Yes, Splurge and go 3 -120s.
If you can't justify it, maybe put up one new 120 deg sector, and leave the
original Omni up to cover the rest.
I guess it depends on why you are needing to sectorize.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
WOW! It is expensive. Nearly 3% of the revenue from each customer (assuming
approx 35.00 monthly per customer) is a nice hit.
And whatever their website is done in, does me in. That "initializing" that
keeps coming up and the small typeface is frustrating.
-Original Message-
From: wirel
I am not sure but I think it is pretty much limited to Military
installations.
I haven't been able to verify this for sure, but one of my mesh gear
providers deals pretty much only with DOD installations and he tells me that
that is where the RADAR is that caused us to have to deal with the DFS
rul
Me = Cheap
RadioMobile = Free
Wispmon = Yikes!
It better be good but I think I'd need a few thousand customers before I
didn't feel that price.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, December 01,
If you want to go real cheap... you could always just put up another omni
antenna if there is available spectrum... then you can load balance the
AP's, and should one fail, you have redundancy.
Not an efficient use of spectrum, but if the site is remote enough... it
might not matter.
Daniel White
Ouija board. Just document your findings in case the FCC gives you any
guff. You need to be able to back yourself up.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Carullo
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 6:22 PM
To: WISPA Ge
A relatively nifty new monitoring service out there also has a great path
profile tool built-in. The person that is developing the product is a long
time wireless operator, so he has a very good feel for what our industry
needs.
www.wispmon.com
I've been a RadioMobile user for years now, but hav
Depending on the cost of whatever sector you are looking at, I think the
extra cash for the third antenna and radio would offset the amount of
aggravation. Take it from someone who is "cheap", just spend the extra
cash. Been there, done that, have less hair over it. (That's why I wear a
hat)
B
HA! Someone had to say it. I know we were all thinking it.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 9:11 PM
To: sc...@brevardwireless.com; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.6
$75 using 10 meter terrain data and 30 meter resolution tree clutter.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
214 Eggleston Hill Rd.
Cooperstown, NY 13326
www.wirelessmapping.com
607-643-4055 Voice
607-435-3988 Mobile
208-692-1898 Fax
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:59 PM, RickG wrote:
> THANKS to EVERYONE for th
Use a double-layer of high grade electrical tape with the coax seal in
between. -RickG
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> Never made a mess except on threads like N female connectors.
>
> On 12/1/09, Scott Carullo wrote:
> > LOL, and I have permanent black marks on my office c
THANKS to EVERYONE for their input. I'll let you know what I decide. Another
question: Normally I do my path analysis with Delorme but I'm not feeling
that is good enough considering the cost of the project and some trees I see
in the distance. Is anyone out there offering path analysis for a fair
I am running 2.4 HPOL It has taken about 1.5 yrs to grow this AP to 32
subs.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of 3-dB Networks
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 9:37 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sectors
Wh
What frequency band and polarization?
I would also strongly consider your reasoning for moving from the Omni to
the sectors. If it is because your AP is overloaded so you need to offload
some, 3 AP's might be attractive for future proofing sakes.
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks
I hate it too!
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Jayson Baker wrote:
> If this is their install truck, I don't think you have to worry about much.
>
> [image:
>
> ?ui=2&view=att&th=1254ad61273873f9&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=ii_1254ad61273873f9&zw]
>
> LOL
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:04 AM
They are in the next county over. Their reputation here (Central Kentucky)
is not very good. Their customers call begging me to come there saying they
are down more than up. With that said, if you want a phone line, they have a
fair deal. But, as you know, most people have cut the cord. -RickG
On
9db
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 7:42 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sectors
What size omni are you using?
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless
Honestly, I doubt the quality of a 120 degree sector that will give you 180
degree coverage. I would hope your at -6dB or -8dB at that point.
For instance... check out this sector... its -6dB off at 180 degrees
http://www.mtiwe.com/uploads/product/127.pdf
So your 12dBi sector is now a 6dBi sect
I have looked at several 120 patterns and it looks to me like there
would be a HUGE gap on the far sides of each antenna? The one pattern I
am looking at shows -20db down at 90 degrees on each side. I'm just not
sure how well it would actually work?
Travis
Microserv
Josh Luthman wrote:
Tha
>From an omni two 120s will get you more coverage, doesn't it?
On 12/1/09, 3-dB Networks wrote:
> 4 90's would be better... but you could make 2 120's work probably.
>
> Check the patterns, and try to align the sectors where the bulk of the
> customers are.
