Again, I didn't express correctly. I don't call this on label.
AjaxRequestTarget does.
-Matej
Johan Compagner wrote:
but if you use setRenderBodyOnly(true) on a label
how can you target it for a ajax update at the first place?
On 3/20/06, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
I noticed that HeadersToolbar from wicket-extensions breaks layout of
certain tables because it renders html like
tr
span
th../th
/span
span
th../th
/span
/tr
The layout breaks when the table (resp. the container holding it) is
replaced by ajax. The solution is to do
Hi, there seems to be a serious problem with beta 2.
Javascript replaces components with outerHtml, but they are rendered
with setStripWicketTags(true), which causes severe problems.
Or am I missing something?
-Matej
---
This SF.Net email
thanks
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
done
-Igor
On 3/19/06, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that HeadersToolbar from wicket-extensions breaks layout of
certain tables because it renders html like
tr
span
th../th
-1 As well. Even span can break layout very easily.
And one more question. What's wrong with forms? List views can't be
replaced without containers, that's fine, but what's the problem with forms?
-Matej
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
I'm -1 on this one.
This will break layout for web pages. Most
Well, few months ago I took wicket tree view and converted it to ajax
tree view in basicaly in couple of minutes, just replacing links with
ajaxfallbacklinks. But since then the wicket ajax implementation change
a bit so it wouldn't work now (even if it had i would have hard time
finding the
20%? Maybe on simple properties, but I've been using ognl compound
property model for list items, and with 20 list items on certain page
the rendering took almost 300 milliseconds. Replacing it with new
implementation the page was rendered in 30-50 milliseconds.
So in some cases, the ognl
Do you mean that the values you enter to the form aren't preserved?
Well, you reload the list of items on every request
(onBeginRequest()). So they can't be preserved. Instead, try to lead
the list only once (in page constructor). That might help.
-Matej
On 2/19/06, Ali Zaid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. Give me the constructor change and the Java 5 functionality in one
pass (Wicket 2.0)
-Matej
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that
It is possible in 1.2. Just ensure the field is public. And it should work.
Frank Silbermann wrote:
In Wicket 1.2, if an object has a public variable named “property” but
no getProperty() / setProperty() methods, can we use the string
“property” in constructing a PropertyModel?
It seems
, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I've made a javascript modal dialog component (iframe based). The
demo is available on
http://ruzin.fei.tuke.sk:8080/majcher/app
if there is any interest in this, I can put it to wicket stuff (having
discussed this with igor there might be a (sub)project
Hi, I've made a javascript modal dialog component (iframe based). The
demo is available on
http://ruzin.fei.tuke.sk:8080/majcher/app
if there is any interest in this, I can put it to wicket stuff (having
discussed this with igor there might be a (sub)project called
wicket-ajax-extensions).
Afaik Popup close link removes the popup page from pagemap.
-Matej
Thomas J du Plessis wrote:
Thanks Igor
That worked fine. What am I missing though with PopupCloseLink? What
does it do differently than a window.close() JavaScript command i.t.o.
cleaning up?
On 2/2/06, *Igor Vaynberg*
pepone pepone wrote:
Hello all
I using wicket and think that there is samething wrong in this
framework when you have 10 diferents classes in
wicket.markup.html.link and there isńt way to create a bookmarkable
link to a resource that need params using any of them.
and with my knowledge of
Hi,
in 1.1, I had my own markup parser and XMLPullParser, that basically
replaced all ${key} strings in Markup with the values from associated
properties files.
This no longer works for 1.2, because
MarkupParserFactory.newMarkupParser does not provide the
MarkupContainer, for which the
approach mentioned above. In case you have any
difficulties implementing it, please let me know.
Juergen
Juergen
On 1/19/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in 1.1, I had my own markup parser and XMLPullParser, that basically
replaced all ${key} strings in Markup with the values from
Are you sure? At least in 1.1, I have a PDF report generator link, and
while the pdf is generating, the session is locked and no other request
(From the same user) can touch it, so all other requests are waiting.
