I'm curious as to why your DNS admin thought removing the reverse lookup zone
was a good idea. The only reasons I've ever gotten at customer sites or within
my own infrastructure has been I thought nothing used them or It is a
security risk (which no one has provided valid reasons for this
There are several factors here that will help determine what technologies you
should look at:
1. Do you need to do file level restores of this VM that has these huge number
of files?
2. About how many and what kind of files (.avi, .mkv, .jpg, etc.) comprise the
huge number of files?
3. What
is that. !!!
Anurag
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 11:40:00 -0400
From: wtsm...@maine.edu
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup , Vmware and Netapp
I'd consider NetApp's Snap Mirror / Snap Vault.
Cheers, Wayne
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Abhishek Dhingra1 abhishek.dhin
Hello,
Upgraded from 7.1 to 7.5.0.3 (7.1-7.5-7.5.0.3).
During a regular hot catalog backup I saw this:
1346454000 1 2 16 master 0 0 0 *NULL* bprd vnet_cached_getnameinfo()
for x.x.x.x failed, Unknown error 18446744073709551614 (-2)
1346540401 1 2 16 master 0 0 0 *NULL* bprd
Hello Justin
I have seen the same thing on Netbackup 7.1.0.2 after our DNS
administrator removed the reverse lookup zones
Took a day or two after the change before the vnet entries appeared in
the problems log.
I would try to run bpclntcmd -clear_host_cache first
Regards
Michael
2012/9/4
I have an infrastructure , where i have a critical windows machine on ESXi
box, total space occupied is 6TB, and the disk are coming from Netapp box.
Server has huge number of files and size of the files are in Kb's and Mb's.
Please suggest a way , how to integrate all three technologies and
I'd consider NetApp's Snap Mirror / Snap Vault.
Cheers, Wayne
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Abhishek Dhingra1
abhishek.dhin...@in.ibm.com wrote, in part:
I have an infrastructure , where i have a critical windows machine on ESXi
box, total space occupied is 6TB, and the disk are coming
: 04 September 2012 13:55
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5.0.3: bprd vnet_cached_getnameinfo() for
x.x.x.x failed, Unknown error 18446744073709551614 (-2)
Hello Justin
I have seen the same thing on Netbackup 7.1.0.2 after our DNS
September 2012 13:55
To: Justin Piszcz
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5.0.3: bprd vnet_cached_getnameinfo()
for x.x.x.x failed, Unknown error 18446744073709551614 (-2)
Hello Justin
I have seen the same thing on Netbackup 7.1.0.2 after our DNS
-bu] Netbackup 7.1 Migration
Here's the plan, please correct me if wrong:
1. Install NBU on new server and configure all the policies,devices from
scratch.
2. take catalog backup on old master server and stop NBU services.
3. Use recover without import option and import all data tapes
Here's the plan, please correct me if wrong:
1. Install NBU on new server and configure all the policies,devices from
scratch.
2. take catalog backup on old master server and stop NBU services.
3. Use recover without import option and import all data tapes from old master
to new master.
4.
@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 Migration
The plan I went with was to build the new hardware 1st and give it the same
name and IP address as the original master server. Install the same NetBackup
version as the old server. Complete a hot catalog backup on the old server
] On Behalf Of Kalusche, Dan
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 8:09 AM
To: mja...@guesswho.com; VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 Migration
I also followed this path - same name/same IP.
The old server was left on the network while the hot catalog ran. When
downtime.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of srikanth09
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 6:06 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 Migration
Hello
Hello Everybody.
We have implemented Netbackup 7.1 for backups. We have 1 master
server(standard) on Solaris-10 and 12 clients(standard). We are going to
upgrade the master server to Enterprise and one of the clients to Enterprise.
Once this is completed, we have to migrate the master server
I think you need a new plan.
Cheers, Wayne
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Does anyone know where the preferences/servers are stored on Windows 7 install
of the NBU 7.1 Java console?
