I think getUrl() is not final and can be overwriten. I've done
something similar recently for autolinks.
regards
Juergen
On 5/10/06, Jerry Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all! How would I go about making a Link that in addition goes to
whatever page, but then scrolls to some named
Sure. An example is more than welcome.
Juergen
On 5/9/06, Ittay Dror [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've done some work to enable embedding wicket pages in jsp pages. this is
required by us, since we're currently using struts, and can't move all our code
to wicket. i think it is important to
wicket:id=imageAlt src=mySrc /
I haven't tested if this works, but if not, maybe some kind of Component
could be created which allows something like this. It will allow for
multiple attributes to be replaced as well.
Thoughts?
--Andrew
On 5/4/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED
not? in a preview you would get a button with text
wicket:i18n:buttons.save
thats good for preview since you can see the key!
-Igor
On 5/8/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It will not be previeable any more.
Juergen
On 5/9/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why
, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it depends on what job you are in. It is nice for the person
who has to maintain the properties. If I were a html designer I'd
rather prefer a default text like save or whatever, which btw
applies if no property is found.
Juergen
properties. That
logic however will become even more flexible in 1.2 meaning that you
can not rely on it all to remove the markup cache entries. IMO it'd be
sufficient to clear the whole cache and avoid these troubles all
together.
Juergen
johan
On 5/9/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$${key}? Or whatever you want.
I don't need this behavior to be in wicket core. I'm much more
interested in clean and simple preprocessing filters, something wicket
lacks currently.
That is true, we don't have something that allow to
PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn is writing about localization for Wicket In Action now. I'm
sure he'd appreciate it if someone would write up some notes about how
to do this on the WIKI.
Eelco
On 5/9/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matej Knopp wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote
What encoding (?xml version=1.0 encoding=) did you use for
FormInput_ja.html. My browser shows some rubbish which I don't think
is japanese. It doesn't seem to be UTF-8.
Juergen
On 5/9/06, Takeshi Matsuba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I am Japanese Wicket user.
I translate three files of
a little distasteful. Things would start looking like
velocity or JSP and I can't afford the alcohol to make that livable...
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
On 5/9/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I definitively like about the pre-processor/ filter is that it is
very efficient. Only
On 5/8/06, Aaron Hiniker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to encapsulate Edit/View/Select markup into one Component. I
want to set the mode, then add the Fragment to the parent container.
My first attempts went something like this:
parent.add( component.getFragment( markupId,
On 5/8/06, Aaron Hiniker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wicket:panel
wicket:fragment wicket:id=edit edit/wicket:fragment
wicket:fragment wicket:id=view view /wicket:fragment
/wicket:panel
throws:
Caused by: java.text.ParseException: Unkown tag name with Wicket namespace:
'fragment'.
PROTECTED] wrote:
why dont we activate it by default?
-Igor
On 5/8/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/06, Aaron Hiniker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wicket:panel
wicket:fragment wicket:id=edit edit
/wicket:fragment
wicket:fragment wicket:id=view view
You want to do what? add() is used to add Wicket Components to the
component hierarchy. It is NOT used to set or add a model. Child
components can be access by get(childId).
Juergen
On 5/8/06, Ittay Dror [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to create a MarkupContainer component which sets the model
because it is much cleaner.
juergen
On 5/8/06, Ittay Dror [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why are all these wicket:xxx tags? why not span wicket:id=wicket:xxx or
similar?
thanks,
ittay
--
===
Ittay Dror
Chief architect, openQRM TL,
RD, Qlusters Inc.
[EMAIL
Yeah, but a good framework should not get in the way of what you are trying
to do, right? I spent 2-3 hours trying to figure out a way to do this with
fragments :)
Others will probably hit the same wall someday. Panels did work for my
solution, but in this situation loading fragments as a
I did a little experiment. The code down below is all you need to
implement your requirement of finding the fragments markup snippet on
a markup stream directly associated with the class.
