Trusz, Andrew wrote:
Well, one significant problem in Konquerer 3.1.4. The navigation list loads but then becomes obscured. The links change from words to a symbol which looks like stacked equilaeral triangles turned on edge. Other than that, the page looks fine.
And you're right, Stephen, the we
Well, one significant problem in Konquerer 3.1.4. The navigation list loads but
then becomes obscured. The links change from words to a symbol which looks like
stacked equilaeral triangles turned on edge. Other than that, the page looks
fine.
And you're right, Stephen, the web interface is nic
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk
Oooh! I like the new interface :) And you can get an RSS feed too??
Well, it's not well formed, but I can still pull it up in FeedDemon :)
Snifty! Any way we could we get a link put on WDVL to this?
I believe it's in the works to have it added
Linda Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [wdvltalk] SCR: lf.mechavox.com
Drew:
>Oh since I haven't figured out (or even found) the new web based
>interface for the list, I'll have to shoot the reply to the gmail box
Oh good you were listening!
-Original Message-
From: Linda Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [wdvltalk] SCR: lf.mechavox.com
Drew:
>Oh since I haven't figured out (or even found) the new web based
&g
Linda Cole wrote:
Drew:
Oh since I haven't figured out (or even found) the new web based
interface
for the list, I'll have to shoot the reply to the gmail box if that's ok?
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk
Oooh! I like the new interface :) And you can get an RSS feed too??
Wel
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
No you can't imagine that! Nobody is that depraved. This is a sustained,
decades long, group effort rooted in ever compounding bad decisions.
Oh, sure I can! I've developed along side too many MicroSoftHeads to
not be able to imagine it. Glad you're not having to suffer tha
Drew:
Oh since I haven't figured out (or even found) the new web based interface
for the list, I'll have to shoot the reply to the gmail box if that's ok?
http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=wdvltalk
Thanks,
Linda
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Caudill
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [wdvltalk] SCR: lf.mechavox.com
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
LOL @ "agency custom image of xp"... My last work place had custom versions
of IE 5.5 that were install
Should look about the same as the report I gave you on Safari. It is based
on Konqueror.
Cheryl D. Wise
Certified Professional Web Developer
Microsoft FrontPage MVP
http://wiserways.com
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Caudill
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
>
> Looks good and all, validates
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
I am on mandrake at home, at work it's an agency custom image of xp. That
may sound innocent but it should make you shudder to the roots of your soul.
If you can wait about 2 hours I'll let you know how it looks on Konqueror.
Sure! It's not really a biggie, but I am interested.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Caudill
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [wdvltalk] SCR: lf.mechavox.com
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
>
> Looks good and all, validates as transitional, but line 33 is:
>
>
>
> align="
Trusz, Andrew wrote:
Looks good and all, validates as transitional, but line 33 is:
align="center?
Oh lord. No telling, really. I guess old habits die hard. I've fixed
that
Say Drew, you're on *nix right? Is that what you tested on? Using
Konqueror? Something else? Display's okay?
/
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Caudill
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 12:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] SCR: lf.mechavox.com
Was wondering if I could get a few folks to mosey by:
http://lf.mechavox.com/
And let me know if they encounter any display quirks. This
FWIW, I don't use the image replacement techniques either since plain text
alt tags especially when combined with structural mark-up so the alt gets
the proper heading mark-up without images is best in most circumstances.
Nice to have options though if needed due to special circumstances.
As far
Ross Clutterbuck wrote:
Good Job Stephen!
Thanks Ross! Means a lot coming from the Master of the Universe and all :)
Re your image replacement for the title - exactly which "flavour" are
you using? I don't think I've seen one which uses an empty . My
personal preference is styling the with the
Cheryl
I'm not a big fan of image replacement anyway but since we can do so much
with web design/development these days (Microsoft browsers permitting of
course) but also have so many different aspects to consider 9 times in 10 I
move more towards keeping things accessible and don't bother with
Using display: none defeats the purpose if accessibility is your concern.
That's the Fahrner technique see: http://www.alistapart.com/articles/fir/
They see the same thing you report when css is on and images off. You need
to position it off page with a negative (or really high) margin. Might check
I agree with you, Ross. CSS is so much cleaner and easier. I made the
jump from tables to CSS (with the help of TopStyle Pro) and I haven't
looked back.
