Hello Jeremy,
On Friday, July 8, 2005 at 2:33:44 AM Jeremy wrote:
On Thursday 07 July 2005 02:31 am, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
On Wednesday, July 6, 2005 at 3:36:39 PM patrick wrote:
Please post the output of
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl
rcpthosts: (Default.) SMTP clients may send
Hello List,
On Wednesday, July 6, 2005 at 3:36:39 PM patrick wrote:
Please post the output of
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl
rcpthosts: (Default.) SMTP clients may send messages to any recipient.
*THIS* is your problem: you don't have any domain in 'rcpthosts' and
therefore your qmail-smtpd
Hello List,
On Wednesday, July 6, 2005 at 3:36:39 PM patrick wrote:
Please post the output of
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl
rcpthosts: (Default.) SMTP clients may send messages to any recipient.
*THIS* is your problem: you don't have any domain in 'rcpthosts' and
therefore your qmail-smtpd
On Thursday 07 July 2005 02:31 am, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Hello List,
On Wednesday, July 6, 2005 at 3:36:39 PM patrick wrote:
Please post the output of
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl
rcpthosts: (Default.) SMTP clients may send messages to any recipient.
*THIS* is your problem: you
Please post the output of
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl
Still haven't found a solution...
Here's the output of /var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl:
qmail home directory: /var/qmail.
user-ext delimiter: -.
paternalism (in decimal): 2.
silent concurrency limit: 120.
subdirectory split: 23.
user ids:
Hi List,
Fixed the problem with smtp-auth...
Really a big Thanx to everyone trying to help.
Right now after several reinstallations another problem came up...
I can't send emails to my server pop-accounts... Of course I copied the
/var/qmail/users folder to my current running qmail-version, but
Hi List,
Fixed the problem with smtp-auth...
Really a big Thanx to everyone trying to help.
Right now after several reinstallations another problem came up...
I can't send emails to my server pop-accounts... Of course I copied
the
/var/qmail/users folder to my current running qmail-version,
Reinstalling qmail and moving stuff around like you did may have caused
locals to not contain what you think it contains.
Hope that helps,
hm... no... one more hint please?
I allready did this, i guess... and it worked. I also installed a new user over
Visas... can't send mails to that
On Jul 6, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Nick Harring wrote:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at 213.239.219.168.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
:
Sorry. Although I'm listed as a
On Jul 6, 2005, at 10:37 AM, Nick Harring wrote:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at 213.239.219.168.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
:
Sorry. Although I'm listed as a
I rechecked virtualdomains locals and rcpthosts... every domain ist there...
but still the same error-message...
any settings in vpopmail I need to take care of? Any settings in /etc/passwd
that could be wrong? Defaultdelivery should be ./Maildir/ right? Anything in
the run script for
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 03:22 pm, Nick Harring wrote:
If it's a local domain (users in /etc/passwd), it should appear in
/var/qmail/control/locals.
If it's a vpopmail domain, it should appear in
/var/qmail/control/virtualdomains.
For whatever reason vadddomain puts it in locals,
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 08:36 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please post the output of
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl
Still haven't found a solution...
Here's the output of /var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl:
locals:
Messages for linux.koneg.de are delivered locally.
Messages for koneg.de are
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 03:22 pm, Nick Harring wrote:
If it's a local domain (users in /etc/passwd), it should appear in
/var/qmail/control/locals.
If it's a vpopmail domain, it should appear in
/var/qmail/control/virtualdomains.
For whatever reason vadddomain puts it in
Hello List,
On Monday, July 4, 2005 at 11:47:36 PM patrick wrote:
I'm using qmail and vpopmail and just patched up with smtp-auth,
Which SMTP-AUTH-patch?
I'm using /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw in my ~/qmail-smtpd/run-script...
Please post complete run script because parameter order matters.
Hello List,
On Monday, July 4, 2005 at 11:47:36 PM patrick wrote:
I'm using qmail and vpopmail and just patched up with smtp-auth,
Which SMTP-AUTH-patch?
