On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:16:41 +1000, Jason Foss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can the DOM
check the 'visitedness' of an a element?
no
Is there a way to use the DOM to scan the page for visited links and
assign them a class?
yes, if you change link style using CSS :visited and look for this
style in a.cu
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:26:26 -, Patrick Griffiths <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm not sure what the rational for dropping the "start= " from
was, and at first glance it seems an odd thing to do. Like others have
mention, I can see cases where it would be useful - a results list
with
1,000 entry,
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:57:06 +0800, Bert Doorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Really depends on the audience, the client, etc but I usually draw the
line at "5th generation" browsers (MSIE5+, Opera 5+, Netscape 6/7,
Firefox, Mozilla, Safari, etc)
You can totally ignore Opera 5 and 6.
92% of Opera u
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 23:07:39 +1100, Michael Cordover
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An ordered list means there is an order, *not* that there is anything
particular assocated with that order. So, think about it in terms of
set theory, if you will. An unordered list is like a set: {1, 2, 3}
which is
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 23:19:02 +, Ian Fenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Had I been doing it with HTML Transitional or similar, I would have
displayed a second page of results as follows:
First result
Second...
...
Do you have any suggestions as to how I could achieve a similar effect
with XH
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:20:08 +1000, Barry Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Is it possible (without using flash transparency) to display html on top
of a Flash Element in Firefox?
In Firefox/Win and Opera8/Win you can if Flash has WMODE enabled.
On Linux and in older browser versions WMODE is no
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 12:13:15 +1100, Neerav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some searching revealed these:
http://www.htmlref.com/reference/appb/css_unicode-bidi.htm states
support is:
CSS2
IE 5, 5.5, 6
Nav 6, 7
No Opera support
This page has outdated info.
Opera 7.5 has full support for CSS21, includ
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:24:35 -, Mike Kear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For example in a survey, if you indicate any default answers, you are
automatically slanting the results, and if someone doesnt make a choice
to a question, they wont get a warning popup, instead they will have a
selectio
I don't like putting "Skip to main content" or "Skip to navigation" link,
because they can be seen in search results.
I thought about replacing it with ">>>" or something that won't contain
keywords and won't go in the way in search results, but that probably is a
killer for screen readers.
Do y
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:44:21 -, designer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Reduce Bandwidth Costs
Not relevant - small site, with folk increasingly being on a high speed
line. Here in UK (where it's called Broadband) the user pays a standard
fee, no matter how much/how long he/she uses it. (that
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:14:04 +1100, Ryan Sabir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have a definitive answer on whether search engines take
any notice of CSS?
I don't think so.
Someone could develop their page full of 's with dodgy keywords,
and simply not display the content of those H1's. We ar
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:01:20 -0800, Chris Kennon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
top:expression(body.scrollTop + 4 + "px");
I'm unfamiliar with CSS expressions. Can someone point me to a source
that has been used by list members. Also doesn't this contradict the
effort of separation of code and co
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:06:12 -, Peter Goddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I've recently had a task to write stylesheet for ASP.Net page and I was
really
shocked how BAD that code is.
Coder that wrote that didn't have any idea of web standards and he said
that
it's generally impossible to
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:47:47 +, David R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Bo$$ wrote:
What about frames? Use ID too?
#1: Don't use frames untill XFrames comes out and gets supported
#2: You don't need to give any element an ID attribute unless you're
doing either a runat="server" or doing ECMA/D
I searched the archives and could not find an answer to my question...
Is it possible to generate right-aligned lists with CSS and have the
bullet on the right instead of the left?
Not really.
You can easily simulate this effect using Generated Content
and maybe CSS21 counters for ordered lists.
How would I tell a stylesheet to not put a line break at the end of an
Hx tag?
e.g.
My heading and some more text.
I want the words "and some more text." to appear on the same line.
How would I do this?
display: run-in; does exactly what you're looking for (you could e-mail
PPK, who was wandering
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:10:52 -0800, Chris Kennon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would this fall under search engine optimization? If so where could I
find more on the subject?
http://diveintoaccessibility.org/day_7_identifying_your_language.html
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
***
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:08:47 +, john <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally I think that HTML lang (or xml:lang) attributes
are more appropriate (and precise).
