domain: ojoobala.com
uid:89
gid:89
dir:/home/vpopmail/domains/ojoobala.com
users: 3
--- Shane Chrisp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you type vdominfo ojoobala.com what output does
it
show for dir?
-Original Message-
From: Balaji NJL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I agree, but Ken says that 'now and at any time in the future'
which seems to be a misunderstanding? If Ken starts to contribute to the
project quite much then you wouldnt refuse his request perhaps?
The thing is that you contradict in what you say.
Michael Bowe has been actively involved with
I dont see why you fight over this. There should be two cvs sources anyhow
one for current development branch and one for stable releases branch.
The new features shouldnt be added to stable branch until they are
relatively bug free.
Since Tom seems to handle cutting edge stuff in the code, we
I think they should write a contract to make both admin on the SF page and
in the contract it should say that noone should be able to remove one
anothers admin status.
or let someone neutral handle the admin part, and make both regular members?
Peace /Raboo
- Original Message -
From:
Okay wtf is this!
i put a reply to this thread and i get a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] cause
of their office is moving
and one from this
Would you guys shut down anti-spam and auto-reply stuff when ya listeninng
to a mailinglist!
or could the mailinglist admin remove them from the list??
Ms. Catherine Kouzmanoff writes:
It is a time to call together everyone on this list to insist that Tom
Collins add Ken Jones or another representative from Inter7.
I've been using vpopmail for a few years now and didn't really care who
was in control as long as somebody was. When I saw
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
get over yourselves. you abandoned vpopmail. your own support staff were
unable to support your paying customers - they had to go to the vpopmail
mailing list for help, and once there were helped by *the community*, not
their vendor. that's a
I posted a mail on the list about having trouble setting up the
.quotawarn.msg . I actually did set it up.. but it's not going through to
the mailbox I have with over 90% (right now it's 93%).
Any ideas, please?
Shai.
Hi,
on 06.05.2003 01:19 CoyoteTM said the following:
I need to customise the bounce messages. How can I do that ?
(...well maybe this is qmail related question, but maybe someone can help me...)
There several patches which can help you to get desired results. You can
search via Google. If this
De: Paul L. Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ms. Catherine Kouzmanoff writes:
It is a time to call together everyone on this list to insist that
Tom
Collins add Ken Jones or another representative from Inter7.
I've been using vpopmail for a few years now and didn't really care
100% right.
it will be really a pain to have two separate sources.
and if they don't agree between, i think that ken should keep the name
vpopmail for this product. the manner and style for the comments does
not apply there. futuremore, the public can not what happened between
tom and ken,
onsdagen den 10 september 2003 12.57 skrev Emris:
Hi,
on 06.05.2003 01:19 CoyoteTM said the following:
I need to customise the bounce messages. How can I do that ?
(...well maybe this is qmail related question, but maybe someone can help
me...)
There several patches which can help you
dalmata writes:
No need to use bad words.
Those words expressed my feelings exactly; other words would not.
That is a personal attack
Correct. As were her comments about Tom. Her attack was more subtle
but it was still a personal attack. I consider her attack to be worse
than mine
Hi,
i have a running setup using vchkpw with cdb authentication. I thought about
switching to MySql Authentication to have a better overview over the
existing accounts. Somewhere i read that Sqwebmail does not completely work
with Mysql authentication and still vchkpw should be used. The
I doubt it because this thread shows that nobody
owns GPLd software and that monopolies are not
possible in Open Source.
My ha'penny / cents worth:
If this statement is true then make impartiality the
byword. Total admin control over the project should be
given neither to Tom nor Ken, but
Nope. Not using MD5 passwords. 5.3.20 at present.
-M
From: Tom Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vpopmail list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] SMTP-Auth bug in passwords?
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 21:24:31 -0700
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 08:40 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
Looking just below,
We use sqwebmail with MySQL and have had no problems. Where did you read
that it doesn't work?