/**
* A special Fragment (WebMarkupContainer) which searches for the
fragment
*
Provided I understand the issue you want to:
Dynamically create a TextField for each entry in the SetString. The
current value of the iterator shall be the default? The TextFied don't
have Labels? No validators are required for numbers, phone number,
email address, etc.?
= use ListView or any
On 5/4/06, Ralf Ebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
just tried the wicket localization features and got some questions:
- usually i have in the html things like this:
h1wicket:message key=xxxheadline/wicket:message/h1
Is there a way that lets me write these like this:
h1
some where in the the settings. ISettings.setStripWicketTag(boolean)
or something like that
Juergen
On 5/4/06, Johannes Fahrenkrug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
It took me a while to track down why Opera makes my Wicket application
look like crap.
Here's why:
when you use a css class like
On 5/4/06, Ralf Ebert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Juergen,
please see WicketMessageTagHandler.java. It is experimental only and
disabled by default. Reason: it is realy ugly to have something like
wicket:example=tag=key. AttributeModifier are much more convinent
and far less ugly, IMO.
if
Not sure I understand what needs to be done. I guess I'll wait until
tomorrow until the that is how the output must look like question is
solved.
Juergen
On 5/4/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i guess in this case we need to capture the head output of the component
during ajax
Please see the template example as well
Juergen
On 5/3/06, Timo Stamm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ashley Aitken schrieb:
On 03/05/2006, at 5:42 PM, Timo Stamm wrote:
Instead of handling Strings yourself, it is perfectly possible to use
ECS or any other lib (like the ones that come with
everything.
I get the following error in wicket-examples-1.2-rc3 in ParsedHTML.java:
WebTable.TableRow cannot be resolved to a type.
Juergen Donnerstag has described extensively his problems with that.
Has anybody else got the same problem?
Maybe i'm missing *.jar file?
Les
--
View this message
Could be, I'm not sure. Matjin is our build master may be he can
answer the question.
Juergen
On 5/3/06, middledot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jurgen,
I did not download any jars. I've downloaded the latest drop rc3 and
installed in Eclipse.
I thought that the drop is designed in such a
Wicket newbies tend to fall into the trap that Wicket requires the
url-patter in web.xml to be something like
url-pattern/helloworld/*/url-pattern. Important is the /* at the
end. There is no easy mean for Wicket during initialization to make
sure that this pre-requisite is realy met, is it?
the real fix post 1.2 but still provide the users a solution
if they want to.
Juergen
On 4/27/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
really how?
they find messages they didn't before?
johan
On 4/27/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It'll break existing applications
But java ResourceBundles don't know about styles and variations as fas
as I know. I know only about locales.
Juergen
On 4/26/06, Ari Suutari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What i (and presumably Ari) wanted tried to achieve, is to have some
style-specific bundle wich only contains some keys
The removeEntry NPE has been fixed, correct. But I wonder why the NPE
causes the thread to stop and if not any other exception causes the
thread to stop as well. Any ideas?
Juergen
On 4/26/06, Ari Suutari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great ! I'll wait for next rc then.
Ari S.
- Original
I've added WicketBundleResourceStringLoader to core which implements
the behavior, but it is not activated by default. You need to add it
to the application like
getResourceSettings().addStringResourceLoader(new
WicketBundleStringResourceLoader(application, ...));
Juergen
On 4/26/06, Ari Suutari
It'll break existing applications.
Juergen
On 4/27/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there a problem why i can't be default?
On 4/26/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've added WicketBundleResourceStringLoader to core which
implements
the behavior
makeing sure it is not forgotten.
Juergen
On 4/24/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is a RFE.
Juergen
On 4/24/06, Marco Geier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
johan,
the fallback mechanism works fine *on the bundle-level*, i.e. Wicket
will try all
I think it is a RFE.
