David Grace wrote:
Maybe the solution to the problems with bad posts can be solved by an
email once a month that describes exactly what the accepted posting
policy is.
Ah, but that's not enough - see, that would require that you actually
read the archives, and that's something that's apparen
Message-
From: David Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 1 April 2006 12:42 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0 vs. 5.5? tomcat 5.5 has been bad!
Then you are most definitely one of the better posters to the list. I
hope you don't take my message too personally.
Tomcat developers. Get mad at the idiot developers who
>>> shipped a
>>> war file without a) knowing how to perform logging and b) performing
>>> basic
>>> testing.
>>> I help out when I can. If I'm not sure, but have a minute, *I* will
>>>
, and you
will get snubbed.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 6:39 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: tomcat 5.0 vs. 5.5? tomcat 5.5 has been bad!
Please don't think it's the whole Tomcat community Dean, there
e to post. Ask intelligent questions, and you will
get intelligent answers. Show an unwillingness to learn anything, and you
will get snubbed.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 6:39 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: R
7;t have to post. Ask intelligent questions, and you will
>get intelligent answers. Show an unwillingness to learn anything, and you
>will get snubbed.
>
>Tim
>
>-----Original Message-
>From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 6:39
my problem is solved. I was just trying to poke tomcat team in hopes
that could put something in to help the next newb.
later, I think I am jumping off the list nowjust too much email on
this list,
dean
Markus Schönhaber wrote:
Dean Hiller wrote:
wow! you guys sound pretty harsh
ew he understands everything about Tomcat and therefore does not
understand what usability is all about.
All the best, AC.
-Original Message-
From: Dean Hiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March 2006 11:39
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0 vs. 5.5? tomcat 5.5 has been
Dean Hiller wrote:
> wow! you guys sound pretty harsh when it comes to messages to help
> users on simple mistakes then. I recently dropped in someone else's
> example app war file that had the SAME PROBLEM.latest facelets. I
> could not even give back information to help them debug the p
guess from his privileged point of view he
understands everything about Tomcat and therefore does not understand what
usability is all about.
All the best, AC.
-Original Message-
From: Dean Hiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March 2006 11:39
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0
refore does not understand what
usability is all about.
All the best, AC.
-Original Message-
From: Dean Hiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March 2006 11:39
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: tomcat 5.0 vs. 5.5? tomcat 5.5 has been bad!
wow! you guys sound pretty harsh when it comes
wow! you guys sound pretty harsh when it comes to messages to help
users on simple mistakes then. I recently dropped in someone else's
example app war file that had the SAME PROBLEM.latest facelets. I
could not even give back information to help them debug the problem. It
was standard
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On 3/30/06, Markus Schönhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The RuntimeException is to make it more noticeable in the logs. I mean
953 hits on googling is quite alot of people having trouble. Would be
nice to cut that number down with an easy log statement that tomcat
co
On 3/30/06, Markus Schönhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The RuntimeException is to make it more noticeable in the logs. I mean
> > 953 hits on googling is quite alot of people having trouble. Would be
> > nice to cut that number down with an easy log statement that tomcat
> > could add!!!
>
Dean Hiller wrote:
> yes, but please look at the solution I found in previous post which
> works WITHOUT stripping down everything.
I never doubted that there is a solution that doesn't require leaving almost
everything out. The fact that the stripped down version behaves as desired
simply prove
yes, but please look at the solution I found in previous post which
works WITHOUT stripping down everything. I think tomcat should fix this
by reporting something like this
log.log(Level.WARNING, "Application Errors will not be logged because
webapp has log4j but no config file", new RuntimeE
Dean Hiller wrote:
> Okay, a zip file with one *.java file and one *.class file can be found
> here...
>
> https://pro40.abac.com/deanhiller/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/Downloads
>
> You can unzip it and copy the folder to tomcat/webapps and watch no
> Exception get logged. Just the " Error listenerStart" me
Okay, a zip file with one *.java file and one *.class file can be found
here...
https://pro40.abac.com/deanhiller/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/Downloads
You can unzip it and copy the folder to tomcat/webapps and watch no
Exception get logged. Just the " Error listenerStart" message gets
logged an no mor
I am still getting no log there.my localhost is empty! Other logs
get filled, I will trim all the fat off. Could it be that I am using
myfaces? BUT myfaces doesn't sit between servletContextListener and
tomcat, so I am really confused. Let me trim the fat(jsp files and
such). All I am
thankyou very much for taking the time to simulate that. I am going to
try your code and compare it to mine and see why mine was not showing up
there at all.
thanks,
dean
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
ok, that was fairly easy, the error gets logged to the
/logs/localhost.2006-03-29.log" thi
ok, that was fairly easy, the error gets logged to the
/logs/localhost.2006-03-29.log" this is on the default
install, no loggers modified
so are you still having a problem?
Mar 29, 2006 9:12:47 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationContext log
INFO: org.apache.webapp.balancer.BalancerFilter:
here is the code, the StandardContext.java logs the error,
its just a matter of finding how to get it to spew it out.
Running a tomcat embedded will spit this sucker out, but running it
within the tomcat catalina.sh swallows it.
I will resolve this and let you know what happens to it.
Filip
thanks for the link. I need that too. Regardless of logging thought,
quickly add this to any serlvetlistener
public void contextInitialized(ServletContextEvent evt) {
throw new RuntimeException("asdfsf");
}
Run it, and enjoy not being able to know what the heck went wrong with
your app lik
I am assuming you have been using logger to log stack traces in case of
errors in tomcat 5.0. This was deprecated in 5.0 and completely removed in
5.5. So, If you have logger defined for engine, host, or context to record
the stack traces in a file in your application this will not work on tomcat
On number 1 5.0 logs the entire stack trace, so you can jump to the line
number. On 5.5, no such stack trace in any file. Also, I searched a few
lists and many people had questions on what was wron when they saw that
error. I think the cause is the lack of informationit should at the
very l
On 3/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone have much experience with running on these. On tomcat 5.5, I have
> ran into many problems
> 1. exception fron ServletContextListener.contextInitialized causes the
> vague error of "Error listenerStart" with no details. Most people
Anyone have much experience with running on these. On tomcat 5.5, I have
ran into many problems
1. exception fron ServletContextListener.contextInitialized causes the
vague error of "Error listenerStart" with no details. Most people on
lists I have seen don't even know it was caused by Exception
27 matches
Mail list logo