--
Adam Hooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
til wrote:
Hi,
i have a running setup using vchkpw with cdb authentication. I thought
about switching to MySql Authentication to have a better overview over
the
Two CVS sources is a nightmare -- as a user, I'd much rather two
branches on the same source, so I could just do, for example, 'cvs up -r
UNSTABLE'
--
Adam Hooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Evren Yurtesen wrote:
I dont see why you fight over this. There should be two cvs sources anyhow
one for current
I ment branches :) ok :) sorry...
Evren
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Adam Hooper wrote:
Two CVS sources is a nightmare -- as a user, I'd much rather two
branches on the same source, so I could just do, for example, 'cvs up -r
UNSTABLE'
--
Adam Hooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Evren Yurtesen
It is my understanding that this is not using CRAM-MD5 but PLAIN login, so
those methods aren't affected. I used the
http://members.elysium.pl/brush/qmail-smtpd-auth/ patch and haven't had
difficulty using it from within netscape or other clients. I will be
investigating further.
As far as
Chris Pugh writes:
If this statement is true then make impartiality the
byword. Total admin control over the project should be
given neither to Tom nor Ken, but to an independent
indiviual, a moderator, not necessarily someone with a
vested interest in the vpopmail project.
But somebody
Mike Miller writes:
Nope. Not using MD5 passwords.
That would explain it then. As Tom said, DES-style crypt ignores
everything
after the first eight characters of the password. MD5-style crypt has a
higher limit, from memory I believe it's something like 126.
--
Paul Allen
Softflare
It's JUST login/plain and not CRAM-MD5. As proof, I used a test client
script:
# Simple SMTP client with STARTTLS and AUTH support.
# Michal Ludvig [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2003
# See http://www.logix.cz/~mic/devel/smtp for details.
# ./smtp-client.pl --host=IP --hello-host=breaded --disable-starttls
Okay, but should it be _allowing_ this as a password or don't you think that
it should reject it? There is a very big difference between 'webmaste' and
'webmaster23445' in terms of security, as I just found out.
The reasoning for my use of CRYPT is that most of my users are still from
when
Mike Miller writes:
Okay, but should it be _allowing_ this as a password or don't you think
that it should reject it?
I think that it is behaving at it is documented to behave and that your
expectations are wrong.
There is a very big difference between 'webmaste' and 'webmaster23445'
in
This whole problem could have been avoided if Tom
had contacted me and told me about his plans.
I would have agreed. I think using source forge is a
great idea.
Unfortunately Tom did not talk to me. The first I heard
of his intentions was when the FreshMeat admins emailed
me saying Tom wanted
I'm in no way stating that that webmaster21312 password is secure, however
I'd say that length issues are important here as often the complex parts of
a password are near the end [ie: dogguy45b]. If this was me, I'd completely
agree and never have a password like that. However it seems that
Regards,
David Choo
Mike Miller writes:
Any way to convert an entire large site of cdb files (probably
150 domains) into MD5? Actually coverting is the wrong word [since you
can't do that unless there is clear text passwords], but rather to have it
choose between both MD5 and CRYPT passwords (based on
Mike Miller writes:
I believe what you say (that if I enable MD5 passwords, then it will work
for both),
I didn't say that. I said that if vpopmail were written correctly then
it would work for both.
There should really be a note that it will accept existing crypt
passwords but store
First off, everybody needs to quit whining. Seriously, if Tom hadn't
taken up the reins, there would be ZERO DEVELOPMENT on this project right
now. Unless you were willing to send a truck of cash to Inter7, they
would often not even respond to emails asking whether development would
continue,
Ladies Gents,
Before I get off the list, let me this useless non-contributing newbie say
something.
Whats happening here over the past few days will do no one any good. Shooting
off like that in e-mails will just simply piss everyone involved off.
So I sincerly hope that everyone will now just
Ken Jones writes:
Since I have been working on vpopmail almost every day
for the last 5 years (including most weekends), it is very
difficult for me to hear people saying I have not done enough
lately. Even during these last 6 months where we have not
made a new devel release
If I had
Is there a way in which I can set the QMAILQUEUE value in tcp.smtp for
mail sent to a virtual domain?
