On 14 June 2011 12:07, Orgil Tulga orgio...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello All,
I am using apache and tomcat with mod_jk.
apache version : 2.2.19
tomcat version : 6.0
mod_jk version : 1.2.30
My web runs through servlet.
http://domainname:8080/contact.shtml - is working
in httpd.conf
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
Include /usr/local/apache/conf/jk.conf
Include /usr/local/apache/conf/jkmount.conf
--- On Tue, 6/14/11, Calum cal...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Calum cal...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: mod_jk problem
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Date
On 14 June 2011 12:28, Orgil Tulga orgio...@yahoo.com wrote:
My jk connector config is below.
Below is jk.conf:
JkWorkersFile /usr/local/jakarta/tomcat/conf/workers.properties
Can we see this?
-
To
No. I am testing on local domain.
--- On Tue, 6/14/11, Calum cal...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Calum cal...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: mod_jk problem
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2011, 4:35 AM
On 14 June 2011 12:28, Orgil Tulga orgio...@yahoo.com wrote:
My jk
On 14 June 2011 12:49, Orgil Tulga orgio...@yahoo.com wrote:
No. I am testing on local domain.
I don't understand this. The ajp13 bit in your jkmount.conf needs to
refer to a worker in workers.properties.
We would need to see it to understand what's happening.
This might help you a little?
On 07.06.2010 20:22, Mangold, Daniel wrote:
Hello to all,
I have a problem with mod_jk (hope this is the right place form my problem).
Used servers and versions:
- Apache 2.2.15 (Win32)
- mod_jk/1.2.30
- Apache Tomcat/6.0.20 using AJP/1.3
- jdk1.5.0_12
Problem description:
I enter the
On 08.06.2010 16:45, Mangold, Daniel wrote:
On 07.06.2010 20:22, Mangold, Daniel wrote:
First: sorry, it looks like at least half of my previous mail was truncated for
whatever reason. The attachment did not go through as well. And it's true, the
pasted log file above is not complete.
However,
On 07.06.2010 20:22, Mangold, Daniel wrote:
Hello to all,
I have a problem with mod_jk (hope this is the right place form my problem).
Used servers and versions:
- Apache 2.2.15 (Win32)
- mod_jk/1.2.30
- Apache Tomcat/6.0.20 using AJP/1.3
- jdk1.5.0_12
Problem description:
I enter the
Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 2:14 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk problem related to multiple hosts on Apache and Tomcat
One real question is why you are bothering with an Apache httpd in
front, since unless I saw this wrong
From: Maciej Zabielski [mailto:m...@tessel.pl]
Subject: RE: mod_jk problem related to multiple hosts on Apache and
Tomcat
when I started reading what is the easiest way to make Tomcat
available on port 80 (under Centos 5.3) the most common
answer was: use Apache HTTPD.
Probably written
From: Maciej Zabielski [mailto:m...@tessel.pl]
Subject: mod_jk problem related to multiple hosts on Apache and Tomcat
Tomcat Host
Host name=localhost debug=0 appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true
autoDeploy=true
xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false
Context path=
What Chuck means is that you need
docBase=/var/lib/tomcat5/webapps/alfresco
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Caldarale, Charles R
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com wrote:
From: Maciej Zabielski [mailto:m...@tessel.pl]
Subject: mod_jk problem related to multiple hosts on Apache and Tomcat
Tomcat
On 07.10.2009 19:40, Maciej Zabielski wrote:
Hello,
I have a mod_jk problem related to multiple hosts on Apache and Tomcat
My setup is
Centos 5.3 + Apache HTTPD 2.2.3 + Tomcat 5
httpd.conf contains (Just before section 3) Basic mod_jk directives.
At the end it contains two virtual
it over tommorow as its almost midnight in country!
:)
Once more, thank you very much for pointing out my mistake!
___
From: Tsirkin Evgeny [tsir...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 8:50 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk problem related
One real question is why you are bothering with an Apache httpd in
front, since unless I saw this wrong, you are proxying absolutely
everything to Tomcat, in both virtual hosts.
JkMount /* etc..
Why not just turn off Apache, and have Tomcat listen on port 80 ?
You would save yourself some
Munkhbold.B wrote:
Hi
I have a problem with tomcat connector mod_jk.
From time to time the connector completely hangs apache.
Tomcat alone is still alive, but apache no longer replies to requests, and I
need to restart both
In mod_jk logs file I have a lot of lines like
[info]
I've the same problem too, and I found that if the tomcat response time is
long, you need to set connection_pool in your workers.properties.
## my properties
worker.node65.port=8009
worker.node65.host=9.186.10.65
worker.node65.type=ajp13
worker.node65.connection_pool_size=100
WenDong Zhang wrote:
I've the same problem too, and I found that if the tomcat response time is
long, you need to set connection_pool in your workers.properties.
Ok, let me be more explicit.
What you suggest above may work, /if/ the underlying reason for the
problem meets certain criteria.
yes. my configuration is just a suggestion. if you just need to fix the
problem quickly, maybe you need to try some solutions. But the main idea to
solve this problem is you need to do some tests to find out where the
bottleneck is.
I did a lots of tests, because my server chain is too long httpd
On 15.04.2009 08:19, Munkhbold.B wrote:
Hi
I have a problem with tomcat connector mod_jk.
