FW: Tomcat MySQL Connection Pooling JNDI lookup

Hello again I sent the following message yesterday. Is anyone going to reply? I'm totally stuck. If no one can help, then I will have no alternative but to abandon Tomcat and try some alternative. Dan Schwartz From: Daniel Schwartz Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 4:19 PM To:

FW: Tomcat 8.5.50.0: Unable to disable TLSv1.1 in protocol="org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol"

Hi, I'm running Tomcat 8.5.50.0 on JRE 1.8.0_241-b07 on Solaris 5.11. Like many other people, I've failed to disable TLSv1, TLSv1.1 etc. Here is a snippet of server.xml: sslEnabledProtocols="TLSv1.2,TLSv1.3" In fact, configuring any

RE: FW: tomcat creating new ssl session id for same session

Hi Chris, Some more details added below. Please let me know id any more details needed. Thanks, Rekha MS -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2019 7:19 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat creating new ssl session id for same

RE: FW: tomcat creating new ssl session id for same session

Thanks for your prompt reply. Please find my response inline. -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 11:15 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat creating new ssl session id for same session -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE

[OT] Re: FW: tomcat creating new ssl session id for same session

On 29.11.2019 06:59, rekha...@dell.com wrote: Highly Restricted - Confidential ... Then maybe a public list, which is also archived for years in various places, is not the best communication channel ? - To unsubscribe,

RE: FW: tomcat creating new ssl session id for same session

Highly Restricted - Confidential Hi Chris, Some more details added below. Please let me know id any more details needed. Thanks, Rekha MS -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2019 7:19 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat

Re: FW: tomcat creating new ssl session id for same session

Wednesday, November 27, 2019 > 11:15 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat > creating new ssl session id for same session > > Rekha, > > On 11/27/19 05:15, rekha...@dell.com wrote: >> I am using javax.servlet.request.ssl_session_id for session >> validati

RE: FW: tomcat creating new ssl session id for same session

Highly Restricted - Confidential Thanks for your prompt reply. Please find my response inline. -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 11:15 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat creating new ssl session id for same session

Re: FW: tomcat creating new ssl session id for same session

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Rekha, On 11/27/19 05:15, rekha...@dell.com wrote: > I am using javax.servlet.request.ssl_session_id for session > validation. But tomcat creating new ssl session id and user > session validation is failing. How are you performing the validation?

FW: tomcat creating new ssl session id for same session

Hi , I am using javax.servlet.request.ssl_session_id for session validation. But tomcat creating new ssl session id and user session validation is failing. Please let me know when tomcat creates new ssl session id and how by mandate it to use same ssl session id for same user session Thanks,

Re: Fw: Tomcat 7.0 how to check if overloaded with requests or were requests received by tomcat on a specific day and time

On 04.09.2019 08:11, ford royal wrote: Dear Experts Please guide me I am trying to investigate we use TOMCAT 7.0 1. how to check if TOMCAT is overloaded with incoming requests ? 2. were the requests received by TOMCAT on a specific day and time from SAP ECC ? How to find ? Precise tomcat

Fw: Tomcat 7.0 how to check if overloaded with requests or were requests received by tomcat on a specific day and time

> Dear Experts > > Please guide me I am trying to investigate we use TOMCAT 7.0 > > 1. how to check if TOMCAT is overloaded with incoming requests ? > 2. were the requests received by TOMCAT on a specific day and time from SAP > ECC ? How to > find ? > > > Rau. > Best Regards, > Thank you, >

Fw: Tomcat 7.0 how to check if overloaded with requests or were requests received by tomcat on a specific day and time

> Dears Experts > > Please guide me I am trying to investigate we use TOMCAT 7.0 > > 1. how to check if TOMCAT is overloaded with incoming requests ? > 2. were the requests received by TOMCAT on a specific day and time from SAP > ECC ? How to > find ? > > > Rau. > Best Regards, > Thank you, >

Re: Fw: Tomcat 7.0 how to check if overloaded with requests or were requests received by tomcat on a specific day and time

On 03/09/2019 14:33, ford royal wrote: > > > Best Regards, Thank you, > Dears Experts > > Please guide me I am trying to investigate we use TOMCAT 7.0 > 1. how to check if TOMCAT is overloaded with incoming requests ?2. were > requests received by TOMCAT on a specific day and time from SAP