I'm setting up a qmail+vpopmail+spamassassin+virus check server, but are
finding that the spam and virus checking is adding a large overhead to
the time taken to process a message (5 seconds
Hi,
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 16:09, Benjamin Tomhave, CISSP wrote:
First off, everybody needs to quit whining. Seriously, if Tom hadn't
[snip]
Just my sniping comment... I am so very sorry for being a whining
sleeping idiot! I will say thanks to Tom, stop being a sysadmin and go
back to
Benjamin Tomhave wrote:
First off, everybody needs to quit whining. Seriously, if Tom hadn't
taken up the reins, there would be ZERO DEVELOPMENT on this
project right
now. Unless you were willing to send a truck of cash to Inter7, they
would often not even respond to emails asking
Hi
i am installing qmailadmin-1.0.13 with qmail but no
images found after installing many times.
Here how i am going to install.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] qmailadmin-1.0.13]#
./configureloading cache ./config.cachechecking for a BSD compatible
install... (cached) /usr/bin/install -cchecking
Let us stop this now and put this war behind us. I can see that Tom has
added Ken as an admin. Cheers to Tom and Ken
Regards Manvendra
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 19:39, Benjamin Tomhave, CISSP wrote:
First off, everybody needs to quit whining. Seriously, if Tom hadn't
taken up the reins, there
I hav downloaded the courier imap
I have compiled the qmail vpopmail with the qinstall-1.1 from www.obua.org
pop mail is running fine
Now I want to use this with Imap
I'm compiling with courier-imap-2.1.1
Here is the error output:
The problem is the vpopmail is installed perfect
I'm finding
i handle this by using a three stage transport - primary and secondary MX
feed mail that is to be filtered on to a
dedicated spamassassin/viruschecker server via /var/qmail/smtproutes.
Those domains that i don't want to filter i just push the mail directly to
the vpopmail server, also via
At 08:49 AM 9/10/2003, Ewald Geschwinde wrote:
Have I done something wrong with the vpopmail installation?
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lvpopmail
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Ewald...
Make sure you have the following two files:
/var/qmail/vpopmail/etc/inc_deps
Robert Kropiewnicki writes:
Do you work for Inter7? Can you speak definitively to the fact that
they've shelved vpopmail for good on their end? No, you can't.
And can you speak definitively to say that they haven't? Despite Ken's
sudden re-appearance here, can you positively, definitely
My 2 cents.
I'm not satisfied both with the last year of Inter7 and the SF period.
I've seen a lot of changes done, but I've the strong feeling that there is
no coherence in the architecture of vpopmail, anymore.
Too much programmers at work, no analists.
No -enable on configuration for new
My first and only e-mail
Like most of the people who are members of this list, we are the benefactors
of your work over the past many years. I take vpopmail and qmailadmin,
customise them to add in our own features, in a production environment and
our clients are happy with them. We contributed
Paul L. Allen
Robert Kropiewnicki writes:
Do you work for Inter7? Can you speak definitively to the fact that
they've shelved vpopmail for good on their end? No, you can't.
And can you speak definitively to say that they haven't?
Despite Ken's
sudden re-appearance here, can you
Lets keep to the topic and leave the conspiracy theories for anther
forum. Politics and religion are better discussed else where.
~jb
Dubya has done more to drive up al-Qaeda recruitment than bin Laden
ever did. Which is only fair because bin Laden has always been a puppet
of the same people
My hope, now that Ken and Tom have apparently been united in mind, is
that the mailing lists, stable vs. devel issues, and what the Inter7
website and Sourceforge project pages say about vpopmail will be quickly
and uniformally aligned as well.
Just consider what a new user to vpopmail would
At 05:30 AM 9/10/2003, Chris Pugh wrote:
I doubt it because this thread shows that nobody
owns GPLd software and that monopolies are not
possible in Open Source.
My ha'penny / cents worth:
If this statement is true then make impartiality the
byword. Total admin control over the project should
Hi Tom,
Thanks for adding me as an admin to the vpopmail project.
I hope to contribute towards making a great new stable release.
When I get back to the office on Saturday I will
update the inter7 development page to point to
sourceforge for both vpopmail and qmailadmin.
