really
needed? And what areas of your business or network also prevent the CIR Full
QOS guarantee from being realized?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless
Correct. Any medium used to deliver broadband can be broken. However,
frankly due to the fewer points of failure we typically see less downtime on
unlicensed wireless links than we do conventional LEC T1 circuits.
Like many things it all comes down to the geographic area. Would you expect
a
and over and
over to this list. I do not need to be told every day that VL is bad in
the world according to Brad Belton. We have all heard you say it 100
times I think. (Maybe several time that if we look at your posts to
other lists about the same issues) Please change the record. There are
many
haven't personally had direct
experience. But the constant bashing that some product will guarantee
business class services in interference and another won't is tiresome, and
just turns people off from the good content that people appreciate.
Rich
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton
lol...gotta love it! I'd argue it doesn't have to be only $300 to sell.
I'd pay two or three times that for such a product.
But honestly that isn't that much to ask as many products are already so
close...Alvarion VL being one of the closest, but still no cigar.
I like what you said about
Nope on both accounts.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 6:33 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] US Wireless Online Sells 50.1 Percent
Are they the company that bought Allen
Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:39 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] US Wireless Online Sells 50.1 Percent
Nope on both accounts.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Tuesday, January 02
Yes, Mobilepro bought ShreveNet along with a payphone company and a variety
of other small companies. Bottom of this webpage http://www.nationwide.net
lists some of the companies they have acquired.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:51 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] US Wireless Online Sells 50.1 Percent
I
Hello Patrick,
Thanks for the explanation, however I'm not sure how simply reversing the
pin-outs will improve cross talk.
The Alvarion VL Manual doesn't specify the function of each Pin/Wire color.
I assume Green Orange pairs are still used for Data and the Blue Brown
pairs are used for
Ahh ok, neither do I or the people I've spoken with about this. In another
post I illustrated the Alvarion VL pin out is simply inverted. Don't see
how that could make any difference in cross talk rejection.
So, can we expect Alvarion will at some point begin to adhere to industry
wiring codes?
Hello Tom,
First let me saydamn Cowboys...sigh
I'm not sure I follow exactly what you are saying, but we have pushed better
than 800Mbps HDX and more than 700Mbps FDX aggregate between GigE MT
routers. Checking the router Interfaces show a 1500MTU setting. Is that
what you are talking
Nice job.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 8:57 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Scrivner's story
*A WISP with Vision *
I'll agree with Mark on this. There are many that are exploiting city
counsel's across the country to only line their own pockets. I have read
about one muni-wifi failure after another...point me to a real success
story. As a percentage my guess is the failures far, far outweigh the
successes.
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Muni networks, the good, bad and ugly
Brad,
Here is a link you might want to read up on.
http://muniwireless.com/municipal/1556
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Brad Belton wrote:
I'll agree with Mark on this. There are many that are exploiting city
counsel's across the country to only
grin...read my mind.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:49 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advanced Bandwidth Management
Have you thought about selling the customer a
Holy cow! Stepped away from the 'puter for a bit and see that everyone's
beating up on poor 'ol Matt for making a perfectly correct statement!
No surprise as to some of the people commenting here that largely promote
best effort gear, but others that have commented should know better.
Rick,
Appears to be a manual thing...
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 1:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] I'm gonna do the honors without permission--
Simple, you price it for what your market will bear. 15Mbps handed off via
a few feet of CAT5 inside a CoLo center is obviously less costly than 15Mbps
several miles from the central business district.
Per MB prices can range from several hundred (or more) dollars a MB to less
than a few bucks a
Somebody turn the flip'n moderation back on!
Patrick, let's be clear; you're motivation is driven only by pushing more
Alvarion boxes off the shelf. Don't try to play the white knight here under
the guise of looking out for everyone. You're a company man simply after
what puts food on your
Agreed. Crazy.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:51 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Disagree with me and I won't buy your product
I've been following the increasingly
Crazy as an astronaut with a BB gun in a diaper on a road trip on a mission
to kill someone. grin
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE:
No kidding.
