable.
>
>
> IIRC, Vipul has said that basically everyone can use Razor unless you're
> selling a product based on Razor in which you need to get licenses.
That's pretty much th
y no guarentee that the service
> will remain reliable.
IIRC, Vipul has said that basically everyone can use Razor unless you're
selling a product based on Razor in which you need to get licenses.
However, the SA list isn't really the best place to discuss the licensing of
non-SA soft
> Ronan McGlue wrote:
> > what is the official stance on using razor/dcc for not personal use.
> > I've looked at the 3.1 docs and its off by default. I cant seem to
> > find any liscencing info on either site. Anyone got any URLS/ info
> > regarding this
Ronan McGlue wrote:
> what is the official stance on using razor/dcc for not personal use.
> I've looked at the 3.1 docs and its off by default. I cant seem to find
> any liscencing info on either site. Anyone got any URLS/ info regarding
> this issue. Im using it at a uni here si
As far as I know, the licensing issues have to do with people selling
antispam sollutions. E.g. you can download and install DCC/Razor and turn
them on in SpamAssassin, but you cannot sell (SpamAssassin with) Razor/DCC
as part of an anti-spam sollution without paying license fee's.
Kind Re
On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 16:48:22 +
Ronan McGlue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what is the official stance on using razor/dcc for not personal use.
> I've looked at the 3.1 docs and its off by default. I cant seem to
> find any liscencing info on either site. Anyone got any UR
what is the official stance on using razor/dcc for not personal use.
I've looked at the 3.1 docs and its off by default. I cant seem to find
any liscencing info on either site. Anyone got any URLS/ info regarding
this issue. Im using it at a uni here sitewide so Id like to forgo a
la
7;,'96','100')
the error went away. Apparently the check_razor2_range eval has changed
to where it uses an additional argument, and needs to be a "full" rule
rather than "body".
+++
I have installed SpamAssassin v3.1.0pre on a
I have installed SpamAssassin v3.1.0pre on a test system running Solaris
8, Perl 5.8.5, and Razor 2.67. I got the following message when I lint:
# spamassassin --lint
[15182] warn: razor2: razor2 check failed: No such file or directory
Can't use an undefined value as a SCALAR reference at
You're right. I am running it as a daemon, and it seems SuSE 9 ships with a /etc/sysconfig/spamd file that includes (for some godawful reason) the -L option. I have just removed that and it seems to be using network tests now. Yes!!
Thanks again...
JON >>> Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:51:33PM -0400, Jonathan Lutz wrote:
> However, when I run: spamassassin -D -t < spamfile on it, it shows a
> whole bunch more such as DCC_CHECK and a bunch of URIBL tags as it
> should. Network checks are seemingly only working on a "local" level.
>
> Any reason why t
ags as it should. Network checks are seemingly only working on a "local" level.
Any reason why this might be?
JON
>>> "Jonathan Lutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 6/8/2005 1:39:46 PM >>>
I have just set up a little mail server with Postfx and Spama
Jonathan Lutz wrote:
> I have just set up a little mail server with Postfx and Spamassassin
> 2.63 with the newest Razor installed (of course). Spamassassin seems
> to be working fine, and running spamassassin -D --lint shows Razor
> appearing to be working fine.. but unfortunate
I have just set up a little mail server with Postfx and Spamassassin2.63 with the newest Razor installed (of course). Spamassassin seemsto be working fine, and running spamassassin -D --lint shows Razorappearing to be working fine.. but unfortunately it is not tagging anymessages. So far I have
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 06:13:36PM -0500, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> > I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0.2 with Razor2 (agent 2.61).
>
> Not 2.67? So no whiplash (version 8) signatures... very odd...
Whiplash was added in 2.61, fyi.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Nothing takes the taste out of pean
hi,
recently i've noticed that razor returns "err 202" messages after
some period of time (~12 to 24 hrs) or some number of messages,
and correspondingly does not report spam results back to SA.
restarting SA fixes the problem.
first, a little about the environment...
# uname -a
Johan Segernäs wrote:
I'd like to use razor-check as well on my servers, is it possible to have a
server on one of my own boxes or am I forced to use public servers? Haven't
found any docs around this.