Could you please elaborate more on this? I'm just wondering what I
should do for this site, since there are multiple languages. Shou
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:38:11 -0500, Anthony Timberlake
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am pretty sure it is for if you have a second language pack on your
computer, the browser will load that before loading your site
(allowing the user to see the page in their foreign tongue).
I don't understand wh
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:03:29 +0100, Sven-Eric Buschgens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The problem that has occured for the menu we are using a flashbased menu.
Is removing flash menu altogether an option?
It seems that you can do it with simple :hover and animgif
or it might be possible to get sim
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:06:00 +, john <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can somebody please explain what the "content-language" meta tag is
useful for?
It's not exactly meta tag. It's HTTP header.
See: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3282.html
Is it required for validity?
No.
I have a site that is being
Where the "Simple" edition is a vastly simplified version where there's
less emphasis on content/presentation separation, such as greater
support for attribute styles and perhaps a element? Where
each has a "Context Order" informing screen-readers in what
order to read the content?
No, t
BUT - for development purposes wrapping is far more readable. Same
way that code indenting is a nice thing to do but serves no practical
purpose.
Of course, if you're very concerned about page size (kb wise) the
wrapping, indenting etc are just pointless wastes of space.
Most of my pages are gene
In both cases, UAs will render the content exactly the same... I was
wondering if there were any advantages to the former... I heard
something about some obscure UAs ignoring content beyond the 80th Column
or something
myth.
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
***
How about using en/em-space instead of regular space?
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/chars/spaces.html
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for
To keep the user informed of the number of pages remaining out of n
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-css3-page-20040225/#pg-based-extensions
"A UA MUST act as if there was a counter with the name of 'pages'
and its initial value was set to the total number of pages."
AFAIK currently no browser supports
Okay I have a page (http://www.m5i.com/m5hr/new/test.php), when I
cross-browser check IE will not pick up the background image. Is this a
syntax error, do you have to declare the background object a couple
different ways ?
about syntax errors ask here:
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:48:49 -0330, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am on a hosted site, where would I find that file? Other .php pages
display just not this one.
Then you have some fatal error on your page, but server has disabled error
display.
See it using such php file:
include('your_fata
It is expected, but does it belong to HTML?
means "header" and is expected to look like a header, even if it is
small.
What makes h1 look like a header if not for a significantly larger size
than everything else?
Alignment? Font style? Color? Background? Decoration? Letter spacing?
People used to
I thought the whole point behind (x)HTML strict was separation of
content and presentation. Keeping "align" attributes does not seem to
fit in.
I think I've found the reason why these properties are kept.
There is a fundamental incompatibility of HTML columns model
and CSS inheritance:
http://l
That wasn't my point. The expected result is readily achievable with no
CSS at all. The few cell alignments that would deviate from the norm in
any given table would require no significant difference in file size
from those that require CSS classes for the same purpose, and the
stylesheet itself w
Because people expect data cells to be centered under column headings
and row headings to be left aligned more often than not?
This can be done with CSS.
If the alignment is different, will it change the meaning of data? I think
not.
It's presentational.
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
*
Is there anything wrong with closing meta tags like so:
In XML probably not, but tag-soup browsers/robots may try to "fix" your
code
and assume that is ment to be or something like that.
My XSLT knowledge is tiny, but I think that it is quite possible to
make tag, check XSLT FAQ:
Kornel - you might like to double-check your statement that "It is not
valid in XHTML/1.1 or any Strict [X]HTML version."
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/index/attributes.html indicates that the
"align" attribute it is *NOT* deprecated for COL, COLGROUP, TBODY, TD,
TFOOT, TH, THEAD and TR.
and got a lot of very unreliable information and not found what I'm
looking
for.
