> On Mar 21, 2016, at 23:14, "Russ George" wrote:
>
> The Lugano issue is the mono-isotopic signature in Ni… no pure isotope Ni is
> available (99%-93% pure isotopes of Ni are available). The instrumentation is
> capable of seeing into the second decimal place in % so where are the other
> is
The Lugano issue is the mono-isotopic signature in Ni… no pure isotope Ni is
available (99%-93% pure isotopes of Ni are available). The instrumentation is
capable of seeing into the second decimal place in % so where are the other
isotopes of Ni even as a small signature if the Lugano report whi
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Russ George wrote:
C’mon guys the Lugano report of that 64Ni is an impossible bit of data,
> there is no way that only 64Ni would be recorded as it would surely not be
> so pure as to not show minor tramp amounts of other nickel isotopes. That
> number is bogus by
The most highly enriched 64Ni available is 99%, more commonly available 64Ni is
93%, thus 1%-7% of said Ni would seem likely to be the other isotopes of Ni.
Few would indulge an isotope analysis without having sufficient resolution and
sensitivity to measure tenth’s of a percent of neighbor Ni i
An instrument capable of resolving the isotopes of Ni, including the Lugano
64Ni, will have the sensitivity to see very small amounts of any and all Ni
isotopes. No one is suggesting the provided 64Ni signature is due to ‘salted’
Ni, rather that such a pure signal in the absence of trace amounts
On the contrary ...
The planted particle benefits from being larger than the typical nickel fuel
particle as part of a plan which makes it likely to be tested. Having enriched
isotope already inside the tube prior to the loading is not enough, and you
want to make sure it gets noticed at th
The Ni62 ash particle is unlikely to be a plant because it is a huge
paticle(600 by 1000 microns) far larger than any fuel particle in the fuel
load and it was melted onto the surface of the center of alumina tube.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *From:* Russ George
>
>
>
From: Russ George
Ø
Ø C’mon guys the Lugano report of that 64Ni is an impossible bit of data,
there is no way that only 64Ni would be recorded as it would surely not be so
pure as to not show minor tramp amounts of other nickel isotopes. That number
is bogus by gross error or intent.
C’mon guys the Lugano report of that 64Ni is an impossible bit of data, there
is no way that only 64Ni would be recorded as it would surely not be so pure as
to not show minor tramp amounts of other nickel isotopes. That number is bogus
by gross error or intent. Get over it, just toss that piece
I built a Lithium Ion Bicycle kit about 3 years ago. Its a Magic Pie with a
48 volt battery and 2KW controller.
I have about 1000 miles on it. I took the bike out this spring and the battery
was not holding much a charge.
It's $600 to replace the 10AH battery. Maybe I can just replace a cell
Industrialization failure would not be a surprise at all, with a report
saying it is leaking, melting, breaking from all side...
If so, the interest if IH is simply to keep the report secret and work on
improving the reliability until they can deliver a reactor that work , in
the industrial way, at
Russ and others--
A. Renoir went through the same kind of attacks when he started painting in the
1870’s. The art critics were vicious. Nevertheless one of the large paintings
(Au Moulin de la Galette) he made early on (which now occupies a prominent
position in the Impressionists Wing of th
Jones etal.--
I agree with Alain and Lennart for what its worth.
I doubt the potential salting of the Lugano reactor with Ni-64 had much to do
with the excess heat that was apparently observed and believed to have been
produced by the Swedes and Italians involved.
In addition I consider the PO
I don't understand why people like Jones make what look like libelous
comments about Rossi, but they do.
Responsible companies like Cherokee and Woodford Equity do due
diligence. They would be liable for legal consequences if the plant
didn't exist and yet they have claimed they did due dilig
Jones Beene wrote:
> It is beyond reasonable doubt that Rossi “salted” the reactor with
> enriched isotope and did not tell anyone.
>
This is not beyond doubt. There is no evidence for it. People who know a
great deal about mass spectroscopy tell me that it is difficult to measure
isotopes in sma
One simple explanation regarding the persistent babble about Rossi ‘real or
unreal’ might be that it is led by petulant groupies, trolls and wanna-be
competitors. It is a perfect match for the banality that surrounded ‘The
Beatles’ when they became famous, unending pompous posturing by those who
Jones, why is it so " beyond reasonable doubt" it can be many honest
explanations as well..
I understand the reasons to debate the Lugano report from an academic /
scientific point of view.
I do not understand why it is important to find out if the insufficiency is
caused on purposeful manipulation
From: alain.coetmeur@gmail
* saying it is a fraud seems not fair for me. Lugano report is visibly
insufficient, unlike anything manufactured to look good...
Alain - I should have been more specific.
It is beyond reasonable doubt that Rossi “salted” the reactor with enriched
isotope and
saying it is a fraud seems not fair for me.
Lugano report is visibly insufficient, unlike anything manufactured to look
good.
Fraud looks perfect, that is a rule, and even a way to detect it.
it is easier to make a fake report that looks perfect than to make a good
one that looks fair.
There is a
just published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-21-2016-info-two-papers-from-french.html
What will happen tomorrow???
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Adrian--
I tend to agree with you about the establishment knowing a lot about LENR.
For example, if you assume Ed Storms was involved with the Establishment via
LANL and listen carefully to his recent on-line interview, Ed notes that
LANL was making tritium early, on apparently with D and H in
The LENR theory must cover the high temperature case that starts at 1500C
with the hot cat, cove the reactor meltdown when concrete and iron rebar
vaporize, and goes to 7000C for plasma based systems such as
http://newinflow.ru/pdf/Klimov_Poster.pdf
The H- ion is meta stable but at what temperatu
For the record, this comment did not come from me. I do not waste time on
Rossi’s absurd blog for one thing.
One the contrary, in my opinion there is no valid proof of any large energy
anomaly from Rossi which is not fully explained by Thermacore’s earlier and
better work - nor is it certain
Using astrophysics observations which are effectively plasma physics
observations to explain solid state physics is a stretch to say the least.
Surely the density of the active ecology makes a very big difference to the
behavior of the atoms.
From: Peter Gluck [mailto:peter.gl...@gmail.com]
have seen it earlier, OK, dear Adrian!
Peter
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:50 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
> Peter Gluck,
> From Rossi's blog.
>
> Jones
> March 20, 2016 at 8:15 AM
>
> DR Rossi – interesting comment on Vortex-L by a ashfield could you comment
> on this:
>
> There must be an important clue
Peter Gluck,
From Rossi's blog.
Jones
March 20, 2016 at 8:15 AM
DR Rossi – interesting comment on Vortex-L by a ashfield could you
comment on this:
There must be an important clue in the new E-Cat X being so small – 100
Watts. This would make a conventional control system for a large plant
I think this has to be discussed with Prof Piantelli
Peter
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:19 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> In astrophysics, the photometric H band, centered at 1.65 µm, falls in a
> very special place, at or near the flux maximum in the energy distributions
> of nearly all stars cooler than
thanks, dear Adrian please help Ego Out with new ideas!
Peter
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 5:15 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
> Peter, you are welcome to publish it.
> I sent that comment on 3/16/2016 and don't know why it took so long to be
> posted.
> I would now add a couple of points:
>
> 1 He will be "
28 matches
Mail list logo