I'm using Version 0.31
I'm using /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw in my ~/qmail-smtpd/run-script...
Please post complete run script because
Hello List,
On Tuesday, July 5, 2005 at 8:50:01 AM patrick wrote:
I'm using qmail and vpopmail and just patched up with smtp-auth,
Which SMTP-AUTH-patch?
I'm using Version 0.31
From which source exactly? What's the complete download URL you used
to get this patch?
exec
Hello List,
On Tuesday, July 5, 2005 at 8:50:01 AM patrick wrote:
I'm using qmail and vpopmail and just patched up with smtp-auth,
Which SMTP-AUTH-patch?
I'm using Version 0.31
From which source exactly? What's the complete download URL you used
to get this patch?
Hello List again,
How do I need to chmod /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw to use it the right way with
qmail smtp-auth-patched? Any other vpopmail-things i need to take care of in
this case? Is there way to tell smtp to control every incoming mail with the
vchkpw? How does tcp.smtp.cdb needs to look
Hi Patrick,
pls. read:
http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html
regards.
--eh.
At 19:18 05.07.2005 +0200, you wrote:
Hello List again,
How do I need to chmod /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw to use it the right way
with qmail smtp-auth-patched? Any other vpopmail-things i need to take care
of in
On Tuesday, July 5, 2005 at 10:35:30 AM patrick wrote:
From which source exactly? What's the complete download URL you used
to get this patch?
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/dist/qmail-smtpd-auth-0.31.tar.gz
OK, than parameters should be OK.
Well, I did not compile vpopmail
Hello Casey,
On Sunday, June 19, 2005 at 12:22:05 AM Casey wrote:
On Saturday 18 June 2005 10:13, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
How did you log in? SMTP-AUTH using CRAM-MD5?
PLAIN with IMAP (dovecot).
And dovecot is configured to explicitly use 'vchkpw' and 'vchkpw' is
for sure the version from
On Sunday 19 June 2005 13:53, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
And dovecot is configured to explicitly use 'vchkpw' and 'vchkpw'
is for sure the version from 'compile with
--enable-clear-password' build?
Yes, there is only one vchkpw on the system. If it's not using the
correct vchkpw then it's
On Sunday 19 June 2005 19:52, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
That works, but that's not useful since none of the client logins
(pop3 or imap) update the password file. SMTP logins *do*, but
they are considerably more rare...
And many accounts exist for POP3 polling only, and the end user only
uses
Hello Casey,
On Sunday, June 19, 2005 at 9:52:55 PM Casey wrote:
printf [EMAIL PROTECTED] |vchkpw /usr/bin/env
30 - check if environment was printed (should be with correct
password presented)
- check 'vpasswd' and 'vpasswd.cdb'.
That works [...]
If *THAT* works your dovecot must use
On Jun 19, 2005, at 12:55 PM, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
On Sunday 19 June 2005 19:52, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
That works, but that's not useful since none of the client logins
(pop3 or imap) update the password file. SMTP logins *do*, but
they are considerably more rare...
And many accounts
Hello Casey,
On Saturday, June 18, 2005 at 10:35:58 AM Casey wrote:
AFAIR it does exactly what you said.
Nope, doesn't seem to. I rebuilt vpopmail with it enabled, edited
out the cleartext portions of a vpasswd file, and logged in a bunch
of times as that user. No updates to vpasswd. :(
On Saturday, June 18, 2005, 12:13:54 PM, Peter wrote:
AFAIR it does exactly what you said.
Nope, doesn't seem to. I rebuilt vpopmail with it enabled, edited
out the cleartext portions of a vpasswd file, and logged in a bunch
of times as that user. No updates to vpasswd. :(
How did you
On Saturday, June 18, 2005, 4:32:17 PM, Sylwester wrote:
Casey was talking about mysql not .cdb for user databases.
blah... I've read bad lines:
Nope, doesn't seem to. I rebuilt vpopmail with it enabled, edited
out the cleartext portions of a vpasswd file
sorry for misunderstanding.
