Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-25 Thread Paul Roubekas
On 7/25/2016 3:45 PM, Mark Eggers wrote: > On 7/25/2016 12:42 PM, Mark Eggers wrote: >> I'm going to do a bit of trimming here: >> >> On 7/25/2016 7:34 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote: >> >> # # Add this before your first ProxyPass # However, after your >> aliases # >> >> ProxyPass "/bb" !

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-25 Thread Mark Eggers
On 7/25/2016 12:42 PM, Mark Eggers wrote: > I'm going to do a bit of trimming here: > > On 7/25/2016 7:34 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > > # # Add this before your first ProxyPass # However, after your > aliases # > > ProxyPass "/bb" ! ProxyPass "/tt" ! This works now. Thanks

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-25 Thread Mark Eggers
I'm going to do a bit of trimming here: On 7/25/2016 7:34 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote: # # Add this before your first ProxyPass # However, after your aliases # ProxyPass "/bb" ! ProxyPass "/tt" ! >>> This works now. Thanks # # Also this would be a good idea to prevent

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-25 Thread Paul Roubekas
On 7/24/2016 11:33 PM, Mark Eggers wrote: > On 7/24/2016 5:10 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: >> On 7/24/2016 5:20 PM, Mark Eggers wrote: >>> On 7/24/2016 1:13 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: >> On 7/23/2016

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-24 Thread Mark Eggers
On 7/24/2016 5:10 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > On 7/24/2016 5:20 PM, Mark Eggers wrote: >> On 7/24/2016 1:13 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: >>> On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> Paul,

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-24 Thread Paul Roubekas
On 7/24/2016 5:20 PM, Mark Eggers wrote: > On 7/24/2016 1:13 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: >> On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: >>> On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Paul, > > On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote:

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-24 Thread Mark Eggers
On 7/24/2016 1:13 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: >> On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: >>> On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: Paul, On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-24 Thread Paul Roubekas
On 7/23/2016 3:44 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: >> On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> Paul, >>> >>> On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote: http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat where my ROOT webapp is deployed. Thank you

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-23 Thread Paul Roubekas
On 7/23/2016 3:15 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> Paul, >> >> On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote: >>> http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat where my ROOT webapp is >>> deployed. Thank you very much!!! >>> A few things that still need

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-23 Thread Paul Roubekas
On 7/23/2016 2:57 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Paul, > > On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > > http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat where my ROOT webapp is > > deployed. Thank you very much!!! > > > A few things that still need correction... > > > Not all my webpages/servlets are

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-23 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul, On 7/23/16 8:39 AM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > http://www.myDomain.com gets me to Tomcat where my ROOT webapp is > deployed. Thank you very much!!! > > A few things that still need correction... > > Not all my webpages/servlets are https, just

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-23 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul, On 7/22/16 4:24 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > On 7/22/2016 4:14 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> You can even use either HTTP or AJP as the protocol to connect >> httpd -> Tomcat. I would recommend mod_proxy_http just because >> it's basically

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-23 Thread Paul Roubekas
On 7/23/2016 4:12 AM, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote: > On 23.07.2016 02:37, Paul Roubekas wrote: >>> I tried going with ajp with the following configuration after reading >>> >the ajp documentation. >>> >Adding a Load module for ajp was not needed as per this message. >>>

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-23 Thread tomcat
On 23.07.2016 02:37, Paul Roubekas wrote: I tried going with ajp with the following configuration after reading >the ajp documentation. >Adding a Load module for ajp was not needed as per this message.

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-22 Thread Paul Roubekas
On 7/22/2016 8:14 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > On 7/22/2016 4:24 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: >> On 7/22/2016 4:14 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> Paul, >>> >>> On 7/21/16 5:08 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: >>> > On 7/21/2016 2:21 PM, Coty Sutherland wrote: >>> >>> Actually my requirement is not that

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-22 Thread Paul Roubekas
On 7/22/2016 4:24 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > On 7/22/2016 4:14 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> Paul, >> >> On 7/21/16 5:08 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: >> > On 7/21/2016 2:21 PM, Coty Sutherland wrote: >> >>> Actually my requirement is not that complex. All I need to do >> >>> is host TomEE (a

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-22 Thread Paul Roubekas
On 7/22/2016 4:14 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Paul, > > On 7/21/16 5:08 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > > On 7/21/2016 2:21 PM, Coty Sutherland wrote: > >>> Actually my requirement is not that complex. All I need to do > >>> is host TomEE (a Tomcat 7 superset), Bugzilla and phpBB (forum > >>>

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-22 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul, On 7/21/16 5:08 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > On 7/21/2016 2:21 PM, Coty Sutherland wrote: >>> Actually my requirement is not that complex. All I need to do >>> is host TomEE (a Tomcat 7 superset), Bugzilla and phpBB (forum >>> software) on the

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-22 Thread Paul Roubekas
t Users List >>> Subject: Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk? >>> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA256 >>> >>> Paul, >>> >>> On 7/20/16 12:12 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: >>>> I am trying to install the mod_

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-22 Thread tomcat
On 22.07.2016 09:18, Jäkel, Guido wrote: -Original Message- From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 5:51 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Paul

RE: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-22 Thread Jäkel , Guido
>-Original Message- >From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] >Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 5:51 PM >To: Tomcat Users List >Subject: Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk? > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA256 > >Paul

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-21 Thread Paul Roubekas
On 7/21/2016 2:21 PM, Coty Sutherland wrote: >> Actually my requirement is not that complex. All I need to do is host TomEE >> (a Tomcat 7 superset), Bugzilla and phpBB (forum software) on the same >> server. It is my understanding the I need httpd to do this. > TomEE can run outside of a web

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-21 Thread Coty Sutherland
> Actually my requirement is not that complex. All I need to do is host TomEE > (a Tomcat 7 superset), Bugzilla and phpBB (forum software) on the same > server. It is my understanding the I need httpd to do this. TomEE can run outside of a web server (its it's on web container), but Bugzilla

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-21 Thread Paul Roubekas
Actually my requirement is not that complex. All I need to do is host TomEE (a Tomcat 7 superset), Bugzilla and phpBB (forum software) on the same server. It is my understanding the I need httpd to do this. It is also my understanding that I needed mod_jk to have the httpd route to TomEE

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-21 Thread Coty Sutherland
Is there some reason that you can't use mod_proxy_balancer instead of mod_cluster (if you don't want to be vulnerable to the known CVEs)? I assume that you're looking for some specific logic offered by mod_cluster, but since you're considering mod_jk I'm not so sure. If you're going to learn to

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-21 Thread Paul Roubekas
I can not use mod_cluster. I was having some issues and posted this (https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/91235/module-mod_proxy_balancer-is-loaded-it-must-be-removed-in-order-for-mod_proxy_cluster-to-function-properly/) question on the Fedora forums. See the reply I got below. Please, *do

Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-21 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Paul, On 7/20/16 12:12 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote: > I am trying to install the mod_jk on httpd for my tomcat 7.0.68 > (TomEE) server. > > I am reading this > https://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/apache.html > > documentation

No binary distribution for mod_jk?

2016-07-20 Thread Paul Roubekas
I am trying to install the mod_jk on httpd for my tomcat 7.0.68 (TomEE) server. I am reading this https://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/apache.html documentation which points to this http://tomcat.apache.org/download-connectors.cgi download page. But there is no binary