Re: More thoughts to rile MS

2010-09-10 Thread Pascal Robert
t;>>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>>>>>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) >>>>>>>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>>>>>

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Michael Gargano
whatever happens, this is the basket i'm putting my eggs in mm, eggs. but, anyway, i've never made a screencast or anything, but as i learn more i would be more than will to help add tutorial content to get more people involved in WO. it could also be used for training new people at

Re: More thoughts to rile MS

2010-09-10 Thread Paul D Yu
apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40pobox.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This email sent to msch...@pobox.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ___

More thoughts to rile MS

2010-09-10 Thread Ken Foust
.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/bosyotech%40gmail.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This email sent to bosyot...@gmail.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>

Re: ERExcelLook problem: Couldn't find the dynamic page named ...

2010-09-10 Thread David LeBer
On 2010-09-10, at 9:42 PM, Klaus Berkling wrote: > > I have been looking at David LaBer excellent D2W screencast for ExcelLook > (http://davidleber.net/?p=369) and it seemed fairly easy. > > I've followed the screencast very closely but yet I see the following error > when invoking the excell

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread André Mitra
it would stop the apocalypse... On 2010-09-10, at 8:12 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: > The main problem is that every time someone is good at helping people and with coding, Apple will snatch him. >>> I'd like to think not everyone. ;-)

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread David LeBer
On 2010-09-10, at 8:12 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: > The main problem is that every time someone is good at helping people and with coding, Apple will snatch him. >>> I'd like to think not everyone. ;-) Though they have tried. >> try"in

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Chuck Hill
On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: >>> The main problem is that every time someone is good at helping people and >>> with coding, Apple will snatch him. >> I'd like to think not everyone. ;-) Though they have tried. > try"ing" Resistance is futile. -- Chuck Hill Se

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schrag
> Now Mike is at Apple too, so we need to find another Mike... I'm not dead, btw ... ms ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Sub

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schrag
>> The main problem is that every time someone is good at helping people and >> with coding, Apple will snatch him. > I'd like to think not everyone. ;-) Though they have tried. try"ing" ms ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be igno

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Alan Ward
On Sep 10, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: >> >> The main problem is that every time someone is good at helping people and >> with coding, Apple will snatch him. > > I'd like to think not everyone. ;-) Though they have tried. You conti

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Chuck Hill
On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: > > The main problem is that every time someone is good at helping people and > with coding, Apple will snatch him. I'd like to think not everyone. ;-) Though they have tried. -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Pra

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Pascal Robert
Le 2010-09-10 à 19:56, Jeremy Matthews a écrit : > Since I'm in and out of the WO world, I can say that it was hardest for me to > get updated documentation, sample code, examples, podcasts, etc. > > News and information appears sporadic and sparse...and not just on WO, but > with the rest of

WOCommunity 2010 surveys

2010-09-10 Thread Pascal Robert
Ok guys, While I'm listening to all WOWODC 2010 recordings, I'm preparing the 2010 surveys. I have put the surveys in the wiki so people can add suggestions and comments before I open the survey. Organization Survey : http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/x/lYF9 Individual Survey : http://

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread André Mitra
Yes, we need another book from you! On 2010-09-10, at 7:51 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > Or we could just find someplace dark to hide and wait for it all to end. In > the meantime, I have a lot of work to do... > > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: > >> And we will try to help ou

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Jeremy Matthews
Since I'm in and out of the WO world, I can say that it was hardest for me to get updated documentation, sample code, examples, podcasts, etc. News and information appears sporadic and sparse...and not just on WO, but with the rest of the stuff WO devs use (Wonder, Eclipse config, etc). The fol

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Pascal Robert
Le 2010-09-10 à 19:51, Chuck Hill a écrit : > Or we could just find someplace dark to hide and wait for it all to end. In > the meantime, I have a lot of work to do... We just have to wait two years :-) > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: > >> And we will try to help out t

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Chuck Hill
Or we could just find someplace dark to hide and wait for it all to end. In the meantime, I have a lot of work to do... On Sep 10, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: > And we will try to help out the community even more. I have a couple of ideas > about that... > >> In the meantime, whil

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Pascal Robert
Yes, the wiki do need a good cleanup. About the videos, that's one of my options for my book/big tutorial... > Looking at it as someone just starting to get very serious about WO The > community needs videos that describe everything from the ground level up. > Not just here's how to insta