Fw: Tomcat 7.0 how to check if overloaded with requests or were requests received by tomcat on a specific day and time

Best Regards, Thank you, Dears Experts Please guide me I am trying to investigate we use TOMCAT 7.0 1. how to check if TOMCAT is overloaded with incoming requests ?2. were requests received by TOMCAT on a specific day and time from SAP ECC ? How to find ? Rau.Best Regards, Thank you, 

Fw: tomcat 8.5.38 change to catalina.sh

This change in catalina.sh is preventing the PID file from being saved. I don't see this mentioned in the changelog. https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/changelog.html I understand the syntax in both is valid in both cases: single-& verses double-&. I'm observing this on RHEL 6 and 7.

Re: Fw: TomCat 8.5.23 application not responding

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Darin, On 11/3/17 5:17 PM, dbol...@dsginc.biz wrote: > From: Christopher Schultz To: > users@tomcat.apache.org Date: 11/02/2017 02:28 PM Subject: > Re: TomCat 8.5.23 application not responding > > > > Darin, >

Fw: TomCat 8.5.23 application not responding

From: Christopher Schultz To: users@tomcat.apache.org Date: 11/02/2017 02:28 PM Subject:Re: TomCat 8.5.23 application not responding -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Darin, On 11/2/17 12:55 PM, dbol...@dsginc.biz wrote: > I have a

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

ion is in the keepalive state, but it's not consuming a thread. - -chris > -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz > [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Friday, January 20, > 2017 10:29 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 > thread not reduced > &

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

status (c) if no more requests are coming. If you want another behaviour, then you should use an Executor. -Smith -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 10:29 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8

RE: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 10:29 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Smith, On 1/19/17 9:59 PM, smith wrote: >> "busy" is the same as "activ

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

z > [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Thursday, January 19, > 2017 4:38 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 > thread not reduced > > Smith, > > On 1/18/17 8:25 PM, smith wrote: >> I don't care if the threads will be reduced, I just want to know

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

[mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 4:38 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Smith, On 1/18/17 8:25 PM, smith wrote: I don't care if the threads will be reduced, I j

RE: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

-Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 4:38 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Smith, On 1/18/17 8:25 PM, smith wrote: > I

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

ads if necessary) 2. Shared thread-pools (no need to have port 8080 and 8443 with separate pools) - -chris > -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz > [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, > 2017 3:28 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: tomc

RE: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Smith, On 1/18/17 12:47 AM, smith wrote: > So the tomcat default executor will not reduce the thread count until > it reach to the max configuration? By default, y

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

7 7:18 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 > thread not reduced > > Smith, > > On 1/16/17 8:22 PM, smith wrote: >> Yes, I think thread count should be reduced when those threads >> are idle > >> Is this right? Or it will not reduced? > &g

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

to see what >> really happens, with a KeepAlive of 20 seconds, and ping or >> heartbeat requests coming in regularly.) In any case, if you want >> to avoid this phenomenon altogether, try configuring an Executor. >> You need to configure the itself, and then in your &

Re[2]: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

o that >Executor). > > > > >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:41 AM >> To: users@tomcat.apache.org >> Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not re

Re[2]: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

artbeat >requests >coming in regularly.) >In any case, if you want to avoid this phenomenon altogether, try configuring >an Executor. >You need to configure the itself, and then in your , >refer to that >Executor). > > > > >> >> >> -Original Messag

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

onfiguring an Executor. You need to configure the itself, and then in your , refer to that Executor). -Original Message- From: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:41 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread n

RE: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:41 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced Hi. I believe that what Philippe mentions below is somewhat different : in his configuration, there is apparently a front-end httpd server, which communicates

RE: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

Hi, André My case is same, my tomcat also has load balancer in front and it has health check to tomcat -Original Message- From: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:41 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

result, not high than 10). This is strange -Original Message- From: Philippe Busque [mailto:pbus...@mediagrif.com] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 8:09 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced We're having a similar issues with our n

RE: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

, 2017 8:09 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced We're having a similar issues with our numberous Tomcat instances. Our connector config look like this. Sometime, the number of active connection would jump very high (up to 190), due to some

RE: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

] Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 7:18 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Smith, On 1/16/17 8:22 PM, smith wrote: > Yes, I think thread count should be reduced when those threads are > idle > > I

