Hi,
Spammers are often using unavailable Mailboxes and when the main
server ( not custom domain ) receives this kind of spam he refuses
with the following answer "550 Mailbox unavailable" : that's
correct!
But I have a problem with backup MX using custom domains.
If this spam is
I'm using 1.18 now and everything is working fine. I did'nt change any
parameters (server.tab or others), just the binarie file.
waiting new version to make a new test because I can't find any other
information to help you.
Pascal
dimanche 18 avril 2004 at 19:42:38, you said :
Pascal> samedi 1
lundi 19 avril 2004 at 13:25:11, you said :
RaveRod> Hmm... after doing that... "ps ux" contains this:
RaveRod> /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail
RaveRod> root 12286 0.0 0.4 55528 1588 pts/0S21:22 0:00
RaveRod> /var/MailRoot/bin/Xmail
RaveRod> Should there be so many instances of Xmail?
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
RaveRod> Behalf Of Pascal de R.
RaveRod> Sent: Monday, 19 April 2004 6:58 PM
RaveRod> To: RaveRod
RaveRod> Subject: [xmail] Re: Excessive memory usage with v1.18
RaveRod> Hi RaveRod,
RaveRod> lundi 19 avril 2004 at 04:18:54, you said :
RaveRod>> I&#x
Hi RaveRod,
lundi 19 avril 2004 at 04:18:54, you said :
RaveRod> I'm running XMail with the "sa_filter" and
RaveRod> "Antivirus Filter". Neither of
RaveRod> those filters should matter though because it's
RaveRod> XMail itself using the RAM.
RaveRod> Here is the "ps ux" output:
RaveRod> USE
samedi 17 avril 2004 at 20:46:05, you said :
>>
>> And the e-mail is in the user box so the following error is not
>> justified :
>>
>> [<02>] The reason of the delivery failure was:
>>
>> The maximum number of delivery attempts has been reached
>>
>>
>> [<04>] Here is listed the message log fi
>>> vendredi 16 avril 2004 at 16:10:48, you said :
>>>
>>>
>>> Davide> What do you mean for alias (in XMail terms) and what setup do you use to
>>> Davide> make such alias?
>>>
>>> Alias for e-mail pop3 mailbox :
>>>
>>> In Xmail aliases.tab i have :
>>>
>>> "localdomain.tld" "webmaster
vendredi 16 avril 2004 at 21:54:21, you said :
>> vendredi 16 avril 2004 at 16:10:48, you said :
>>
>>
>> Davide> What do you mean for alias (in XMail terms) and what setup do you use to
>> Davide> make such alias?
>>
>> Alias for e-mail pop3 mailbox :
>>
>> In Xmail aliases.tab i have :
>>
vendredi 16 avril 2004 at 16:10:48, you said :
Davide> What do you mean for alias (in XMail terms) and what setup do you use to
Davide> make such alias?
Alias for e-mail pop3 mailbox :
In Xmail aliases.tab i have :
"localdomain.tld" "webmaster""postmaster"
>> - The Rcpt domain is
Hi Davide,
I recently install 1.19 for test and i got now the new following
error message. I have many exemple like that but only when the message
is for alias adress.
For the moment i know :
- The receiver has correctly received his message.
- The message arrived in the récipient box at 17
vendredi 30 janvier 2004 at 19:43:20, you said :
Davide> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
>> Xmail is not rejecting messages to an unknown mailbox if the e-mail is
>> sent to the attached custom domain :
>>
>> The test i did is :
>>
>> 1 )I
Xmail is not rejecting messages to an unknown mailbox if the e-mail is
sent to the attached custom domain :
The test i did is :
1 )I have a domain : sample.com
with only one box called postmaster
2) I have a custom domain ; sample.org with domain redirection to
sample.com
3) I
Dear Veeresh,
lundi 19 janvier 2004 at 07:43:49, you said :
Veeresh> Any link, pointer where I can understand what's happening with XMail if
Veeresh> its on Red Hat 9?
