.
> On 26. 9. 2018, at 7:12 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> Hi OC,
>
> No, no magic like that. At least not that I know of. Subclassing
> EOEditingContext, EOSharedEditingContext, maybe EODatabaseContext is probably
> your best bet to pursue this.
>
> Chuck
>
Hi there,
is there any hook WO- or WOnder-side, which would allow me to catch
handleQueryWithUnboundKey for 3rd party objects?
Something like to be able to set up a (presumably static) method with a
signature (Object object,String key), which would get called by the framework
whenever an objec
erver-port) and assume the access to
application was SSL-protected, right?
Thanks again a big lot,
OC
> On 2017-04-07, 9:31 AM, "Webobjects-dev on behalf of OC"
> o...@ocs.cz> wrote:
>
>Hi there,
>
>my ages-old code to support SSL
>
>-
D'oh. Thanks a lot!
OC
> On 25. 2. 2017, at 7:01 PM, Fabian Peters wrote:
>
> Try "blobDictionary"… ;-)
>
>> Am 25.02.2017 um 17:56 schrieb o...@ocs.cz:
>>
>> Thanks! But... sorry for me being stupid, but where do I find them? Google
>&g
.
All the best,
OC
> On 25. 2. 2017, at 6:32 PM, George Domurot wrote:
>
> Use the Prototype of blodDictionary or mutableDictionary to do the heavy
> lifting for you.
>
> -G
>
>
>> On Feb 25, 2017, at 8:19 AM, o...@ocs.cz wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>&
Hi there,
this must be WebObjects 101 and I must be blind as a bat, but ... how on earth
does one use the value conversion/factory model support to represent e.g., an
attribute containing an NSDictionary (or another custom data object) by a BLOB
containing archived data?
Far as I understand th
Hi there,
I am fetching raw rows. Most time, it works well, but I have bumped into a
pretty weird behaviour with a derived attribute. The attribute is defined like
this:
===
{
className = NSString;
definition = "CAST(C_AUCTION_SEQ as VARCHAR(18))";
externalType = "CH
Hello there,
I must be missing something darn obvious, for my subEntityForEntity delegate
method never gets called. My code looks like this:
===
class ModelGroupDelegate {
EOEntity subEntityForEntity(EOEntity entity,NSDictionary dic) {
println "&& fetching '$entity' $dic"
Hello there,
the subject says it all — is there a decent way to construct a direct action
URL from a code which has no session (and thus no context)? Note I need a full
URL, not a relative one (it is to be used in diverse ways like “sent to client
by an e-mail” etc.)
At the moment, I use
Appl
=1308 (Interpreted
> frame)
> - model._DBReport.fetchDBReports(com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOEditingContext,
> com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOQualifier, com.webobjects.foundation.NSArray)
> @bci=103, line=141 (Interpreted frame) // my code which fetches
> ... the rest, I believe, is irrelev
Thanks a lot both!
(weird, I would have bet wotaskd is designed to survive and detect and
potentially even relaunch frozen apps, but well, my memory self-evidently plays
ugly tricks on me.)
Anyway...
> On 24. 10. 2016, at 6:23 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> This should explain the how and why (IIRC)
Hello there,
just the very now, I have bumped into a weird problem.
I run some DB-intensive background tasks. So as they do not block the whole
application, I set up
er.extensions.ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorPool.maxCoordinators > 1, and my code
(a) gives one of the coordinators to all sessions (
Hello there,
at the moment, my application can return a file to the user through
===
WOResponse downloadFile(String mimeType, File path) {
WOResponse wor=new WOResponse()
wor.setHeader("$mimeType; name=\"$path.name\"","content-type")
wor.setContent(path.getText("utf-8"
Hello there,
is that normal that for a :N relationship *which is not a class property* EOF
ignores EODeleteRuleDeny and deletes the object, happily leaving dangling
foreign keys in the other table?
(Making the relationship a class property helps. Nevertheless, since the only
purpose of the rel
ld be used to determine
whether at the place and moment and particular eo it is safe to call
committedSnapshotForObject or not?