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

o explicitly configure an and use that with your . - -chris > -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz > [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Monday, January 16, > 2017 2:20 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 > thread not reduced > > Smith, >

RE: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

Yes, I also think it should act like this, but it did not. -Original Message- From: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 2:33 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced On 16.01.2017 15:19, Christopher Schultz

RE: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

Yes, I think thread count should be reduced when those threads are idle Is this right? Or it will not reduced? -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 2:20 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080

Re: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

: Monday, January 16, 2017 10:08 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced On 16.01.2017 09:50, smith wrote: Busy one is process customer request, do not know what non-busy one is doing, always keep 120 for many days. I don't think 20s timeout will not cause so

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

On 16.01.2017 15:19, Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Smith, There are your only active s: On 1/14/17 1:30 AM, smith wrote: [snip] You have not changed any settings from the default. What makes you think that your thread count should be reduced

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Smith, There are your only active s: On 1/14/17 1:30 AM, smith wrote: > connectionTimeout="2" redirectPort="8443" /> > > [snip] > > You have not changed any settings from the default. What makes you think that your thread count should be

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

: Monday, January 16, 2017 10:08 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced On 16.01.2017 09:50, smith wrote: Busy one is process customer request, do not know what non-busy one is doing, always keep 120 for many days. I don't think 20s timeout will not cause so long

RE: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

We has same problem on dev env that no any traffic to the serive, will try on dev first -Original Message- From: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 10:08 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

y logical reason why you have so many threads on average, and I am just trying to give you ideas for finding out the reason. -Original Message- From: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 8:33 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW

RE: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced On 16.01.2017 03:41, Smith Hua wrote: > > actually there is not much busy threads, less tahn 10,so i think this > parameter may has nothing to do with this It depends on what you call "busy". Wha

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

On 14.01.2017 07:30, smith wrote: The server.xml: -Original Message- From: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 10:42 AM

Re[2]: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

resourceName="UserDatabase"/> >> >> >>> unpackWARs="true" autoDeploy="true"> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > directory="lo

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

-Original Message- From: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 10:42 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced On 13.01.2017 09:38, smith wrote: From: smith [mailto

RE: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

- From: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 10:42 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced On 13.01.2017 09:38, smith wrote: > > > > > From: smith [mailto:smith@zoom.us] > Sent: Tuesday, Januar

Re: FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

On 13.01.2017 09:38, smith wrote: From: smith [mailto:smith@zoom.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:57 AM To: 'users' Subject: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced Hi, We have installed Apache Tomcat/8.0.14, and found that after one period of time, the thread count for 8080(our port

FW: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced

From: smith [mailto:smith@zoom.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 9:57 AM To: 'users' Subject: tomcat 8080 thread not reduced Hi, We have installed Apache Tomcat/8.0.14, and found that after one period of time, the thread count for 8080(our port published) goes to 120 and

RE: FW: Tomcat 6.0.45 - Problem in creating the socket.

...@internetallee.de] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 5:38 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: FW: Tomcat 6.0.45 - Problem in creating the socket. Am 13. Juni 2016 08:01:51 MESZ, schrieb "Radha Krishna Meduri -X (radmedur - HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED at Cisco)" <radme...@cisco.com>: >Thanks Felix

RE: FW: Tomcat 6.0.45 - Problem in creating the socket.

To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: FW: Tomcat 6.0.45 - Problem in creating the socket. Am 13. Juni 2016 08:01:51 MESZ, schrieb "Radha Krishna Meduri -X (radmedur - HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED at Cisco)" <radme...@cisco.com>: >Thanks Felix for your reply. Yes the connect h

RE: FW: Tomcat 6.0.45 - Problem in creating the socket.

pile your own implementation with the current tomcat source code? The class JSSEImplementation was changed between 6.0.37 and 6.0.45 (the overridden method getServerSocketFactory has been added. ) What is the reason for your own implementation, why can't you use the tomcat ones? Regards, Felix

RE: FW: Tomcat 6.0.45 - Problem in creating the socket.

...@internetallee.de] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 11:07 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: Tomcat 6.0.45 - Problem in creating the socket. Am 13. Juni 2016 07:25:54 MESZ, schrieb "Radha Krishna Meduri -X (radmedur - HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED at Cisco)" <radme...@cisco.com>:

Re: FW: Tomcat 6.0.45 - Problem in creating the socket.