Vendredi 26 décembre 2003 at 10:11:51, Pascal said :
Pascal> First, Merry Christmas everybody :-)
Pascal> I have xmail 1.1
an 12 :
Pascal> - no crash
Pascal> - Using never over 85 Mb
Pascal>Seems very good :-)
Pascal> mardi 13 janvier 2004 at 08:30:34, you said :
Davide>> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
>>> XMail has running all night without crash
D
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
>> XMail has running all night without crash
Davide> I lost the track. So, now you have RH9 + -static + LD_ASSUME_KERNEL, don't
Davide> you?
>> Davide; do you the coredump file of previous crash or can i
>> destr
pr=FCngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Pascal de R.
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. Januar 2004 08:38
>> An: Davide Libenzi
>> Betreff: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...
>>=20
>&
mardi 13 janvier 2004 at 08:30:34, you said :
Davide> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
>> XMail has running all night without crash
Davide> I lost the track. So, now you have RH9 + -static + LD_ASSUME_KERNEL, don't
Davide> you?
No I have :
Compil on RH9 with
XMail has running all night without crash
Davide; do you the coredump file of previous crash or can i
destroy it ?
Thank for your help
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 19:03:30, you said :
Davide> Starting from when they introduced NPTL,
Davide> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL is permanently
Davide> in my /et
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 19:03:30, you said :
Davide> On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
>> So, I generated a new version without -static
>> And I have LD_ASSUME_KERNEL in my starting script
>>
>> I have to say XMail is using only 60 Mo exactly the same
>
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 18:21:26, you said :
Jeffrey> Pascal de R. wrote:
>>Dear Jeffrey,
>>
>>
>>lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 16:53:00, you said :
>>
>>
>>Jeffrey> Have you tried using the kernel from the RPM?
>>
>>I'm not sure to un
his new information ?
Bill> Bill
>>------
>>From: Pascal de R.[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 6:34 AM
>>To: Harald Schneider
>>Subject: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...
>>
&g
I decided to post here.
Sorry, I said something stupidSure I didn't test without -static
and LD_ASSUME_KERNEL I will test it ...I really apologize :-(
I let you know what's append!
Bill>> Bill
>>>--
>>>From:Pascal de R.[SMTP:[EMAI
Dear Jeffrey,
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 16:53:00, you said :
Jeffrey> Have you tried using the kernel from the RPM?
I'm not sure to understand your suggest ?
Jeffrey> Jeff
Jeffrey> -
Jeffrey> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
Jeffrey> the body of a message to
g because
without -static the memory is growing without any reason and XMail is
not crashing. After 2 or 3 days Xmail refuse connexion and i have to
restart it. That is the initial problem why I decided to post here.
Bill> Bill
>>--
>>From: Pascal de R.[SMTP:
mended.
>> -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Pascal de R.
>> Gesendet: Montag, 12. Januar 2004 15:34
>> An: Harald Schneider
>> Betreff: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMail growing memory image ...
=
Harald> compatible to
Harald> existing applications therefore they have this env variable.
Harald> --Harald
>> -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Pascal de R.
>> Gesendet: Montag, 12.
lundi 12 janvier 2004 at 09:31:11, you said :
Harald> Exactly 2.4.1 .. this makes the system to emulate the older threading =
Harald> scheme.
thank you, it's running from now...let's see!
Best regards,
Pascal, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xm
r=FCngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Pascal de R.
>> Gesendet: Montag, 12. Januar 2004 08:36
>> An: Davide Libenzi
>> Betreff: [xmail] Re: XMail growing memory image ...
>>=20
>>=20
>> diman
dimanche 11 janvier 2004 at 18:00:15, you said :
Davide> code. But maybe is a linking problem, so it is wirth a try. Let us know
Davide> how it goes ...
About memory, no problem but XMail scrash at 3h42 am :-(
Running 21 hours and never using more than 80 Mb
Do you want the core File (74 Mb) ?
dimanche 11 janvier 2004 at 18:00:15, you said :
>>
>> Just one question, Davide, Why you didn't suggest to build static
>> version on my RH9 ? Do you think it will be unstable or any known
>> trouble ? Let me know if i have to stop my test, I'm in production!
