al field is supposed to be radial, not directed toward the
accretion disk. IOW the polar directions are not "vertical", and angle should
have no bearing. (The word vertical implies parallel with the direction of
maximum gradient in the gravitational field).
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nels
>are the the one's that create inner funnel lightning. The vids show an
>occasional "inner lighting effect".
>Strange and wonderful stuff.. Fun stuff.
>Richard
>
>
>Jones wrote,
>>Magnetization might help.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ms are kind of fundamental...
[snip]
No, the problem is easily overcome by working with nature rather than against
it. The problem is that we have been trying to use brute force too.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:37:33 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Now, however, they believe they are on the verge of achieving
>controlled fusion in a laboratory for the first time.
[snip]
Where have they been for the last 20 years?
Regards,
Robin van Spaand
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:05:44 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
>
>"Clearly the EPA needs a new category for PLUG-IN hybrids, as opposed
>to ordinary hybrids. (The volt is NOT an electric car. It IS a
>plug-in hybrid).&quo
y be able to at least meet all our
transportation energy requirements, and the power density could probably be
improved upon by deliberately increasing the static charge.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
y definition of a plug-in hybrid.
>
>Terry
>
>On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Robin van Spaandonk
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:31:08
>> -0400:
>> Hi,
>> [snip]
>>>Somehow it doe
like
> >to see it heat water.
>
>and Robin van Spaandonk replies
>
> >I would be happy with accurate frequency x torque measurements
>combined >with temperature, pressure and volume measurements of in and
>out flowing passing through it >makes a difference.
>
>You
r PLUG-IN hybrids, as opposed to ordinary
hybrids. (The volt is NOT an electric car. It IS a plug-in hybrid).
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
I would be happy with accurate frequency x torque measurements combined with
temperature, pressure and volume measurements of in and out flowing air.
I would also like to know if the humidity of the air passing through it makes a
difference.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ndred times more efficient.
[snip]
>The power of the sun is to be recreated in a new £1 billion science project
>which aims to provide a clean and almost limitless source of energy.
>http://www.telegraph.co.uk:80/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/10/05/scisun104.xml&source=EMC-new_0510200
ing to fall into it
>(slingshot effect I believe)
>
>Michel
That seems a little odd to me. Why would it all be axial?
I would expect at least some mass (if not all of it) subject to a slingshot
effect to remain in the plane of the accretion disk.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
would be only $3000.
The higher weight will decrease the range, which will result in even more
battery weight.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
an outside observer can never actually observe anything crossing
>the event horizon, in either direction. (Hawking radiation also
>originates just outside the event horizon, as I understand it, which
>isn't very well.)
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
) for growing food.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ase where a black hole swallows a planet sized chunk of
matter. How long will it be before the *change* in strength of the gravitational
field of the BH will be felt outside the event horizon? ...and perhaps more to
the point how does the information pertaining to that change in mass escape?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
0,
>each. That seems too high.
[snip]
How much is the average home loan, and how many people on average per house?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
history. The situation is a lot
>more critical than most people realize, according to friends of mine
>who understand something about economics.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tch?v=BZJ58zSOGP8&feature=related
10 min 54 sec
ZERO : An Investigation Into 9/11 - PART 10 of 10
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=X4LaWppkXxM&feature=related
7 min 58 sec
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
udywood.com/articles/JJ/) ;)
>
>Terry
>
>On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Robin van Spaandonk
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:32:13 -0500:
>> Hi,
>> [snip]
>>>I knew it! I knew it!
>&
g" and crash it into the BEC. That is probably easier to do, as it
avoids your vacuum problem. For that matter, if BECs are forming in CF cathodes,
and fast particles are being generated by fusion events, then this is probably
already happening.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ds between quarks). If it were, then "atom smashers" wouldn't need
to be huge underground devices, but could reside on a laboratory work bench.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 27 Sep 2008 17:14:32 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>and there was substantial QM tunneling triggered by impact
[snip]
Why would you expect this to be the case?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
er happened to other
steel structures elsewhere????