Alternatively does anyone know how to make the console store the master server
as default host on Windows 7?
DETAILS:
On Windows XP Windows 7 is properly storing the preferences and they
)
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 Java console not saving info on Windows 7
Does anyone know where the preferences/servers are stored on Windows 7 install
of the NBU 7.1 Java console?
Alternatively does anyone know how to make the console store the master server
as default host on Windows 7
: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.1 Java console not saving info on Windows
7
That line should read “On Windows XP Netbackup 7.1 is properly storing…”
From:
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edumailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu]mailto
Hi, i am trying to install a new server with tape drives attached. Client has
7.1.0.2 installed.
the tapes drives have been zoned on to the server however Netbackup is unable
to see the new drives.
running cat /proc/scsi/scsi shows the devices so i guess the OS is happy with
it. according
running cat /proc/scsi/scsi shows the devices so i guess the OS is happy with
it.
Are the device special files (/dev/nst*) present, along with the
corresponding scsi-generic devices (/dev/sg*)?
Try
lsscsi --device --generic
to see all the device special files.
You may need to install the
Been running 7.1 and recently upgraded to 7.5.0.1 and I noticed when trying
to restore a lot of data, the bprd process dies?
Have not seen this with NBU 7.1?
bprd[3045] trap stack segment rip:496aa8 rsp:7fff8d64d410 error:0
Has anyone run into this?
How much data? How many files? I'm
: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5.0.1 restores fail when restoring
large numbers of files?
Been running 7.1 and recently upgraded to 7.5.0.1 and I noticed when
trying
to restore a lot of data, the bprd process dies?
Have not seen this with NBU 7.1?
bprd[3045] trap stack segment rip:496aa8 rsp
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5.0.1 restores fail when restoring large
numbers of files?
Hi,
We've done a number of restores of 10-50M+ files, this last test was only
around 1-1.2 million files, went back to 7.1 in the meantime. I have the
images that caused the issue so I'm duping
'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.5.0.1 restores fail when restoring
large numbers of files?
I've noticed this in the 7.5 operational notes:
If you attempt to restore a large number of files such as 2,000,000, the
restore
job may remain in the queue state
Hello,
Been running 7.1 and recently upgraded to 7.5.0.1 and I noticed when trying
to restore a lot of data, the bprd process dies?
Have not seen this with NBU 7.1?
bprd[3045] trap stack segment rip:496aa8 rsp:7fff8d64d410 error:0
Has anyone run into this?
Justin.
: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 11:43 PM
To: veritas-bu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 7.5 Operational Restore or Search Hold
??
All
I've been doing deep dive in NetBackup 7.5 and the benefits involved.
One of the greatest enhancements with this release is Opscenter and the role
it is going
NBU 7.1.0.4 is probably the most stable of the 7.1 patches. I have had several
customers that were/are on earlier releases which required several EEB fixes to
be applied. If you are doing any kind of deduplication (MSDP or OST
appliances) or using SLPs, then you will want to be on 7.1.0.4.
I agree. I upgraded from 7.1.0.2 to 7.1.0.4 a few weeks ago and I haven't run
into any issues. This release contains a LOT of bug fixes (add VMware to the
list below).
On Apr 19, 2012, at 5:23 AM, tsimerson wrote:
NBU 7.1.0.4 is probably the most stable of the 7.1 patches. I have had
All
I’ve been doing deep dive in NetBackup 7.5 and the benefits involved.
One of the greatest enhancements with this release is Opscenter and the role it
is going to play in the future restores
Netbackup Opscenter 7.5 comes for free and the comes with the FREE feature of
: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Uprade to 7.1.0.4
We just upgraded from 7.0.1 to 7.1.0.3 and so far no issues.
Sent from my TAB. Please excuse spelling errors.
On Apr 6, 2012 10:45 PM, Jimenez, Daniel daniel.jime...@owb.com wrote:
Hey guys Anyone upgrade to 7.1.0.4? And those that did upgrade, can you tell me
Hey guys
Anyone upgrade to 7.1.0.4? And those that did upgrade, can you tell me if the
version seems stable or were there issues encountered after the upgrade?