Try the source: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/
XHTML is based on HTML4, so this also applies (note the Deprecated
columns!):
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/index/elements.html
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/index/
Does this really work on IE? Can I really use transparency in my PNG-24
and
have IE display it? Or is there some hidden catch?
There are several catches.
http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/notes/#PNG
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
**
The discussion list
I've been looking for a different solution, and I found one -
use multiple classes on :
Although, if I understand you correctly, that class attribute will be
written out server side on request, based on user choices
No, it may be written on client-side using DOM.
I know that classnames should
Personally, I don't see the point in JavaScript-powered style switchers
when Server-Side works better...
Client-side switcher has immediate effect, so it's easier to choose style
IMHO.
Besides that, there is no real difference.
Current browsers' built-in style switcher implementations are "fo
Further to Carmelyne's post I am also having trouble placing link text
over the top of background graphics.Surely there must be a way of using
CSS to position the text?
Yes, there is a simple way: use padding.
See http://browsehappy.pl (note: .pl) - heading gfx is just
and text is positioned using
Empty link elements are not good (as Patrick pointed out)but what about
named anchors (destination anchors)?
They are obsolete. Refer to any id instead.
Is there any reason why they should not be empty?
I wouldn't be surprised if it was because of a bug in Netscape4.
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
*
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:34:58 +1000, Tony Aslett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I would love some feedback on a User Preference Script
http://www.csscreator.com/generator/userpref.php
Because Opera is not able to modify stylesheet rules,
I've been looking for a different solution, and I found one -
Thing is, I need the "ol li ol" element to start at a specified number.
The HTML4.01 spec says I can use the start="" attribute, but that its
depreciated...
So what replaces the start="" attribute in XHTML1.1? I couldn't see
anything in CSS about it.
Ignore XHTML/1.1. Removal of start is a m
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:49:54 +0400, Marwan Farha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
In IE6 the spacing between the subNav list items is perfect but in
Firefox they become all squashed up against each other, and i can't
seem to find the problem.
I'd say that in Firefox list is as it should be, and IE6
What about s to seperate the form elements when CSS isn't
present?
a slippery slope, in my opinion...starting to add what is, in this case,
visual markup to compensate for lack of CSS...
i usually only worry about accessibility in cases where CSS is not
available, but i do take your point on
can someone provide any piece of information about behaviors in CSS
They are IE-only. That's all I care to know.
Some useful implementations:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/csshover.html
http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/
Microsoft has some docs on the subject:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author
Well, GMail works on the various browsers (ok, I havent tested *all* of
them), so I can report it works there too :)
Well, it doesn't work in Opera 7.5x.
Opera Software implemented XMLHttpRequest and ActiveX objects emulation
(only js side, no real controls), specially for GMail.
Opera 8 beta works
I know a lot of people use this:
* {
margin:0;
padding:0;
}
issue I found with this, was that within dropdowns the "downarrow" GUI,
covers some of the text on the right.
That's why I never reset margins/padding for all elements, and just set
them (both!)
where it matters (body/h1/ul/li).
B
The point is that it is not layout table.
Of course it's a layout table. You're using a table so you can lay out
your labels next to your inputs all nice and neat.
No, it is what you suggest. Original post is not about that. Have you read
it?
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
***
If you want to use tables to lay out your forms (or anything else for
that matter) then go for it.
The point is that it is not layout table. It has semantic value.
It's a kind of table that can have summary, caption, headers and
contains repeating sets of data.
hairs and getting semantic, isn't
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:01:38 +, Andy Budd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that inputs in a table are ok.
This is tabular data, although not output, but input, but the
structure certainly is tabular.
To read a table user needs to understand its structure
(associate content with headings, navi
You can find out more, help to support and register on the shiny new
website:
http://www.atmedia2005.co.uk
Looks interesting, but Â345 registration fee is too much for me.
--
regards, Kornel LesiÅski
**
The discussion list for http://webstandards
You can only set the padding and margin properties if the LI element is
block or inline-block. Not inline, I'm afraid. (AFAIK!)
or you can set line-height on inline li element.