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
That won't ever happen. It is not possible for
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
On 1/19/06, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't say I like the first approach much. When I was implementing the
localization before, that was the first thing i tried. Didn't like it
then, but maybe things have changed.
Still, it won't be possible for me to use
that are in jars are not
available to be changed thus the error is shown. You shouldn't see
this in production when the polling feature is turned off.
On Nov 27, 2005, at 9:06 AM, Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi.
I'm using datepicker and I'm constantly getting this warning
17
Doesn't work :(
wicket:id is not problem for other elements, it seems just to cause
problems with input. Maybe a bug in opera?
-Matej
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
may be html xmlns:wicket=http://wicket.sourceforge.net;
to define the namespace?
Juergen
On 11/27/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL
Hi.
I'm using datepicker and I'm constantly getting this warning
17:46:32.146 WARN!! [SocketListener0-3]
wicket.util.resource.UrlResourceStream.init(UrlResourceStream.java:92)
22 cannot convert url:
Hi.
I found out, why the datepicker is not working in Opera. The problem is
the wicket:id, that confuses opera.
having
input wicket:id=xyz id=elementId/
document.getElementById('elementId') returns null.
the (temporary?) solution now is to setStripWicketTags(true);
Any ideas?
-Matej
Now this is great, I really like it ;)
Thanks to everyone involved.
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Also please note that we're in the middle of refactoring some of the
wicket internals, and the solution as currently implemented might
change a bit still (though hopefully only the internals).
Hi,
DatePicker doesn't work in opera. It shows a window with this error message:
Calendar setup:
Nothing to setup (no fields found). Please check your code.
Has anyone a clue, what's going on? To me, it seems that somehow the
javascript can't touch input field, even if the javascript
it is jscalendar.
Eelco
On 11/23/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
DatePicker doesn't work in opera. It shows a window with this error message:
Calendar setup:
Nothing to setup (no fields found). Please check your code.
Has anyone a clue, what's going on? To me, it seems
it should be mentioned in the
javadoc?
Any ideas?
-Matej
Matej Knopp wrote:
Checked it out, I really like it. Mine was just a quick hack ;)
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Thanks. Much better now. I implemented a couple of small changes on
top of it, please check out whether you agree (find
Uh, I forgot, PdfDataSource is final, so option B is not even an option
now ;)
Matej Knopp wrote:
Btw, there's a problem with current implementation. After the report is
done, you can't generated another report (e.g. clicking twice on the
same link). Because datasource is the same and it's
Having a component on every place localized text is, doesn't seem to be
a very good solution for me. As well as not be able to localize button
captions.
The solution I've chosen was to translate the markup during parsing
(using my own modified MarkupParser). This solution works quite well for
Okay, once more, without antivirus message attached to java file and one
unnecessary try/catch block :)
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi.
There's a slight performace problem with JRResource, that it creates
JasperReport in it's constructor. I've 10 resource links on one page so
it means that 10
Hi,
Have a look at wicket-extensions: DataView. You implement your own
IDataProvider which can use hibernate paging.
-Matej
Juhani K wrote:
Hi,
what is recommended way to create pageable ListView for 1 database
items? Is it possible to utilize Hibernate paging?
Hi,
there's a bug in JRImageResource that the size of output image does not
reflets the zoom. (It's always the same - iamage than gets cropped).
I wanted to submit a bugreport and commit a patch but I can't even
checkout the project from anonymous cvs (I've got the source code from
web
with 1.1 and 1.2?
Thats nice to hear :)
Backporting to 1.1.1 ... we could do it but it is a big change.. that could
affect running installs (you can't just swap 1.1 to 1.1.1 then if you depend
a bit more on ognl)
This should be an issue where we should count votes!
johan
On 11/16/05, Matej Knopp
Well, it's little more complicated. FeedbackPanel doesn't use the filter
directly. It uses FeedbackMessagesModel to feed the ListView, and that
model uses the Filter.
Nevertheless, overriding getFeedbackMessageFilter worked well for me.
Which version of wicket are you using? I'm using 1.1 and
to use a inbetween model
There is no other way. Even if we stored it inside the form itself
then that is the inbetween model
And i don't know if i want to support that.