Kudos to Stephen for doing it right.
Will
Professional Graphics Artist
Certified Web Designer (BCIP)
Stewart and Company
--
www.stewartandco
Good Job Stephen!
Re your image replacement for the title - exactly which "flavour" are you
using? I don't think I've seen one which uses an empty . My personal
preference is styling the with the background image and relevant sizes
and then nesting a inside that . That nested is then
styled
Thanks John, but it flapped it's little wings off to the client around
an hour ago :) They're fine with serving IE5.2 no style sheet (along
with NS 4.x) and when they checked on their mac in Safari 1.1, they
didn't see anything out of place :)
All's well that ends well...
Thanks,
Stephen
On Tu
Stephen,
I can test on a mac on netscape 7 in the morning if you have the time for
that?
John.
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
Re the fixed font size argument with your designer, take a screenshot,
reduce it to 55% of the size (assuming you have an 800x600 monitor) then
resave it and send it to the designer and say it is a screenshot as seen by
someone on a high resolution medium to high end system. If you need to you
can
Cheryl D Wise wrote:
Looks nice, works well and I didn't notice the lag in Firefox mentioned
earlier. I did see more of a lag in IE both in some of the images loading
and on the first rollover. Which brings up another point, if I were just
using IE I wouldn't stay on the site long because on my tab
Looks nice, works well and I didn't notice the lag in Firefox mentioned
earlier. I did see more of a lag in IE both in some of the images loading
and on the first rollover. Which brings up another point, if I were just
using IE I wouldn't stay on the site long because on my tablet pc the text
is to
Gerrie Warner wrote:
" to satart is the Special Areas page, "
Thanks Gerrie! Good catch :)
- Stephen
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
" to satart is the Special Areas page, "
:-)
http://lf.mechavox.com/
The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] or
use the web interface http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL
PBC Web Design wrote:
Stephen,
Verrry nice =) I really like it and those drop downs look great! Love
the pen/paper/ink on the right. Viewing Firefox on XP, 800x600 and
1024x768. Love the effect when it opens up to 1024x768, super!
Thanks Deb! Again, I must hat-tip the designer. He's pixel-ri
Stephen,
Verrry nice =) I really like it and those drop downs look great! Love the
pen/paper/ink on the right. Viewing Firefox on XP, 800x600 and
1024x768. Love the effect when it opens up to 1024x768, super!
Deb
www.puterbug.com
At 11:07 AM 12/7/2004, you wrote:
Was wondering if I could get
No mac-users out there? Gotta be one... just a cursory glance would be
appreciated.
tia,
Stephen
Stephen Caudill wrote:
Was wondering if I could get a few folks to mosey by:
http://lf.mechavox.com/
And let me know if they encounter any display quirks. This is a
template, one page only and it'
William Stewart wrote:
Stephen,
Congratulations on a solid design. Everything worked like it was
supposed to and it looks great. Let's just hope that the client likes
it! :)
Thanks Will :) I can't take all the credit though. I'm not the graphic
maven behind it, just the code jockey. I've cur
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Win XP SP2
SlimBrowser 4.02.004 (Tabbed interface, IE engine)
hnnh. You just never know :)
1024 x 768
300+ KB/sec
Page loaded quickly, but with this connection speed that's probably not
a significant metric. I don't have any modem-connected systems anymore,
so I can't he
Stephen,
Congratulations on a solid design. Everything worked like it was
supposed to and it looks great. Let's just hope that the client likes
it! :)
- XP
- IE6
- 1024x768
- 56k
Will
Professional Graphics Artist
Certified Web Designer (BCIP)
Stewart and Company
--
www.stewartandcompany.net
Win XP SP2
SlimBrowser 4.02.004 (Tabbed interface, IE engine)
1024 x 768
300+ KB/sec
Page loaded quickly, but with this connection speed that's probably not a
significant metric. I don't have any modem-connected systems anymore, so I
can't help there. There was a delay while the logo and "Legal F
34 matches
Mail list logo