Daniel Jimenez
Backup and Recovery
___
Veritas-bu maillist -
Hey guys
Anyone upgrade to 7.1.0.4? And those that did upgrade, can you tell me if the
version seems stable or were there issues encountered after the upgrade?
Daniel Jimenez
Backup and Recovery
___
Veritas-bu maillist -
This is a little off topic, but I would like to know anyone that is
using File System Archive EV (and not the Exchange EV) on file servers
and using NetBackup.
I don't want to delve too deep here, but I am having some issues with
FSA where users have moved placeholder files, and now the
Hello
After an issue with the Netbackup disk running full and the NBDB
stopping our Netbackup Authorization resource keeps failing
Have run validate of the NBAZDB database with succces
Getting V- V-18-3078 error Optional VxSS libraries not initialized
Any suggestions/hints ?
Already have a
We were just advised that we’ll be doing Hyper-V virtualization on Windows next
year for both Windows and RHEL guests.
I haven’t done any research yet but given recent discussion about other
virtualization backups (i.e. VMWare) I wondering if anyone is doing NBU for
Hyper-V guests (Windows and
We recently faced this question when designing a brand new data centre. We
decided there was not much point in virtualising the media servers, since
they are just I/O machines and will probably (hopefully) saturate SOME part
of the infrastructure they're running on, be it inbound network, outband
Oh, and I forgot to say that the virtualised master server doesn't do ANY
backups, other than it's own catalog backups.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Dean dean.de...@gmail.com wrote:
We recently faced this question when designing a brand new data centre. We
decided there was not much
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of *
brian_tho...@playstation.sony.com
*Sent:* Thursday, December 15, 2011 5:38 PM
*To:* VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
*Subject:* [Veritas-bu] NetBackup (Virtualized Master Media Servers)
I work for Sony Playstation and we are moving a racked stand-alone Master
Media
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup (Virtualized Master Media Servers)
Hey Brian,
We have a customer that has virtualized 10 media servers and haven’t seen any
issues with performance. The master is a physical server.
Two things I can immediately think of: Resource contention
: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Lynne Seamans
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 12:49 PM
To: 'veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 7.1 and Exchange 2007 integration
Hi to all.
We're a brand new
Hi
Any idea when Netbackup 7.1.0.3 will be available for download or has it
already been released for general public?
Thanks
Sandeep
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Just before christmas (This year!!) :-)
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Bhangui,
Sandeep - BLS CTR
Sent: 06 December 2011 14:04
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu
Hi to all.
We're a brand new NetBackup site.. converting from another backup solution
entirely.
Basic stuff going well, got windows, solaris, HP-UX, linux clients all
happily backing up.
Now on to the harder stuff! We are currently running Exchange 2007, so I
started reading the
From: Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.com
[...] However, I've just started looking into Analytics
(w/trial key) and was curious if anyone had found any
killer features it offers over the regular OpsCenter
in terms of metrics/reporting or other things
I may have missed?
I'm not much for
Hello,
I've been investigating OpsCenter and find many of its features quite useful.
However, I've just started looking into Analytics (w/trial key) and
was curious if anyone had found any killer features it offers over
the regular OpsCenter in terms of metrics/reporting or other things I
may
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of rico78
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:47 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 6.5: socket read failed ??
yep!
I think Daniel you summarize exatly the problem:reverse lookup failing
:)
A big thankful thanks
Hi Folks,
Just a word to say that after installing Netbackup sg drivers, all is working
fine! The HP drive is well detected under Netbackup! Cool
Thanks in particular to rusman :D
+--
|This was sent by edesam...@opentv.com
Hi folks,
Back again with my problems!
I've got a solaris 5.10 server with Netbackup 6.5 (which hostname is
master_server for the example) on which I'm trying to configure the clients!