On 11/16/05, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi.
The problem
have?
I don;t think anything will really change in the validation and or feedback.
On 11/17/05, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, having to do validation in model seems like a step backwards from
what I have now. There are already validators that can
something.
johan
On 11/17/05, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so if I understand you correctly, you suggest changing default
form processing like this?
- immediate button submitted:
validate();
if (hasError
in comparison of the total
computing for one request? Any other bottlenecks you can identify? Or
was - like Johan said - OGNL one of the biggest hurdles?
Eelco
On 11/17/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, I took CompoundPropertyModel from 1.2 and put it to my project, so
that I can directly
No, he is not using resource reference. The site worked, just a while
ago. The image was a static image, served by the http server, just
without the right headers.
-Matej
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
The online page throws an exception.
Are you using a resource reference(!) and not a plain
Hi. Wicket is hardly responsible for the headers, that come with your
(static) images. I'm sorry, I can't help you here, I've very little
experience configuring apache, nor the connector - mod_jk2.
Good luck.
-Matej
Dorel Vaida wrote:
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi.
What does wicket have
:
Dorel Vaida wrote:
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi. Wicket is hardly responsible for the headers, that come with your
(static) images.
I thought a little and maybe, but just maybe, the images are not cached
because of the way wicket forms the urls and everything ...
I'm sorry, I can't help you here
Your problem is really strange. As far as I know tomcat (and other
servlet containers) put Last-Modified header to static resources
automatically. I really don't know where was it lost.
I suspect the connector. But have no experience with it, unfortunately.
-Matej
Matej Knopp wrote:
But you
it doesn't know that the image hasn't changed.
-Matej
Alexandru Popescu wrote:
#: Matej Knopp changed the world a bit at a time by saying on
11/17/2005 8:28 PM :#
No, he is not using resource reference. The site worked, just a while
ago. The image was a static image, served by the http server
the browser to fetch the page for each hit.
I don't know how static content is treated, but this may be the cause.
./alex
--
.w( the_mindstorm )p.
On 11/17/05, Dorel Vaida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dorel Vaida wrote:
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi. Wicket is hardly responsible for the headers
Alexandru Popescu wrote:
On 11/17/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but these tags only affects the html. As it's dynamically
generated, it's all right to always fetch the new version.
But with static images, there should be a header provided with the
image, that informs
(it can't be between
Form-Model
but it has to be between TmpModel-RealModel
This looks to me like a much better way to have multiply page forms...
johan
On 11/13/05, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I know this has been discussed already, but still I'm
Hi.
My current benchmark shows that CompoundPropertyModel is a serious
performance issue when having big dataview. Is there any chance that the
new CompoundPropertyModel from 1.2 will be backported to 1.1?
-Matej
---
This SF.Net email is
I think this is not about updating model nor validating. It's about
preserving http parameters, that are already sent.
What I want to achieve is that you have kind of immediate button, that
preserves the form attributes (exactly as they were filled by the user),
but doesn't update model, nor
Hi.
In Component class, the flag FLAG_HAS_ROOT_MODEL is set only if the
model is CompoundPropertyModel. Why do we have ICompoundModel then?
Shouldn't it only check if the model implements ICompoundModel?
-Matej
---
SF.Net email is
:
No because components can have a ICompoundModel but not be the root because
they got there model from the root. (see initModel())
johan
On 11/14/05, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
In Component class, the flag FLAG_HAS_ROOT_MODEL is set only
Form();
form.setModel(new MyCompoundModel); // set a compound model so it is
the root!
TextField tf = new TextField(); // no model!
then tf.initModel() will get the forms model and use it as its own BUT
it is not the root.
johan
On 11/14/05, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL
I assume he meant that multiple (different) threads can access the
page/session during page lifecycle. But not during one request.
-Matej
Alexandru Popescu wrote:
#: Johan Compagner changed the world a bit at a time by saying on
11/14/2005 6:18 PM :#
at the same time.
What do you mean?