--
On Jun 18, 2005, at 7:32 AM, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
I've checked in mysql log what happens if I auth via POP3 - vpopmail
makes select from vpopmail where pw_name='x' and pw_domain='x.com'
and the connection is being closed. As far as I understand well I
should get an update to vpopmail
On Saturday, June 18, 2005, 7:06:49 PM, Tom wrote:
If you're using qmail's pop3 server, you could add some debugging to
vchkpw.c (and recompile and reinstall it) to do some printfs around
that code to see why it isn't running.
I love open free software ;P
It's called tchechien debug ;-)
I
On Saturday 18 June 2005 10:13, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
How did you log in? SMTP-AUTH using CRAM-MD5?
PLAIN with IMAP (dovecot).
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | cell 425-443-4653
AIM Yahoo: SomeLinuxGuy | ICQ: 1494523
SeattleServer.com, Inc. |
On Saturday 18 June 2005 14:32, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
Casey was talking about mysql not .cdb for user databases.
I certainly was not! I do not wish to use mysql, though I do want
to start using postgresql soon.
I will try rm'ing the cdb.
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe |
On Saturday 18 June 2005 10:13, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Additionally you should make sure you rebuilt vpasswd.cdb after
you edited vpasswd, because else vchkpw will still see the clear
text password in vpasswd.cdb and therefore see no reason to
update anything. vchkpw does *not* look into
i've followed the qmailrocks installation method. But i've a problem i
need to port the old mails to this new mail server. the problem is the
old mail server is using mbox format and the newer one is using Maildir.
is there a way to convert these mbox messages to Maildir mails.
On Wed,
this question has nothing to do with the message you replied to. When posting
to the list to ask a new question you should start a new thread by using your
MTA's 'new' function.
On Friday 14 January 2005 02:32 am, Rizwan Iqbal Malik wrote:
i've followed the qmailrocks installation method. But
On Jan 14, 2005, at 12:32 AM, Rizwan Iqbal Malik wrote:
i've followed the qmailrocks installation method. But i've a problem i
need to port the old mails to this new mail server. the problem is the
old mail server is using mbox format and the newer one is using
Maildir.
is there a way to convert
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 22:52:54 -0800
Allie D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok fine...I did exactly as it states and it didn't make a difference.
It takes from 20 to 40 seconds to send an email...that's horrible. If
I disable TLS it's immediateI can see qmail-smtpd just sitting
there while it's
Actually I did...but then I found the problem. It was the user and group
of the .pem files. It looks as though when my corn job ran
update_tmprsadh, the script changes the user and group. That broke it, I
updated the script to make the user vpopmail.vchkpw and it's all good. I
tested it from about
Thanks for the direction...but I appear to be following it as is. Stuff of
interest follows from my run file:
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 400 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -vR -l $LOCAL -c $MAXSMTPD \
-u $VPOPMAILUID -g $VPOPMAILGID 0 smtp \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd \
Allie D wrote:
Thanks for the direction...but I appear to be following it as is. Stuff of
interest follows from my run file:
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 400 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -vR -l $LOCAL -c $MAXSMTPD \
-u $VPOPMAILUID -g $VPOPMAILGID 0 smtp \
Ok fine...I did exactly as it states and it didn't make a difference. It takes
from 20 to 40 seconds to send an email...that's horrible. If I disable TLS it's
immediateI can see qmail-smtpd just sitting there while it's
authenticating..the entire time. Should I use
Hello Allie,
On Monday, January 10, 2005 at 5:43:11 AM Allie wrote:
I'm running vpopmail-5.4.9, netqmail-1.05, and Bill Shupp's TLS +
SMTP-AUTH patch. It runs great...but the delay is bordering on
grueling. No matter what the client is it takes a goods 10-20
seconds to send mail. The server
Hello Blist,
On Monday, May 24, 2004 at 11:16:58 PM you wrote (at least in part):
10092 write(4, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 27) = 27
However your Base64-encoded your login data, something went wrong.
