RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-05 Thread Roarty, Francis X
o bill the end user. Fran From: Mark Goldes [mailto:overton...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 3:52 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE This assumes Rossi has a nuclear reaction. There is reason to believe he might not. Should that be pr

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-04 Thread Mary Yugo
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > And by the way, it's expensive. >> > > It is much cheaper than inadvertently irradiating hundreds of thousands of > people. > What's wrong with ordinary radiation detectors? Or do you think animals are used to verify that conventional nucl

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-04 Thread Jay Caplan
- From: Robert Leguillon To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:03 PM Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE If LENR reactions are sufficiently branded as "dangerous", they could easily be banned from personal use. We cannot legal

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Mary Yugo wrote: > They might actually be dangerous. I do not think extensive tests have been >> performed with rats and other species. >> > > What are you describing here? There is no need for animal experiments > unless some sort of radiation is discovered to be emanating from the > reactions

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-04 Thread Mark Goldes
]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE Robert Leguillon wrote: If LENR reactions are sufficiently branded as "dangerous", they could easily be banned from personal use. They might actually be dangerous. I do not think extensive tests have been performed with rats and other species. I doub

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-04 Thread Mary Yugo
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Robert Leguillon wrote: > > If LENR reactions are sufficiently branded as "dangerous", they could >> easily be banned from personal use. >> > > They might actually be dangerous. I do not think extensive tests have been > performed with rats

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-04 Thread Mark Goldes
]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE Robert Leguillon wrote: If LENR reactions are sufficiently branded as "dangerous", they could easily be banned from personal use. They might actually be dangerous. I do not think extensive tests have been performed with rats and other species. I doub

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Robert Leguillon wrote: If LENR reactions are sufficiently branded as "dangerous", they could > easily be banned from personal use. > They might actually be dangerous. I do not think extensive tests have been performed with rats and other species. I doubt they are anywhere near as dangerous as

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-04 Thread Robert Leguillon
ate: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:05:25 -0500 From: francis.x.roa...@lmco.com Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Dave, You are not alone in “wanting” true energy independence but I am sure home brew reactors will only be allowed in rem

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
David Roberson wrote: They key word you used is "meter". I think that it will be a big uphill > run for us to finally become free of the energy producers. > I do not think this will be a problem. There is a significant amount of unmetered energy already. Many people in the U.S. heat their house

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote: > It seems to me that a perfectly legitimate business many fossil > fuel industries ought to seriously consider would be to "retool" > into something equivalent to an eCat (or whatever "eCats" evolve > into) service provider. It would be no different than hav

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-04 Thread Roarty, Francis X
start this ball rolling. Fran From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:32 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE They key word you used is "meter". I think that it will be a big uphill run for us to fina

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-04 Thread David Roberson
ncis X To: vortex-l Sent: Wed, Jan 4, 2012 11:10 am Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE E-L, I think Europe will precede the US but it will actually be smaller, poorer nations that first scramble to certify and demonstrate the worth of any residen

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-04 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
>From Francis >Big oil has no way to plug all these > little holes and is probably rethinking their future investment schemes to > “join” rather than “beat”  LENR and will probably find some way to purchase > and meter this new resource. It seems to me that a perfectly legitimate business

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:20 kW home E-Cat LCOE

2012-01-04 Thread Roarty, Francis X
schemes to "join" rather than "beat" LENR and will probably find some way to purchase and meter this new resource. Fran From: Energy Liberator [mailto:energylibera...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 10:29 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:2