I've got one client , called for instance win2003_client1 under windows 2003 on
which I installed the
Assuming you're using the standard vnetd communication, port 13782 is no
longer required as it was with version 5/5.1 ... just port 13724.
From your NetBackup server(s), run bptestbpcd -client clientname for
each client. Telnet on port 13724 will work, too, but the response is not
as clear (as
Hey!
Well I would love to run the command from your NetBackup server
bptestbpcd -client clientname but the command isn't available in
/opentv/netbackup/bin?
Is there an additionnal package to install?
Are the firewalls of server and client open in both directions for port
13724?
Well
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 6.5: socket read failed ??
Hey!
Well I would love to run the command from your NetBackup server
bptestbpcd -client clientname but the command isn't available in
/opentv/netbackup/bin?
Is there an additionnal package to install
oh thanks Michael ! :D
ok That's what I get:
#./bptestbpcd -client win2003_client1
16bptestbpcd main: Function ConnectToBPCD(win2003_client1) failed: 23
socket read failed
+--
|This was sent by edesam...@opentv.com via
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of rico78
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:24 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 6.5: socket read failed ??
Also, I ran again a bpcd command form the client, and I get this:
18:58:41.753 [3328.2604] 16
yep!
I think Daniel you summarize exatly the problem:reverse lookup failing
:)
A big thankful thanks
+--
|This was sent by edesam...@opentv.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
Hey guys
I have been looking for some comparisons between Netbackup and Quest Netvault
only because management has requested it. I know that Netbackup and Commvault
are tops but need some information to get management off my back so please post
any comparision information you may have between
Hey guys
I have been looking for some comparisons between Netbackup and Quest Netvault
only because management has requested it. I know that Netbackup is way ahead of
Quest Netvault but need some data to back it up and can't find much on the
Quest software. So please post any comparison
Hi Folks,
I've got a solaris 5.10 server with a HP tape library (Model MSL2024 1 LTO-4
Ultrium 1760 SAS Tape Library AK378A) connected to it by SAS.
I'm running Netbackup 6.5 on the solaris server, but from the netbackup java
console, I CAN'T find the media device attached to the host through
@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 6.5: can't find any media device ??
Hi Folks,
I've got a solaris 5.10 server with a HP tape library (Model MSL2024 1 LTO-4
Ultrium 1760 SAS Tape Library AK378A) connected to it by SAS.
I'm running Netbackup 6.5 on the solaris server
Did you install the netbackup sg driver?
Which drivers are you using?
Hmm I guess no! :(
I'm using the default SCSA installed with Solaris:
# /usr/sbin/modinfo |grep sg
142 f01cb000 1af8 97 1 sysmsg (System message redirection (fan)
222 f0a75000 2e70 231 1 sg
-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-
boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of rico78
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 9:57 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 6.5: can't find any media device ??
Did you install the netbackup sg driver
AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 6.5: can't find any media device ??
Any chance you are using Sol10 U5? If so then read this article from HP
about disappearing libraries/drives.
http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?lang=encc=u
.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Rusty Major
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 1:03 AM
To: nbuser; Lightner, Jeff
Cc: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup VERBOSE in bp.conf
. This only pertains
-Rusty
*From:* Lightner, Jeff [mailto:jlight...@water.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, August 25, 2011 7:51 AM
*To:* Rusty Major; nbuser
*Cc:* VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
*Subject:* RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup VERBOSE in bp.conf
Thanks all – The GUI actually shows 6 levels (0
There are 5 levels of VERBOSE available. Am I right in assuming VERBOSE = 5 is
highest or is VERBOSE = 1 the highest?
If change VERBOSE = in bp.conf do I need to actually restart NetBackup or is it
sufficient to do the bpadm --global --modify --notify request daemons?
If I change debugging
Verbose =5 is highest and you dont have to restart the services. Whenever a
new job schedules it picks up latest change made in bp.conf
Sent from my TAB. Please excuse spelling errors.
On Aug 24, 2011 10:43 AM, Lightner, Jeff jlight...@water.com wrote:
There are 5 levels of VERBOSE available. Am
*To:* Lightner, Jeff
*Cc:* VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
*Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup VERBOSE in bp.conf
Verbose =5 is highest and you dont have to restart the services. Whenever a
new job schedules it picks up latest change made in bp.conf
Sent from my TAB. Please excuse spelling
Thanks. I kind of thought it would be a network issue.
It may well be our SRX5800 that is the problem. As without the SRX in the way
it works fine.
Problem is I cant find any QoS or rate limiting or bandwidth restrictions
within the contexts of the SRX. I will keep hunting and will try the
Hi
We have an issue where is we utilise netbackup it works under 2mb but when it
goes above that speed it fails. Here is a section of the client trace and also
the Server:
Client:
14:08:26.482: [7216.6592] 32 TransporterRemote::write[2](): FTL -
SocketWriteException: send() call failed,
-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of adgwytc
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 5:53 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup fail issue (FTL - Socket 24)
Hi
We have an issue where is we utilise
Hello all;
I have configured netbackup air in my nb 7.1 unix servers.
Everything is working as I aimed except duplication job is starting
after 30 minutes backup job finished.
Do you know any parameter to determine this?
Why duplication job start after 30 minutes?
Best regards;
[mailto:
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of *Asiye Yigit
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:58 AM
*To:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
*Subject:* [Veritas-bu] netbackup air
Hello all;
I have configured netbackup air in my nb 7.1 unix servers.
Everything is working
jpiszcz, you mentioned the following in your thread: During restores with 7.1,
I've been seeing this on some restore jobs: 1: (2826) Failed to get status code
information.
The error you got was obfuscated by the application and it only does so in
particular cases. What you should be seeing is
Hi,
During restores with 7.1, I've been seeing this on some restore jobs:
1: (2826) Failed to get status code information
06/24/2011 06:17:12 - begin Restore
06/24/2011 06:17:13 - number of images required: 1
06/24/2011 06:17:13 - media needed: ABL198
06/24/2011 06:25:22 - end Restore; elapsed
Hello,
We are doing a new install using a STK/Sun L180 (SCSI drives) and Netbackup
7.0. My question, is ACSLS necessary? The installer only allows me to select 1
drive out of a possible 6 that are installed in the library?
Thanks
Hi,
The ACS/LS is necessary if you have more than one backup server that wants to
access the Library. If your library is going to be access by only one server is
not necessary.
Saludos
Fernando Boveda
Director
Uniqs S.A.
tel: +5411 4711 7755
cel: +54911 3106 0576
www.uniqs.com.ar
On
Hi,
The installer only allows me to select 1
drive out of a possible 6 that are installed in the library?
You need to add your media servers in (that also connect to the other tape
drives), assuming that is how you have configured your environment, then
thye should be discovered.
Justin.
The attached image shows the issue.
(http://postimage.org/image/24uebqxic/)
undefined
+--
|This was sent by hx_...@hotmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
Hi,
On the media server you need to define/make sure they are defined as being
connected to the robot, (tpautoconf -a) may help unless you have a strange
configuration?
How do you attach to your drives physically?
cat /proc/scsi/scsi on the media server, are the drives directly
connected?
Solaris 10 new install.
SCSI attached to L180 with 7 internal drives.
(http://postimage.org/image/dny6qozo/)
+--
|This was sent by hx_...@hotmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
Hi,
7 devices on a single host?
You must be using a SAN fabric then?
If so, you need to configure that first.
Justin.
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, hxman wrote:
Solaris 10 new install.
SCSI attached to L180 with 7 internal drives.
(http://postimage.org/image/dny6qozo/)
Nope. SCSI. One L180 Tape Library with 7 internal LTO tape devices.
+--
|This was sent by hx_...@hotmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
It's just for testing purposes only.
+--
|This was sent by hx_...@hotmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--
Waiting on a call back from Symantec but does anyone know which user and group
should own the uid 437 and gid 110 files under /usr/openv/pdde/ ?
It appears the installer just uses the uid/gid from the Symantec tar file and
doesn't change them. A security requirement on my end requires them to
;
Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Media Server Deduplication (PDDE)
I agree – having that UID/GID is meaningless if not defined in passwd/group
files so changing to your standard owner
Of Matthew Opoka
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 11:11 AM
To: Lightner, Jeff; scott.geo...@parker.com; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Media Server Deduplication (PDDE)
One thing I see, the installer or the configure procedures for PDDE created a
user and group
what name do you see on top left corner when you open activity monitor. Does
it show correct master server name.
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:43 PM, musiqdefunk
nbu-fo...@backupcentral.comwrote:
Let me clarify, I am running the Windows client version on my Windows box,
the reason for the
I am currently running Veritas Netbackup 6.5 on Red Hat Linux 5.6 but I am
using the Java Console on a Windows box. The way I've been taught to connect to
the server is by running a tunnel session with Putty and than running the
console. For the most part it works just fine, however when I get
on UNIX/Linux from 3.4 up through 7.1.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
musiqdefunk
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 10:17 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup
Let me clarify, I am running the Windows client version on my Windows box, the
reason for the tunneling is do to some governemnt network restricitions that
Putty is supposed to be the workaround for. I see everything else just fine
like reports, activity monitor etc. But anytime I run Master
, July 01, 2011 12:14 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Java Admin Console
Let me clarify, I am running the Windows client version on my Windows
box, the reason for the tunneling is do to some governemnt network
restricitions that Putty is supposed
post from Nathan:
Thanks, when I checked the bptm logs I can see the throughput but no indicator
as to why the second tape crawls.
Nathan
I've seen some of my jobs start out good and slow to a crawl later. I had not
cosidered that it might have changed tape in the process. I
Of NetCookingTalk
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 8:14 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup to VTL fast with first tape then slow thereafter
post from Nathan:
Thanks, when I checked the bptm logs I can see the throughput but no indicator
as to why the second tape
I would try to isolate the problem.
Take two new tapes from the VTL.
Move them to a new pool
Create a test policy that backs up directly to the VTL and fills the two
tapes.
See if that repeats the behavior of the second tape being. This will tell
you whether duplication is involved.
If the
:44 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Cc: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU; veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup to VTL fast with first tape thenslow
thereafter
Try looking at the BPTM and BPDM logs (T for Tape, D for Disk). I don't know
I'm getting ready to replace my Netbackup server, moving from Solaris to Linux.
I also need to upgrade Netbackup software from 6.0MP4 to 7.1.
Is there a recommended procedure or best practice for doing this? I'm not sure
it it would be better to upgrade software first, then move to the new
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup upgrade: Solaris-Linux and Netbackup
6.0-7.1
I'm getting ready to replace my Netbackup server, moving from Solaris to
Linux. I also need to upgrade Netbackup software from 6.0MP4 to 7.1.
Is there a recommended procedure or best practice for doing this? I'm
not sure
I'm writing my jobs to VTL then using SLP to get them to LTO5. I've noticed
that when i start a job it jumps right up and the speed is 25MB - 40MB then
after the tape fills and a second one is loaded the KB/Sec drops to 2MB -
4MB and the speed never raises for subsequent tapes.
However when
-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
06/09/2011 01:02 PM
Please respond to
VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
To
VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] Netbackup to VTL fast with first tape then slowthereafter
I'm writing my jobs to VTL then using SLP to get them to LTO5. I've
Is anyone out there running netbackup 7.x master server on Linux in a
high-volume environment? Preferably with a large catalog in the 1TB range.
Looking for any feedback on performance/stability... Does it effectively
utilize the 8/10 core Intel procs? What filesystem are you using? etc...
101 - 200 of 1828 matches
Mail list logo