There's a '\n' that shouldn't be there.
The correct B64-data would be:
Username:
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
However your Base64-encoded your login data, something went wrong.
There's a '\n' that shouldn't be there.
The correct B64-data would be:
Username: YnJvb2tzQGJyb29rc3JveS5jb20=
Password: amo=
Please try again with these data and report in.
Peter,
After tyring with these
Hello Blist,
On Tuesday, May 25, 2004 at 6:22:11 PM you wrote (at least in part):
After tyring with these values I get:
24597 --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
That's not necessarily easy to debug.
First try this:
$printf [EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp/auth.data
$setuidgid
Am Dienstag, 25. Mai 2004 19:18 schrieb Peter Palmreuther:
Hello Blist,
On Tuesday, May 25, 2004 at 6:22:11 PM you wrote (at least in part):
After tyring with these values I get:
[...]
If this segfaults too, one /might/ be able to guess why from the
strace and the last action done. If
Hello Blist,
On Sunday, May 23, 2004 at 9:28:35 PM you wrote (at least in part):
== /var/log/mail ==
May 23 15:10:53 ps1 vpopmail[14133]: vchkpw-smtp: invalid user/domain
characters [EMAIL PROTECTED] :192.168.5.50
Where does the space character after '.com' comes from? Seems there's
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Where
does the space character after '.com' comes from? Seems there's
something wrong with Base64-decoding / handing decoded values over to
vchkpw. I might be wrong, but all logs similar to this found in my
system logs have 'username:IP' instead of 'username :IP'.
Hello Blist,
On Monday, May 24, 2004 at 4:47:43 PM you wrote (at least in part):
I'd say this is a case for strace [...]
Here is a copy of the strace log:
Please replace your strace call by
strace -fF -s 4096 -o /tmp/qmail.log -e write ...
(replace '...' with 'softlimit -m ...' and so on).
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Please replace your strace call by
strace -fF -s 4096 -o /tmp/qmail.log -e write ...
(replace '...' with 'softlimit -m ...' and so on).
else we'll not see what qmail hands over to vchkpw.
3906 write(2, "tcpserver: status: 0/20\n", 24) = 24
3906 write(2,
Am Sonntag, 23. Mai 2004 03:02 schrieb Eric Ziegast:
I know this is a shameless plug, but I'm a happy customer.
Have Inter7 do a SugarBox install for less time/money than
it takes to figure it out using online resources and googled
howtos. I didn't have to second-guess or debug anything.
Hello List,
On Friday, May 21, 2004 at 5:21:36 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (at
least in part):
In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your
e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox over the internet.
Hello Peter,
Saturday, May 22, 2004, 6:34:03 PM, you wrote:
PP Hello List,
PP On Friday, May 21, 2004 at 5:21:36 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (at
PP least in part):
In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent
please remove this troll from the list. i'm tired of hearing this bigotry
on a technical mailing list. there is no content in this post that has
anything to do with either the list, or the thread in question.
At 11:06 AM 5/22/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before You make comments, first read
Hello List,
On Saturday, May 22, 2004 at 8:06:41 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (at
least in part):
[full quote snipped]
Before You make comments, first read the previous post.
Well, ok. *erm* I just recognize: already done.
I am talking about TLS, smtps
You are. In fact you are.
But maybe I
Hello Peter,
Saturday, May 22, 2004, 9:03:21 PM, you wrote:
PP Hello List,
PP On Saturday, May 22, 2004 at 8:06:41 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (at
PP least in part):
PP [full quote snipped]
Before You make comments, first read the previous post.