>
> MTI does have some 900MHz 180's in
4 90's would be better... but you could make 2 120's work probably.
Check the patterns, and try to align the sectors where the bulk of the
customers are.
MTI does have some 900MHz 180's in H-pol...
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-
S P E C T R U M A N A L Y Z E R
Scott Carullo wrote:
> Anyone know of a way to find out what freq a weather radar is operating on?
> I know of several local ones and would like to know what freq they operate
> on for safety sake. Any ideas? I've looked everywhere and found nothing?
>
> Scott
What size omni are you using?
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 7:59 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sectors
>
> That is the general suggestion - two
That is the general suggestion - two 120s. That one guy that does
antenna design said so :)
You will get some less coverage then three 120s but at the cost of the
extra radio/antenna it isn't cost efficient.
On 12/1/09, Mark McElvy wrote:
> I need to sector a tower that currently is an omni. I
I need to sector a tower that currently is an omni. I don't really want
to go to 3x 120's but find it hard to find 180's and have heard they
don't tend to work great. I have also heard 2x 120's will work, any
comments?
Mark
---
Never made a mess except on threads like N female connectors.
On 12/1/09, Scott Carullo wrote:
> LOL, and I have permanent black marks on my office carpet, my home, my
> truck, my clothes, my harness etc etc...
>
> When coax seal gets HOT it doesn't melt but it gets real soft and sticky
> and wil
I found one in the ULS once. I haven't looked latey.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Scott Carullo"
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 5:21 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5.6 G
Why can't you? We've got a bunch of them recently, and have more on the way
from distro right now.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Scott Carullo wrote:
> I would not concern yourself with this option because you can't buy one if
> you wanted to right now.
>
> Scott Carullo
> Brevard Wireless
> 3
LOL, and I have permanent black marks on my office carpet, my home, my
truck, my clothes, my harness etc etc...
When coax seal gets HOT it doesn't melt but it gets real soft and sticky
and will not ever come off anything. Its been such a mess here in FL that
I have actually stopped using it.
Here are a few
17 001970057AF7 36/36 -68/-68 -90 0 21 8 4592
18. 0060B33BC71E 48/48 -64/-67 -93 0 4 15 9479
19. 0060B3453746 48/48 -65/-67 -93 0 1 26 454
20. 0060B38F0706 48/48 -66/-67 -91 0 21 2 83727602
21. 0060B33F7AE6 48/48 -60/-59 -92 0 4 3 3597
22. 0060B33F80DD 48/48 -57/-58 -94
Noise?
Any stats?
I have 30 or so updated and no issues so far.
ryan
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:20 PM, NGL wrote:
> I upgraded 50 TR-902 client and 2 AP's now they are erratic, and have to be
> reboot from the client side. Also I am having problem accessing some
> clients
> via the web. The AP
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 17:16 -0600, Data Technology wrote:
> This won't work because if the dsl provider is down somewhere within
> their network the dsl modem will still answer ping requests on the local
> interface.
I have not read all of this thread. Here is the approach I use and it
works w
Ok, Thanks. I have enough to get started. Will cross the next problem
when I get to it.
Well I guess I am going home. I'll play around a little with this tonight.
Dennis Burgess wrote:
> It will work, but there is other work to be done.
>
> ---
lol. I beat ya to it! hahaha
---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linkt
can't do that if the gateway is on the DSL modem 3 foot from the MT.
Does you no good.
---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
WISPA Ve
Unless it's a Modem/router it's not the gateway - it's just converting DSL to
Ethernet.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Data Technology
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 3:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA
It will work, but there is other work to be done.
---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member - wispa.org
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik & WISP Support Services
WISPA Vendor Member
Office: 314-735-0270 Web
Anyone know of a way to find out what freq a weather radar is operating on?
I know of several local ones and would like to know what freq they operate
on for safety sake. Any ideas? I've looked everywhere and found nothing?
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
--
I upgraded 50 TR-902 client and 2 AP's now they are erratic, and have to be
reboot from the client side. Also I am having problem accessing some clients
via the web. The AP have to be rebooted at their location.
NGL
--
From: "D. Ryan Spott"
Sent:
I've got an extra set, I don't need right now, never deployed will sell
for my cost.
Regards
Michael Baird
> I would not concern yourself with this option because you can't buy one if
> you wanted to right now.
>
> Scott Carullo
> Brevard Wireless
> 321-205-1100 x102
>
>
> --
This won't work because if the dsl provider is down somewhere within
their network the dsl modem will still answer ping requests on the local
interface.
