This is a seriously odd problem, resulting from Photoshop's PNG
output/Firefox 1,0.x's PNG decoder (I think).
Test case at
http://joahua.com/blog/2006/01/04/photoshopfirefox-10x-and-the-case-of-the-mystery-line
Anyone seen this before?
Note that the size of both images is 210px: in the Photosho
http://www.usability.com.au/resources/tables.cfm is a great resource.
I find particularly interesting
http://www.usability.com.au/resources/tables.cfm#very , as it
demonstrates that "accessible" tables needn't be meagre and can, in
fact, contain quite a lot of structured information. It sounds as
t
re.
On 1/4/06, Patrick H. Lauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Street wrote:
> > This is a seriously odd problem, resulting from Photoshop's PNG
> > output/Firefox 1,0.x's PNG decoder (I think).
> >
> > Test case at
> > http://joahua
://cat-scan.net/
Features list: http://cat-scan.net/features.html
Blog: http://blog.cat-scan.net/
Demo: http://demo.cat-scan.net/
Kind regards,
Joshua Street
http://joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://websta
list-style:none; on the UL should work well... failing that, try
playing with padding: on the list.
On 1/8/06, Artemis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My partner and I have a tagboard on our site and it looks greate in FF,
> but when you view in IE there are round bullets. Can someone help me get
> r
On 1/9/06, Al Kendall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh,
>Is it possible to leave the thumbnails with the main pic instead of
> having to go back the the thumbnails each time?
>
> Cheers
> Al
Sure thing, there's a fairly simple templating system that lets you do
just that if you so desire.
Love the design, but just one thing about the background.
The dotted line fluctuates at the edge of each repetition, because
there are dots right on the edges. I don't know if you can
add/subtract a pixel in on one side of the graphic easily, or whether
this'll interfere with the other repeating p
xt shows bold is when I
> press on it.
>
>
>
> Is there a way to set up the CSS globally with a:Active or similar so I
> don't have to hand-code each link in my menu?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> -H
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
***
THANK YOU in advance!!!
>
> Mani Sheriar
> Founder, Sheriar Designs
> www.ManiSheriar.com | 925.914.0741
>
>
>
> **
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
&g
Well, if Photoshop won't open them, the GIMP certainly can. Then it's
just cutting it apart like you would had you received any other flat
file, I suppose! Of course, if you need backgrounds then a kindly
worded email to the client requesting the source file with layers,
etc., would probably be the
On 1/14/06, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tables for forms is ok in some cases, forms can be considered tabular.
This one has always confused me. There is a linear relationship
between a field's label and the field proper, yes, but how does one
mark that up as a table? SHOULD that be m
that it's impossible to use , which seems a
fair benchmark of what is most definitely a table. Maybe not... your
example's use of the scope attribute makes it all seem remarkably
sensible!
Thanks,
Josh
On 1/14/06, Patrick H. Lauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Street wr
Nope. Only, I'd add that there are existing apps out there that will
fall into various server-side languages to do intelligent replacement
of linebreaks -> paragraphs, smart quotes, etc. KSES, used by
WordPress (or at least it used to be) is one such for the PHP langauge
( http://sourceforge.net/pr
We're waaay OT now, but I can't resist just posting this last message
for those thinking about Photoshop->GIMP migration. GIMPshop! is a
re-working of The GIMP's interface to make it more Photoshop-like. I
haven't used it myself, because I recently went (was coerced into
going) the other way (i.e.
content-type
>
> Regards,
> Rimantas
> --
> http://rimantas.com/
> **
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to
ome hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **********
>
>
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgro
Good to hear you solved it, but one other thing. I observed in Firefox
1.0.x/Linux that the borders on your left navigation items
appear/disappear at certain zoom settings. This might be something to
do with the Flash items on the lower right, because they flickered
around where the nav items were
Hi all,
I've got a page that has a print stylesheet, and two elements of
important (i.e. the things you'd want to print) content. One is a list
of items, whilst the other element is a kind of "More information"
area (linked by XMLHttpRequest if JS is enabled).
In the "More information" bit, there
Is it? I'm using AHAH (H = HTML, as opposed to XML) to dynamically
retrieve some content and innerHTML seems infinitely more sensible:
the content being pulled in has an indeterminate number of paragraphs,
so short of parsing the incoming document for paragraphs, recreating
elements, and setting th
someone with not a great deal of JS
experience -- me) somewhat redundant, surely.
