On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Filip wrote:
DL On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Filip wrote:
Would you be so kind as having a look at my files ? I would be very
happy to find where I made a mistake.
http://libre-essai.com/filters.tar.gz
DL The file has zero size.
Sorry, should be ok now :
Hi,
DL On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Filip wrote:
DL On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Filip wrote:
Would you be so kind as having a look at my files ? I would be very
happy to find where I made a mistake.
http://libre-essai.com/filters.tar.gz
DL The file has zero size.
Sorry, should be ok now :
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Filip wrote:
DL On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Filip wrote:
DL On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Filip wrote:
Would you be so kind as having a look at my files ? I would be very
happy to find where I made a mistake.
http://libre-essai.com/filters.tar.gz
DL The file has zero
Hi all,
I have created a simple filter that counts the traffic (size of all
e-mails) coming to XMail and stores the information in database. Included
are scripts for viewing the data by domains and users. Windows platform
only. If someone is interested: www.iclub.cz/xmail
Cheers,
Roman
-
To
Hi,
http://libre-essai.com/filters.tar.gz
DL Just tried on my machine. Works flawlessy.
Thanks Davide. Anybody has a clue about the reason it should not
behave the same on my system ?
DL Can you describe me exactly how do you test it ?
Well, I installed Xmail 1.17 and the two filters
I sent myself a test message with nothing more than test in the body, and
yet it comes up as?
Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:04:26
UTC;[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]; # SPAMSCORE:
10
I have removed the entry but why in the world would it do this,
when there was not a single $
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Roman Dusek wrote:
I have created a simple filter that counts the traffic (size of all
e-mails) coming to XMail and stores the information in database. Included
are scripts for viewing the data by domains and users. Windows platform
only. If someone is interested:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote:
I sent myself a test message with nothing more than test in the body, and
yet it comes up as?
Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:04:26
UTC;[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]; # SPAMSCORE:
10
I have removed the entry but why in the world
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Filip wrote:
http://libre-essai.com/filters.tar.gz
DL Just tried on my machine. Works flawlessy.
Thanks Davide. Anybody has a clue about the reason it should not
behave the same on my system ?
DL Can you describe me exactly how do you test it ?
Well, I
Hi,
DL Can you describe me exactly how do you test it ?
As I could not find any clue about my problem, I'm using a workaround.
I've put only 1 line in filters.in.tab. This line points to a Main
bash script that launches all other scripts sequentially. If one of the
scripts returns 6 the main
Beau E. Cox wrote:
Its the latest version on the website.
hmm I think I found the problem... well at least i think so. the Return
[snip]
Yep -
Just change 'exit 100;' to 'exit 7;' for 1.16+.
There is no exit 100 in 1.6a Please use the correct version as announced
two weeks ago.
--
Nick Marino wrote:
Membership is like a 2 minute process, so I can keep track of how many
people and who are using it. Anyway I have made it where you dont have to
register to get it. Just follow the link off the Xmailserver.org website and
you will be able to download it now with out
Well its not for a one time use the forums for support and update info is a
registered area of the site. So you wont be able to post or read those areas
unless you are a member. Sorry but thats the only way I can get feedback on
bugs and suggestions. I am in the process of some major updates, as
You're using SA, aren't you ?
No, unfortunately it doesn't work on my 2k box. Looks like others have been
working on getting it going so I am going to follow that up.
Currently I am using XMail 1.10 because of my inability to get the codes
97-99 to set properly using XScanner filter, it would
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote:
You're using SA, aren't you ?
No, unfortunately it doesn't work on my 2k box. Looks like others have been
working on getting it going so I am going to follow that up.
Currently I am using XMail 1.10 because of my inability to get the codes
97-99 to
Hi,
DL On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Filip wrote:
The one that is treated by the second scipt found in filters.in.tab is
never rejected on the RH9... On RH7, no problem.
DL I tested on RH8 and RH9. No problems at all. You still didn't describe me
DL the exact procedure you used to state that it
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Filip wrote:
The one that is treated by the second scipt found in filters.in.tab is
never rejected on the RH9... On RH7, no problem.