Am 13. Juni 2016 07:25:54 MESZ, schrieb "Radha Krishna Meduri -X (radmedur - HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED at Cisco)" : >Anyone can help on this? Could you explain a bit more, how you configured the connector/ssl implementation? Perhaps post a snippet of the server.xml, or

FW: Tomcat 6.0.45 - Problem in creating the socket.

Anyone can help on this? -Original Message- From: Radha Krishna Meduri -X (radmedur - HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED at Cisco) Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:12 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Tomcat 6.0.45 - Problem in creating the socket. Hi, We are trying to upgrade to 6.0.45 from

Fw: Tomcat 7.0.63 - socketBuffer "-1" - linux platform behaviour

Hi, I have implemented a service using Http11Protocol and I have disabled the socketBuffer for the object by setting its value to "-1". When the client disconnects before the server responds, then on windows I see the exception: SEVERE: Error processing request java.net.SocketException:

Fw: TOMCAT 7 , Native CORS FILTER and Spring Security

--  Maatari Daniel Okouya Sent with Airmail On July 23, 2015 at 10:49:19 AM, Maatari Daniel Okouya (okouy...@yahoo.fr) wrote: Hi,  I am using TOMCAT 7, and I have enable the CORS FILTER as per the explanation on the official website: 

FW: Tomcat 7.0.40 on Win2k8 occasionally does not deploy war file on restart

Hi I was wondering if anyone can help We have an issue with with tomcat7 deploying wars on server2k8 which is quite perplexing: Essentially the normal and desired procedure is that we build a new set of wars (using jenkins) which are then moved to an output directory, this change in the

Re: FW: Tomcat 7.0.40 on Win2k8 occasionally does not deploy war file on restart

Adam Scarborough wrote: Hi I was wondering if anyone can help We have an issue with with tomcat7 deploying wars on server2k8 which is quite perplexing: Essentially the normal and desired procedure is that we build a new set of wars (using jenkins) which are then moved to an output

RE: Re: FW: Tomcat 7.0.40 on Win2k8 occasionally does not deploy war file on restart

Adam Scarborough wrote: Hi I was wondering if anyone can help We have an issue with with tomcat7 deploying wars on server2k8 which is quite perplexing: Essentially the normal and desired procedure is that we build a new set of wars (usingjenkins) which are then moved to an output

Re: [OT] FW: Tomcat 7.0.40 on Win2k8 occasionally does not deploy war file on restart

Adam Scarborough wrote: Adam Scarborough wrote: Hi I was wondering if anyone can help We have an issue with with tomcat7 deploying wars on server2k8 which is quite perplexing: Essentially the normal and desired procedure is that we build a new set of wars (usingjenkins) which are then

FW: Tomcat 5.5.20 not stopping and starting correctly

Hi, We currently have an issue whereby Tomcat 5.5.20 does not seem to stop and start correctly. When we stop the service the below message appears: 'Windows could not stop the Apache Tomcat 5.5.20 service on Local Computer. Error 109: The pipe has been ended.' When we start the service, we

Re: FW: Tomcat 5.5.20 not stopping and starting correctly

Hi, 2013/4/10 Tailor,Nilesh wrote: Hi, We currently have an issue whereby Tomcat 5.5.20 does not seem to stop and start correctly. When we stop the service the below message appears: 'Windows could not stop the Apache Tomcat 5.5.20 service on Local Computer. Error 109: The pipe has been

RE: FW: Tomcat 5.5.20 not stopping and starting correctly

:33 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: Tomcat 5.5.20 not stopping and starting correctly Hi, 2013/4/10 Tailor,Nilesh wrote: Hi, We currently have an issue whereby Tomcat 5.5.20 does not seem to stop and start correctly. When we stop the service the below message appears: 'Windows

Re: FW: Tomcat 5.5.20 not stopping and starting correctly

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Tailor,Nilesh nilesh.tai...@fhlbny.comwrote: Thanks for the reply. This has been working without any issues so far. The problem started to appear yesterday. The strange thing is that it does not write any error to the logs. It's always best to inform the

RE: FW: Tomcat 5.5.20 not stopping and starting correctly

Message- From: Howard W. Smith, Jr. [mailto:smithh032...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 10:50 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: Tomcat 5.5.20 not stopping and starting correctly On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Tailor,Nilesh nilesh.tai...@fhlbny.comwrote: Thanks