Thanks and all the best,
OC
> From: "o...@ocs.cz"
> Date: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 1:42 PM
> To: Chuck Hill
> Cc: "webobjects-dev@
Chuck,
> On 21. 9. 2016, at 6:10 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> I bet Alice was a developer too.
Beware the EOF, my son!
The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
Looks like I have found the culprit — seems it was the very log of the
committed snapshot. It looks like that if one calls e.g.,
> eo.edi
Tuesday, September 20, 2016 at 6:33 PM
> To: Chuck Hill
> Cc: "webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com WebObjects"
>
> Subject: Re: EOF inserts already existing M:N relationships/empty snapshot?!?
>
> Chuck,
>
> On 21.
Just a quick followup -- sorry, forgot to copy/paste the 2nd part of the log,
though I fear it would not help much — it just confirms the user's snapshot
does not get changed either:
> On 21. 9. 2016, at 2:40 AM, o...@ocs.cz wrote:
>
> Chuck,
>
>> On 20. 9. 2016,
eird I use this settings for years and lots of M:N's, and this
is the first time I have bumped into this kind of problems.
Can you see what to check next?
Thanks a very big lot,
OC
>
> Also, this is 100% consistent, right? This is not a concurrency issue?
>
> Chuck
>
>
Hello there,
I have a pretty common setup: entities User and DataBlock, an M:N relationship
represented by an intermediate entity containing just the two keys, flattened
on both sides. At both sides the relationships are appropriately flattened. Set
to own destination+delete rule cascade.
The
Thanks a lot (Samuel too).
> On 22. 8. 2016, at 8:29 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
...
> I can’t think of a way to do that that isn’t a lot of code and prone to
> inconsistencies with the relationship data.
Hmmm... is there at least some WO or WOnder trick, which would fetch at
SQL-level a sum for rel
Hello there,
I would need an unique object representative of an EO. The object needs to be
identical for all EO clones of all editing contexts.
Such a _value_ representation would be the primary key or GID; but these, far
as I know, ensure only isEqual for same EO, not ==. I need the identity -
Hello there,
in my code, there is a number of “derived relationships”, defined by Java code
at the EO class level. It works well for years, but now (as part of the “import
another application's database” task I am working on) I would need to move the
behaviour to the model level, so that I can
Hello there,
I've got a page which lists a number of relationships; for each of them the
user wants to see the number of objects, i.e., essentially something like this:
===
for
- we got
rel1 items show
- we got
rel2 items show
...
===
The first time this page gets display
Hello there,
my web app should occassionally import from an external DB (a database created
and maintained by another WO-based application). Just import, and only
low-level dictionaries at that, never full-fledged EO-objects. Probably though,
the imported tables would be rather big, it would be
Chuck,
> On 19 5 2015, at 11:13 pm, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>> Well then, what if I, at the moment any EO gets inserted into an EC,
>> immediatelly called permanentGlobalID for it?
>
> The original problem was caused, as best I can call, by FrontBase vending the
> same sequence number twice.
Whi
Samuel,
> On 14 5 2015, at 2:30 pm, Samuel Pelletier wrote:
>
> I just tested with my local FB 5.2.14 and it behave like oracle, the current
> transaction state or setting does not affect the unique sequence, it always
> increments and return the next value.
>
> OC, I suggest you upgrade your
Chuck,
> On 14 5 2015, at 2:22 am, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> FrontBase will “return” the sequence number if the transaction is rolled
> back, but I am pretty sure that EOF does a commit immediately after selecting
> for a PK.
>
> It is possible that somehow the commit after the PK select failed a
Samuel,
> On 14 5 2015, at 2:12 am, Samuel Pelletier wrote:
> I think your problem is with the locking. Optimistic locking does not lock
> anything it check on commit if things have changed.
Right; but does it potentially mess up PK generation? I thought it should not,
but of course, as so oft
29 matches
Mail list logo