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
**
The discussion list for http://webs
in the Fox, the transition between the gradient and the
background-color is seamless while in IE/Win (5/5.5/6) the colors
suddenly don't match anymore. please disregard the slightly mangled
layout.
any ideas?
Use GIF if you need colors to match exactly. Sad, but true.
http://www.hut.fi/u/hsi
Which standard exactly prohibits use of px as font-size unit?
Exactly this one: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-CSS-TECHS/#units
and soon this one: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-WCAG20-CSS-TECHS-20040730/
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
**
The discussion
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:39:46 -0500, Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would do something along the line of the below perhaps, recently did,
but am wondering if it is a good idea?:
I'd use:
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
**
The discussion list
What I wondering is, could a comment be used to feed a GIF variant of a
logo to IE to replace a PNG (with alpha) that IE doesn't support?
Don't double your code.
Using apache mod_rewrite and PHP you can make all PNG 'files' to actually
contain GIF, if requested by explorer.
See: http://osiolki.ne
How *Microsoft* would benefit from supporting XHTML and CSS2?
To play the counter act here...
How does microsoft benefit by offering IE at all?
They have control over the browser market and the Web.
Because IE is everywhere, developers can base applications on it,
and make apps tied to Microsoft s
Microsoft has been hyping about web-applications more than you'd
imagine, the MSDN Library is full of articles on the subject. 3 of the
included posters in the 2003 edition are about web-applications.
They don't think about W3C-standards based applications.
They are just using a buzzrword to p
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:17:48 +1100, Mariusz Stankiewicz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
They should just ship firefox with longthorn and forget about IE7
No, thats crazy talk! ...but they could buy out Opera Software... ;)
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
***
responsibility only, which is to maximize return on investment. He has
done this incredibly well.
I'm deeply worried that Microsoft is just going to make tabbed browsing
add-on,
to put some "fire" out, and keep it's 12-year old engine.
From their point of view, following web standards is:
* exp
I just went to the main page for Internet explorer to look for some
information and while the images were loading, I noticed the alt
attribute of one image was "Need alt text"
Maybe that's a cry for help of some poor developer trapped in Redmond? ;)
** QUESTION **
In what condition is Explore
I was wondering if any of you have any specific questions, queries, or
comments regarding the development of IE, and more specifically, IE7
which may, or may not, come with Longhorn (before... if we're lucky)
Does Microsoft feel resposibility for the web?
Do they realize how much web traffic
Hehe, that's a good one :)
OK, they don't want to follow standards, that's okay with me, but
blaiming Dreamweaver for that... hey, isn't this the program
that many Web Standards activists use?
Dreamweaver is just a tool, it does not guarantee good code.
This page is non-standard and messy. It has
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:29:22 -, designer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Frameborder 0 still leaves the space between the frames, so is
effectively
useless.
Oh, indeed. It was a long time since I last used frames :)
oveflown elements, server side includes or "webmaster-side" preprocessing
are IM
Hard as it is to accept, borderless framesets just won't validate.
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/present/frames.html#h-16.2.2
There is frameborder attribute!
Frames have several serious problems, but none of them is validation.
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
Creative Commons gives a bit of XML to paste into your page
...but XML is inside HTML comment.
Don't you think it's rather pointless?
XML parsers won't pick it up, so if you want to get license info,
you have to threat whole file like a tag soup anyway.
Do you know tools that read this rdf license?
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 05:35:21 -0500, Bennie Shepherd
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would any of you have and idea as to why my guestbook is so narrow and
screwed up in IE 6 and Opera? It's using the same html and css as the
rest of the site. Looks fine in FF 1.
http://bennieshepherd.com/orangegu
First of all, current browsers don't really use the Document Type
Definitions
provided by the W3C website, they just look for the correct
Document Type Declarations. So, they probably will recognise your
DT Declaration as another junk and will probably fall back to the
quirksmode (I wouldn't cer
I'm thinking about creating my own doctype/DTD and adding some new tags.