(currently I am on
I hope that this time the address is unsub'd now. I sent an
unsub request for it.
-Original Message-
From: Prodigy Abuse Department [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 10 September 2003 10:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ ABU1063202463386 ] RE: [vchkpw] Re: Inter7,
Those of you who have posted since about 10 o'clock this morning have
probably noticed that you're not getting autoreplies anymore. I didn't
see any reason to have [EMAIL PROTECTED] subscribed to the mailing
list, or the pager, or the broken autoresponder. I didn't think we
needed to know he was
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Paul L. Allen wrote:
Ms. Catherine Kouzmanoff writes:
It is a time to call together everyone on this list to insist that Tom
Collins add Ken Jones or another representative from Inter7.
I've been using vpopmail for a few years now and didn't really care who
was in
Wondering if someone can answer this for me. I've got maybe 100 domains
thus yet using crypt() encryption for passwords, as well as storing clear
text [for CRAM-MD5 encryption requiring the password].
If I just install VPOPMAIL with MD5 support, will it detect which domains
are crypt and
Don't hold your breath. SBC has been flooding us for weeks. We finally
resorted to blocking IP addresses because we could not get a response
from their black-hole abuse address.
Shane Chrisp wrote:
I hope that this time the address is unsub'd now. I sent an
unsub request for it.
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 1:14 pm, Mike Miller wrote:
Wondering if someone can answer this for me. I've got maybe 100 domains
thus yet using crypt() encryption for passwords, as well as storing clear
text [for CRAM-MD5 encryption requiring the password].
If I just install VPOPMAIL with
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003, Ken Jones wrote:
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 1:14 pm, Mike Miller wrote:
Wondering if someone can answer this for me. I've got maybe 100 domains
thus yet using crypt() encryption for passwords, as well as storing clear
text [for CRAM-MD5 encryption requiring the
Well said. I am another person that has not contributed very much to
wonderful development that Ken and his team have done over past several
years. Bill has also contributed greatly to this product.
Any person that has contributed as much to this project as they have
should be have full
Does anyone know how to delete a project at sourceforge.
A long time ago I registered theqmailadmin project.
To avoid confusion, I'd like to remove that project from sourceforge.
Ken Jones
Just so everyone's clear: I'm done with this thread. It's gotten way
out of control and I can't see how it will benefit the
vpopmail/qmailadmin community at this point. Ken is now an admin on
both vpopmail and qmailadmin, and we will work together on SourceForge
to coordinate further
I think you just need to email the guys at SF. I remember an
email coming out a few months ago about them starting a clean
up of dead or unused projects.
Shane
-Original Message-
From: Ken Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 3:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It figures the programmers at SF would forget the OFF BUTTON!!!
g
-Rich
On Wednesday, Sep 10, 2003, at 15:17 America/New_York, Shane Chrisp
wrote:
I think you just need to email the guys at SF. I remember an
email coming out a few months ago about them starting a clean
up of dead or unused
Hi,
Seems like a permission problem + a few oddities in
paths .. working now! Thanks for pointing out the
obvious .. ;-)
Cheers,
Chris.
--- Jonathan Viney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Check your permissions on
/home/vpopmail/lib/libvpopmail.a. Make sure
the user that you're building
it should, as the md5 holds a salt and it also defines as being MD5 with $1
in the front then $2 for the salt then $ for the rest of the md5 hash, if
there isnt any detection in the src it should be added, im to hashed from
last nite partying to go over the code, some 1 else do it...
k thnx bye
resending this. i think this got drowned in the flood
of other mails. can some one help me on this pl. i
appreciate it.
-B
--- Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
domain: ojoobala.com
uid:89
gid:89
dir:/home/vpopmail/domains/ojoobala.com
users: 3
--- Shane Chrisp [EMAIL
Robert Kropiewnicki writes:
I've spoken definitively to no such thing. What Ken Jones will do now
that he has been granted admin access (bravo Tom!) is not at the core of
my argument. My argument is that he has done enough in the past for
vpopmail development to warrant his inclusion as an
Hello,
Has anyone successfully gotten spamc/spamd to create user preference
files for vpopmail users?