So...in one breath you're saying WISPA isn't playing the FCC Cop, and in
another you make a completely unfounded comment like this? shaking head
I must have missed where Travis said he was deploying 5.4GHz APs and
thumbing his nose at the FCC.
Geesh, what an outlandish and
The McKinney, TX address doesn't come up as a good address using Yahoo or
Google maps. Can you confirm the address, provide coordinates or possibly
identify the closest major intersection?
What type of service are they looking for?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Correct and that I believe is what Matt's point is. Too early to kick CLWR
to the curb for at least two reasons:
(1) short term market downturn
(2) additional 4M shares issued
Both of these items can and often will soften a stock value.
All that said I think $20 - $24 a share is ridiculous
to be made for a company to survive long term,
when they are kept alive by the stock market?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent
money sitting
around to invest, shouldn't we be investing it in ourselves for a higher
return and less risk?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent
In the event we need to extend a CAT5 cable we use the 3M UY connectors.
Keep the twist of each wire as close as possible and then tape, Coax-Seal
and more tape. We've never had a problem with this method...knock on wood.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh dear, please keep the off topic comments off list and under your tinfoil
hat.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 11:16 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Spring has sprung!
Hello Tom,
Got any pictures?
Good to hear they improved the mounting design. The old design was too
small for many of the pipes we use. If the new design will accommodate 3
1/2 - 4 pipes then that is a nice improvement.
Wow, they changed the CAT5 weather seal and now a terminated CAT5 cable
Agreed. Just getting caught up on some of my email readings and strongly
believe Jack and John are off the mark here.
6GHz, 11GHz, 18GHz, 23GHz, 24GHz, 60GHz and 80-90GHz should all be important
to us as a group. Any frequency that can be used by fixed wireless
operators should be important
Curious as to why Cogent would de-peer with anyone?
You're peered with LimeLight and WV Fiber?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2007 9:25 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject:
I read somewhere that you don't want to perform the latest Update from
Apple with a hacked IPhone. Something about the update can break the
hacked phones. Of course Apple says the update has no intention of doing
so...yah right!
Quick search came up with this:
This doesn't come as a surprise. We deployed a couple VL units and they
were all but shut down due to a less than ideal RF environment. Countless
hours over days if not weeks with Alvarion's finest in an effort to remedy
the situation were unsuccessful.
Reflecting back on our particular
Have to agree the iPhone is just plain cool. Sure makes my Sprint HTC Mogul
look like a clunky, dumpy brick by comparison! lol
I've been a Sprint wireless subscriber since their inception. Just can't
bring myself to jump ship...even for the iPhone. sigh
Best,
Brad
-Original
.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 11:18 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?
This doesn't come as a surprise. We deployed a couple VL
] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 8:18 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.4 GHz ?
This doesn't come as a surprise. We deployed a couple VL units and they
were all but shut down due to a less than ideal RF environment.
Countless
hours over days if not weeks
expending considerable effort to
salvage the client relationship.
Geeshh...give me a break!
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 11:18 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 5.4
Hey Travis,
What calculator are you using and what is it telling you the expected rssi
will be?
Best,
Brad
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 11:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject:
I've been meaning to throw this out to a couple lists for some time now.
My father-in-law is looking for service and may be willing to provide space
for a tower as well. He tells me the local computer shop isn't aware of any
wireless providers in the area, but I know I've seen antennas on the
Well done Travis. Congratulations!
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Award
Hi,
I would like to publicly thank everyone in the
Hello Ralph,
Very interesting read.
As an early Ricochet adopter I'd like to add one of these boxes to my museum
collection alongside my Ricochet PCMCIA card. Let me know off list if you can
come up with a good example.