And yup, I'll be serving this one as HTML :)
Thanks,
Josh
> Joshua Street said:
> > do people consider it okay to use
> Supposedly faster than DOM methods, and usually requires less code.
> Pers
On 1/19/06, Richard Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use the onclick event;
>
> a.onclick = function() {
> alert('not going there!');return false;
> }
>
> Its not an issue of standards it's in the javascript not the html.
>
> Richard
http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
# Imp
Definition list. It's a list of definitions ;-)
On 1/20/06, Pat Boens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> What would be the best way to create a glossary: a table ? a definition
> list? something else?
>
> Thanks for your expert input.
> Pat
--
Joshua
At least, I'm fairly certain the absolutely positioned elements are
causing the problem(s).
I can't give an example page (NDA, and it's too complex to bother
recreating -- the complexity is probably part of the reason it's so
bad when text is selected/copied), just wondering if anyone else has
cre
yle.margin = 0;
> onresize = null;
> document.body.style.height = 0;
> setTimeout(function(){ document.body.style.height =
> document.documentElement.scrollHeight+'px'; }, 1);
> setTimeout(function(){ onresize = fixIE6AbsPos; }, 100);
> }
> }
>
> HTH,
>
Yep, that'd be the PNG files. Something to do with saving Gamma. My
usual workaround is to open + re-save using the GIMP... it works
though I'm still not quite sure why!
Josh
On 1/24/06, Joseph R. B. Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys and Gals,
>
> Here's a neat one for you. If you look at
Hmm I'd strongly contest a definition list. Maybe nested UL's would be
better... but Item 1 cannot be sensibly/reasonably _defined_ as "Add",
or "Edit", or "Delete".
On 1/27/06, Paul Novitski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> I could argue either list or table, but I'd be inclined to make
I've never read about setting the subject with title (unless you're
using JavaScript to do magic to the href?), but imagine it doesn't
much matter. I've NEVER encountered a mail client that choked if you
fed it a subject as well... even if not all parse that into the
Subject field. Hence, from an a
Select with Optgroups?
Tables with (assuming two levels), a structure like this:
FruitAdd Edit Delete
AppleAdd Edit
Delete
etc?
The other thing (this list is definitely the wrong place for me to say
this) is if this is for a content management system or the like, where
the client's browsing
ated by Andreas, nothing
more.
On 1/29/06, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Street wrote:
> > The other thing (this list is definitely the wrong place for me to say
> > this) is if this is for a content management system or the like, where
> > the client's
On 1/29/06, Rene Saarsoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is one usability problem still: the contents of elements
> are centered by default in most browsers, making the table look like
> this:
>
> 1 Fruits Add Edit Delete
> 1.1 Apple Add Edit Delete
>
, more
importantly, is there a known FIX for a Firefox bug of this nature?
Any other feedback is also welcomed, but especially on that point :-)
Regards,
Joshua Street
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See htt
sured it's
not going to move!
On 1/30/06, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Street wrote:
> > http://sunrisefamily.com.au/current/content/
>
> The site looks good, it's a huge improvement over all the other 7
> network web sites.
>
> However,
On 1/30/06, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Street wrote:
> > I'm assured it's not going to move!
>
> I wouldn't believe that. In fact, here's a perfect example of why 301
> shouldn't have been used. On Today Tonight (ano
rsion 9 is beta
> after all) but if you're interested you could check it out .
>
> cheers,
> Justin.
> **
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list &am
Two quick things. Your primary navigation list doesn't need to use
pipe separators. It'd be much better to just use borders with CSS to
achieve this. Also, maybe consider a "skip to login" as well as your
"skip to main content" link. It makes things faster than tabbing
through all the links between
On 1/30/06, Anders Nawroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does the toggle function have to be connected to a element, or do
> JS-enabled screen readers recognize onClick events attached to other
> elements?
To add to this question, what happens where screen readers with
JavaScript result in an elem
Maybe give © a shot instead of © ... not certain, but it may
help. Love the design, by the way.
On 1/31/06, Kara Spellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This my first website using CSS. I've gotten most of the bugs out of
> it except for one on the home page. For some reason the copyright
>
Just out of curiosity, what about "Tick this box if you don't want to
receive massive amounts of spam"? Is it really anti-checked box, or
anti-default-opt-in? Seems pretty... open to abuse and/or
re-interpretation, unless it's the latter.
On 1/31/06, Philippe Wittenbergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sly, things are floated) in order to trigger the
scroll thingy. That's a technical term...