DL I tested on RH8 and RH9. No problems at all. You still didn't describe me
DL the exact procedure you used to state that it failed.
Don't you have the source code ?
Yes, I'll take a peek. Sadly however my knowlege of C is cursory at best.
My current filter works very simply, with a code at the end of the string
defining my spam
contentfilter.def entry looks like so
example string blah blah#6 --- the spam score value
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote:
Don't you have the source code ?
Yes, I'll take a peek. Sadly however my knowlege of C is cursory at best.
My current filter works very simply, with a code at the end of the string
defining my spam
contentfilter.def entry looks like so
example
Hi,
DL On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Filip wrote:
The one that is treated by the second scipt found in filters.in.tab is
never rejected on the RH9... On RH7, no problem.
DL I tested on RH8 and RH9. No problems at all. You still didn't describe me
DL the exact procedure you used to state that it
Look at its doc, you can pass the return code inside the .tab file.
Thats rather what I figured, since thats how my current filter works now.
XScanner.txt leaves me with:
7. Check out documentation for return codes (97, 98 or 99).
So,
example spam string
becomes
example spam string#99
?
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote:
Look at its doc, you can pass the return code inside the .tab file.
Thats rather what I figured, since thats how my current filter works now.
XScanner.txt leaves me with:
7. Check out documentation for return codes (97, 98 or 99).
So,
example spam
c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe[TAB]c:\xscanner[TAB]@@FILE[TAB]@@FROM[TAB]
@@RCPT[TAB]Retcode
Don't add a \ to the second argument!
where c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe is the full path to executable name and
c:\xscanner the directory where to find xscanner.dat file.
I had that exactly, and even
I dont know why its not working. I did as you described and the only thing I
can get to work is the copy of the files. I cant seem to make it not copy by
individual username.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Tuesday, July 22,
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, William wrote:
c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe[TAB]c:\xscanner[TAB]@@FILE[TAB]@@FROM[TAB]
@@RCPT[TAB]Retcode
Don't add a \ to the second argument!
where c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe is the full path to executable name and
c:\xscanner the directory where to find
I would like to post here... since it's for WinNT, I found the bug is -
when you close it by the upper right X close button, it actually won't
quit, it's still running in the task. If you had opened couple tasks, they
all alive in the thread.
also the log view can not scroll so you can not see
You set the Retcode inside the .tab file and XMail will pass the same
value to xscanner.exe, that in turn will exit with such code in case it'll
find something. I didn't do that app though, you might want to bug the
developer eventually.
I will experiment more, thanks for taking the time to
--- Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ppl will be using it and it'll have issues, be sure that you'll receive
feedback. If ppl won't be using it *or* the tool is perfect, you won't
need any feedback at all ;)
- Davide
Good point, just don't want people to think thats as
--- Guild Group Public Acct. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to post here... since it's for WinNT, I found the bug is -
when you close it by the upper right X close button, it actually won't
quit, it's still running in the task. If you had opened couple tasks, they
all alive in the
This is a common problem with sending mail to aol accounts. One of
the mechanisms used to check whether the email is spam is whether it
comes from a registered IP address or not. If the IP is not a fixed and
registered address, then you will get this error.
i.e. Cable connections, dial up
Check your /etc/aliases
You've possibly got something like:
root being forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain
and also
[EMAIL PROTECTED] being forwarded to root
...or perhaps some slightly more complex arrangement where the mail
just goes round in circles.
HTH
Best regards
Peter
On 8 Jul
It was rejected be cause the domain that IP is assigned to does not have
Reverse DNS configured for that domain. Which is: USDA Office of Operations
May want to contact them and ask if they know about or plan to correct their
problem.
You can see the results here:
Many bug fixes and updates.
Check the changelog on www.kryptontech.com
Xmail Log Reader 1.2 Beta
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 7/22/2003
Tested on: 7/23/2003 9:49:50 PM
avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
-
To
33 matches
Mail list logo