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Michael Gargano
Looking at it as someone just starting to get very serious about WO The community needs videos that describe everything from the ground level up. Not just here's how to install WO and "Hello World" with every other video being fairly advanced. To much is assumed for beginners. Also, the

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Klaus Berkling
On Sep 10, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: > In the meantime, while we wait for the apocalypse, whoever wants to keep > making apps with Java and WebObjects is welcome to hang around. > Having been a worry-monger (is that a word?) when Apple pulled Sun & Windows support, which has becom

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Pascal Robert
And we will try to help out the community even more. I have a couple of ideas about that... > In the meantime, while we wait for the apocalypse, whoever wants to keep > making apps with Java and WebObjects is welcome to hang around. > > ms > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Ken Foust wrote: > >

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schrag
> On the subject, Ext has released its designer to build ext views : > http://www.sencha.com/products/designer/ have you used this thing, though? it's a pretty unpleasant experience imo ... ms ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ign

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Alexis Tual
Yeah, i was hoping Mike would answer this while asleep and upload a secret release on the list ;) On the subject, Ext has released its designer to build ext views : http://www.sencha.com/products/designer/ Nice, Ext has a bunch of really nice widgets but Extjs lacks bindings, component model, c

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread André Mitra
So, are you suggesting we all downgrade to WO 4.5? On 2010-09-10, at 5:43 PM, Ken Foust wrote: > From the outside looking in: > > It appears to me as thought WO is on the end of life list. As good as it may > be I don't suspect in can survive in the future. > Apple has elected to leave web d

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schrag
In the meantime, while we wait for the apocalypse, whoever wants to keep making apps with Java and WebObjects is welcome to hang around. ms On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Ken Foust wrote: > From the outside looking in: > > It appears to me as thought WO is on the end of life list. As good as it

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Ravi Mendis
On Sep 10, 2010, at 9:17 PM, Mertz St?phan wrote: > The new 'the Sales and Trend reporting module' of iTunes Connect is develop > with JSF instead of WebObjects. That maybe because iTunes engineering has someone with considerable JSF expertise...i think i know who ;) For anyone considering alt

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Ken Foust
From the outside looking in: It appears to me as thought WO is on the end of life list. As good as it may be I don't suspect in can survive in the future. Apple has elected to leave web development to the open-source. I would suspect they only possible way Apple can compete in the Enterpris

Re: Owns destination doesn't play well with nullify delete rule?

2010-09-10 Thread Benjamin Chew
Ah, good to know. Thanks Chuck! On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > It's because if you nullify the relationship, after EOF does that it can't > find the related objects to do the cascade delete. Nullify and Cascade are > not compatible. > > Chuck > > > On Sep 7, 2010, at 7:31 A

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Chuck Hill
I think that was part of it. And the use of the default package is now deprecated in Java so properly every class name should have a package anyway. My feeling is that FQ names in the model is just The Right Thing. On Sep 10, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: > Good call .. You're right

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schrag
Good call .. You're right, and maybe that was part of the reason we recommended the change? It's completely a blur now. ms On Sep 10, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > Then you would have the problem of possibly getting the wrong class. My > preference is for FQ names in the model. Other

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Chuck Hill
Then you would have the problem of possibly getting the wrong class. My preference is for FQ names in the model. Otherwise, how doe veogen know where to put the classes? Chuck On Sep 10, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: > I seem to recall Wonder changed this to enforce that you use ful

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schrag
I seem to recall Wonder changed this to enforce that you use fully-qualified class names because not everything in EOF actually properly does an _NSUtilities.classNamed call. We probably could automagically rewrite your class names at startup if they're simple names, though ... I'll think about

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Your Friend The Atom
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Alan Ward wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:29 AM, Pascal Robert wrote: > > > So the message is : Learn WO, be good at it, and you likely be able to > get a job at Apple. > > I believe quite a few people have done exactly that. You'll need deep WebObjects knowl

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Farrukh Ijaz
Thanks Chuck for correction. Mike, AppUser.class.getSimpleName() should give the non FQ class name. Farrukh On 10, ستمبر 2010, at 10:01 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Michael Gargano wrote: > >> ENTITY_NAME is the class name > > Also wrong. :-) > > There are three

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schrag
and emacs, i guess ... On Sep 10, 2010, at 3:02 PM, André Mitra wrote: > except Mathematica :) > > On 2010-09-10, at 9:26 AM, Amiel Montecillo wrote: > >> Mike is scary somtimes ;) But I agree with him that there is no 1 tool >> that does everything. >> >> Cheers, >> Amiel >> >> On Fri,