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:12:27 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Wouldn't it be easier to just give each nano-particle a charge and accelerate
them in an electric field?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
implied that the producers and consumers are one and the same,
whereas I was trying to point out that that is frequently not the case.
>
>On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Robin van Spaandonk
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 26 Sep 200
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:42:24 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>In an
>industrial society, the people who make things must have enough money
>to buy those things.
[snip]
If that were the case, there would be none left over for those who don't make
anythi
will pay off. If not, then little is lost.
>
>Regards, Robin van Spaandonk
>
>Hi Robin,
>
>I want to send you $1000 US for your project, no strings.
>
>Please post instructions.
>
>Thanks, Jack Smith
>
That's very generous of you, but I'm afraid it wo
as far apart as possible gets
largely washed out.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:01:45 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
>
>> >Well, it would still cost hundreds of millions to make it into a
>> >practical device.
>>
>>No, that's precisely the difference. CF as
to a
golden age for all, not just a few.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
eanwhile enjoy
>the process but don't quit your day job.
>
>Ed
[snip]
Truer words were n'er spake! :)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
maybe there really is an aether,
and these galaxies got caught up in a stream? (IOW maybe gravity is not the
motivating force - if there even is one).
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
applying knowledge. You just need to show them how we
can have our cake and eat it too, and they will change like the wind.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:48:07 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Frankly, even $100 million cannot guarantee clear thinking or a breakthrough.
[snip]
There is no such thing as a perfect guarantee.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ve chosen a different approach. Make a guess at the mechanism, and assume it
is correct. Then optimize a design based upon the guess. Build the design. If
the guess was correct, it will pay off. If not, then little is lost.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:20:27 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
>
>> >Experts at the Naval Research Laboratory estimate that
>> >cold fusion can be fully developed and commercialized for roughly
>> >$300 million
work for
free in their spare time and the availability of a good machine shop, a
prototype could be built for a few thousand dollars.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
be a Muslim in good standing.
>
[snip]
...then if he gets elected, perhaps they will feel less inclined to bomb US
targets. ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
over, which normally implies energy removal
through gamma ray emission. Although if the "lattice loss" mechanisms are
correct, then perhaps it may turn up as heat in the lattice.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
very low reaction rate, but does exist.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:05:37 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>I hope the people who elected
>and supported him are pleased.
[snip]
He was voted for by lots of people, but he was never elected, as both elections
were rigged.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
with cholesterol which then gives rise to "plaques". When these plaques occur in
the arteries around the heart they call it arteriosclerosis, when they occur
around nerve cells in the brain they call it Alzheimer's disease.
(All this is just my opinion, but I think worthy of furt
ening the window
to let the stuffy air *out*, and the fresh air *in*, while contemplating the
complete silence of all the stopped electric motors as everyone enjoys their
jolt of Volt. :)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
olute power (~10 W), more excess energy (1.14 MJ), and a
larger ratio of input to output (2500%)."
It should read ".ratio of output to input (2500%)."
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
35 kW and make it a
>diesel, possibly a two cylinder diesel.
>
>I believe this would cut $10,000 off the cost of batteries - making the
>vehicle affordable for a much larger segment of drivers. Compared to the
>present Prius, the smaller diesel will get significantly better mileage.
batteries. It would also make sense to have a
set of preprogrammed destinations (like preprogrammed radio stations, or a
better analogy might be programmed cooking schemes in a microwave), for places
that you visit frequently. The general idea of course is to delay the engine
start as long as possibl
for nickel (much more
>costly than lead).
>
>http://www.effpower.com/
From the website:-
Battery:
Capacity: 6 Ah
Voltage: 150 V
Weight: 37.5 kg
If I am not mistaken this works out to 24 Wh/kg, which is nothing to write home
about.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[snip]
I think Lithium batteries are more expensive than other types, because Lithium
is fairly scarce. If so, then it should be possible to get a significant rebate
on new batteries by trading in the old ones, which still contain the Lithium
they started out with (in one form or another).