Okay, I should have written it in a different way. I just wasn't sure if
it was a bug or an intention :)
-Matej
Johan Compagner wrote:
ahh
i read youre first message wrong because how it was written :)
Why do we have ICompoundModel then?
fixed it.
johan
On 11/14/05, *Matej Knopp* [EMAIL
Hi.
I know this has been discussed already, but still I'm opening it once
more. I think there should be a way to preserve form state without
validation and model updating.
The use case is following.
I have a (complex) form with some fields, that can not be entered
directly, i.e. they have
it and it seems to work. Defaults can be defined if the key is just
RequiredValidator (the validators class name without any prefix). In
case no other key is found, it'll be used as default.
Juergen
On 11/3/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I just want to ask, why AbstractValidator
Juergen
On 11/3/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I put there something like RequiredValidator=XYZ it works. But that's
not what I mean.
The problem is, that I want to see in feedback something like
* entry1.RequiredValidator value is missing
* entry2.RequiredValidator value
In my opinion, there's no need for another indirection. From what I've
seen, new users are already confused about models, making them even more
complicated isn't imho the way to go.
I think that Ognl models should be separated from the core and put to
extensions. That would also get rid of
And how do you make sure that the hibernate connection is ever closed?
You can't count on another http request, since it may never come. Will
you put a hook on session expiration?
-Matej
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just curious what does this mean:
All I need is to be able to disconnect the
Hi
I think it would be nice to have a feature in 1.2 that would allow
having single instance of certain pages.
For example if I said that MyPage class is singleton,
bookmarkablePage=MyPage would search the PageMap if there is any
instance of MyPage and if it's there, it would use it.
Another
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi
I think it would be nice to have a feature in 1.2 that would allow
having single instance of certain pages.
For example if I said that MyPage class is singleton,
bookmarkablePage=MyPage would search the PageMap if there is any
instance of MyPage and if it's
Yes, that would make sense. Another thing is that disabled elements
don't get submitted, so there should be some handling of this (e.g. not
update form component state when disabled, or something like that)
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
disabled is a standard html property of form elements.
Hi.
I don't know if this has been discussed yet. Using PageParameters and
BookmarkablePageLinks I just found a strange feature. If there is null
in PageParameters for argument foo, the url contains 'foo=null'.
Is this deliberate? Wouldn't it have more sense if url didn't contain
the foo
and updateModel.
But it would be even easier, if getInput() wasn't final...
Or if in input name=XXX XXX didn't contain page id.
Any ideas?
-Matej
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi
I just want to ask whether it is necessary for the form components to
contain page id in their names? Isn't it sufficient
I didn't want vote, just your opinions :)
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Ah, yes :)
Do you want to start a vote as a new message? It seems that votes are
only picked up by people when there is a large VOTE: in the subject.
Eelco
On 9/6/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eelco
that)
ok?
johan
johan
Matej Knopp wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Yep. We could just strip the first nbr + '.'. That's not a big
problem.
nbr + ':' ;)
Great. Thanks for quick and positive feedback.
-Matej
Eelco
On 9/5/05, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Okay, I don't see a point of this discussion unless it's a vote, but I
just liked setImmediate more :)
It's less verbose and it seemed clean to me that it bypasses validation
and model updates.
-Matej
David Liebeherr wrote:
Hi Eelco,
i think setDefaultFormProcessing is a very good name.
I
Hi
I just want to ask whether it is necessary for the form components to
contain page id in their names? Isn't it sufficient to have page id
specified only in form action?
The fact is that the form components' names depend on the current page
id and things like browser's autocomplete just don't
Hi.
For a long time I was working with render strategy set to
REDIRECT_TO_RENDER. Now I've switched to REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER and found
out, that removing items from ListViews no longer works.
I've code like
IModel customersModel = new LoadableDetachableModel() {
protected
isn't loaded twice because all is
done in one request.
customersModel.detach() should do the trick
or remove the deleted customer specific from that model
johan
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi.