On 1/30/06, Joshua Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many thanks. I'd only tested Opera in 8.5x (because, IMO, it's
> reasonable to assume if people are using Opera they're pro
Regrettably not. I'd also love some way to associate a header element
with content, much like fieldset's legend element does, but
unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately, because it'd be potentially
hellish to make work consistently with some automated content
management stuff!) no such thing exists.
1) HTML 4.01 Strict, unless you've got really ambitious plans and a
very good idea what user agents will be in play: keeping in mind
Internet Explorer doesn't support XHTML served as
application/xhtml+xml, so it's still going to be parsed as straight
HTML in that browser.
2) So far as I'm aware, t
Gilmore
> Developer/Consultant
> Affordable Websites and Marketing Solutions for Real Small Business.
> SmashingRed Web & Marketing
> P) 902.529.0651
> E) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
Practically speaking, it's a good idea to reset font-size, padding and
margin on * at the start of your CSS file. This does help improve
consistancy somewhat.
* {
padding:0;
margin:0;
font-size:100.01%;
}
Then, obviously, you can style individual elements from that, and you
know what the default
That's still going to be 1em of whatever 1em becomes by the time you
get down to #editableArea (i.e. 1em of (x) on #editableArea of (y) on
#body of (z) on #html), isn't it?
On 2/1/06, Seona Bellamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One possible solution would be not so much to have 'no style' but to h
On 2/1/06, Peter Ottery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cant replicate it here using firefox 1.0.2 and win xp. you may have
> fixed it..?
Nope, but it occurs less frequently on FF1.0.x/XP than on other OSs,
and I've only actually looked at it in Firefox 1.0.7 in XP (I figured
it'd be relatively con
whatsoever. We're also trying to change the
way non-"professional" web publishers think about the media they're
creating/the means by which they are creating it, so the "how are you
making money doing THAT?" argument for being generally dismissive of
non-web-standa
Microsoft has newsgroups for identifying and reporting bugs. I blogged
a for/against thing on IE7 preview beta 2 after having played with it
for a morning, http://joahua.com/blog/2006/02/01/ie7-beta-2 , and
discovered a zoom bug that doesn't play nice with CSS backgrounds. Bug
is here:
http://www.
For the navigation, you can put all your nav images into the one file
so that they all load at once, then use background-position to make
them sit in place.
As for making things readable before the background images download,
how about setting a background colour as well? That way if users have
im
this is more of a content-based question. But the subdomain
thing comes into it, too, as well as the fact that this equates to
providing different versions for different devices.
1. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/TLD
2. http://wap.yahoo.com.au/sunrise/ -- note the evil subdomain
Regards,
Josh
--
J
That web patterns thing people were bouncing around in here a month or
so back? I've lost the address... if someone else doesn't post it,
it's in the archives somewhere... probably something really obvious
like "webpatterns.org"... Ah, yes, that's it.
http://webpatterns.org/
On 2/2/06, Peter Ott
Yes, it's a good thing. PDF's aren't web pages. This is the
distinction between a web site and a web application: applications are
'expected' to have 'application-like' behaviour (such as new windows,
etc.). Also, PDF content rarely has the _behaviour_ of a web page
(rich hyperlink structures/inbou
Ah, righto. Linux user here, apologies... it's obviously simpler on
other desktop systems ;-)
On 2/3/06, Patrick H. Lauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Street wrote:
>
> > Also I wasn't aware of way to override browser object settings for PDF
> > files e
mes.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marilyn Langfeld
> Langfeldesigns
> http://www.langfeldesigns.com
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> **
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidel
Yes, but can you use an anchor fragment to link to a point in an
Acrobat document?
The other thing is why would we even bother with that when we have
hypertext? On one site I did recently, the client wanted a PDF
brochure with _identical_ information to what was in hypertext
included. The PDF broc
On 2/4/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well someone here (no names :) told me a while back that
> the *hmtl hack was ie future proof so maybe not.
Well, it is. It's not going to affect any more versions of Internet
Explorer (this has been known for some time now), hence any rules you
p
Works fine here with Firefox 1.0.7 + web developer toolbar,
irrespective of whether or not the top margin of #header is set to 0.
On 2/6/06, Paula Petrik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm doing something fairly simple. The problem arises when I apply
> margins to my #header. When I simply apply mar
On 2/8/06, Al Sparber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's another approach you're sure not to like :-)
> http://www.projectseven.com/csslab/swapclass/outline/
Hmm... it'd be nicer if there weren't anchor tags in there/the H3 were
used directly. Not being amazingly JavaScript saavy, is there a
comp
On 2/8/06, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> heretic wrote:
> > ...