Regar
t; everything they want handed to them. A team of scientists are enroute to
> Houston, Washington and Wall Street to poll intellectuals on their reaction.
>Richard
Not quite yet. First someone has to take a gamble on my fusion device. Then we
will effectively have (almost) free energy indefinitely. ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ulate about when an
Earth-like planet might lose its water and how much closer to the Sun Earth
could have formed without ending up like Venus."
...I take it from this that they concluded that it couldn't have ended up like
Venus at it's current location.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ratio being
bandied about.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
fans?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
used in many applications, including
>underwater explosive devices
However, researchers aren't permitted to
>discuss what practical military applications may come from this
>research."
>
>Dr Son has now apparently been silenced by the powers that be, and has no
>further comment.
Not surprising.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
]
Possible alternatives to a past "snowball Earth":-
1) The crust has slipped several times, resulting in different land masses being
located near the poles and accumulating ice, and leaving evidence that has been
interpreted at "snowball Earth".
2) Continental drift with the sa
be no CO2 overshoot.
>
[snip]
In how many places around the world, is the ice dirty due to volcanic dust?
The problem with this theory is that snow falls tend to be a lot more frequent
than volcanic eruptions, and the next snowfall will cover the dust again.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:49:11 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>On Sep 8, 2008, at 11:23 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
>>
>> If the oceans were to boil off, where would all the water to go?
>
>Same place it went on venus, into building a
mal action will release the
methane from the clathrates (and they want to put CO2 down there too???).
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't think it's necessarily a hoax, though I agree that it may have been over
emphasized by some, and hitched to the bandwagon of others for their own
political ends.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
90)
>
>1998 0.52
>
>2005 0.48
>
>2003 0.46
>
>2002 0.46
>
>2004 0.43
>
>2006 0.42
>
>2007(Jan-Nov) 0.41
>
>2001 0.40
>
>1997 0.36
>
>1995 0.28
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:45:47 +1000:
Hi,
Don't bother answering this, I get it.
[snip]
>In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:12:25 -0400:
>Hi,
>
>Thanks, that helped. However it raises another ques
>A "traveling wave" is exactly that. It is not a "changing wave"; rather
>it's a fixed pattern which travels through space.
>
>
>
>>
>> [snip]
>> Regards,
>>
>> Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
at their speed must be
>subluminal. At C, 1/gamma=0 and the particle must remain immutable
>between events, because its internal "clock" has stopped.
This makes me wonder how an ordinary photon manages to go through umpteen cycles
between source and destination with a "stopped clo
In reply to Rick Monteverde's message of Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:45:00 -1000:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin -
>
>Well and concisely put.
>
>I only take issue with #3 because of the assumptions that we should be
>trying to interfere with the situation, and that warming is necessarily a
>
) As a byproduct of switching from fossil fuels, we get less air pollution
which is better for our health.
5) If we do it right, we make a net profit rather than a net loss.
6) If my ideas on fusion are correct, then that is going to be a very large
profit.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
they don't have a frequency, then how can they have differing
energies if they all travel at the speed of light?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
g,
in the form of neutrinos.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ion."
This lead me to wonder if perhaps neutrinos are the particle equivalent of
gravity waves (just as photons are the "particle" equivalent of light-waves),
since neutrinos carry angular momentum, and otherwise have little interaction
with matter.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Thu, 4 Sep 2008 15:37:43 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>Yes Robin, but why do the nonoil barons keep making this point?
Are you really sure that those who keep making the point are not influenced by
the oil barons?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
age.
[snip]
It will result in economic damageto the oil barons. ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
just in very tiny orbits.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
my mind at rest. :)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
les have a chance to evaporate
before traveling their MFP.
With the supercollider however any black holes formed may collide with a solid,
which has a much smaller MFP, potentially giving black holes a chance to grow
before they evaporate.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ther than in opposition.
however it's also possible that the sunspots will pick up again.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
nable economy based upon sustainable energy.