For a long time I was working with render strategy set to
REDIRECT_TO_RENDER. Now I've switched
programming to me ;)
can't you just have a reference directly to youre customersModel ??
johan
Matej Knopp wrote:
Okay, thank you, this works.
Nevertheless putting
getParent().getParent().getModel().detach();
to link handler doesn't seem very pretty.
Maybe like I'll just stick
Matej Knopp wrote:
sure I can have reference to customerModel by making it final. But I
want to get as much garbe collected as possible at the end of request
and making the reference final wouldn't help it much :)
But considering the speed issue, maybe it is better to use
redirect_to_buffer
Your onToBeNamed() method already exists, and it's called
onBeginRequest() :)
-Matej
Ralf Ebert wrote:
Hi,
you may override Form.onRender() or Form.onComponenTagBody(). First do
your check and set components invisible/visible and than call the
super implementation.
I had another case
Hmm.. You may be right. I'm using REDIRECT_TO_RENDER strategy. thus for
me, this is working well. But I understand this doesn't work with
REDIRECT_TO_BUFFER.
-Matej
Ralf Ebert wrote:
Hi,
Your onToBeNamed() method already exists, and it's called
onBeginRequest() :)
onBeginRequest() is
You can map you servlet to myApp/
e.g.
servlet-mapping
servlet-nameWicketServlet/servlet-name
url-pattern/myApp//url-pattern
/servlet-mapping
but you must be aware, that all external resources (css, js, images)
will be one level deeper.
-Matej
Jan Bares wrote:
Hi,
I
I think this should be somehow possible to do, without altering wicket
in any way. I'd like to see your progress here :)
There is a problem, though, that Johan has already pointed out, that if
you use syntax like /signin/home, etc.. You have to treat all urls in
your markup (images,
This is the way I do it. After logout it redirect to the home page
(Servlet name without any arguments)
public class LogoutPage extends BasePage {
public LogoutPage() {
}
protected void onEndRequest() {
getSession().invalidate();
try {
the session holds all the pages. a
simple redirect is the only possibility. personally, i prefer a
goodbye page so that links to the home page so that people get clear
confirmation that they signed out.
Matej Knopp wrote:
This is the way I do it. After logout it redirect to the home page
that people get
clear confirmation that they signed out.
Matej Knopp wrote:
This is the way I do it. After logout it redirect to the home page
(Servlet name without any arguments)
public class LogoutPage extends BasePage {
public LogoutPage() {
}
protected void onEndRequest
Hmm.. Maybe the bookmarkable link should properly escape page
parameters... (at least replacing for amp;)
-Matej
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, let me try to be more clear with code.
PageParameters pParams = new PageParameters();
pParams.put(name, ab);
BookmarkablePageLink link = new
Yeah, that would be nice. I'm +1 for it.
-Matej
Jonathan Locke wrote:
was just looking at the new database code i've been writing and it seems
like i could
provide a nice shortcut to add custom resource handling to that...
basically you could
override a method like one of these in your
Well, I kind of disagree here. What you are talking about is context
name. 'app' is just servlet name. There should _not_ be slash after app.
You can have as many contexts as you want. The problem is, that you have
deployed the application to / (root) context.
I for example have EvStudZad
Philip A. Chapman wrote:
Matej Knopp wrote:
Well, I kind of disagree here. What you are talking about is context
name. 'app' is just servlet name. There should _not_ be slash after app.
You can have as many contexts as you want. The problem is, that you have
deployed the application
and most of the department staff is on vacation.
-Matej
Peter Veentjer - Anchor Men wrote:
Are you going to make it opensource? I would like to have a look at
Wicket in a serious application.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Matej Knopp
Thank you very much. Of course, this has to be fixed. Seems that I've
overlooked it.
This is exactly what I ment when I said that any button can be pressed. :)
If you found anything similiar (exception where they shouldn't be
(actually, they should be nowhere :)), pleas let me know.
-Matej
would sove this.
-Matej
Michael Jouravlev wrote:
On 8/3/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw. What do you think would be correct action?
Showing user a message, that assignment has been deleted,
or
Being able to save the assignment, without throwing any exception?