From time to time the connector completely hangs apache.
Tomcat alone is still alive, but apache no longer replies to requests, and I
need to restart both
In mod_jk logs file I have a
Partha Goswami wrote:
I compile,mod_jk in my vps everything is fine, but when i am trying to add,
following lines, restarting my apache its not starting anymore pls help
# Set the jk log level
[debug/error/info]JkLogLevel info
Is this a copy/paste issue or a real config line?
Regards
Yes..
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Partha Goswami wrote:
I compile,mod_jk in my vps everything is fine, but when i am trying to
add,
following lines, restarting my apache its not starting anymore pls help
# Set the jk log level
On 02.03.2009 16:57, Partha Goswami wrote:
Yes..
This is not an answer for an or question :(
There is a second item, that seems to be broken:
# Where to put jk
logsJkLogFile /var/log/httpd/mod_jk.log
In case Apache doesn't start with mod_jk, you should find an error
either in your Apache
can not found anythig in logs.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 02.03.2009 16:57, Partha Goswami wrote:
Yes..
This is not an answer for an or question :(
There is a second item, that seems to be broken:
# Where to put jk
logsJkLogFile
Not a known problem. You can increase log level via JkLogLevel debug.
There should be a line containing service or Service, which includes
the URI) we send forward to Tomcat.
The log will also show you, if any of your JkMount directives match,
i.e. if mod_jk thinks it should forward, or it
Thank you Rainer for taking the time to answer. My comments are below.
Not a known problem. You can increase log level via JkLogLevel debug.
There should be a line containing service or Service, which includes
the URI) we send forward to Tomcat.
The log will also show you, if any of
I forgot to mention that the request is sent over https.
The https is handled by apache httpd. I am not sure If this has an impact
as it would be difficult for me to test it under http.
Cheers
Nicolas
-
To start a new topic,
Your test JSP works fine for me with Apache httpd 2.2.6 and mod_jk
1.2.25 on Solaris. Since your jk log file ends very early in the request
processing, the tomcat version should not matter (I used 5.5).
I would guess, that something with your build is broken. It would also
help, if we could see
Your test JSP works fine for me with Apache httpd 2.2.6 and mod_jk
1.2.25 on Solaris. Since your jk log file ends very early in the request
processing, the tomcat version should not matter (I used 5.5).
I would guess, that something with your build is broken. It would also
help, if we
]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 8:22 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [mod_jk] problem serving URIs with 'special characters'
Guy Katz wrote:
Thanks;
one question though.
The downloads page states that mod_jk1.2.25 is for apache 2.0.59 and
later only.
i have a 2.0.52 installation(on centos
I agree with Christopher.
If you feel totally uncomfortable with the idea of compiling yourself:
there is a good chance, that the downloadable binary for 2.0.59 will
work with your 2.0.52. You need to test and check the error log of
apache for log lines indicating process crashes. Those would
-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 8/26/2007 11:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: [mod_jk] problem serving URIs with 'special characters'
Guy Katz wrote:
Hi; (using: centos, apache 2.0.52, mod_jk 1.2.21, tomcat 6)
Recently, I encountered a problem with URIs
Guy Katz wrote:
Thanks;
one question though.
The downloads page states that mod_jk1.2.25 is for apache 2.0.59 and later only.
i have a 2.0.52 installation(on centos) that i can't change. does this mean i
am stuck here? or can mod_jk1.2.25 still work with apache 2.0.52
thanks in advance.
URLEncoding doesn't take care of this problem?
In Response To:
Hi; (using: centos, apache 2.0.52, mod_jk 1.2.21, tomcat 6)
Recently, I encountered a problem with URIs that has 'non western
European' characters (for example:
be happy to hear ideas but please be more specific.
thanks.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun 8/26/2007 10:11 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: [mod_jk] problem serving URIs with #39;special characters#39;
URLEncoding doesn't
]
Subject: Re: [mod_jk] problem serving URIs with #39;special characters#39;
URLEncoding doesn't take care of this problem?
In Response To:
Hi; (using: centos, apache 2.0.52, mod_jk 1.2.21, tomcat 6)
Recently, I encountered a problem with URIs that has 'non western
European' characters
Guy Katz wrote:
Hi; (using: centos, apache 2.0.52, mod_jk 1.2.21, tomcat 6)
Recently, I encountered a problem with URIs that has 'non western
European' characters (for example:
http://www.somehost.com/roller/admin/entry/nofx_%D7%91%D7%93%D7%A8%D7%9A
). I noticed that apache was forwarding to
Rotating an open log file from outside the using processes is a very bad
idea. The processes in most cases will simply try to use the old log
file further on (and will run into trouble, after you compressed them etc.).
Rotating log files for apache can be easily done using the bundles
-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 21 May 2007 7:26 p.m.
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk problem
Rotating an open log file from outside the using processes is a very bad
idea. The processes in most cases will simply try to use the old log
file further
error/bug that occurred in the
production server, but unfortunately we still can't reproduce it. Any
idea why?
Thanks
Regards
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 21 May 2007 7:26 p.m.
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk problem
Rotating
List
Subject: Re: mod_jk problem
You really should totally drop the idea of rotating an open logfile from
the outside. The file descriptor is open in the writing process and it
will proceed to use the file descriptor, which will point to the rotated
file and after compression will be deleted
41 matches
Mail list logo