That's where we come in.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
large change
in albedo (promoting further warming), whereas the high altitude ice in the
Antarctic doesn't get warm enough to melt at all (whereas low altitude ice in
the Antarctic does melt - ice shelves disintegrating).
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
as it that said that no one ever went broke underestimating the general
public? ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
F papers, and have that list under a single URL on LENR-CANR.
That way the most convincing evidence is always easy to refer to. Just pointing
to LENR-CANR can be a bit overwhelming if one doesn't know where to start, or
have the time or inclination to sift through them all.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
woman he improves
his chances of capturing the disaffected Hillary supporters.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
y sudden bursts of
Hydrino fusion.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s going to run out first...:)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n"
it.
When they have created their lovely little fantasy, it is trotted out by the
leadership, as the definitive reason.
So this doesn't have to be a massive conspiracy, just a matter of
compartmentalizing information.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:53:05 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
>In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:11:40 -0700 (PDT):
>Hi,
>[snip]
>>One would suspect that a denser metal like Osmium
>>would work better, but perhaps
that only has one naturally occurring isotope.
Perhaps this results in "pure" oscillations of the atoms, because they all have
exactly the same mass and hence resonant frequency (for sound).
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
.com/news138374177.html
Quote: "Currently, the advance is theoretical." ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:44:03 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>http://tinyurl.com/5hwcc8
>
>http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D92M3FN80.htm
The small eggbeater models will never happen. Not economical.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jones wrote:
>Robin -oops ... looks like I left out a "not" as in
>"not have" but anyway, on another reading, let me
>retract previous message and start over with a
>hopefully new and improved version.
>
Ok, I'll reply when you post it.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ave also been deliberately ignored.
Clearly however this is something that needs to go into an introduction.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I have placed a pdf file at
http://users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/theory-paper.pdf, and would be grateful for
any constructive criticism.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s to be about 4-7 cm from the center of the cell.
However, we are also both making the assumption that the power output is
continuous. Some of the figures in the paper give the strong impression that
that is far from the truth.
>-- Robin
>
>> Assuming 10%, then the light output would
on Am241 (smoke detector pellets), which obviously don't melt,
yet the reaction energy of each individual reaction is on the order of MeV, not
a mere 60 eV.
>It is
>little wonder to me that he receives such strong and
>harsh criticism from those experts who do not believe
>his
tra 37% to the energy (1.17^2 because the velocity
increased by 17%, hence the kinetic energy increased by 37%).
(In fact I've often wondered why Hydrino energy "doesn't" show up in rocketry
results. ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 7 Aug 2008 16:07:06 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>On Aug 7, 2008, at 2:46 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
>
>> In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:37:57
>> -0800:
>> Hi,
>>
>> II
. If so, when stimulating at their resonant
>frequency, or some fractional wavelength, it is feasible they can
>generate ionizing voltages. Axons come in lengths differing from
>microns to multiple centimeters.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Horace Heffner
>http://www.mtaonline
>marginal wells will be capped, and consumers will
>return to gas-guzzlers.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
difference to the circuit).
The water vapor may just provide extra ions, reducing the resistance of the
plasma, or there may be an additional kick due to e.g. Hydrino formation, but
this is by no means certain.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
it doesn't sound totally impossible to me that two 600W power
>drills could propel that thing at this kind of speed...
That's about he speed of a horse and buggy, the weight and power of which would
be about the same.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
al electrochemist (Ed?) would care to step in
here and straighten us all out.
BTW this may also explain the importance of the discovery. By replacing the
anode, they may have replaced the only electrode that heretofore actually had to
be a noble metal.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Unfortunately, the "Read Full Interview Here" link no longer works.
>
>Anyone familiar with Adrian Prael's work?
See also http://www.crnano.org/interview.tymes.htm or contact him directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
course this assumes
100% conversion efficiency, but so what, 3 gm or 12 gm what's the difference?
(H + Li-7 -> 2 * He-4 + 17 MeV).
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
401 - 500 of 1683 matches
Mail list logo