Re: FW: Tomcat 5.5.20 not stopping and starting correctly

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Tailor,Nilesh nilesh.tai...@fhlbny.comwrote: Nothing has changed since it was last running (no windows updates/reboots etc). We rebooted the server yesterday when we were debugging this issue to see if a reboot would sort the issue out (but it did not). Its

Re: [OT] FW: Tomcat 5.5.20 not stopping and starting correctly

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Howard, On 4/10/13 10:50 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote: I am running Windows Server 2008 R2 64bit, and I recognized that my server restarted automatically this morning, most likely, because of automatic (Windows) updates. You have automatic

Re: FW: Tomcat 5.5.20 not stopping and starting correctly

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Nilesh, On 4/10/13 12:02 PM, Tailor,Nilesh wrote: Nothing has changed since it was last running (no windows updates/reboots etc). We rebooted the server yesterday when we were debugging this issue to see if a reboot would sort the issue out

Re: [OT] FW: Tomcat 5.5.20 not stopping and starting correctly

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Howard, On 4/10/13 10:50 AM, Howard W. Smith, Jr. wrote: I am running Windows Server 2008 R2 64bit, and I recognized that my server restarted

Re: FW: Tomcat 5.5.20 not stopping and starting correctly

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Nilesh, On 4/10/13 12:02 PM, Tailor,Nilesh wrote: Nothing has changed since it was last running (no windows updates/reboots etc). We rebooted the

Re: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Steve, On 1/22/13 11:59 PM, sry...@jsrsys.com wrote: I thought you had hit the nail on the head of 5.0 vs. 5.5, but when I recoded the short form into the long form I still get the same error. I am ready to install a new Tomcat. Is there any

Re: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dude, On 1/21/13 11:32 PM, sry...@jsrsys.com wrote: Why don't you show us what you've got, and we can suggest some improvements? Thank you. This one is in localhost: Context path=/ !-- put this one in localhost add path because of

Re: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP.

conf is: Program Files/Apache Software Foundation/Tomcat5.0/conf (where server xml resides). When I put context.xml in that directory, it seemed to be ignored. I did some experimenting moving it around and when I put it in: Program Files/Apache Software

Re: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 1/22/13 1:50 PM, sry...@jsrsys.com wrote: conf is: Program Files/Apache Software Foundation/Tomcat5.0/conf (where server xml resides). When I put context.xml in that directory, it seemed to be ignored. If the file is in fact named

Re: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP.

I thought you had hit the nail on the head of 5.0 vs. 5.5, but when I recoded the short form into the long form I still get the same error. I am ready to install a new Tomcat. Is there any reason to NOT go to most recent 7.x release? I realize that as long as I stay at Java 5 and MySQL 5

Re: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 To whom it may concern, On 1/20/13 2:49 PM, sry...@jsrsys.com wrote: shouldn't it be easy to determine where the file should go in your development environment? One would think so. On the linux environment it is under etc/Tomcat5.5/ the same

Re: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP.

Why don't you show us what you've got, and we can suggest some improvements? Thank you. This one is in localhost: Context path=/ !-- put this one in localhost add path because of Context path is required error-- ResourceLink name=jdbc/MySql type=javax.sql.DataSource

Re: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 To whom it may concern, On 1/19/13 10:54 PM, Gmail wrote: The production machine (Ubuntu) is Tomcat 5.0, which is why I need to keep my development machine at the same level so I can test changes to xml files, and then upload to the server.

Re: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP.

. - Original Message - From: Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 11:13 AM Subject: Re: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE

Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP.

Due to a hard disk failure, I had to reinstall Tomcat 5.0.28 and MySQL 5.0.8 on my WindowsXP development machine. I have updated sever.xml and context.xml using the parameters from my production Linux Ubuntu server, adding Global Naming Resources to server.xml and creating context.xml (which

Re: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP.

On 1/19/2013 11:32 AM, Gmail wrote: Due to a hard disk failure, I had to reinstall Tomcat 5.0.28 and MySQL 5.0.8 on my WindowsXP development machine. I have updated sever.xml and context.xml using the parameters from my production Linux Ubuntu server, adding Global Naming Resources to

RE: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP.