(or showing user
Thank you for positive responses :)
When it's done, I'm going to put a big 'using wicket' button there :-)
Btw. feel free to push any button you find there :)
-Matej
Matej Knopp wrote:
Just in case anyone would be interested, there's a pre-alpha version of
my application running at
http
David Liebeherr wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Considering most companies are still working on JDK 1.4 for their
application servers (WebSphere being the numbero uno), there is a slim
chance you will find Java 5 features in Wicket core. Of course there
can be Java 5 /extensions/ and
Hi.
I've a logout link and I want it to invalidate the session and redirect
to homepage. Is there a simple way to do this? Calling
Session.invalidate() in link handler throws java.lang.IllegalStateException.
Thanks
-Matej
---
SF.Net
()
{
getSession().invalidate();
}
}
Matej Knopp wrote:
Hi.
I've a logout link and I want it to invalidate the session and
redirect to homepage. Is there a simple way to do this? Calling
Session.invalidate() in link handler throws
java.lang.IllegalStateException.
Thanks
-Matej
Matej Knopp wrote:
How can you ensure that a session will be closed? What if user got
disconnected? Will the session hang open until the http session timeout?
Another problem that comes to my mind is that hibernate session is not
thread safe. Using one session through multiple request you
I'm afraid not. When using markup inheritance and having setStrip...
off, the result page looks like this
wicket:extenddoctype...
everybrowser will ignore doctype, as it's preceeded by wicket:extends.
So no schema is going to help there.
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Phil Kulak wrote:
I
Hmm.. couldn't there be both?
public AbstractChoice(final String id, IModel model, final List choices,
final IChoiceRenderer renderer)
{
this(id, model, new Model(choices), renderer)
}
public AbstractChoice(final String id, IModel model, final IModel
wrote:
Yes and on all its subclasses.
But we could do that...
Matej Knopp wrote:
Yeah, 9 might seem a little bit scary number :) But i think most of
them are self-explaining...
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
That would mean having 9 (!) constructors though...
Eelco
Matej Knopp wrote
+1
I've allways wondered why are they there :)
-Matej
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
I think we should remove these methods. They are quite easy to implement
yourself, and they limit the ways we can change ListView's internals.
I can see they are 'handy', but I feel they also mess up the idea that a
is, what is more important.
Juergen
On 7/27/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
I agree, nothing should go before doctype. But we don't test it.
Actually you might add doctype whereever you want to. I think none of
the web frameworks validates the output. They all rely
?
Juergen
On 7/28/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm.. This does sound logical. But then we should use doctype of the
component (inherited page) and put it in front, ignoring the doctype of
the parent page.
I understand, but IMO it is too much of magic. Will it be clear to
every user
. I understand it's comes from the way markup inheritance is
implemented.
-Matej
Matej Knopp wrote:
SetStripWicketTag() should definitely be fixed.
Once this is fixed, having doctype first would be nice, but not necessary.
-Matej
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
How important is it for you
/html
Exactly.
I'l check it.
Thanks.
-MAtej
Juergen
On 7/27/05, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm.. If this is default behavieor, then I think it's a little bit
weird. Having wicket:extend before doctype causes problems.
I still don't understand the reason for this. Having markup
Hi, I'm using 1.1 and I just tried markup inheritance. It works almost
ok, but there's one strange thing. The generated page source code starts
with wicket:extend. It's even before doctype, and that's bad. It's
there no matter if setStripWicketTags is on or off. Is this correct
behavior?
1.1.0-b1 is a great release. I've succesfully upgraded my current
project. It was almost painless :) Actually, it consisting of removing
a class that was a wrapper around ListMultipleChoice, because it was
obsolete in 1.1, as well as removing my own ChoiceList implementation,
since it's no
Sure you can. :)
-Matej
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Can I use this comment on my blog? A little advertisement never hurt ;-)
Martijn
Matej Knopp wrote:
1.1.0-b1 is a great release. I've succesfully upgraded my current
project. It was almost painless :) Actually, it consisting of
removing
501 - 600 of 686 matches
Mail list logo