Juergen
On 4/24/06, Marco Geier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
johan,
the fallback mechanism works fine *on the bundle-level*, i.e. Wicket
will try all these SomeApplication_locale_style.properties combinations
down to SomeApplication.properties.
But once it found a bundle
Could you please open a bug and if possible attach a simple junit test case
Juergen
On 4/22/06, Iman Rahmatizadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The WicketTester.assertVisible(path) method should check to see if the
component with
the given path is visible or not, but instead it throws a
I think you are right. Components which have been removed (because
they have been replaced) should not contribute to onLoad anymore.
Would you please open an RFE for that. Thanks
Juergen
On 4/21/06, Dave Schoorl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my project, I have a WebPage that is build from
What was the bug number again? Opening a bug in sourceforge is the
safest way to make sure that nothing gets forgotten and junit tests
are helpful for us to reproduce the error and to make sure it doesn't
come back in new releases. Running wicket-example, cdapp and the
phonebook on IE6.0 and FF
Please see WicketTester which is based on MockWebApplication and all
the junit test cases in src/test which use the same principle: create
the output as a string and compare it with the expected output which
is kept in a file.
Juergen
On 4/19/06, Aaron Hiniker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would
the NPE is present because getRequestCycle() is returning null.. what is
causing that?
On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 10:28 +0200, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
Please see WicketTester which is based on MockWebApplication and all the
junit test cases in src/test which use the same principle: create the output
Johan, may be you can create a little ICrypt implementation for that?
As it is one way, decrypt should probably throw an exception
Juergen
On 4/19/06, Rüdiger Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Compagner wrote on 19.04.2006 at 12:11:
it is not just the =
we use a different base64 set
Where does the a come from?
Juergen
On 4/19/06, Rüdiger Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
in a form I have a TextField for an email, simply like this:
final TextField email = new TextField(email);
email.add(EmailAddressPatternValidator.getInstance());
add(email);
In the
Take a look at WicketTester which we use for junit testing. It is not
exactly what you asking for as it implements a in-container mock
servlet container, but the outcome is the same
Juergen
On 4/18/06, Henry Story [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I need to generate html for use by swing
Yes that is true. We most likely change it back. The reason it has
been changed is because / and + are not allowed in URLs and we use the
same encryption algorithm for URL encryption Though we used a
(old) standards compliant base64 encoder/decoder it is not URL
compliant. The new standard
? So unfixing it will give those users those problems
again.
Eelco
On 4/18/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes that is true. We most likely change it back. The reason it has
been changed is because / and + are not allowed in URLs and we use the
same encryption algorithm
because people were experiencing problems
with it, right? So unfixing it will give those users those problems
again.
Eelco
On 4/18/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes that is true. We most likely change it back. The reason it has
been changed is because
I don't think Wicket requires input /. At least not by purpose.
Wicket should work with input ../input as well.
Juergen
On 4/19/06, nato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I'm a bit confious what document type to use for my Wicket html
markups... It's not HTML and not XHTML either. It's not
It is in the examples and wicket-bench the eclipse plugin supports it
as well. Everything else, please see the blog
Juergen
On 4/17/06, karthik Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the excellent feature already in the core/extensions? If yes, could
someone please tell me where can i find it and if
I just deployed 1.2b3 on wicket-library and tested it with IE6 and
Firefox. No problems.
juergen
On 4/17/06, Rémy Rakic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I was testing the form components on the wicket-library website
(http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/forminput) under IE, and
And you example works perfectly if you rename wicket:id=message to
wicket:id=myMessage?
Juergen
On 4/15/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you please create a junit test case (see src/test) to reproduce it.
Thanks
Juergen
On 4/15/06, Michael Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
=10171730forum_id=42411
Hope these can be incorporated into next release too.
On 4/14/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sure, everything that makes life easier and doesn't break existing
code is welcome. Send it to me.
Juergen
On 4/14/06, Ingram Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED
I committed a fix a few minutes ago
Juergen
On 4/15/06, Michael Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, it does.