Davide> Because if it was a glibc pro
Dear Davide
samedi 10 janvier 2004 at 16:54:42, you said :
Davide> It has been reported that on some Linux systems the XMail memory size
Davide> (RSS) grows in an almost uncontrolled way. It has been verified that this
Davide> is a problem with never glibc (maybe 2.3.2). The problem has been veri
lundi 29 décembre 2003 at 17:04:12, you said :
Davide> It's ok. Valgrind just uses a maximum number of 100 threads inside
Davide> include/vg_skin.h. For what I've seen there's no reason for the VM to
Davide> expand in the way you're experiencing. Later I'll send you a tar of the
Davide> 1.18 to t
10, you said :
Davide>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
>>> Running from around 8pm..
Davide>> Very good, leave it running if you can.
Pascal> XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) server stopped
Pascal> ==2805== discard syms in /lib/libnss_files-2.3.2.so due to munmap()
Pas
Hi Davide,
This is the morning report of xmail ;-)
dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 22:06:10, you said :
Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
>> Running from around 8pm..
Davide> Very good, leave it running if you can.
XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) server stopped
==2805== dis
dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 22:06:10, you said :
Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
>> Running from around 8pm..
Davide> Very good, leave it running if you can.
I will for the night..
See you tomorrow..
>> ==31314== 200 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely l
00% of reg-reg movs avoided (0 bytes)
dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 20:51:07, you said :
Pascal> dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 20:44:33, you said :
Davide>> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
Davide>> Those are all harmless/one-time leaks. Please let XMail to run a
dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 20:44:33, you said :
Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
Davide> Those are all harmless/one-time leaks. Please let XMail to run a little
Davide> bit more.
I understood, it's running now til 7 pm. :-)
Davide> Did XMail process any m
3944 bytes)
--31051--58603 args, avg 0.59 setup instrs each (48010 bytes)
--31051--0% clear the stack (175755 bytes)
--31051--0 retvals, 100% of reg-reg movs avoided (0 bytes)
dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 19:58:12, you said :
Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal
dimanche 28 décembre 2003 at 18:49:17, you said :
Davide> On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Pascal de R. wrote:
>> This is the first test with valgrind (15 minutes running) !
>> Do you think my setup of it is correct and how many time I have to
>> keep running before to re
samedi 27 décembre 2003 at 21:05:54, you said :
Davide> # valgrind -v --skin=addrcheck --num-callers=8
Davide> --leak-check=yes --show-reachable=yes ./XMail -Md
When I'm running Xmail with this command I have only 57212 Kb memory
using by the process
This number seems to be normal so run
-30326--65298 args, avg 0.63 setup instrs each (47598 bytes)
--30326--0% clear the stack (195840 bytes)
--30326--0 retvals, 100% of reg-reg movs avoided (0 bytes)
samedi 27 décembre 2003 at 21:05:54, you said :
Davide> On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Pascal de
vendredi 26 décembre 2003 at 22:45:34, you said :
Davide> Are you able to run valgrind on it?
I didn't know this product!
Davide> http://valgrind.kde.org/
Davide> Basically you have to build XMail with -O0 -g and remove the strip
Davide> commands from Makefile.lnx. Then :
Davide> # make -f Ma
TECTED]
Chad> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chad> On Behalf Of Pascal de R.
Chad> Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 4:44 AM
Chad> To: Bill Healy
Chad> Subject: [xmail] Re: To much memory ?
Chad> vendredi 26 d=E9cembre 2003 at 10:34:41, you said :
Bill>> Any filters or custom processin
vendredi 26 décembre 2003 at 10:34:41, you said :
Bill> Any filters or custom processing?
Yes Anti-virus filter : http://xmail.libre-essai.com/
>>--
>>From: Pascal de R.[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 1:11 AM
>
First, Merry Christmas everybody :-)
I have xmail 1.17 installed on RH9 managing around 500 domains. around
200 e-mail / hour
When I start running xmail process, he needs 281MB, 24h after 360 and
3/4 days after 690 MB!. I hope it is a setup problem and I have to correct it
because on this compute
45 matches
Mail list logo