Jerry Richardson wrote:
> It's also likely the gateway doesn't change, just the IP address. Ping the
> gateway on WAN1 and if it stops respon
I would not concern yourself with this option because you can't buy one if
you wanted to right now.
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
From: "Jerry Richardson"
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 12:57 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: R
Can you be more specific?
ryan
On Dec 1, 2009, at 3:00 PM, "NGL" wrote:
> Has anyone had problems with the new Firmware TR6-5.0.2Rt?
> If so what and what is the fix?
>
>
> ---
> ---
> ---
> ---
>
> WISPA Wants You! Join to
It's also likely the gateway doesn't change, just the IP address. Ping the
gateway on WAN1 and if it stops responding activate WAN2
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 3:01 PM
T
If you can specify source address for ping then do a policy route.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources."
--- Albert Einstein
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Data Technology
Josh Luthman wrote:
>> I was thinking that if I just change the distance value to a higher
>>
> value then I could leave the interface up and nat should use the route
> with the lowest distance value. (not tested yet)
>
> That is how static routing works - it picks the lowest distance. If yo
That's a good idea - find an IP only responsive on that network. I think
DNS servers will respond to pings (but not DNS queries) off network. Test
it with dig/ping. I can tell you if it works from my network if you share
the IP.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne
Has anyone had problems with the new Firmware TR6-5.0.2Rt?
If so what and what is the fix?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
just ping the DSL provider's DNS server.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Data Technology
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 2:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] suggestions for dual wan dhcp auto fail over
> I was thinking that if I just change the distance value to a higher
value then I could leave the interface up and nat should use the route
with the lowest distance value. (not tested yet)
That is how static routing works - it picks the lowest distance. If you
have two routes identical except th
Yes the dsl modem is handing out a dhcp address. I figure I will have
to ping way back upstream to check the connection vs just pinging the
dhcp modem.
I was thinking that if I just change the distance value to a higher
value then I could leave the interface up and nat should use the route
wit
No one that works on HPUX is a wimp...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources."
--- Albert Einstein
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Data Technology wrote:
> Well I have always
Well I have always used the command line for most things
I learned to configure hp-ux systems back in the 80's when the command
line was the only way.
I still configure my linux servers via the command line and laugh at
anyone that wants to us a GUI.
But MT has made configuring via the GUI so eas
There are other things to also keep in mind when dealing with DHCP, i.e.
is your DHCP being handed out locally. sSo if you have a DSL line is
the DSL modem handing this out? if so, then watching that connection is
useless, you will have to do some policy based routing and checks to
verify that it
I don't think so. Page 17 contrasts the FreeBSD implementation with
"most implementations" on page 16.
Mike Hammett wrote:
> So does page 16 imply that a GPS system could be used?
>
> It sounds like these new Atheros chipsets have TDMA hardware on them.
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent
I think it's a fairly big project, although a lot of the fine work has been
done. I started drooling when reading the paper a few weeks ago.
It would be a kicker to have an open-source multi-platform TDMA
implementation. UBNT has encouraged open source firmware on their platforms
for a long time,
Lucky you, glad you could have 3.x everywhere!
I could be wrong as it may just be my experience, but the command line for
custom things is necessary as the GUI doesn't show everything. I started
with GUI and moved a lot to CLI as it seems easier/faster. Hopefully it's
simply a personal preferenc
Yeah, when I looked at the article you listed it clicked. I don't use
the command line except when I have to so I was a little off on the
command to change the distance setting.
I have version 4.3 so that should not be a problem.
I've been using MT for several years but I have gotten past the 2
So does page 16 imply that a GPS system could be used?
It sounds like these new Atheros chipsets have TDMA hardware on them.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Randy Cosby"
Sent: Tuesday, December
First one is definitely not going to work.
Second one is what you need =)
Do keep in mind you need 3.11+. If you're new to Mikrotik there is little
reason to be concerned, but some users such as myself still have 2.9.50 or
51 stuff!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wa
Josh,
That is what I was trying to do but I was trying to use "/ip route set
ether1 distance=3" instead of "/ip dhcp-client set ether1
default-route-distance=3".
Thanks
LaRoy
Josh Luthman wrote:
> This might help you
> http://stfunoo.be/?p=268
>
> I like using route distance since 3.11 DHCP ca
This might help you
http://stfunoo.be/?p=268
I like using route distance since 3.11 DHCP can do it.
It has worked very well for me.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources."
---
Sounds too easy :) I'll give it a try.