> Maybe the standards community prefer to ride ponies instead of real
> race-horses? ;-)
Must be something to do with keeping nearer the earth. Opera spoils
web developers, and makes Internet Explorer (and Firefox, to a
On 2/9/06, Stephen Stagg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is not meaningless, It is more readable than HTML, to a human. And
> when computers start to need to read websites automatically...
Humans read content, computers read markup. Humans don't read HTML
(excusing, perhaps, the rare breed that
Yep... I agree, hence "web [...] recommendations are actually about"
rather than "accessibility is actually about". Specs are
purpose-agnostic (see pages that validate but are a semantic blight on
the face of the web)... ironically, guidelines (human-language,
practical documents) are actually more
o the list & getting help
> > **********
> >
> >
>
> **
> The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
>
> See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
> **
>
>
--
Joshua Street
http://www.joahua.com/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
On 2/16/06, James Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/16/06, Rick Faaberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > They can of course continue in that new window - their choice.
>
> Their choice? *You're* the one who made their browser open a new window...
Yeah. That's MY (emphatically "my"... no wide
On 2/17/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://63.134.237.108/
>
> any feedback at all greatly appreciated
Table-based layout? Was that guy looking at the same site? Looks
pretty layout-table free to me...
You're missing a H1, which isn't great... wrap the header image in an
H1 element
One other thing... typo, "your are here »" above the imagemap.
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*
On 2/17/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can i get a second opinion on felix's advice?
It must've been offlist, but I'd guess it was about fonts ;-) My
second opinion is "I agree"... he's generally right about such things!
**
The discus
On 2/18/06, Paul Sturgess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/16/06, Joshua Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The BIGGEST thing I can see wrong with this site is the image map.
> > Obviously the link areas aren't regular shapes, so even if you were to
>
On 2/22/06, Terrence Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 22 Feb 2006, at 2:50 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> > Outlook users should ...switch to a better mail client that isn't
> > broken.
> Outllok can be configured to send plain text can't it?
I think Lachlan meant that + bottom-quoting?
*
On 3/1/06, Joseph R. B. Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It validates and renders correctly on FF 1.5, Opera 8.5 and IE 6.0. The
> only issue I discovered so far is a layout break when I zoom the text to
> unbelievable sizes in FF.
"Unbelievable sizes" here being one step DOWN (decreasing font
http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-6044418.html?part=rss&tag=6044418&subj=news
just popped up in my feed reader. At first glance I wasn't too
concerned, but took a look at the linked MSDN page (
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/workshop/author/dhtml/overview/activating_activex.asp
)
On 3/4/06, Jens Brueckmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > a font for the web that has a distinction between the
> > uppercase letter O and the number 0.
> > If such a font exist, which is it?
Georgia uses pretty much the same shape for o, 0 and O, but lower-case
is small, zero is bigger, and capit
On 3/4/06, Vicki Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My own main bugbear is in product serial numbers where there is a
> mixture of numbers and letters. It's all very well knowing that O is
> rounder than 0, but if you don't have one of each to compare, it can
> be very hit-and-miss. I'm sure there
On 3/7/06, kvnmcwebn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How would i target a:hover on the following links?
> I tried a few things but cant get down to the classes(one, two).
>
>
>
> bla bla
> bla
#navcontainershort a.one:ho
On 3/9/06, Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Site:
> http://69.94.122.44/new.php?/caribbean/category/antiqua/
No help there right now, coz I'm at home and without access to IE,
BUT... I do have a bug report for you.
Firefox 1.0.x/Linux (and presumably on every other platform, and
proba
On 3/12/06, Jay Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am open to other suggestions from members though.
http://cat-scan.net/ (but this uses flat-files rather than a database).
--
Joshua Street
http://joahua.com/blog/
+61 (0) 42
On 3/13/06, sime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have never had a problem with the uppercase not working in strict.
> Maybe I'm not defining strict correctly. Here is a test page which works
> in FF,IE6: http://urbits.com/_/test.php
You're serving it as text/html.
**
On 3/13/06, sime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rephrased, what are the different situations in which you'd use HTML4 over
> XHTML1? So far
> I've been led to believe (outside of this list) that XHTML is a step forward.
You're serving your XHTML as text/html, so it's effectively being
parsed as HTM
On 3/13/06, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sime wrote:
> > I have never had a problem with the uppercase not working in strict.