Vipul made a post a few months ago about the idea of setting up a Razor
caching
Oops, wrong network service... I was thinking of DCC, not Razor.
On Apr 4, 2005 10:36 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ryan Castellucci wrote:
> > I actualy emailed cloudmark about this for our installation that
> > processes 30k emails to pay, and I got a reply saying that it was fine
> > to use thier servers for free. I'd email them and ask.
On 2005-04-04 11:03 -0500 or thereabouts, Brian Wong wrote:
> You can also try running your own DCC server.
Working on DCC as well, up and running i 5 hours but I'd like to use
pyzor/razor as well.
Ryan Castellucci wrote:
I actualy emailed cloudmark about this for our installation that
processes 30k emails to pay, and I got a reply saying that it was fine
to use thier servers for free. I'd email them and ask.
Was this before or after the new license came into effect?
is OK with you doing
for free, you cannot run a local razor server for free. That's a for-pay
option only.
Since the OP wanted to run a local razor server, I was stating that would
not be possible with the free client.
As for doing 500k/day for free, yeah, you can ask cloudmark. However, I
Johan Segernäs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2005-04-04 09:32 -0400 or thereabouts, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > > There's no way to do that with the free Razor client.
> >
> > Just read some service info and license and it looks like I have to choose
> > so
On Apr 4, 2005 8:41 AM, Johan Segernäs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2005-04-04 09:32 -0400 or thereabouts, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > There's no way to do that with the free Razor client.
>
> Just read some service info and license and it looks like I have to choose
>
On 2005-04-04 09:32 -0400 or thereabouts, Matt Kettler wrote:
> There's no way to do that with the free Razor client.
Just read some service info and license and it looks like I have to choose
something else.
A good howto on running my own pyzor server would be nice though.
At 05:47 AM 4/4/2005, Johan Segernäs wrote:
I'd like to use razor-check as well on my servers, is it possible to have a
server on one of my own boxes or am I forced to use public servers? Haven't
found any docs around this.
There's no way to do that with the free Razor client.
I
I'd like to use razor-check as well on my servers, is it possible to have a
server on one of my own boxes or am I forced to use public servers? Haven't
found any docs around this.
I know it's possible with pyzor but how is it with syncing data?
Guides/howtos around this?
Newbie question - Saw the following in log - Does
this represent a temporary inability to connect or a more basic configuration
problem on my end? Thanks
Mar 30 10:01:28 Luke spamd[27283]: razor2 check
skipped: Transport endpoint is not connected Died at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/D
Matt Florido wrote:
Here's a good article for ports needed by Razor/Pyzor/DCC.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/NetTestFirewallIssues
Thanks for the URL. I'm not too faimiliar with IPTables. I just allow
outgoing UPD/6277 for DCC and outgoing TCP/2703 for Razor. I don't have
On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 20:03 -0800, Norman Zhang wrote:
> > Did you run "razor-admin -create" after installing razor? It will create
> > the razor-conf and *.lst files. You will want to do this as the user
> > that runs amavisd (typically, amavis or vscan). Given wher
Did you run "razor-admin -create" after installing razor? It will create
the razor-conf and *.lst files. You will want to do this as the user
that runs amavisd (typically, amavis or vscan). Given where amavisd is
looking for the razor files, I would guess you may also need to use
On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 19:12 -0800, Norman Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I run
>
> # amavisd debug-sa
>
> I see the following errors. Do I need to crate the missing files
> manually? May I ask for a few pointers?
>
> Regards,
> Norman Zhang
>
> Razor-L
Hi,
When I run
# amavisd debug-sa
I see the following errors. Do I need to crate the missing files
manually? May I ask for a few pointers?
Regards,
Norman Zhang
Razor-Log: No /var/lib/amavis/var/.razor/razor-agent.conf found, skipping.
Razor-Log: No razor-agent.conf found, using defaults.
check
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
use_dcc 0
use_razor2 0
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin:Conf
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:24:57 +, R McGlue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there a way to temporarily switch off either razor or dcc?