Best,
Brad
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Wow, already down 30%+ this morning. Hate to say I told ya so (not your
Frank, but the list in general) on the over-valuation of Clearwire, but I
told ya so.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Frank Muto
Sent: Thursday,
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 8:21 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Sprint and Clearwire scrap WiMax deal
Wow, already down 30%+ this morning. Hate to say I told ya so (not your
Frank, but the list in general
consolidators, BUYING up local WISPs.
Just my 2 cents.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 9:20 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA
Wouldn't BGP multi-hop have worked in this situation?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ryan Langseth
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 10:11 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion VL TRUTH
You are correct.
, and my limited BGP
skills ;)
Although I do not think multi-hop BGP would have been any harder, it
just avoids the extra delay and load for us.
Ryan
On Nov 13, 2007, at 10:28 PM, Brad Belton wrote:
Wouldn't BGP multi-hop have worked in this situation?
Best,
Brad
-Original
Hello Cameron,
As good as Alvarion gear is or may be, it is still best effort gear and not
committed rate. Many factors will play into what an end user will actually
be able to produce across Alvarion gear.
If you are looking for a committed rate backhaul you need to look at the
Trango GigaLINK
Yes and yes they handle the license. Not sue if it was five days on the
license for us, but if they are telling you five days then I'd believe it.
The beamwidths are so tight on these links that the chances of you receiving
or causing interference is almost nil.
Best,
Brad
-Original
Ok, here is a curve ball for you Butch; WinBox into a MikroTik router
running v2.8. grin
Only because recently you said you couldn't WinBox into a v2.8 client router
we were working on together from your Linux machine. ducking
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Just wouldn't be Christmas without Allen's annual post!
Merry Christmas Allen!
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Allen Marsalis
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 5:27 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Just a suggestion, but I would cross reference your cable loss settings with
the manual's guidelines.
Your flaky behavior could be due to the ODU being overdriven or starved for
power. Then again if you've already had Trango looking into this I'm sure
they have already thought to double check
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bryan Scott
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:21 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for short licensed link
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a suggestion, but I would cross reference your cable loss settings
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Looking for short licensed link
Brad Belton wrote:
If you like, please provide me the cable length and type on each end.
Then
provide me the loss figures you have entered for each side. We'll compare
notes between yours and ours.
What version are you
Trango GigaLINK radios have eight wayside T1 circuits alongside four
independent copper GigE ports for data. If this is too pricy or overkill
then I would look into the RAD Data Communications Airmux-200. Gives you up
to four T1 ports along with Ethernet transport all in one package. Works
well
I received a notification/invitation from Patrick/Alvarion on Jan 23rd.
Automatically added it to my calendar. Didn't say anything about limited
seating other than the webinar was for North American wISPs only.`
I followed the hyperlink webinar testing instructions and appear to be good
to go.
. The limited seats refers to how many dial-ins
are permitted. I have already upped the quantity I need so I should be
able to accommodate just about anyone.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:20
A quick search on the tornado that ripped through Fort Worth came up with
this:
http://www.fortwortharchitecture.com/tornado.htm
I was standing outside watching the sky when this happened. The tornado
touched down about 2 miles east of me...really was a mess. Pictures don't
do it justice.
. therefore I don't
think they should have ANY say in what I do with MY company.
Travis
Microserv
Brad Belton wrote:
I see this as a good thing. We don't really care what our users do with
the
bandwidth they buy from us as long as it's legal. Bandwidth hungry
applications are good for our model
I can agree with this approach. Encourage the providers with a lesser
product to clearly illustrate they have a lesser product. Leave it to the
consumer to decide if they want to pay for a better (non-limited) product or
not, but don't let the lesser provider get away with selling one thing and
I can appreciate your position and I think George has hit it squarely on the
head. Simply state exactly what your service is going to provide...nothing
more and nothing less. I think the FCC is more interested in providers
possibly bait and switching the consumer than they are at regulating our
company.