Thanks
LaRoy
e...@wisp-router.com wrote:
> Just change the nat to use the other public ip since your already
> masquerading just change that rule to src-nat and set the public ip to
> src-nat to.
>
> /Eje
> --Original Message--
> From: Data Techn
Just change the nat to use the other public ip since your already masquerading
just change that rule to src-nat and set the public ip to src-nat to.
/Eje
--Original Message--
From: Data Technology
Sender: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
To: WISPA General List
ReplyTo: WISPA General List
Subje
I am trying to configure an rb450 v4.3 to connect to 2 different
providers with dhcp using 1 as the primary and the other as a backup.
I would like it to switch over to the backup if the primary service is down.
I want to nat local users to either service.
I assume I will need to use netwatch to
Perhaps he's now just a carrier...
;-)
Regards,
Jeff
Jeff Broadwick
ImageStream
800-813-5123 x106 (US/Can)
+1 574-935-8484 x106 (Int'l)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2
Oh heck no! I'd NEVER live through it the second time!
At 12:52 PM 12/1/2009, you wrote:
>I dunno about that, Butch. I had a lot more fun in my late teens\early
>20s... before I came down with the WISP illness. Sometimes I wish I could
>go back in time. :-p
>
>
>-
>Mike Hammett
>Intellig
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 12:52 -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I dunno about that, Butch. I had a lot more fun in my late teens\early
> 20s... before I came down with the WISP illness. Sometimes I wish I could
> go back in time. :-p
Yeah...there's no cure for that disease, either. SIGH. You'd t
I dunno about that, Butch. I had a lot more fun in my late teens\early
20s... before I came down with the WISP illness. Sometimes I wish I could
go back in time. :-p
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
-
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 10:27 -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
> True, but MT has had a lot of issues over the years with N-Streme. Alvarion
> (AFAIK, just works).
I'm not aware of anyone wanting to go back in time. What "used to be"
true isn't now, and I prefer living in the here and now. BTW, "nstr
I have a backup with another WISP as well, but I don't quite have enough to
offer much in return.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Rick Harnish"
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 12:01 PM
To: "'W
Price != Quality
Windows 7 costs $400 while Linux distros are free
Ubnt stuff is ~$100 while Engenius is ~$125
PSTN PBX can be >$10k while Asterisk/FreePBX is free (plus $1000 hardware)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"The secret t
Well... it's always easier to cooperate if you know " who's 'er? "
Rick Harnish wrote:
> We do that regularly in the Hoosier State! :)
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Mike Hammett
>> Sent: Tuesday, Decembe
We do that regularly in the Hoosier State! :)
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 11:33 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] A Ridiculous Failure of Critical
I am really, really having a hard time getting my head around using $90 radios
for "must work" links.
Maybe I'm being obstinate, I don't know.
Just seems wrong somehow.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Jayso
My neighbor who is also on Charter was able to route through us, and did
so during their last outage. He still has a couple of T1s through AT&T
that are paid through the end of December, so he ended up routing
through those during this one.
OSPF and properly setup costs/NAT rules is wonderful
It was resolved about 1:30am MST. I watched the first pings start
passing from my edge router and switched back over within about 10
seconds. Charter didn't call anyone until 5am, so that is the time we
are using to figure our credits.
I get a $40 credit on next months bill. Whoopideee do
Outages mailing list had one member claim it was resolved at 2:30am.
Is this not so?
On 12/1/09, Travis Johnson wrote:
> This is why we have 3 different providers, with different paths out of
> our NOC and on different fiber pairs leaving town.
>
> Qwest had an outage here about 9 months ago that
True, but MT has had a lot of issues over the years with N-Streme. Alvarion
(AFAIK, just works).
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Butch Evans"
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 12:19 AM
To: ; "W
This is where it would be nice if WISPs were friendly enough with each other
in their area to interconnect their networks.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Matt Larsen - Lists"
Sent: Tuesday, De
I don't have dealings with them, but from a financial point of view,
I've heard good things about them which probably means they do have 1/2
clue on how to run operations unlike Fairpoint who we compete with.
On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 10:11 -0600, Blake Bowers wrote:
> Windstream. AKA Alltell Wire
Windstream. AKA Alltell Wireline. Formed when Alltell
spun off their wireline operations from their wireless (cellular).
These guys ain't stupid. They know that they cannot offer
plain old telephone service anymore, and are very aggressive.
Over 1 million high speed internet customers.
3.2 bi
This is why we have 3 different providers, with different paths out of
our NOC and on different fiber pairs leaving town.