> Im running spamd on a sunblade 100 dual 800Mhz cpu with r
is there a way to temporarily switch off either razor or dcc?
Im running spamd on a sunblade 100 dual 800Mhz cpu with razor
SURBL(local dns) and dcc network tests but am still getting timeouts on
the mail relays becuase of (i think) the network tests lagging a bit
causing timeouts. Im
I set up a fake email address that I will send all my spam to. This
address should report spam via "spamassassin -r" which calls razor-report.
I use qmail, so here is the content of my .qmail-spamtrap:
|spamassassin -x -C /etc/mail/spamassassin -r
Of course, to prevent spamassassin fro
Yeah, get a newer version of razor.. At least 2.40. Ancient versions of
razor older than 2.40 aren't supported by SA anymore...
OK, thank you very much.
--
Milos Prudek
_
Most websites are
confused chintzy gaudy conflicting tacky unpleasant... unusable.
Learn how usable
At 11:47 AM 2/22/2005, Milos Prudek wrote:
> What version of razor2 do you have?
perl-razor-agents 2.34
Yeah, get a newer version of razor.. At least 2.40. Ancient versions of
razor older than 2.40 aren't supported by SA anymore...
Also, any version of razor 2.61 or higher contains
of razor2 do you have?
>
> perl-razor-agents 2.34
From the 3.x INSTALL doc:
To use Razor with SpamAssassin, you will need to be using v2.40 or
higher. v2.61 or higher is recommended.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"As a competitor, we might be better off if they shipped it.&quo
> What version of razor2 do you have?
perl-razor-agents 2.34
SuSE 9.0
--
Milos Prudek
_
Most websites are
confused chintzy gaudy conflicting tacky unpleasant... unusable.
Learn how usable YOUR website is! http://www.spoxdesign.com
etuid at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.1/i586-linux-thread-multi/IO/Socket.pm line 114,
line 105.
What does this mean? Is spamassassin unable to connect to spamd?
No, it means SA runs in taint mode, and your current version of razor
doesn't seem to be taint-safe.
In theory all razor versions higher
Hi,
i just installed spamassassin 3.0.2 and it works but always complains
about razor2. Here's what it prints when I test spamassassin:
razor2 check skipped: Illegal seek Insecure dependency in connect while
running setuid at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.1/i586-linux-thread-multi/IO/Socket.pm line 114,
line
MAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 January 2005 10:28 AM
> To: Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SA 3.0.2 with Razor & DCC
>
> On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 08:34 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank]
> wrote:
>
> > debug: DCC -&
ginal Message-
From: Laurent Luyckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 January 2005 10:28 AM
To: Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SA 3.0.2 with Razor & DCC
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 08:34 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank]
wrote:
> debug: DCC ->
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 08:34 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank]
wrote:
> debug: DCC -> check failed: no X-DCC returned (did you create a map
> file?): missing SMTP header lines; fatal error
>
>
"(did you create a map file?)"
DCC seems not be configured yet.
If you plan to use the public
Title: SA 3.0.2 with Razor & DCC
Hi List.
I have recently installed razor & dcc and found that Razor is working great but DCC gives errors.
Here is a snippet from a debug:
debug: DCCifd is not available: no r/w dccifd socket found.
debug: Current PATH is: /usr/local/sbin:/u
I've noticed that since going to 3.0.2 that some of the spamassassin
config files are being written with a 666 permission.
Can anyone else confirm?
Can anyone else offer an explanation?
I'm running from my main procmailrc, with drop_privs=yes, with spamd,
system wide.
-Dan Mahoney
--
"It would
At 11:20 AM 12/29/2004 +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
Hello,
I see that SA checks razor DB. Great.
I guess SA also report spam to the razor DB by default. Am I right ?
Only if you do a spamassassin --report.
SA used to auto-report spam over a threshold, but this feature was removed
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 11:20:16AM +0100, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote:
> I see that SA checks razor DB. Great.
> I guess SA also report spam to the razor DB by default. Am I right ?
No. See the man page for razor-admin.
Rainer
Hello,
I see that SA checks razor DB. Great.