Travis
Microserv
Brad Belton wrote:
I see this as a good thing. We don't really care what our users do
with the
bandwidth they buy from us as long as it's legal. Bandwidth hungry
applications are good for our model as the more they need the more
they buy.
I don't see that as a bad
they should have ANY say in what I do with MY company.
Travis
Microserv
Brad Belton wrote:
I see this as a good thing. We don't really care what our users do
with the
bandwidth they buy from us as long as it's legal. Bandwidth hungry
applications are good for our model
Yes, it is case sensitive.
Brad
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 3:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Any Trango Command Line Experts?
Try:
# eth link 10FDX
I think it's case sensitive.
I believe we have one of the first units in the field. I was told it was
#7. Had a couple initial bumps with the gear during the installation, but
nothing Trango wasn't able to resolve overnight for us.
So far we've only had one issue with the gear not passing data. No idea
what caused it, but
Agreed. Intel motherboards, CPUs and NICs are the best we've found so far
for MikroTik routers. Just a few days ago we had what appeared to be our
first Intel based 3GHz router fail due to Intel hardware. After swapping
DoM, RAM, power supply and even the motherboard it turned out to be a bad
Ice.
Reduce wind load.
Aesthetics.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Nash
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 5:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Radome
ICE...
Mark Nash
UnwiredWest
78 Centennial Loop
Suite E
lol...maybe me too!
Website didn't timeout on me, but I still haven't seen anything yet either.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 3:41 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FYI
This should be interesting...
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of CHUCK PROFITO
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 12:01 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future
Patrick,
If not 70 miles and 30 mbps,
what are the real
By the way, the VL would in turn smoke the Canopy and do it in the same
channel size.
Unless there have been some terrific changes made to Alvarion VL since our
last run around the block with it, your statement will only hold true in RF
friendly environments. Add a healthy dose of
.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 11:17 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Future
Exactly. A couple weeks ago an Avarion rep called
This is well out of your budget for this project, but we recently put up a
BridgeWave 80GHz with 2' antennas. Nice gear aside from the rinky-dink ODU
enclosure. Pretty amazing to see a product at that price level with a
plastic single edge housing seal with one center thumb screw holding the lid
Yah, Rogelio left that pretty open ended. For anyone to be able to give you
suggestions more information will be needed.
Path distance?
Line of Sight?
Antenna size/mount limitations?
RF limitations?
Required payload capacity?
Required uptime? (e.g. 99.9%, 99.99%, 99.999%)
Interface required?
Damn, there goes any hope for free water service too...
grin
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 7:17 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] Philadelphia's municipal WiFi network to go
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Philadelphia's municipal WiFi network to go dark
It's starting to look like the dot-bomb era again, only in the
communications realm this time.
Travis
Microserv
Brad Belton wrote:
Well, true on the original failed Muni-WiFi business model, but my comment
was based
Agreed. There is no good reason not to give one public IP to each client.
There are many reasons why it is a bad idea to NAT clients behind private
IPs.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, May
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 4:31 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Question concerning IP Schema
Agreed. There is no good reason not to give one public IP to each
client.
There are many reasons why it is a bad idea to NAT
I think it's fair to say that any ISP of size has in fact done this once if
not twice. It's not the end of the world unless there was little planning
done beforehand. I've experienced both. grin
We do not use DHCP anywhere, but within the client LAN environment.
However, I don't see where
We had several Packeteer boxes years ago. Fantastic product and IMO (and
first hand testing at the time) was far and away the best bandwidth
management device available. I have no reason not to believe the Packeteer
is still the finest bandwidth management device available today.
We moved away
Hello Shaun,
We really need to know more about what exactly isn't working well with your
current setup to better help, but I'll give you two suggestions to consider.
Ditch the omni antennas and place all three APS on the center building with
the Internet feed. Then use three 120* or maybe
Wow. I'm impressed and would have never have predicted this.