PP Well, ok. *erm* I just recognize: already
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Your first message, which started this flamewar.
snip
Roy,
In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
security as SMTP after POP, because with SMTP-Auth, You sent Your
e-mailadress and Your password of Your mailbox
Hello X-Istence,
Saturday, May 22, 2004, 11:06:33 PM, you wrote:
XI -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
XI Hash: SHA1
XI Your first message, which started this flamewar.
snip
Roy,
In the OLD days, people were happy with SMTP-Auth. I consider it LESS
security as SMTP after POP, because
Hello List,
On Saturday, May 22, 2004 at 11:24:43 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (at
least in part):
The flamewar did NOT start with my message.
PLOconnection interrupt *beep*
--
Best regards
Peter Palmreuther
Bumper sticker: All the parts falling off this car are of the very
finest British
Hello List,
On Saturday, May 22, 2004 at 11:24:43 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (at
least in part):
I clearly stated to do POP3-SSL, to have afterwards a 'SMTP after
POP' functionality.
Sure. I may quote your first reply:
,- [ mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
| Activate TLS by create a certificate,
I know this is a shameless plug, but I'm a happy customer.
Have Inter7 do a SugarBox install for less time/money than
it takes to figure it out using online resources and googled
howtos. I didn't have to second-guess or debug anything.
Within 4 hours of the consultant logging in via SSH, I had
(Apologies for the delayed reply - I've been on the road)
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 13:52, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Even if RELAYCLIENT is set, (the Auth patched) qmail-smtpd *WILL* ask for
Authentication.
No. It'll /OFFER/ SMTP-ATUH, for those that want to set up their mail
client to always
Joel Newkirk schrieb:
- I want both method, SMTP-Auth and POP3-b4-SMTP, for allowing a client
to relay.
- I don't want the system to /require/ SMTP-Auth when POP3-b4-SMTP
already set RELAYCLIENT=
Hi,
I have such a setup.
I use qmail-spamcontrol+vpopmail+mysql+courier+relay-ctrl
my smtpd run
Hi Peter,
At 17:24 31.03.04 +0200, you wrote:
Hello Erwin,
On Wednesday, March 31, 2004 at 10:09:29 AM you wrote (at least in
part):
In case a client is accepted via pop-4-smtpd, the $RELAYCLIENT environment
variable is set. It might be useful to define this variable explicitely,
ie.
Hello Erwin,
On Thursday, April 1, 2004 at 3:23:49 PM you wrote (at least in part):
[RELAYCLIENT set to something different than ]
2. Relayclients identfied by POP-b4-SMTP carrying RELAYCLIENT=P4S (sample).
Ok. qmail-smtpd will append this string to the Recipient address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
=
Hello Erwin,
On Wednesday, March 31, 2004 at 10:09:29 AM you wrote (at least in
part):
In case a client is accepted via pop-4-smtpd, the $RELAYCLIENT environment
variable is set. It might be useful to define this variable explicitely,
ie. RELAYCLIENT=PB4S.
No. It will, for sure, not be
Mike Miller writes:
Nope. Not using MD5 passwords.
That would explain it then. As Tom said, DES-style crypt ignores
everything
after the first eight characters of the password. MD5-style crypt has a
higher limit, from memory I believe it's something like 126.
--
Paul Allen
Softflare
] Re: SMTP-Auth bug in passwords?
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:30:27 GMT
Mike Miller writes:
Nope. Not using MD5 passwords.
That would explain it then. As Tom said, DES-style crypt ignores
everything
after the first eight characters of the password. MD5-style crypt has a
higher limit, from memory I
Mike Miller writes:
Okay, but should it be _allowing_ this as a password or don't you think
that it should reject it?
I think that it is behaving at it is documented to behave and that your
expectations are wrong.
There is a very big difference between 'webmaste' and 'webmaster23445'
in
passwords
but store new ones in MD5. This would ensure that users looking to migrate
know what's going on. I just didn't want it to stop working when migrated
users.
-M
From: Paul L. Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vchkpw] Re: SMTP-Auth bug in passwords?
