lternating layers of insulation and skeletal catalysts is way ahead of the
game.
Regards
Fran
Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR
Jones Beene
Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:42:03 -0800
Fran,
Actually I think the many problems, as I understand what they (Moddel etc)
have done (incorrectly) and why they hav
h1 and h2 try
to load and unload respectively, I think we need to separate these conditions
and control them independently to realize any discounts.
Regards
Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 2:08 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERN
Reifenschweiler papers are here:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Reifenschwreducedrad.pdf
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Reifenschwsomeexperi.pdf
Atlanta is a terrible mess. I have not seen it this bad for years. It
took me an an hour and a half to walk 3.5 miles. The main highway, 285,
is half-cl
If the Reifenschweiler effect is relativistic as I have posited then it
is colder / slower from our perspective but distributed widely over the
exterior of the Casimir plate boundary in a shallow resivoir (sail analogy)
vs the acceleration / heating that occurs inside the cavity where this
re
NT,
Ah, nothing like the glory of Atlanta in the snow. :) It's been awhile
since I've seen that - probably too long.
I had a lovely shepherd's pie on New Year's Eve, at a glorious little Irish
pub in Arlington with my wayward son, back from Kabul for the last time, or
so he claims.
This journe
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:08:18 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Moreover, if there is a 'dynamic Casimir effect' in the sense of an ongoing
>heating effect, then it is likely that there could also be an ongoing
>cooling effect, when those small changes in geometry happen. This is
On 01/10/2011 02:01 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:32 PM, peatbog wrote:
>
>
>> Don't lambs eat ivy (kids eat it too)?
>>
> Wooden shoe?
>
Heavens no. The stuff's poisonous, the well known but (IMO) toxic old
rhyme aside (was the author trying to encourage kids
alyst?
Regards
Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 1:41 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR
Fran,
Actually I think the many problems, as I understand what they (Moddel etc) have
done (incorrectly) and why they
More on suspected Casimir thermal anomalies - up or down, as they relate to
the subject heading.
These effects, if they are real, may or may not be a "set-up" (preliminary
stage) for eventual LENR, but there seems to be a direct connection, at
least when the experiment is run long enough for trans
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:32 PM, peatbog wrote:
> Don't lambs eat ivy (kids eat it too)?
Wooden shoe?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3oSyr8mHY4
T
Yup... just "kidding" to see who is paying attention.
-Original Message-
From: peatbog
> Thanks. Brrr... Not much heat in the Lamb shift.
>
> ... guess that's why lambs-eat-oats ...
>
Don't lambs eat ivy (kids eat it too)? I believe it is mares and
does who eat oats.
> -Origin
Fran,
Actually I think the many problems, as I understand what they (Moddel etc)
have done (incorrectly) and why they have not seen thermal gain with Casimir
cavities is three-fold:
1)Lack of a spillover catalyst (nickel alone is not sufficient).
Spillover is required for pycno to accum
> Thanks. Brrr... Not much heat in the Lamb shift.
>
> ... guess that's why lambs-eat-oats ...
>
Don't lambs eat ivy (kids eat it too)? I believe it is mares and
does who eat oats.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Terry Blanton
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:M
ecraft
returning to their time :_)
Regards
Fran
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 9:34 PM
To: francis
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR
In reply to francis 's message of Sat, 8 Jan 2011 21:01:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Thanks. Brrr... Not much heat in the Lamb shift.
>
> ... guess that's why lambs-eat-oats ...
I was a little bored. I've been answering physics questions on
answers.yahoo.com.
Shepard's pie would be good now, cold or not. We have seven inch
Thanks. Brrr... Not much heat in the Lamb shift.
... guess that's why lambs-eat-oats ...