On Apr 15, 2006, at 4:20 AM, Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
And you example works perfectly if you rename wicket:id=message to
wicket:id=myMessage?
Juergen
On 4/15/06, Juergen
Only very little performance impact.
Wicket automatically creates a Link component for you and the
disable behavior is exactly the same as for for Links. And Links get
disabled if they point to the same page. If you don't want that
behavior, than you can not use autolinks. Just add standard
please see http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Panels_and_borders
and copied from previous mails
Maybe 'around' is a bit a weird term too. A more visual explanation:
Panel:
div
blah, blah
span
Panel contents
/span
more blah
/div
vs Border:
span
Border before
div
blah, blah
Most users, probably except the core developers and a few other users,
are using wicket.jar. Replying n/a if not using the jar is ok for
me. And as long as unit tests don't suffer, and I think they don't,
than
+1 for MANIFEST.MF
Juergen
On 4/13/06, Gwyn Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone
the jar in a running
system
johan
On 4/13/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Either that way or remove the code from
UrlResourceStream.lastModifiedTime/() and check well
known urls (file,
http) only.
Juergen
On 4/13/06, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I guess there are plenty of HTML and CSS ref and tutorial pages out there:
http://www.selfhtml.org/
http://www.w3schools.com/html/
http://www.w3schools.com/css/default.asp
Juergen
On 4/13/06, MailingWicketUser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Is there an elegant way to set the column widths
Extensions are part of the Wicket project and maintained by Wickets
core developers. Contrib projects are part of wicket-stuff which has
much relaxed contribution rules and contrib projects are usually not
maintained by core developers. The Wicket team does not feel
responsible for the content of
.
If you configure the home page to be Home.class instead of Index.class every
hitng works normally.
As i mentioned in the hom.class i have added a panel with the js file
refernce.
Thanks
Dipu
- Original Message -
From: Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wicket-user
Thanks. I updated it.
Juergen
On 4/11/06, ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in Show (sub-)totals section from display-tag demos
i think logic of code is mistake but result is correct
in here , fill map with groups
int startIdx = 0;
for (int i=1; i data.size(); i++) {
Thanks again
Juergen
On 4/11/06, ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think must replace
buffer.append(row.toString());
with
buffer.append(escapeColumnValue(row.toString()));
in BaseExportView class of exporting section of display tag demos
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail
MI is probably better suited for LF (and feedback we get indicates
that it is easier to use), but there are still plenty good use cases
for Border. MI for example can not be used inside a Panel or Border
bordering a specifc html tag/region (compared to the whole Page or
Panel as MI does).
Juergen
That is kind of strange. We don't reload markup files anymore in 1.2,
we just remove the cache entry if the file modify time has changed.
Only if required, the file is reloaded. In case of a jar, the file
doesn't change and hence doesn't/shouldn't get reloaded.
would it be possible to analyse
() )
But there are many more places in java that don't let me control the cleanup
this is just plain stupid. And one big flaw is some api's of java.
for example this is also such a thing:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4715154
will not be fixed... tseee
johan
On 4/12/06, Juergen
?
Thanks.
Gregg
On 4/12/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MI is probably better suited for LF (and feedback we get indicates
that it is easier to use), but there are still plenty good use cases
for Border. MI for example can not be used inside a Panel or Border
bordering
.
johanm
On 4/12/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you imagine a workaround like using UrlConnection only if no other
means exist.
Aren't markup file are usually (99%) either files or files within
jars? Lets say we do polling only for URL type which refer to files
and files
No, it is not expected. Would you please copy the unit test and send
it to me. I make sure it'll work in 1.2
Juergen
On 4/11/06, Gustavo Hexsel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Wicket 1.1.1 and trying to get my first WicketTester to work with
the current app. I can't seem to get
please open a bug report in sourceforge.