Date: Wed, 10 Sep
Mike Miller writes:
Any way to convert an entire large site of cdb files (probably
150 domains) into MD5? Actually coverting is the wrong word [since you
can't do that unless there is clear text passwords], but rather to have it
choose between both MD5 and CRYPT passwords (based on
Mike Miller writes:
I believe what you say (that if I enable MD5 passwords, then it will work
for both),
I didn't say that. I said that if vpopmail were written correctly then
it would work for both.
There should really be a note that it will accept existing crypt
passwords but store
Hello Rob,
On Saturday, March 1, 2003 at 10:23:09 PM you wrote (at least in
part):
Does anyone have a patch for Qmail/vpopmail that will allow
SMTP-Authentication instead of Pop before SMTP .. or if someone could
show me how I would do this using the vpopmail database that would be
greatly
Kit, you're reinventing the wheel!
Yes, there are significant problems with simply merging together a
bunch of the qmail patches. It took me quite some time to get all the
patches I wanted to play nicely together. Now that it's done, feel
free to use it:
Hi Matt:
At 1:06 PM -0500 12/5/02, Matt Simerson wrote:
Kit, you're reinventing the wheel!
Thanks for getting in touch, but the attempt below is actually qmail
with just the SMTP-AUTH patch. I figure if I can't get 1 patch
working, my chances for the rest are pretty low. :}
Yes, there are
Thanks for the pointers, everybody...
At 11:22 PM -0500 12/3/02, Kit Halsted wrote:
...
Tried 0.31 tonight, no luck. Maybe my other patches are interfering?
I'll try it at home as the only patch see how that goes.
2.) Try to run qmail-smtpd as root. Just for testing, but this avoids
Hello Kit,
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002 at 6:18:35 PM you wrote:
I have no clue why this is not working
1.) Give 0.31 a try, I don't know what exactly changed, but the syntax
is different between 0.30 0.31, maybe you're using the 'new'
one, while old (to me unknown) is needed.
2.) Try
Hmm...I'm not sure if Bill Shupp's big patch will compile for BSD, but
it includes the SMTP-Auth patch...just a suggestion.
Regards,
Tren
-Original Message-
From: Kit Halsted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vchkpw] Re
Hello Lists,
On Thursday, October 31, 2002 at 2:37:43 AM you wrote:
smtp auth is returning user unknown:
Oct 30 15:59:27 query vpopmail[9465]: vchkpw-smtp: vpopmail user not found
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:209.124.141.171
startups are:
/usr/bin/tcpserver -u 63 -g 65 -l -R -H 0 smtp
your right. users were not vpopmail/vchkpw. working perfectly now. thanks
peter.
-chris
-Original Message-
From: Peter Palmreuther [mailto:lists;pitpalme.de]
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vchkpw] Re: smtp auth
Hello Lists,
On Thursday
Hi John,
version 5.2.1
no extra compile option.
TIA,Paulo Henrique
Quoting John Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira writes:
Hi all,
I installed qmail smtp-remote-auth patch. It works well for outlook
client
Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira writes:
Hi all,
I installed qmail smtp-remote-auth patch. It works well for outlook
client but with eudora it fails. What I can do to fix this?
TIA, Paulo Henrique
What version of vpopmail are you running and what are your
compile options?
-John
At 1:46 PM -0200 10/24/02, Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira wrote:
Hi John,
version 5.2.1
no extra compile option.
TIA, Paulo Henrique
Somebody flame me if I'm wrong, but IIRC vpopmail 5.2.1 will not work
with SMTP-AUTH Eudora. Eudora requires CRAM-MD5, so vpopmail 5.3.6
looks like
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 15:35, Kit Halsted wrote:
Somebody flame me if I'm wrong, but IIRC vpopmail 5.2.1 will not work
with SMTP-AUTH Eudora. Eudora requires CRAM-MD5, so vpopmail 5.3.6
looks like the minimum version for your requirements. (5.3.9 is up on
the dev page, 5.3.11 is the most
85 matches
Mail list logo