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Michael Gargano
the reason I thought it was the source is because it was complaining about a FQ class name. it was actually that I needed to but the FQ class name in the model. Never had to do that before, but this is my first wonder app, so I guess the ER stuff is different. normal, i'd just map the models

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread André Mitra
except Mathematica :) On 2010-09-10, at 9:26 AM, Amiel Montecillo wrote: > Mike is scary somtimes ;) But I agree with him that there is no 1 tool > that does everything. > > Cheers, > Amiel > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: > Here's my slightly less grumpy response

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Chuck Hill
On Sep 10, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Michael Gargano wrote: > ENTITY_NAME is the class name Also wrong. :-) There are three names, all of which can be different: 1. Entity: User 2. Class: com.foo.bar.User 3. Table: MyUser > , but still is not a substitute for getName() as that gives the FQ class na

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Michael Gargano
ENTITY_NAME is the class name, but still is not a substitute for getName() as that gives the FQ class name Sent from my iPhone On Sep 10, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Farrukh Ijaz wrote: > Hi, > > Try moving the classes inside a java package instead of the default package. > AppUser.ENTITY_NAME repres

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Chuck Hill
On Sep 10, 2010, at 11:55 AM, Farrukh Ijaz wrote: > Hi, > > Try moving the classes inside a java package instead of the default package. > AppUser.ENTITY_NAME represents the table name No, it represents the Entity name. The Entity and Table names may be different. > hence can't be replaced

Re: D2W Auto-Qualifying all listings

2010-09-10 Thread Tim Worman
On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:02 AM, David Avendasora wrote: > > On Sep 9, 2010, at 8:49 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote: > >> On Sep 9, 2010, at 6:03 PM, David Avendasora wrote: >> >>> Hi all D2W Gurus, >>> >>> I'm starting a new D2W app, and one of the things it needs to do is >>> automatically pre-qua

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Farrukh Ijaz
Hi, Try moving the classes inside a java package instead of the default package. AppUser.ENTITY_NAME represents the table name hence can't be replaced with AppUser.class.getName() Farrukh Sent from my iPhone On 10, ستمبر 2010, at 9:22 PM, Michael Gargano wrote: > the classes are in packages

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Chuck Hill
Are the packages also set up in the EOModel? Use something like JarInspector to see what classes are where in what is running. On Sep 10, 2010, at 11:22 AM, Michael Gargano wrote: > the classes are in packages under the sources folder. I was using AppUser. > ENTITY_NAME which is not FQ, but

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Michael Gargano
the classes are in packages under the sources folder. I was using AppUser. ENTITY_NAME which is not FQ, but I also replaced that with AppUser.class.getName() and I got the same error. I'm stumped. This isn't a complicated app. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 10, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Chuck Hill wro

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Chuck Hill
Are the class names in the model fully qualified? Are the Java classes in packages and under the Sources folder? On Sep 10, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Michael Gargano wrote: > no, I the project's resource folder. it's getting pulled into the build. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 2:

Re: D2W Auto-Qualifying all listings

2010-09-10 Thread David Holt
On 2010-09-10, at 8:02 AM, David Avendasora wrote: > > On Sep 9, 2010, at 8:49 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote: > >> On Sep 9, 2010, at 6:03 PM, David Avendasora wrote: >> >>> Hi all D2W Gurus, >>> >>> I'm starting a new D2W app, and one of the things it needs to do is >>> automatically pre-qua

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Michael Gargano
no, I the project's resource folder. it's getting pulled into the build. Sent from my iPhone On Sep 10, 2010, at 2:13 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: > That sounds like you have the model in the project but not the code. Is this > model in a framework? > > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Michael Ga

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Chuck Hill
That sounds like you have the model in the project but not the code. Is this model in a framework? On Sep 10, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Michael Gargano wrote: > Yes, all of the above. :) > > AppUser > user=(AppUser)EOUtilities.objectMatchingValues(session().defaultEditingContext(),AppUser.ENTITY_

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Michael Gargano
Yes, all of the above. :) AppUser user=(AppUser)EOUtilities.objectMatchingValues(session().defaultEditingContext(),AppUser.ENTITY_NAME,loginDict); Error is ERROR er.extensions.eof.ERXEntityClassDescription - Error registering model: PerfTestEOModel ClassNotFoundException: AppUser it's a