I guess SA also report spam to the razor DB by default. Am I right ?
--
ASPO Infogérance http://aspo.rktmb.org/activites/infogerance
Unofficial FAQ fcolc http://faq.fcolc.eu.org/
LUG sur Orléans et alentours.
Tél : 02 38 76 43 65 (France)
Title: OT: razor...compilation problems
I got the same error when I did a make test. I just
ignored it and did the make install. Haven't tested it, as I had some
conflicts with the perl libraries. I found I had multiple versions of some
of them spread around. I spent some time cle
Title: OT: razor...compilation problems
Hi List.
I have decided to give Razor a go.
However, I am getting an error during "make test"
t/rsync..ok
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List
Hitete wrote:
I've installed razor1xxx and I'd like to configure it.
I'm not sure the Razor servers even keep track of the Razor 1 hashes
anymore. Razor 2 is *far* more effective and has been available for a
long time.
Do I really have to configure razor and pyzor or do they w
I would suggest using Razor 2 (the current version) http://razor.sf.net once
you've installed it, it depends what version of SA you are running as to how
you tell it to use it in the local.cf file, but I would suggest reading the
doc on configuration, as all these questions are answered
I've installed razor1xxx and I'd like to configure it.
. What do I have to take special care about in order for the mails of my
domain not beeing tagged as spam by razor ?.
. I also installed pyzor, if I put razor and pyzor at 1 in procmailrc,
aren't there gonna be too m
I'm getting connection refused on port 2703 for all the cloudmark.com servers.
Oct 07 10:28:47.241994 check[8774]: [ 3] Unable to connect to
thrill.cloudmark.com:2703; Reason: Connection refused.
Oct 07 10:28:47.264952 check[8774]: [ 3] Unable to connect to
wonder.cloudmark.com:2703; Reason: Conn
At 11:50 PM 9/25/2004 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote:
I finally created RPMs for Razor-Agent 2.61 on FC2. I've read through the
man pages for razor-check and razor-report and I am pretty sure I
understand how to use them, but do I really need to directly use these
tools? Or does SA use
I finally created RPMs for Razor-Agent 2.61 on FC2. I've read through the
man pages for razor-check and razor-report and I am pretty sure I understand
how to use them, but do I really need to directly use these tools? Or does
SA use Razor automagically via the "use_razor2 1" en
while running with -T switch at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/IO/Socket.pm line 114."
Looking at the -D output, I see the razor related messages:
Sep 22 18:15:27.075609 report[28831]: [ 5] report: mail 1, 0: Server
accepted report.
Sep 22 18:15:27.075780 report[28831]: [ 3] Sent r
list of cloudmark servers?
>
> Don't know if there is a master list somewhere, but here are the razor
> servers that I know of:
>
> folly.cloudmark.com
> joy.cloudmark.com
> pride.cloudmark.com
> shock.cloudmark.com
> solace.cloudmark.com
> thrill.cloudmark.com
> wonder.cloudmark.com
>
> Bill
>
>
--
- Original Message -
From: "kaiser suse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> BTW I have head of folly and joy, but where does one find the definitive
> list of cloudmark servers?
Don't know if there is a master list somewhere, but here are the razor
servers that I kn
Yikes - that's a lot of razor configs to edit, I have 1000 users invoking
spamc from procmail... time to whip up a little perl script I guess.
BTW I have head of folly and joy, but where does one find the definitive
list of cloudmark servers?
e
Bill Landry said:
> - Original
- Original Message -
From: "Keyser SuSE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Since midmorning PST today (Sept 8), all razor servers have been
> rejecting connections - did I miss an announcement somehow? Did anybody
> else see this coming?
I had to switch from the "th
Since midmorning PST today (Sept 8), all razor servers have been
rejecting connections - did I miss an announcement somehow? Did anybody
else see this coming?
e
Sep 08 15:40:31.233958 check[7543]: [ 2] [bootup] Logging initiated
LogDebugLevel=3 to file:/home/jjs/.razor/razor-agent.log
Sep 08
301 - 396 of 396 matches
Mail list logo