Instead of having or I'd like to
simpy have tag.
and have no semantic meaning, and in practice would
have no meaning either, but there are some advantages:
- less to write
- validator can check these against dtd
- ge
Any thoughts on semantic markup for object dimensions? For example works
of art;
height x width x depth
400mm x 800mm x 200mm
I can't think of anything better than using unicode 'x' for multiplication.
[X]HTML doesn't have any markup for dimensions.
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
*
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 22:36:26 +, Patrick H. Lauke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Erwin Heiser wrote:
Ijust cracked it, IE was chocking on the lang="en" statement inside
(in the XHTML code) in combination with
this statement "div:lang(en)" in the style sheet.
I remembered that IE doesn't supppo
Won't attempt at going any further as I don't think I'm talking about
web standards at any length.
XML and XSLT are W3C standards :)
If you don't have server-side technologies available, then you may
transform your XML using (offline) shell script and upload XHTML to server.
--
regards, Kornel Le
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 22:48:05 +0800, Wong Chin Shin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry, don't really understand what you mean by your statement below. The
XSL document may not be readable but the XML can be set to be as readable
and descriptive as we want it to?
XML has no semantics. Your custom ma
Separating content and layout made perfect sense to me as a programmer.
XML/XSLT is good 'cos it allows me to modularize sections of a site
without having to resort to server-side technologies.
...except server-side XSLT transformation, right?
Because XSLT on client side is non-semantic, incompa
i know that one must put block elements inside inline elements with
xhtml 1.0 strict, but this isn't the case here? paragraphs are block
elements, as are s.
You got this other way round.
It's: inline content inside block.
can go inside , but in cannot.
must have inline contents.
Use , even
Konqueror 3.0.5
Wow, amazing it works. CSS in Konq 3.0 is sooo bug ridden. "Safaried" Konq
3.3 behaves much better.
IE4 - PC
Ignore it. IE4 is suicidcal when it comes to CSS.
All Versions of Opera
If in Opera 6, you can ignore it.
But if it breaks in latest Opera you have a problem.
Opera 7.5 h
I am learning CSS tricks (I know the star hack) but where can I find out
about Vicki's 'conditional comments' and Kornel's *>{} ?? Where is this
stuff documented?
http://positioniseverything.net/explorer.html
is a great resource for IE bugs and hacks.
Conditional Comments: http://www.quirksmode.
The only bug/quirk with IE that I've come across that needed my attention
was the big one: box model. I prefer to use the "box in a box" sort of
workaround
This needs excessive divs and without IE support for '>' selector requires
them additionally messed with lots of id/classes.
Why serve any
I think it is important *not to* build&test in IE first.
You have to avoid building your code on top of some IE bug/quirk.
It is much less work to force IE to behave well,
than making all other browsers misbehave like IE.
For that matter I build and test pages for Firefox and Opera7 first
(having I
If you make commercial sites you must live with the fact that it is mainly
for IE.
Loudest "f. you" I can tell to IE is Firebar:
http://hpstudios.homeip.net/Firebar.html
Usually I don't have to trash the code with conditional comments.
* html {}
and
*> {}
css hacks are enough.
I try to make page
Opera7 doesn't allow fieldsets to float. Bug.
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
- I doubt XHTML 2/DOM 3 will hit the main stream for a number of years
(at least 5). So I wouldn't start worrying about it now.
- I don't think XHTML 2/DOM 3 have be designed with developers in
mind. These guys are not thinking about our immediate needs - they are
thinking about the direction of t
Kornel Lesinski wrote:
So, in this case it's CSS hack. AFAIK IE5/win ignores > and
+ selectors and iterprets it as "html #wrap".
Still trying to find out which browsers mistakenly apply this. IE5/5.5/6
seem to rightly ignore the rule. The closest I came was the star-7 hack
ht
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:31:27 +0930, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
is a child selector:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-CSS21-20040225/selector.html#child-selectors
html>#wrap means element with id=wrap inside html (but not inside other
element inside html).
