To get a real test, you need to run iperf with numerous threads using the
-P parameter. It's the only way to push 1G+
reliably.
mc
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Sam wrote:
> Has anyone used iPerf before? I'm curious of your thoughts as to the
> reliability, and how the results would map
Note on IPerf! It tests and reports UPLOAD by default, not download. Check
the commandline options carefully to differentiate between UDP, TCP, Up,
Down and concurrency. It will gladly send 1Gbps UDP and report that it is
doing so... but that doesn't mean jack!
-d
-r
-b
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:
ay or may not be accurate.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
From: "Sam"
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:50:51 PM
Subject: [WISPA] iPerf as a Real-World Performance Simulation Tool
Has anyone used iPerf before? I
On 11/12/2013 09:15 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Careful using FTP as, particularly on fast links, you may find yourself
> measuring disk IO instead.
>
>
If you can exceed modern day disk I/O on a wireless network...I'm
impressed.
Bret
___
Wireless mailing
s very accurate in what it tells you. What you draw from
>>> those conclusions may or may not be accurate.
>>>
>>> -
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com [1]
>>>
>>> -------
:
>
>> iPerf is very accurate in what it tells you. What you draw from those
>> conclusions may or may not be accurate.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>> ------
gt; http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>> From: "Sam"
>>> To: wireless@wispa.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:50:51 PM
>>> Subject: [WISPA] iPerf as a Real-World Performance Simulation Tool
>>>
>>>
>>> H
@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
*Sent: *Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:50:51 PM
*Subject: *[WISPA] iPerf as a Real-World Performance Simulation Tool
Has anyone used iPerf before? I'm curious of your thoughts as to the
reliability, and how the results would map to a real-worl
@wispa.org
> *Sent: *Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:50:51 PM
> *Subject: *[WISPA] iPerf as a Real-World Performance Simulation Tool
>
>
> Has anyone used iPerf before? I'm curious of your thoughts as to the
> reliability, and how the results would map to a real-world environmen
Use jperf for simplicity sake ☺
-Tim
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:35 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] iPerf as a Real-World Performance Simulation Tool
iPerf is very accurate in
2, 2013 12:50:51 PM
Subject: [WISPA] iPerf as a Real-World Performance Simulation Tool
Has anyone used iPerf before? I'm curious of your thoughts as to the
reliability, and how the results would map to a real-world environment.
For example, a friend was testing some 3.65 radios (which had
If you run TCP from a machine that has enough CPU they are very accurate.
On Nov 12, 2013, at 13:50, Sam wrote:
> Has anyone used iPerf before? I'm curious of your thoughts as to the
> reliability, and how the results would map to a real-world environment.
> For example, a friend was testing
Has anyone used iPerf before? I'm curious of your thoughts as to the
reliability, and how the results would map to a real-world environment.
For example, a friend was testing some 3.65 radios (which had no
connection to the Internet) using iPerf. Based upon the iPerf results, a
determination wa
13 matches
Mail list logo