Juergen
On 4/11/06, nato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wicket adds script element which is not a valid html 4 or xhtml because it
does not specify the type attribute. I think it's a bug.
---
This SF.Net
WicketTester extends Application. Hence you create the session object
exactly the way you do it in your real application.
Juergen
On 4/7/06, karthik Guru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to test my sigon page - meaning i need to make sure that after
validation of credentials, it stores my user
Could you please create a unit test and send it to me. Thanks
Juergen
On 4/6/06, Dzenan Ridjanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have two errors that come from the Wicket beta3 jar files:
Tag '/html' (line 11, column 1) does not have a matching open tag
[markup =
wicket core contains several unit tests with input / and these tests
look ok to me. It can not only be that. Did you try and change it to
input ../input to see if it works? I guess it is related to
wicket:head. Try and add a head to your page if you haven't or
wait until the weekend. And a unit
Thanks. I'll check it out.
Juergen
On 4/5/06, Ari Suutari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a simple example in
http://download.syncrontech.com/public/wicketheadproblem.zip
Ari S.
- Original Message -
From: Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wicket-user
was able to use
markup inheritance on page level, but not in beta3.
Ari S.
- Original Message -
From: Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] update from beta2 to beta3 broke
if wicket:child/ is used
in page's html directly ie. in beta2 I was able to use
markup inheritance on page level, but not in beta3.
Ari S.
- Original Message -
From: Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 9
yes, and it is already fixed in SVN trunk.
Juergen
On 4/5/06, Marieke Vandamme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I get an error while using wicket:message in my html. Did you forget to add
'message' to the wellKnownTagNames or do I need to do this myself?
thanks!
stacktrace :
Root
Note that wicket:head MUST be before body, /head,
wicket:panel, wicket:border and wicket:extend. Unfortunately no
error message is thrown yet. Its currently only my laptop. I need to
test it further before committing.
If that is not the case in your example, please send me a stripped
down version
The error message means that the string to be decrypted does not have
the proper/expected length (padding). The problem is the encrypted
string must be URL encoded to make sure that only chars are use which
are allowed in URLs. The only reason I can think of: The following
equation should be true:
I think we are doing it already, but haven't checked the code.
Juergen
On 4/4/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we might have to base64 the encoded string before putting it into the url.
-IGor
On 4/4/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The error message means
problems as well.
Juergen
On 4/4/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if we are base64 encoding the string why do we need to urlencode it? it
should be safe already.
-Igor
On 4/4/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we are doing it already, but haven't checked
-
From: Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Problem migrating the application to the new
version of Wicket.
I stepped through the code and its clearly trying to add the
component
Igor is right, IComponentResolver does it already. Please see
SimpleListView in the displaytag examples.
Juergen
On 4/3/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not sure your patch is necessary. you can probably do the same with:
DynamicMarkupContainer extends MarkupContainer implements
+1 for now. For all new 1.2 interfaces and methods and for internal
methods (incl. pre 1.2).
Did we add replaceComponentTagBody in 1.2? If not, that should not
(yet) be changed. Especially as I can imagine that this function is
used by some users.
Juergen
On 4/1/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL
It obviously hasn't been changed yet. The code from
AuthenticatedWebApplication() must be moved into its init() method.
Juergen
On 3/31/06, Andre Matheus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I tried to use AuthenticatedWebApplication instead of
WebApplication to create my Application, the system
Because ExternalLink does not point to a Wicket resource or listener.
It points to some wicket external address (e.g. google, ebay, amazon)
and hence doesn't need all the features/functionalities (and the
overhead) of Link and it derivatives.
Juergen
On 3/31/06, Jesper Preuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You probably have multiple wicket:id=flightSearchResultValidation in
the same markup file at the same level in the component hierarchy.
That is no longer possible. We are now more strict, enforcing a 1:1
between component hierarchy and markup. Simply rename one of the
flightSearchResultValidation
more because it's not all using extends Link.