Good for you Patrick and all the best with Sageni. I'll be interested in
learning more about your new company as information comes available.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Mission critical equates to multiple paths and technologies in my book.
Network hardware can break whether it costs $100 or $100,000.
I would consider a licensed unlicensed combination for this path. If your
sites will allow you could go with 6GHz and a 5Ghz failover path. Both
links could
) to other solutions
available today.
Best,
Brad Belton
BelWave Communications
O: 817-737-3124 #101
F: 817-336-7031
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stephen Patrick
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 12:39 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject
Sorry everyone. Meant to be off list.
Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Belton
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:28 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] mission critical 100Mbps links
Hello Stephen,
Good to hear
Doesn't 11Ghz have a 4' minimum or was that changed?
Last rumor I heard was you might be able to get a 3' or possibly even a 2'
approved for 11GHz, but if it becomes a problem then you'll be forced to
change to an antenna that doesn't cause a problem with a tighter
pattern...like 4'.
Best,
Agreed...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 11:18 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 477 NPRM Comments Due
Jack Unger wrote:
delete
That only works if you do it silently. By
How long have you had the link installed?
How long is the Ethernet cable that you are running the PoE on?
Are you powering the unit over the management port or the data port?
We had trouble keeping an Apex unit powered up some time ago. It would run
for 15min to an hour and then stop. Turned
] Trango APEX link trouble
Voltage on the power supply can be increased if all you need is a
shorter power run.
On 5/14/10, Brad Belton b...@belwave.com wrote:
How long have you had the link installed?
How long is the Ethernet cable that you are running the PoE on?
Are you powering the unit over
the current power injector has a bad component that doesn't react
well
to heat.
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Brad Belton b...@belwave.com
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango APEX link trouble
How long have
We've leased 38GHz spectrum from FiberTower (actually the company prior to
FiberTower) for several years now. We also have one very small fiber PtP
circuit from them simply because they had some available bandwidth between
two common sites and it was easier (which is rare) for us to have them
Our Dell 6248s seem to be ok with generic SFPs. I guess YMMV and exactly
what generic SFP you source.
BTW Gino, I checked our source and he's out of ZX right now.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Faisal
On 5/25/2010 3:53 PM, Brad Belton wrote:
Our Dell 6248s seem to be ok with generic SFPs. I guess YMMV and
exactly
what generic SFP you source.
BTW Gino, I checked our source and he's out of ZX right now.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
We apply Coax-Seal around the cable clamp gland wrapping it out to the 3/8
armored CAT5 cable, but not around the 1/8 turn locking collar. I agree the
Apex cable entries are about as chickenshit as we've ever seen, but so far
no water issues when additional Coax-Seal is used.
Best,
Brad
As Travis said make sure you've issued the tftpd on command, but also make
sure your router isn't blocking or firewalling the traffic from reaching the
radios. Do your radios have a valid ipconfig with a good gateway?
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
http://cbs11tv.com/local/att.u.verse.2.1783395.html
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List:
,
Brad Belton
BelWave Communications
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 9:35 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Missing Bridgewave
Allthough, I generally dislike
I have a lead for a 5MB business class customer in Tyler, TX. off of the
South side of Loop 323. Please contact me off list if interested.
Thank you,
Brad
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
Butch Evans put together a MikroTik script for us that monitors our APC
UPSs. Sends us an email when power is lost along with battery time
remaining. Then sends us an email again once power is restored and again
updates the remaining battery life. Works well, but unfortunately the
RB493AH
Cameron - Nick,
No kidding, an internal battery will render the unit unreachable even after
a hard factory reset? Good to know. I guess I'll order a couple more
replacements, so I can then crack open the ones that have become doorstops
and check them out.
Thanks,
Brad
-Original
I agree with Josh's comment. Butch has been the first and last MikroTik
consultant we've needed.
Best,
Brad
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Alan Bryant
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 7:16 PM
To: WISPA General List
301 - 400 of 583 matches
Mail list logo