I.E. `~vpopmail/bin/vuserinfo -d`/.spamassasin/user_prefs
If so, could you send me your configuration info off-list?
Thanks,
Bill Shupp
what is the actal problem again, as we fixed so many for you.
- Original Message -
From: Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:25 AM
Subject: RE: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with
vpopmail
resending
That would be great if I can get that too. Thanks Bill,
Remo Mattei
Network Security Engineer
cell 801-209-8554
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 4:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [vchkpw] OT:
*WANK WANK*
is this really nessicary for the public fourm?? shouldnt this be handled
with personal email rather then pulling us all into it??
- Original Message -
From: Paul L. Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:27
ahem. likewise, or is the sauce only good for the goose?
At 03:55 PM 9/10/2003, VeNoMouS wrote:
*WANK WANK*
is this really nessicary for the public fourm?? shouldnt this be handled
with personal email rather then pulling us all into it??
- Original Message -
From: Paul L. Allen [EMAIL
Hi Paul,
I think Tom and Ken have resolved their issues off list and we would
appreciate it if you did the same. I've held off posting on this topic
for a long time now just because I didn't want to waste more bandwidth.
If Tom or Ken has an issue, it may belong on the list, if you personally
Please post this answer to the list!
I have been searching for this answer for two days now, and I was about to
post to this list. I think a lot of people would like to know this.
-Alex
- Original Message -
From: Bill Shupp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi,
Alex Martin wrote:
Please post this answer to the list!
I have been searching for this answer for two days now, and I was about to
post to this list. I think a lot of people would like to know this.
-Alex
- Original Message -
From: Bill Shupp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Rick
Rick Macdougall writes:
I think Tom and Ken have resolved their issues off list
So it appears. Ken has not resolved my issue with his involvement with
vpopmail.
and we
We??? Do you claim to speak for everyone on the list? Surely not
because at best you can speak for everyone
dude get a fucking hint, WE DONT CARE ABOUT THIS BS IN THE PUBLIC FORUM!
- Original Message -
From: Paul L. Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 11:47 AM
Subject: [vchkpw] Re: Tom's fork of vpopmail (and qmailadmin)
Hello Rick
Rick
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 04:22 PM, Alex Martin wrote:
Please post this answer to the list!
I have been searching for this answer for two days now, and I was
about to
post to this list. I think a lot of people would like to know this.
-Alex
Ok, here's where I'm at now:
I upgraded to
VeNoMouS writes:
[A load of crap]
So you quote the WHOLE of my mail to lecture me about wasting bandwidth
and brainwidth in the mailing list and post it to the mailing list.
Please find a dictionary and look up the meaning of the folliwing words:
hypocrite and moron.
--
Paul Allen
Softflare
Hi,
I apparently made a mistake between Paul Theodoropoulos and Paul Allen
in replying to some emails written to the list. I apologise for the
mis-understanding.
Regards,
Rick
Paul Theodoropoulos wrote:
Hi,
Sorry if that's the case. Entirely possible. I was just responding
to the last
in short, YES, because how is it related to what any one here reads, as far
as ive seen this has been a post a q and answer forum, not hi im gonna state
my fucking opinion on what ever the fuck i feel like, who died and made you
ceo of inter7?
as i said before, take it to personal emails and
VeNoMouS writes:
in short, YES, because how is it related to what any one here reads,
I'm someone here. I'm reading your latest post. Surely, by your own
standards, I have a right to reply to it.
as far as ive seen this has been a post a q and answer forum,
For six months it was a q and
Title: Mensagem
Hello
all,
I´ve qmail installed
with visualoffice. On that installations I´ve:
# cat
/var/qmail/alias/.qmail-default
|/var/qmail/bin/checkattach |/usr/bin/odeiavir
|/usr/local/visualmail/bin/visualmda -f
/usr/local/visualmail/config.mda/mda.cfg -d "$EXT@domain.com.br" -Q
In all the time I've been subscribed to this list (around 2 years or
more), I've been lucky to see even one USEFUL message.