> > Maybe I'm not defining strict correctly. Here is a test page which
> > works in FF,IE6: http://urbits.com/_/test.php
>
> Add this function call to the top o
On 3/13/06, Jay Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have also read (no personal first hand knowledge) that there can be
> issues between using DOM/DHTML scripts and XHTML. I don't know what
> these issues are but why invite trouble.
This arises from non-DOM methods, which are often much simpler
On 3/13/06, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Street wrote:
> > any elements in the inserted content _aren't_ created as
> > elements, and hence cannot be manipulated at all.
>
> Um... What the? Of course they are created as elements, or at least
ly playing here in Firefox.
Also, that menu really looks a lot like it should be a list... just a
thought :-)
Josh
--
Joshua Street
http://joahua.com/blog/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
rest to AT LEAST 96.1% of the list (assuming that
_every_ member in Canberra actually cares... which they won't).
--
Joshua Street
http://josh.st/blog/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail
that of the potentially-messy
semantics to which it is presented as an alternative...
I have no answer.
:P
Josh
--
Joshua Street
http://josh.st/blog/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidel
most a visual form of communication.
--
Joshua Street
http://josh.st/blog/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cf
On 3/26/07, Stuart Foulstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nobody mentioned nesting flowcharts (whatever that means: a flowchart is a
flowchart).
Well, no, but you'd have to nest *L's to represent recursion in a
flowchart. The flowchart is recursive, therefore the
definition/unordered/ordered list
are a range of other possibilities listed on that page, also.
In most real-world practice, most websites use non-breaking spaces
extensively. This is, obviously, less than ideal in terms of unbloated
& semantic markup!
--
Joshua Street
http://josh.st/
similar, but I don't know it.
--
Joshua Street
http://josh.st/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
ABN 64 515 086 181
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/un
andardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******
--
Joshua Street
http://josh.st/
+61 (0) 425 808 469
***
+1000, John Horner wrote:
> the "system" is pretty much exactly the same...
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mo
is kind of mess before? Aside from "browser
testing" Dreamweaver as though it were another user agent, is there
anything that can be easily done to fix it?
We're probably just going to use a content management system instead,
but it's a bit frustrating...
Kind Regards,
J
ct me on a standards-based way of doing this?
Thanks.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
Website: http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02) 8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
E-mails and any attachments sent from base10solutions are to be regarded
 registered trademark ® ®
Copied and pasted from
http://www.w3schools.com/html/html_entitiesref.asp
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 11:58 +0100, Lee wrote:
> Hello Listpeople,
>
> Anyone know if there's an XHTML special char. for  ?
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
d Malaga from Â74" - div.page_content >
div.single_column > h2 > a according to Firefox's Web Developer toolbar
"View style information" utility.
Generally, great site!
Kind Regards,
Joshu
p.s. whose idea was this:
http://www.lastminute.com/site/main/boss_page_spreadsheet.html
I laughed... :D
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 12:28 +0100, Tom Hamshere wrote:
> Any feedback appreciated.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060
http://photomatt.net/tools/texturize makes it really easy. He's also
responsible for the WordPress blogging software (I know, off topic...)
which has that function embedded. Quotation marks and apostrophes, if
copied out of Word, can give you all kinds of messy encoding errors...
best to either u
rect' way are beyond the letter
of web standards, but adhere to their spirit - namely, ensuring a more
meaningful and accessible web.
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-
s, but they are on separate lines, and
are therefore separated by a line break (yeah, I know, is
theoretically semantically null... shrug!)
Looks okay to me...
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
;s not a list, and shouldn't be marked up as one.
> It's a single paragraph with a line break. Looks pretty
> straight-forward if you ask me.
>
> ~john
> _
> Dr. Zeus Web Design
> http://www.DrZeus.net
> "content without clutter&qu
riticise the idea
on that point).
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
8572-6021
Mobile: 0425 808 469
Multimedia Development Agency
___
certain characters not written in their
appropriate entity codes.
Could someone shed any light on this? Are entity codes redundant, or
should we be using them where possible?
Kind Regards,
Joshua Street
base10solutions
Website:
http://www.base10solutions.com.au/
Phone: (02) 9898-0060 Fax: (02)
>>It's just always felt dirty seeing certain characters
> >>not written in their appropriate entity codes.
> Hmmm...that's a very English centric view of the Web ;-)
Yeah, I thought that too, but couldn't think of another way to say it!
*blushes whilst wishing he we
101 - 200 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