From: Mark Eggers [mailto:its_toas...@yahoo.com] Subject: Re: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP. In short, upgrade to at least 6.0 (6.0.36 as I write this). 7.0 would be better. Also, never, never copy configuration elements from one major

Re: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP.

, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 2:51 PM Subject: RE: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28 jdbc error Name jdbc is not bound in this Context on WindowsXP. From: Mark Eggers [mailto:its_toas...@yahoo.com] Subject: Re: Fw: Tomcat 5.0.28

Re: Fw: Tomcat 6 query

Comments in line (warning - this is done before coffee): On 11/3/2012 8:59 PM, vicky wrote: Thanks christopher. I am using Probe application for monitoring the Tomcat application , in that everything is getting displyed fine except the Min Spare Threads Max Spare thread Ques1 : == Both

Re: FW: Tomcat server start up taking excessive time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mansukhdeep, On 6/27/12 11:00 PM, THIND Mansukhdeep wrote: You were correct Chris. I found the jar file which was causing the issue. It is a kernel specific jar that contains wrapper classes for context initialization with the

RE: FW: Tomcat server start up taking excessive time

List Subject: Re: FW: Tomcat server start up taking excessive time -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mansukhdeep, On 6/27/12 11:00 PM, THIND Mansukhdeep wrote: You were correct Chris. I found the jar file which was causing the issue. It is a kernel specific jar that contains wrapper

RE: FW: Tomcat server start up taking excessive time

From: THIND Mansukhdeep [mailto:mansukhdeep_th...@3dplmsoftware.com] Subject: RE: FW: Tomcat server start up taking excessive time What is lack of entropy in dev/random? Please clarify. GIYF. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki//dev/random http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_%28computing%29

Re: FW: Tomcat server start up taking excessive time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mansukhdeep, On 6/25/12 11:27 PM, THIND Mansukhdeep wrote: Can any one give a cue as to why tomcat is taking such a long time to start up on windows-7 64 bit machine, while the same used to startup in mere seconds on a 32 bit windows XP machine? I

FW: Tomcat server start up taking excessive time

Hi Can any one give a cue as to why tomcat is taking such a long time to start up on windows-7 64 bit machine, while the same used to startup in mere seconds on a 32 bit windows XP machine? I have pasted the server startup console info below. -Original Message- From: THIND Mansukhdeep

Re: FW: Tomcat server start up taking excessive time

you may have put so many unnecessary jar filse in your library, since tomcat reads the library during startup, it slows down.-- debabratta jena - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional

Fw: Tomcat manager fails and can't tell why.

From: yucca...@hotmail.com Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 4:45 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Tomcat manager fails and can't tell why. Hello Tomcat is playing games and I donno why. I copy my tomcat-users.xml to production and use credentials(tomcat username and password tomcat) As

Re: Fw: Tomcat manager fails and can't tell why.

Yucca Nel wrote: From: yucca...@hotmail.com Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 4:45 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Tomcat manager fails and can't tell why. Hello Tomcat is playing games and I donno why. I copy my tomcat-users.xml to production and use credentials(tomcat username and password

Re: FW: tomcat integrated with httpd and over https port, not working

Irfan Khan wrote: Is there anyone who can help me to resolve this issue. Maybe (but check the documentation, because I am not sure). The thing is, you have an Apache configuration with VirtualHost's. In such a case, the configuration directives present outside a VirtualHost section,

RE: FW: tomcat integrated with httpd and over https port, not working

Thanks, Your recommended configuration worked, thanks dude... you are a champ! made my day. Thanks, IK -Original Message- From: Leon Kolchinsky [mailto:lkolc...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 11:05 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: FW: tomcat integrated with httpd

FW: tomcat integrated with httpd and over https port, not working

Is there anyone who can help me to resolve this issue. From: Irfan Khan [mailto:irfan.k...@enovatemedia.co.in] Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 5:31 PM To: 'users@tomcat.apache.org' Subject: tomcat integrated with httpd and over https port, not working Dear pals, Issue: tomcat

Re: FW: tomcat integrated with httpd and over https port, not working

Hi, Take a look here- http://myunster.com/blog/25.html http://myunster.com/blog/25.htmlIt'll give you an easy start. Cheers, Leon Kolchinsky On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:57, Irfan Khan irfan.k...@enovatemedia.co.inwrote: Is there anyone who can help me to resolve this issue. From: Irfan

  1   2   >