If its not (or ) then it doesn't match any
Does anyone know of any existing (and much simpler) JavaScript libraries
that enable :hover, :focus, and :active for non anchor tags for IE?
http://www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/csshover.html
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
**
The discussion list for htt
BOM is a Unicode standard. Without BOM, applications have to waste
resources trying to figure character encoding. Here are some FAQs about
BOM:
http://www.unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#22
I know that. FAQ more or less confirms what I've said - BOM in UTF-8 is
"Microsoft conventions for .txt f
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 16:04:48 +0100, JohnyB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do I remove this BOM marker once it's inserted? Damn it, it causes
all my XSL transformations on Java to fail!
I use PSPad (www.pspad.com), it doest it transparently (if set in
preferences).
alternatively you can open fil
there appears some funny
characters.
ÃÂÂ
This is another Microsoft "invention" - BOM marker used to recognize UTF-8
files.
ByteOrderMarker makes no sense in UTF-8.
Notepad and other MS-tools silently insert it in all UTF-8 files, making
them invalid.
This breaks HTML validation, causes trash
And please, please, if using a table remember to include row and column
scope.
What is the default scope?
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
fo
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 11:46:20 -0500, Michael Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Chris Kennon wrote:
In the following name/value listing what would be the most semantic
mark-up.
Product Name:
Product Number:
Product Description:
Product Cost:
I'd probably use a definition list:
My Produ
Hmmm... I have tried to hide the border of an input field in Opera, but
it flatly refused:
input{border:0;}
This is Opera 7.23
oh, that bug. Fixed in 7.50 or 7.60...
For Opera 7.2 use:
input {border: 0 solid;}
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
**
The di
The problem is the input style doesn't work in all browsers. In
particular Opera and some of the Mac browsers will ignore them, if I
remember correctly.
Current version of Opera does excellent job with styling input elements.
Opera even lets you change border on checkbox elements. I haven't seen
SOLUTION 1:
Search
Problem: Doesn't work in older browsers (e.g. NN4).
Eh, another good solution spoiled by this zombie.
Search
Forget hackish href="javascript:". Use onclick instead.
To make this less evil you could put link inside .
--
regards, Kornel Lesiński
***
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 13:19:48 -0600, Charles Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Chris Kennon wrote:
Any suggestions on bringing the file size down? I've tried interlacing
the .gif the current size is the lowest without image degradation.
Just for comparison, I took the image into PaintShopPro (
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:37:49 +0100, Nick Verstappen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is the noscript tag not allowed anymore in XHTML 1.0 Strict? I'm trying
to use it, but it does not validate. If it IS allowed, what markup
should I use to make it validate? Many thanks!
Ofcourse it is allowed.
XHT
The url: http://www.azapi.com/
Reviewing the home page only. Firefox 1.0 on Win2K, dial-up connection.
The page took a long time to load. Looks like one of those "if you
don't
have cable or ADSL we don't want your business" type of sites.
I suggest converting top and bottom backgrounds to JPEG
Are you sure? Some time ago there was a deal between Macromedia and
Opera:
http://www.opera.com/pressreleases/en/2002/07/20020702.dml
(oh, and Apple: http://www.macminute.com/2003/09/30/opera)
Not Apple. Adobe.
oops. It was supposed to be "and Adobe".
Test it:
body {content: "It's Opera";}
You wh
On the Mac, Contribute uses the same (system-level) rendering engine as
Safari, which means you should not get any nasty surprises with the
layout.
Are you sure? Some time ago there was a deal between Macromedia and Opera:
http://www.opera.com/pressreleases/en/2002/07/20020702.dml
(oh, and Appl
For 30mb movies that is not a good idea. Browser will try to save whole
file before sending it to application. This eliminates streaming.
Not quite correct. When the QuickTime Movie is authored correctly,
QuickTime plays the Video while it still downloads.
You'd have to make few kb "dummy" quicktim
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 23:48:40 +1100, russ - maxdesign
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://news.com.com/Mozillaaimsformobilebrowsermarket/2100-1032_3-5483683.html
I'd like to note that this news is disinformative. You could think that
there isn't
any browser that reformats pages, zooms images and
101 - 200 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