Most of the messages have been complaining about SPAM and getting SPAM
ASSASSIN working!!!
1) I thought this was the vchkpw (aka vpopmail) group NOT SPAM ASSASSIN
--
Please end this thread. Enough has been said.
Shd i not use vipmap at all since i only have One IP address?
Best regd,
Urban
Im using vpopmail-5.3.27 + courier-imap + qmail. In vpopmail the default
domain is chaein.com We have a new domain cyberchaein.com. What i did was
using vipmap to map 192.168.1.15 to cyberchaein.com so it looks like
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 8:07 pm, Richard A. Secor wrote:
snip
In the meantime, I've been waiting for the QMailAdmin version that will
support the damn aliases in the database for well over a year.
snip
You are more than welcome to submit a patch to the
qmailadmin source forge project to
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 06:17 PM, Urban - wrote:
Shd i not use vipmap at all since i only have One IP address?
Correct. vipmap is useful when you want more then one domain to not
require [EMAIL PROTECTED] to login. But it eats up IP addresses, which
kind of defeats one of the
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 8:17 pm, Urban - wrote:
Shd i not use vipmap at all since i only have One IP address?
Best regd,
Urban
That's right. vipmap is only for sites that need to do
ip based hosting instead of virtual hosting. The primary
usage is to allow multiple domains to login
- Original Message -
From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vipmap - help
username instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] The ip mapping
figures out which domain is on the IP and automatically
fills in the
Correct. vipmap is useful when you want more then one domain to not
require [EMAIL PROTECTED] to login. But it eats up IP addresses, which kind of
defeats one of the main advantages of virtual mail.
Regards,
Bill
Hi,
So since i can not use vipmap, is there any other solution that i can
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 06:30 PM, Urban - wrote:
Hi,
So since i can not use vipmap, is there any other solution that i can
use so i dont have to login with [EMAIL PROTECTED]? I have one IP and
3 domain names.
You can use --enable-default-domain to allow one domain to login
ahem.
At 06:07 PM 9/10/2003, Richard A. Secor wrote:
In all the time I've been subscribed to this list (around 2 years or
more), I've been lucky to see even one USEFUL message.
that's a shame. i've found very useful info on this list from time to time.
there is always *noise* associated with any
On Wednesday 10 September 2003 8:29 pm, Vladimir Kabanov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] vipmap - help
username instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] The ip mapping
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 13:30, Charles Sprickman wrote:
This is also somewhat OS dependant. The *BSDs for example have a crypt()
that can handle DES, MD5, and Blowfish. I'm successfully using Blowfish
(accounts were system account users from OpenBSD) after making the
pw_passwd field larger in
i am able to check the mails
using sqwebmail. but i am still unable to check it via
outlook express by POP. this is the error i am getting
There was a problem logging onto your mail server.
Your Password was rejected. Account: '192.168.0.3',
Server: '192.168.0.3', Protocol: POP3, Server
Response:
Hi all,
I'm afraid I was told that some people replied to my msg.. but I MUST have
missed it somehow and so I'm making this email again, in HOPE that I'll get
help in this issue and not miss it this time around.
I made /home/vpopmail/domains/.quotawarn.msg
I placed this inside:
From: Mail
then why are you trying to login as a virtual user
- Original Message -
From: Balaji NJL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: VeNoMouS [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [vchkpw] Unable to access mail using POP and domain issues with
vpopmail
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 09:35 PM, Balaji NJL wrote:
i also tried this on my mailserver directly
telnet localhost 110
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pass x
-ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir
this is true because this is a virtual user and this
user doesnt hv Maildir.
What POP server are
I have uploaded the current (and, as of yet, unreleased 5.3.28 version) of vpopmail to the CVS server on SourceForge. You probably won't be able to browse it on the web right away, as the CVS browser only syncs with the main distribution point every 24 hours.
All developers on the vpopmail
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 04:45 PM, Ken Jones wrote:
Untill CVS is up and running, how would I go about
packaging up a new release?
CVS is up now. Please start with that code, as it includes a few
changes to the current tarball.
I forgot to mention the following in my previous
99 matches
Mail list logo