Qwest had an outage here about 9 months ago that took two of my
competitors completely down for 5 hours... yet we were completely
unaffected. :)
Travis
Microserv
Matt Lars
Which isn't "true" TDMA as the term has conventionally been used. ;)
Travis
Microserv
Randy Cosby wrote:
I think what we're talking about is the TDMA package for Freebsd (which
is probably exactly what is being used by UBNT).
http://people.freebsd.org/~sam/TDMAPresentation-20090921.pdf
Jayson, redo the link and send it again; I want to see it.
At 09:22 AM 12/1/2009, you wrote:
>If this is their install truck, I don't think you have to worry about much.
>
>[image:
>?ui=2&view=att&th=1254ad61273873f9&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=ii_1254ad61273873f9&zw]
>
>LOL
>
>
>
>On Tue, Dec
Exactly! You had how many people working on your project? What resources
did you have available? Then Ubiquiti comes in and trumps it all! With
that I'd just do a "wait and see" for what UBNT comes out with. I'm sure
there isn't much they haven't been trying that we couldn't think of
ourselves
George,
Glad to see it's not just us. We put in some MT N links when 4 was still
beta. It worked awesome. Awesome.
Then, somehow, the units have found their way into the upgrade stream, and
performance sucks now.
After pulling our hair out trying to figure out the problem, we choked it up
to f
I think the Rockets are going to be great, but right now today the best
software is a beta version of 5.1. That pretty much says it all.
We have pulled all our MikroTik N links back out. 4.0beta3 was pretty good,
but N wireless performance and stability took a real nosedive with the
release versio
I thought the same thing. UBNT is already trying to work the ACK out of the
Airmax, was supposed to be out in the newest firmware but it's still there.
So we'll see ACK gone soon already in their airmax line, which is TDMA MIMO.
I'm sure someone can put their own twist on it as well for another pr
At first I was like "huh? " but thinking of the now and present, the Rockets
are new and the longevity has yet to be tested. I have both UBNT and MT
backhauls, love UBNT to no end but it's from the ease of use aspect. My
UBNT needs to be taken care of from time to time, the MT is just put up and
If this is their install truck, I don't think you have to worry about much.
[image:
?ui=2&view=att&th=1254ad61273873f9&attid=0.1&disp=attd&realattid=ii_1254ad61273873f9&zw]
LOL
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Mike wrote:
> My primary competition for the past few years has been Iowa
> Telecom
My primary competition for the past few years has been Iowa
Telecom. They have been purchased by Windstream. I knew what to
expect from Iowa Telecom, but don't now.
Have any of you had experience with Windstream? Should I be bracing
for some "real" competition?
Iowa Telecom decisions, in my
Is anyone an iDirect Partner? I may have a lead. Contact me off-list.
- Cliff
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
I appreciate the gesture. Iowa does have a lot of options; just not
in my area which is very rural. Qwest has fiber to the home
northwest of me. I am trying to engineer another backhaul from a
point there back to my tower. The wheels of progress sometimes turn slowly.
Mike
At 08:27 AM 12/
Rick:
You have been getting some good advice here. I am not a networking
guru and have never played one on TV, but do know a thing or two about RF.
It seems with your physical layout you may have an opportunity for
some space diversity. A simple link will probably serve you with 3
nines or s
We are tapped into fiber about 10 miles from Iowa on Illinois. Traffic runs
to Chicago, not across sprint.
Last I knew, Iowa had lots of options, but if they don't pan out, the
neighbor between us youSQ might have an option
was hoping to offer an option, but 100 miles is probably to far
--
Timing of this "Failure of Critical Infrastructure" seems suspect to
Charter's bankruptcy. All existing outstanding shares have been cancelled.
I wonder if Paul Allen somehow left Qwest holding the bag like he did the
rest of his shareholders...just a thought.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Char
Looking for input on which antennas to use
Was mentioned briefly on one of the lists that using a 16-120 instead of a
19-120 would give better coverage, We have 7 or so 19-120's deployed and they
just seem to be very "particular". seems about 60 degree wide, and 2 mile out
sweet spot.
Looki
Scott,
We are a little over 100 miles west of the Quad Cities, close to hwy
30, just east of central Iowa. Your thoughts?
Mike
At 08:00 AM 12/1/2009, you wrote:
>How far away from Illinois are you?
>
>
>
>-
>Scott Piehn
>
>- Original Message
How far away from Illinois are you?
-
Scott Piehn
- Original Message -
From: "Mike"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 7:52 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] A Ridiculous Failure of Critical Infrastructure
> Mediacomm was hav
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo