Very wise idea, Jed. It has inspired me to formulate Rule No.20
of problem solving, in addition to
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/06/all-my-rules-of-problem-solving.html
*NOT *always* *the real, but many times, the imaginery problems are more
difficult to resolve
Artificial problems can
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
**
What if the E-Cat is operating with a 98% 'full charge' on the
heat-capacitor? It would still have considerable capacity left to absorb
heat fluctuations without significantly changing steam temperature.
It
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:26 PM, Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com wrote:
Assuming the boiling is always happening at the same pressure, you can
extend the horizontal line B-C to the temperature axis and treat that as the
temperature of boiling. Wet steam is present only AT the temperature of
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
They said it was a different liquid.
They did not actually identify the medium:
Re: Cooling Hyperion with liquid salts
Defkalion GT
Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:46 pm
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 6:56 am
Posts: 121
Peter... Anyone...
It has now been six months since the January demonstration in Bologna, Italy.
Has anyone noticed if Dr. Park has chosen to say anything on the Rossi matter?
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
I am subscribed to his What's New and have informed him repeatedly about
the developments. He has ignored the subject completely ad has not answered
the messsges.
Too small subject for such a great man.
Peter
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:18 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com
Hi Peter.
I am subscribed to his What's New and have informed him repeatedly about
the developments. He has ignored the subject completely ad has not answered
the messsges.
Too small subject for such a great man.
Too small [a] subject... for Dr. Park? ???!!!
Surely you're joking! ;-)
IMHO,
messages coming back from vortex
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:57 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter.
I am subscribed to his What's New and have informed him repeatedly
about
the developments. He has ignored the subject completely ad has not
answered
At 04:47 AM 7/5/2011, Joshua Cude wrote:
BASIC CONCLUSION: None of the plausible
assumptions are consistent with the claim for excess energy being wrong.
These conclusions are an indication of what
passes for evidence for cold fusion advocates.
And are consistent (but much more obviously
At 08:50 PM 7/5/2011, Rich Murray wrote:
MISTer Joshua Cude, you are, as always, right...
No evidence at all for excess heat production...
From defective evidence to no evidence is a leap.
I just looked over the Kullander and Essen report, and what I see is
that some assumptions were made.
It has been almost that long since Black Light Power has made any announcements
... 02/09/11
I wonder if they both agreed to sit this one out?
Fran
-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson [mailto:svj.orionwo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 9:19 AM
To:
At 09:45 PM 7/5/2011, Harry Veeder wrote:
The Kirvit video *might* be explained in terms of the Tarallo Water
Diversion Fake:
http://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_details_v323.phphttp://lenr.qumbu.com/fake_rossi_ecat_details_v323.php
Tarallo suggests that there is a hose leading water out
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
The inconclusive epithet is from roughly twenty years ago, and we can see
this crumbling by the time of the 2004 U.S. DoE review, where excess heat
evidence was considered conclusive by half the panel, and it's
Hi,
Wow, this really s*cks.
I'd expect at least also a decent nachsynchronization (voiceover)
i.s.o. of simply putting subtitles under it.
Now the subtitles are in no way a representation of what is being said.
Kind regards,
MoB
On 6-7-2011 6:34, noone noone wrote:
Check out the video
Andrea Rossi
July
6th, 2011 at 4:04 AM
Dear Paul Esteban,
I cannot , because I have been told to maintain very
confidential what happened this week in Uppsala.
Warm
Regards,
A.R.
Paul Esteban
July
5th, 2011 at 1:50 PM
Dear Mr Rossi, could you tell us who are the top scientists?
Warm
I have stumbled upon yet another peculiar engineering design choice. This
one I cannot explain as anthing other than a deliberate and
studied inplimentation with the sole intent to defraud.
Whereas the previous choices might be explained by oversight, or ignorance I
see no way to justify this
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Jed claims that there has been extensive testing, but we don't have
confirmation on that, AFAIK, from the actual testing agencies. And what,
exactly, was tested is not clear.
I did not claim that. Defkalion did, during their press conference.
Joshua,
You may recall, I conjectured:
... how can this newly formed H2O gas be
expected to be much above 100 C if it doesn't
have a chance to hang around long enough to
absorb additional heat energy.
...to which you replied:
How can it not?
There lies the little pickle of a situation we
I wrote:
Memo from the Director of Safety Testing: Did you measure the generated
heat?
Response from testing technician: No, of course not, that wasn't in the
test specification. We did not see any explosions. . . .
Let me point out another thing about this un-funny joke, and the many
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:23 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Joshua,
You may recall, I conjectured:
... how can this newly formed H2O gas be
expected to be much above 100 C if it doesn't
have a chance to hang around long enough to
absorb additional
21 matches
Mail list logo