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Subject: Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR
LS = 4.372 x 10^-6 eV => x 1.602 x 10^-19 J/eV = 7.00 x 10^-25 J
LS = 4.372 x 10^-6 eV => x 1.602 x 10^-19 J/eV = 7.00 x 10^-25 J
spective outside of the cavity perhaps
the enormous accelerations reported for UFO's is actually time axis
contraction of future spacecraft returning to their time :_)
Regards
Fran
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 20
e: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR
In reply to francis 's message of Sat, 8 Jan 2011 21:01:18 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>
>Robin,
>
>When I say gas atoms see themselves as totally normal inside the cavity but
>time is accelerated inversely proportional to the cube of the
From: Frank [mailto:froarty...@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 9:48 AM
To: 'mix...@bigpond.com'
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR
In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Sat, 08 Jan 2011 14:39:22
-0800
Hi,
[snip] That's infinite in
Robin,
When I say gas atoms see themselves as totally normal inside the cavity but
time is accelerated inversely proportional to the cube of the spacing
between Casimir plates I am simply applying a relativistic interpretation to
the Casimir formula. That is to say the longer vacuum wavelengths
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Sat, 08 Jan 2011 08:51:44 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin,
>Yes, gas atoms do see themselves as totally normal inside the cavity, and time
>is accelerated by an enormous factor inversely proportional to the cube of the
>spacing between Casimir plates which act
riginal Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 9:29 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR
In reply to francis 's message of Thu, 6 Jan 2011 07:08:10 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin,
>
> I l
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 6 Jan 2011 07:09:05 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>See also http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=275
>
>
>Ha! and befitting the new year . from this entry, which I had not seen, it
>appears that Dufour has already "thrown out the old and rung in the new" -
>
In reply to francis 's message of Thu, 6 Jan 2011 07:08:10 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin,
>
> I like the idea of reacting with clusters but you know my
>bias toward a relativistic solution where those clusters see themselves as
>normal h2 while from our perspective they appear greatly acc
Robin,
>In fact, Rossi could (should) have borrowed Dufour's "hydrex" virtual
neutron model which goes back twenty years. This might have necessitated
slight alteration.
See also http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=275
Ha! and befitting the new year . from this entry, which I ha
- but
from our perspective some of this collision is occurring on the time axis
instead of our spatial axis.
Regards
Fran
Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR
mixent
Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:23:22 -0800
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 5 Jan 2011 06:42:19 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Wel
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:22:33 +1100:
Hi,
[snip]
Oops!
>These positrons should produce annihilation gammas when interacting with
>electrons from the metal. 58% of the 511 keV gammas would get through the 2 cm
>lead shielding, and be very readily detected.
Th
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 5 Jan 2011 06:42:19 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Well, Robin - in that case there is almost no difference between your view
>and that of the Rossi collective, except at the outset you are borrowing
>Mills version of the hydrino, with some changes - whereas they have
Well, Robin - in that case there is almost no difference between your view
and that of the Rossi collective, except at the outset you are borrowing
Mills version of the hydrino, with some changes - whereas they have
'invented' the 'hypole' probably to avoid any taint of his intellectual
property.
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:42:21
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>Reading the blog, I gaather a "hypole" can also be called "virtual
>neutron" in the Hydrogen Nickel system.
>
>I wonder how such a species might be different from muons.
A virtual neutron would effe
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:30:05 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>
>On 01/04/2011 03:16 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>>
>> _http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=338_
Quote:
"However, based on the principle of conservation of momentum, as a result of the
backlash of th
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:51:12 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Hi Robin,
>
>> This is exactly what I would expect if the energy of Hydrino fusion were
>carried away by a fast IC electron ...
>
>
>What about the transmutation of nickel to copper? This seems to be the
>cornerstone
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:58:31
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>>http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=338
>
>Interesting speculation.
>
>What is the atomic number belonging to a "Hypole". Is it stable? 1? If
>it is 1, how and why would such an atomic spec
This has nothing to do with the results, but I would like to point out
again that everything about this website impeaches the credibility of
the claims. It cries out "Fake Flake, FAKE, FFFAAAKKKEE FLKKKEEE."
To start with, it is called "Journal of Nuclear Physics." You would
think that name
Reading the blog, I gaather a "hypole" can also be called "virtual
neutron" in the Hydrogen Nickel system.
I wonder how such a species might be different from muons.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
On 01/04/2011 03:16 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> _http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=338_
>
> This is basically Rossi's blog site and it is attracting the attention
> of many international as well as local cranks, due to persistent
> rumors of ongoing success from experiments being carrie
Hi Robin,
> This is exactly what I would expect if the energy of Hydrino fusion were
carried away by a fast IC electron ...
What about the transmutation of nickel to copper? This seems to be the
cornerstone of his findings and theory.
>http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=338
Interesting speculation.
What is the atomic number belonging to a "Hypole". Is it stable? 1? If
it is 1, how and why would such an atomic species be considered
different than Mills' hydrino?
Robin, what's an "IC electron"?
Regards
Steven Vincent
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:16:20 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=338
>
>This is basically Rossi's blog site and it is attracting the attention of
>many international as well as local cranks, due to persistent rumors of
>ongoing success f
40 matches
Mail list logo
