On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
When I queried DGT about comparing their products using glycol to AR's
use of diathermic oil, I got this response:
"We do not wish to comment any further the differences between
products and any lab prototype, which are huge."
:-)
T
2011/10/19 Jed Rothwell :
> I should point out that Dennis has in mind using the temperature of the
> water in the swimming pool, rather than the flow Delta T.
> That seems tricky to me because the test will run for many hours and it is
I do not believe that megawatt demonstration is too tricky or
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Michele Comitini
wrote:
> http://www.youreporter.it/foto_Incendio_alla_centrale_elettrica_foto_dei_pompieri_1_1
>
> That electric transformer contained diathermic oil!
> I know it is not easy to handle as it can burn as any mineral oil.
Yes, Michele, I thought of
http://www.youreporter.it/foto_Incendio_alla_centrale_elettrica_foto_dei_pompieri_1_1
That electric transformer contained diathermic oil!
I know it is not easy to handle as it can burn as any mineral oil.
mic
2011/10/20 Terry Blanton :
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Michele Comitini
> wrot
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Michele Comitini
wrote:
> Terry,
>
> you mean this?
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg53062.html
Yes! He said he would use diathermic oil. This seems to be common in
Italy with several patents held by Italian inventors. Here's a brief
descr
Michele Comitini wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Pacific_Big_Boy
I already posted a picture of the above as an example of a machine
that had thermal power of at least 10MW.
Those locomotives were made around 1940. They ran at 80mph max speed. . . .
Sure. No one disputes that people
Probably a Freudian slip but I wrote:
There is a reason why people nowadays demand ultrahigh-tech
test-everything-to-the-n'th degree before you turn on the first time,
and OSHA rules galore. It is a conspiracy to prevent innovation.
I meant it is NOT a conspiracy to prevent innovation. That is
t: Re: [Vo]:Is Rossi's 1MW demo supposed to output "steam", or
just hot water under 100 C?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Pacific_Big_Boy
I already posted a picture of the above as an example of a machine
that had thermal power of at least 10MW.
Those locomotives were made aroun
Terry,
you mean this?
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg53062.html
mic
2011/10/19 Terry Blanton :
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:51 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
> wrote:
>
>> This does not bode well from my POV. Granted it is conceivable that
>> Rossi DOES have access to a
From: Jed Rothwell
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Wed, Oct 19, 2011 1:35 pm
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is Rossi's 1MW demo supposed to output "steam", or just
> hot water under 100 C?
>
> Robert Lynn wrote:
>
>> Actually pretty easy, just parallel together 3-4 truck radiator
l need a slight size reduction
to become a successful replacement for that truck engine. We have a long way
to go.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wed, Oct 19, 2011 1:35 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is Rossi's 1MW demo supposed to output "steam",
I wrote:
> I guess you would do this as flow calorimetry where the inlet temperature
> keeps rising. It is not generally a good idea let the inlet temperature
> fluctuate, but in this case I guess you have to live with that.
>
I should point out that Dennis has in mind using the temperature of t
Dennis Cravens pointed out to me that you do not need a fire hydrant
water main to do this test with water only, instead of steam. You can
use a heavy-duty pump and pump the water from a swimming pool, through
the device, and back to the swimming pool.
That is another clever idea which never
Robert Lynn wrote:
Actually pretty easy, just parallel together 3-4 truck radiators or 10
car radiators (quite cheap) with standard cooling fans on them and
pump water around with an open header tank.
Wow. You are right. A large truck produces 425 hp, which is 316 kW. It
takes a lot more tha
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:51 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
wrote:
> This does not bode well from my POV. Granted it is conceivable that
> Rossi DOES have access to a fire hydrant's worth of flowing water, and
> running that much water through his prototype is what he intends to do
> - but I
Actually pretty easy, just parallel together 3-4 truck radiators or 10 car
radiators (quite cheap) with standard cooling fans on them and pump water
around with an open header tank.
Or spray hot water in air stream from a fan and collect it in a catch tank
for re-use (as thermal power stations do)
ed to output "steam", or just hot water
under 100 C?
Thanks for all the interesting input pertaining to whether Rossi may
ave already tested his one MW prototype. There are a lot of
revailing opinions on that matter. I have appreciated reading them
ll. I hope others have found the
>From Jed:
>> On a related topic I have also been under the impression
>> that Rossi was NOT planning on producing steam as the final
>> output product - only hot water below the temperature of 100 C.
> That is what he said months ago. Evidently he changed his mind.
>
> It would be rather challen
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
>
> On a related topic I have also been under the impression that Rossi
> was NOT planning on producing steam as the final output product - only
> hot water below the temperature of 100 C.
That is what he said months ago. Evidently he changed his mind.
It w
19 matches
Mail list logo
