Why can't you include those exact scripts directly in your page or
component?
Henri Dupre wrote:
We have several partners that require us to include some javascript like
that:
script type=text/javascript
!--
xtnv = document;
xtsd = ... http://logi12/;
xtsite = ...;
xtn2 = ;
xtpage = .;
roimt =
Isn't Shell's delegate parameter (and functionality) appropriate for you?
By using delegate you can include the scripts in the head of the page.
Regards,
Norbi
Henri Dupre wrote:
We have several partners that require us to include some javascript like
that:
script type=text/javascript
!--
xtnv
I just downloaded 4.1.1 SNAPSHOT and it appears that there is a tacos
compatibility error with the latest build.
I know that I shouldn't even expect 4.1.1 work with tacos, but after all
they did work together as of yesterday. The only thing I upgraded was
tapestry itself.
I'm sure don't expect
As I know T4.1.1 is not compatible with tacos at all.
T4.1.1 has more enhanced functionality and it will have support for
advanced dojo components like tree in the future.
But if you need a tree in 4.1.1, I think that you should create your own
component or wrapper around the dojo tree, or
Norbert Sándor wrote:
As I know T4.1.1 is not compatible with tacos at all.
Yea, I haven't tried this at all... but for the record, which tacos
version are you using?
The maven repo ( http://tacos.sourceforge.net/nightly/ ) has an october
2 update
for the 4.0.1-SNAPSHOT of tacos.
If i'm
Those configuration ( tweaking ) questions arise from time to time.
Even if it's a bit OT, it'd be nice to see all those recommendations
in the wiki over at http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/
Just like we have SuccessStories, we could have ConfigurationStories.
Anyone willing to make the
Yup. I downloaded the latest tacos and it seems to be working.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Andreou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 1:25 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Latest 4.1.1 tacos compatibility
Norbert Sándor wrote:
As I know
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup. I downloaded the latest tacos and it seems to be working.
Thanks.
BTW, since you seem to be the first one to try this,
could you give a report on which components do work with
Tapestry 4.1.1 ?
Do you include tacos' dojo,
or do you let Tapestry 4.1.1
Oh cool, thanks Andy ! :) I had no idea they were working together...
And for the record, the dojo tree widget will not be making an appearance in
tapestry if I can help it. A tree of some sort, just not that tree.
On 10/6/06, Andreas Andreou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I can get through my configuration woes here I might make a
contribution to it. Other than my current problem, the setup seems to be
pretty good and scalable.
Along the same lines, a page on setting up an easily testable
development environment could be good also. We use maven, hsqldb, and
Thanks Andy, that did the trick.
On 10/5/06, andyhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps use
http://dojotoolkit.org/pipermail/dojo-checkins/2006-June/007071.html
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
It's the iframe created to handle the background display. I've brought
it up
with one of the dojo devs (there
Hi,
I'd like to use the Contrib:Table to display a collection of search
results, but I'm not sure it can provide me what I want...any
suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Our GUI designer wants us to provide search results in a table format
like this:
Hi there --
does anyone have any suggestions about tools to use to manage page flow
within an application that works well with the Tapestry and an AJAX flow?
I have looked a little at Spring's Webflow and there is also Seam from the
Jboss people.
I want to have the ability to be able to
I've got a component which accepts a parameter. I want to listen (receive a
callback) when the parameter is set (bound). Does Tapestry provide such a
facility?
Thanks,
Ezra Epstein
Hi Jesse,
I tried disabling the dojo debug message in the Shell component per your
instructions but I get the following runtime exception:
Component my page/component.shell allows only formal parameters,
binding debugEnabled is not allowed.
This is how I define the Shell component:
Thanks ... I think building the registry by hand is the way I should go...
On 10/3/06, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can either build up your registry by hand using the RegistryBuilder
(do
not call constructDefaultRegistry) or you can test your service
implementations outside the
Thanks for such a quick response, still no luck though.
Leo
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
Ahh..Looks like I made it so that you have to use an ognl expression ...
Try debugEnabled=ognl:false .
On 10/6/06, Leo Sakhvoruk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jesse,
I tried disabling the dojo debug message in
Try moving the validation logic to the second component...
I don't think rdg1Max has rewinded (and given a chance to update its value)
when rdg's validator kicks in.
Julian Wood wrote:
Hmm, so am I off in left field here? Is it not possible to validate
the contents of one field based on the
Have a normal contrib:Table with 5 columns...
Add a custom renderer to the 4th column
(using a correctly named @Block)
In that block add a span jwcid=@Insert value=ognl:tableBreak/
Add a method
public String getTableBreak() {
return /td/trtrtd colspan='4';
}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Yes, but the usefulness of my answer largely depends on how clever/efficient
you are trying to be doing it.
Now, there is IBinding. The one object to bind them all ;)
If you work your way down the type hierarchy you'll find AbstractBinding,
which holds the method you care about most -
20 matches
Mail list logo