On 3/31/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because ExternalLink does not point to a Wicket resource or listener.
It points to some wicket external address (e.g. google, ebay, amazon)
and hence doesn't need all the features
the
AuthenticatedWebApplication?
Thanks,
On 3/31/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It obviously hasn't been changed yet. The code from
AuthenticatedWebApplication() must be moved into its init() method.
Juergen
On 3/31/06, Andre Matheus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I tried
(xx);
On 3/31/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you? What exactly are the differences.
On 3/31/06, Jesper Preuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would just think it was easier to understand that all types of links
did inherit or implement some class.
Because I'm
clearly says that i have multiple wicket id's with the same
name.
But i don't have more than one id there in my mark up with the same name, i
did a search in the mark up and as well as in all the panels that are added
to the page.
Thanks
Dipu
- Original Message -
From: Juergen
Sorry, might questionwas referring to
Because I'm makeing a dynamic menu, where you can put your own links.
Here I have to do more because it's not all using extends Link.
On 3/31/06, Jesper Preuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/31/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you? What
, 2006 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Problem migrating the application to the new
version of Wicket.
Dipu,
Just to flag that the latest code is in SVN, not CVS anymore.
/Gwyn
On 31/03/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are using markup inheritance (wicket:extend
(flightSearchResultValidation,searchResultValidations()));
Has this got any thing to do with the version of the code i am using right
now or am i doing something in the wrong way.
Thanks
Dipu
- Original Message -
From: Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent
.
Ohh this turned out much bigger stand I imagined.
On 3/31/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, might questionwas referring to
Because I'm makeing a dynamic menu, where you can put your own links.
Here I have to do more because it's not all using extends Link.
On 3/31
Sounds like your browser is using its local cache. Try
meta http-equiv=Expires content=-1 /
meta http-equiv=Pragma content=no-cache /
meta http-equiv=Cache-Control content=no-cache /
Juergen
On 3/30/06, Anders Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem
What about Application.properties as the internal one. It is (should)
already be search for.
Juergen
On 3/30/06, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but the problem with wicket.properties is that it is also used by our users!
what we need is a unique property file that our users wont have
On 3/29/06, John Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish I had the time :-) I'm in the process of moving my client's code
from php-Java. Need to move to a typed language. Things were getting
way too messy with PHP. I discovered wicket and think it's the right way
to go. But I wanted to share my
There is already a bug for this in sourceforge.
Juergen
On 3/29/06, Andre Matheus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having trouble using Ajax links in pages with a border with
setTransparentResolver(true);
The message in the Wicket Ajax Debugger is the following:
INFO:
INFO: initiating
That realy looks like a orion bug
Juergen
On 3/29/06, Theo vN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
In the web.xml of the wicket-examples the servlet mapping is shown as..
servlet-mapping
servlet-nameLinkomaticApplication/servlet-name
(ajaxLabel, AAA ));
ajaxLabel.setOutputMarkupId(true);
myBorder.add(new AjaxLink(ajaxLink) {
Juergen
On 3/29/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is already a bug for this in sourceforge.
Juergen
On 3/29/06, Andre Matheus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am
sorry, I was mislead. Your code is right. The issue is the Ajax stuff
is not yet supported if the Ajax component is part of a bordered page.
Please use markup inheritance instead.
Juergen
On 3/29/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wicket shouldn't get into an infinite loop
not that I can think of
Juergen
On 3/29/06, Vincent Jenks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a performance hit for customizing the location of the html files?
I thought I had read that somewhere in the wiki, once upon a time.
On 3/29/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please
Ok, should be fixed in svn head now. Added junit tests.
Juergen
On 3/29/06, Juergen Donnerstag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry, I was mislead. Your code is right. The issue is the Ajax stuff
is not yet supported if the Ajax component is part of a bordered page.
Please use markup inheritance
201 - 300 of 907 matches
Mail list logo