Re: EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Chuck Hill
Details? Code? Exceptions? Hints? On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Michael Gargano wrote: > hi all, > > I'm having an issue with EOUtilities.objectMatchingValues... it keeps > giving me ClassNotFoundExceptions telling me it cannot find the class for the > entity. I tried entity.ENTITY_NAME

EOF issue

2010-09-10 Thread Michael Gargano
hi all, I'm having an issue with EOUtilities.objectMatchingValues... it keeps giving me ClassNotFoundExceptions telling me it cannot find the class for the entity. I tried entity.ENTITY_NAME and entity.class.getName(). and nothing, it tells me I need the FQ class name still. (this is a wo

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Lon Varscsak
Yeah, what ever happened with that? I heard discussion of it at WOWODC 2009 and not much since (although I could just not be paying attention :D). -Lon On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:37 AM, David BON wrote: > Hoping a spoiler? +1 :-) > > David B. > > Le 10 sept. 10 à 14:52, Alexis Tual a écrit : > >

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread David BON
Hoping a spoiler? +1 :-) David B. Le 10 sept. 10 à 14:52, Alexis Tual a écrit : Not to mention Gianduia ? :) ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Un

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread James Cicenia
All I can say is I started in about 2004 and this list was like a desert with the exception of Chuck Hill. I actually doubted my choice at times. Fast forward to today and after my first WOWODC, I actually think WO has grown quite a bit. Throw in D2W / ERRest / BinaryPlist / iOS connectivity an

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schrag
> Oups, I had a really very very bad idea to open this subject again. For the record, this was why I had the one line response originally :) But I haa to followup. ms ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev m

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schrag
I had a whole response written and pulled the ejection handle, but now that everyone's playing, I want in :) >> I can not say for sure, but it is incredibly difficult to get folks who have >> expertise in WebObjects anywhere, at low cost. > Why would you want them at low cost? Yeah, I agree --

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Mertz Stéphan
Oups, I had a really very very bad idea to open this subject again. Le 10 sept. 2010 à 17:18, Michael DeMan a écrit : > Well > > I can not say for sure, but it is incredibly difficult to get folks who have > expertise in WebObjects anywhere, at low cost. It also has been a dying > technology

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Pascal Robert
Le 2010-09-10 à 11:43, Chuck Hill a écrit : > On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Pascal Robert wrote: >> now people who get out of school only want to do PHP > > OK, now THAT is just scary. PHP is the Visual Basic of the Net. A lot of people are using it because they took a course or learn about it

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Chuck Hill
On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Pascal Robert wrote: > now people who get out of school only want to do PHP OK, now THAT is just scary. -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Alan Ward
On Sep 10, 2010, at 9:18 AM, Michael DeMan wrote: > Well > > I can not say for sure, but it is incredibly difficult to get folks who have > expertise in WebObjects anywhere, at low cost. Why would you want them at low cost? > It also has been a dying technology since NeXT got Apple back. I

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Alan Ward
I wondered about that too! Alan On Sep 10, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Lon Varscsak wrote: > I thought maybe Anjo had hijacked your email account. ;) > > -Lon > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Mike Schrag wrote: >> I should ONLY send emails at 3:30am ... >> >> ms >> >> On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:48 A

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Chuck Hill
On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Michael DeMan wrote: > Well > > I can not say for sure, but it is incredibly difficult to get folks who have > expertise in WebObjects anywhere, at low cost. A low salary has never been one of my goals. Pay peanuts, get monkeys. Your choice. > It also has been

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Pascal Robert
Le 2010-09-10 à 11:18, Michael DeMan a écrit : > Well > > I can not say for sure, but it is incredibly difficult to get folks who have > expertise in WebObjects anywhere, at low cost. It also has been a dying > technology since NeXT got Apple back. Please define "dying". Apple outside suppor

Re: Renaming instanceIdKey - Why Does This Work?

2010-09-10 Thread Brook, James
Actually, there is not a problem with component action URLs at all. The rewrite rule we used was incorrect. The trailing slash that we had added breaks the component action URL parsing. It should read: > RewriteCond %{HTTP_COOKIE} custom_ins=([-0-9][0-9]*) > RewriteRule ^/friendlyUrl/(.*)/?$ /cg

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Michael DeMan
Well I can not say for sure, but it is incredibly difficult to get folks who have expertise in WebObjects anywhere, at low cost. It also has been a dying technology since NeXT got Apple back. I am not sure why it was never just open sourced, other than it must be that somebody somewhere at ex

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Lon Varscsak
I thought maybe Anjo had hijacked your email account. ;) -Lon On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Mike Schrag wrote: > I should ONLY send emails at 3:30am ... > > ms > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Alan Ward wrote: > >> >> I liked your grumpy response better ;-) >> >> Alan >> >> On Sep 10, 2010,

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schrag
I should ONLY send emails at 3:30am ... ms On Sep 10, 2010, at 10:48 AM, Alan Ward wrote: > > I liked your grumpy response better ;-) > > Alan > > On Sep 10, 2010, at 6:22 AM, Mike Schrag wrote: > >> Here's my slightly less grumpy response :) >> >> Apple, like any smart company, makes techn

Re: D2W Auto-Qualifying all listings

2010-09-10 Thread David Avendasora
On Sep 9, 2010, at 8:49 PM, Ramsey Lee Gurley wrote: > On Sep 9, 2010, at 6:03 PM, David Avendasora wrote: > >> Hi all D2W Gurus, >> >> I'm starting a new D2W app, and one of the things it needs to do is >> automatically pre-qualify all listings of of entities to filter down to only >> the EO

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Alexis Tual
> Apple has public web properties that are static html, php, struts, jsf, jsp, > sproutcore, webobjects, and I'm sure others Not to mention Gianduia ? :) Alex Le 10 sept. 2010 à 14:22, Mike Schrag a écrit : > Here's my slightly less grumpy response :) > > Apple, like any smart company, makes

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Alan Ward
On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:29 AM, Pascal Robert wrote: > So the message is : Learn WO, be good at it, and you likely be able to get a > job at Apple. I believe quite a few people have done exactly that. Alan > >> Apple develop stuff with a wide variety of tools based upon available >> developer

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Alan Ward
I liked your grumpy response better ;-) Alan On Sep 10, 2010, at 6:22 AM, Mike Schrag wrote: > Here's my slightly less grumpy response :) > > Apple, like any smart company, makes technology decisions based on lots of > variables -- what technology makes sense? what technology doesn't make sen

Re: Renaming instanceIdKey - Why Does This Work?

2010-09-10 Thread Brook, James
Running more than one WO application on the same domain with the session and instance cookie paths set to "/" definitely brings complications. We only do it because for two applications we want to expose 'user friendly' URLs using Apache rewrite rules. As Ben mentions, because the adaptor matche

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Amiel Montecillo
Mike is scary somtimes ;) But I agree with him that there is no 1 tool that does everything. Cheers, Amiel On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: > Here's my slightly less grumpy response :) > > Apple, like any smart company, makes technology decisions based on lots of > varia

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schrag
Here's my slightly less grumpy response :) Apple, like any smart company, makes technology decisions based on lots of variables -- what technology makes sense? what technology doesn't make sense? what is the expertise of our current staffing? what are the goals for the project? etc ... I love W

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Pascal Robert
So the message is : Learn WO, be good at it, and you likely be able to get a job at Apple. > Apple develop stuff with a wide variety of tools based upon available > developer resources. The iTunes Store and MobileMe suck up virtually all the > WO developers that Apple can find and they then tu

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Karl
Apple develop stuff with a wide variety of tools based upon available developer resources. The iTunes Store and MobileMe suck up virtually all the WO developers that Apple can find and they then turn to other technologies. Everything that I know of within Apple that is mission critical and in-h

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Johnny Miller
Wow. NWA? Respect! On Sep 9, 2010, at 9:25 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: > http://c.itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZConnections.woa/wa/viewProfile?userId=368107 Johnny Miller Kahalawai Media Corp http://www.kahalawai.com ___ Do not post admin requests to

Re: WOWODC 2011 coming to your city

2010-09-10 Thread Robin Smith
To be honest after attending SF and Montreal this year i was much happier in Montreal. It was much nicer place to spend the evenings. Robin ___ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-d

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schrag
oh, i forgot to mention that if anyone wants to follow me on Ping, my profile page is: http://c.itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZConnections.woa/wa/viewProfile?userId=368107 On Sep 10, 2010, at 2:54 AM, Mertz Stéphan wrote: > Hi, > > The new 'the Sales and Trend reporting module' of iTunes Connec

Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?

2010-09-10 Thread Mike Schrag
Apple stopped using WebObjects? Awesome -- I assume this means I get the rest of the year off? Sent from my iPhone On Sep 10, 2010, at 2:54 AM, Mertz Stéphan wrote: > Hi, > > The new 'the Sales and Trend reporting module' of iTunes Connect is develop > with JSF instead of WebObjects. > Does